Abstract
This study explores integration and risk transmission in the Chinese (residential) housing market using variance decompositions from the vector autoregression model. The study covers the period from January 2000 to September 2022. The results indicate that short-term total connectedness changes over time and is significantly larger than long-term connectedness, suggesting that total connectedness is sensitive to time-specific developments and short-term events. Supply-side shocks typically lead demand-side shocks in the long term. However, because of changes in the economy, market conditions, government policies, and investor sentiment, the direction of short-term risk transmission between supply and demand sides varies. Moreover, long-term shocks usually flow from housing prices to the supply side and from the demand side to housing prices. In the short term, prices alternately affect the supply and demand sides of the housing market at different points in time. This study also supports the predictive ability of connectedness measures for macroeconomic conditions, suggesting meaningful implications for investors, real estate developers, and policymakers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data used in this study will be made available upon reasonable request.
Notes
This conceptualization is in line with existing literature in this field. For instance, Conefrey and Whelan (2013) use new homes entering the market as an indicator of housing supply, while new home sales are considered as an indicator of housing demand. Glaeser et al. (2008) use the flow of new construction as a measure of the supply of homes. Varli and Erdem (2014) identify the number of construction permits as a measure of housing supply. Ooi and Le (2012) regard the quantity of new units launched by homebuilders as an indicator of housing supply.
The exchange rate of Chinese yuan vs. USD was 6.45:1 on average in 2021.
The most popular criteria for selecting lag VAR models, including the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Hannan–Quinn (HQ), final prediction error (FPE), and Schwartz criteria (SC), all recommend setting the lag length of the VAR model to one in order to generate the most parsimonious model. We also calculate the results based on different lag lengths, and although the values slightly changed, the pattern in Table 2 remains. Therefore, the results are robust and independent of the lag lengths used in the VAR model.
A larger window size with more observations improves parameter estimation accuracy but reduces representativeness in the presence of heterogeneity. In contrast, a smaller window size increases representativeness but decreases accuracy.
We also experiment with different horizon values, and find that the results do not materially change and are robust with respect to the window sizes and horizon selection.
There are three major theories that provide insight into the relationship between sales area and housing prices in the housing market. These are the down-payment model (Ortalo-Magne and Rady 2006), the search and matching model (Ngai and Tenreyro 2014), and the loss aversion model (Genesove and Mayer 2001). The search and matching model emphasizes the leading effect of sales area, while models based on loss aversion and credit constraints highlight the leading effect of price shocks.
References
Adekoya OB, Oliyide JA, Noman A (2021) The volatility connectedness of the EU carbon market with commodity and financial markets in time- and frequency-domain: the role of the US economic policy uncertainty. Resour Policy 74:102252
Albouy D, Ehrlich G, Liu Y (2016) Housing demand, cost-of-living inequality, and the affordability crisis. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, No. w22816
Antonakakis N, Chatziantoniou I, Floros C, Gabauer D (2018) The dynamic connectedness of UK regional property returns. Urban Stud 55(14):3110–3134
Aslam F, Bibi R, Ferreira P (2022) Cross-correlations between economic policy uncertainty and precious and industrial metals: a multifractal cross-correlation analysis. Resour Policy 75:102473
Bajari P, Chan P, Krueger D, Miller D (2013) A dynamic model of housing demand: estimation and policy implications. Int Econ Rev 54(2):409–442
Baker SR, Bloom N, Davis SJ (2016) Measuring economic policy uncertainty. Q J Econ 131(4):1593–1636
Balcılar M, Usman O, Yülek M, Ağan B, Erdal B (2024) House price connectedness and consumer sentiment in an era of destabilizing macroeconomic conditions: empirical evidence from Türkiye. Borsa Istanbul Rev 24(1):14–34
Baruník J, Bevilacqua M, Faff R (2024) Dynamic industry uncertainty networks and the business cycle. J Econ Dyn Control 159:104793
Been V, Ellen IG, O’Regan K (2019) Supply skepticism: housing supply and affordability. Hous Policy Debate 29(1):25–40
Chakraborty I, Goldstein I, MacKinlay A (2018) Housing price booms and crowding-out effects in bank lending. Rev Financ Stud 31(7):2806–2853
Chen CF, Chiang SH (2020) Time-varying spillovers among first-tier housing markets in China. Urban Stud 57(4):844–864
Chen J, Nong H (2016) The heterogeneity of market supply effects of public housing provision: empirical evidence from China. J Hous Econ 33:115–127
Chow GC, Niu L (2015) Housing prices in urban China as determined by demand and supply. Pac Econ Rev 20(1):1–16
Clayton J, Miller N, Peng L (2010) Price-volume correlation in the housing market: causality and co-movements. J Real Estate Financ Econ 40:14–40
Conefrey T, Whelan K (2013) Supply, demand, and prices in the US housing market. University College Dublin, Centre for Economic Research, Working Paper Series (No. WP13/07)
De Wit ER, Englund P, Francke MK (2013) Price and transaction volume in the Dutch housing market. Reg Sci Urban Econ 43(2):220–241
Deng Y, Liu P (2009) Mortgage prepayment and default behavior with embedded forward contract risks in China’s housing market. J Real Estate Financ Econ 38(3):214–240
Diaz A, Jerez B (2013) House prices, sales, and time on the market: a search-theoretic framework. Int Econ Rev 54(3):837–872
Diebold FX, Yilmaz K (2009) Measuring financial asset return and volatility spillovers, with application to global equity markets. Econ J 119(534):158–171
Diebold FX, Yilmaz K (2014) On the network topology of variance decompositions: measuring the connectedness of financial firms. J Econom 182:119–134
Du Z, Zhang L (2015) Home-purchase restriction, property tax, and housing price in China: a counterfactual analysis. J Econom 188(2):558–568
Edelstein RH, Tsang D (2007) Dynamic residential housing cycles analysis. J Real Estate Financ Econ 35(3):295–313
Fang H, Gu Q, Xiong W, Zhou LA (2016) Demystifying the Chinese housing boom. Natl Bur Econ Res Macroecon Annu 30(1):105–166
Fuster A, Zafar B (2021) The sensitivity of housing demand to financing conditions: evidence from a survey. Am Econ J Econ Pol 13(1):231–265
Gabauer D, Gupta R, Marfatia HA, Miller SM (2024) Estimating US housing price network connectedness: Evidence from dynamic Elastic Net, Lasso, and ridge vector autoregressive models. Int Rev Econ Financ 89:349–362
Genesove D, Mayer C (2001) Loss aversion and seller behavior: evidence from the housing market. Q J Econ 116(4):1233–1260
Glaeser EL, Gyourko J, Saiz A (2008) Housing supply and housing bubbles. J Urban Econ 64:198–217
Grimes A, Aitken A (2010) Housing supply, land costs, and price adjustment. Real Estate Econ 38(2):325–353
Hilber CAL, Vermeulen W (2016) The impact of supply constraints on house prices in England. Econ J 126:358–405
Huang Y, Luk P (2020) Measuring economic policy uncertainty in China. China Econ Rev 59:101367
Hwang SJ, Suh H (2021) Analyzing dynamic connectedness in Korean housing markets. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 57(2):591–609
Jia S, Wang Y, Fan GZ (2018) Home-purchase limits and housing prices: evidence from China. J Real Estate Financ Econ 56:386–409
Koop G, Pesaran MH, Potter SM (1996) Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models. J Econom 74:119–147
Krainer J (2001) A theory of liquidity in residential real estate markets. J Urban Econ 49(1):32–53
Lee HS, Lee WS (2019) Cross-regional connectedness in the Korean housing market. J Hous Econ 46:101654
Li Q, Nong H (2022) A closer look at Chinese housing market: measuring intra-city submarket connectedness in Shanghai and Guangzhou. China Econ Rev 74:101803
Li VJ, Cheng AWW, Cheong TS (2017) Home purchase restriction and housing price: a distribution dynamics analysis. Reg Sci Urban Econ 67:1–10
Liu CH, Nowak A, Rosenthal SS (2016) Housing price bubbles, new supply, and within-city dynamics. J Urban Econ 96:55–72
Liu Y, Tang Y (2021) Epidemic shocks and housing price responses: evidence from China’s urban residential communities. Reg Sci Urban Econ 89:103695
Lu Z, Zhang S, Hong J (2021) Examining the impact of home purchase restrictions on China’s housing market. China Econ Rev 67:101620
Murphy A (2018) A dynamic model of housing supply. Am Econ J Econ Pol 10(4):243–267
Murray MP, Sun G (2017) The demand for space in China. J Urban Econ 98:214–222
Ngai LR, Tenreyro S (2014) Hot and cold seasons in the housing market. Am Econ Rev 104(12):3991–4026
Nong H (2021) Have cross-category spillovers of economic policy uncertainty changed during the US–China trade war? J Asian Econ 74:101312
Nong H (2022) Understanding housing price–volume connectedness: the case of housing markets in major megacities of China. Appl Spat Anal Policy 15(3):947–965
Nong H, Liu H (2023) Measuring the frequency and quantile connectedness between policy categories and global oil price. Resour Policy 83:103565
Nong H, Yu Z, Li Y (2024) Financial shock transmission in China’s banking and housing sectors: a network analysis. Econ Anal Policy 82:701–723
Novy-Marx R (2009) Hot and cold markets. Real Estate Econ 37(1):1–22
Oikarinen E (2009) Household borrowing and metropolitan housing price dynamics–Empirical evidence from Helsinki. J Hous Econ 18(2):126–139
Ooi JT, Le TT (2012) New supply and price dynamics in the Singapore housing market. Urban Studies 49(7):1435–1451
Ortalo-Magne F, Rady S (2006) Housing market dynamics: on the contribution of income shocks and credit constraints. Rev Econ Stud 73(2):459–485
Paciorek A (2013) Supply constraints and housing market dynamics. J Urban Econ 77:11–26
Payne JE, Sun X (2023) Time-varying connectedness of metropolitan housing markets. Real Estate Econ 51(2):470–502
Pesaran HH, Shin Y (1998) Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Econ Lett 58:17–29
Shi S, Zhang H, Zhang J (2022) The impact of a home purchase restrictions (HPR) policy on the distressed property market in Beijing. J Hous Econ 58:101877
Sun W, Zhang S, Lin C, Zheng S (2021) How do home purchase restrictions affect elite Chinese graduate students’ job search behavior? Reg Sci Urban Econ 87:103644
Tsai I (2022) The connectedness between Hong Kong and China real estate markets: spillover effect and information transmission. Empir Econ 63(1):287–311
Varli Y, Erdem O (2014) The demand and supply model of housing: Evidence from the Turkish housing market. Available at SSRN 2479794
Wang S, Chan SH, Xu B (2012) The estimation and determinants of the price elasticity of housing supply: evidence from China. J Real Estate Res 34(3):311–344
Wang Z, Zhang Q (2014) Fundamental factors in the housing markets of China. J Hous Econ 25:53–61
Wheaton WC (1990) Vacancy, search, and prices in a housing market matching model. J Polit Econ 98(6):1270–1292
Wu J, Deng Y (2015) Intercity information diffusion and price discovery in housing markets: evidence from Google searches. J Real Estate Financ Econ 50(3):289–306
Wu Y, Li Y (2018) Impact of government intervention in the housing market: evidence from the housing purchase restriction policy in China. Appl Econ 50(6):691–705
Yang J, Tong M, Yu Z (2021) Housing market spillovers through the lens of transaction volume: a new spillover index approach. J Empir Financ 64:351–378
Yang J, Yu Z, Deng Y (2018) Housing price spillovers in China: a high-dimensional generalized VAR approach. Reg Sci Urban Econ 68:98–114
Zhang D, Fan GZ (2019) Regional spillover and rising connectedness in China’s urban housing prices. Reg Stud 53(6):861–873
Zhang L, Hui ECM, Wen H (2015) Housing price–volume dynamics under the regulation policy: difference between Chinese coastal and inland cities. Habitat Int 47:29–40
Funding
This research is supported by the program for scientific research start-up funds of Guangdong Ocean University (No. YJR24008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The author declares that he has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Nong, H. Integration and risk transmission across supply, demand, and prices in China’s housing market. Econ Change Restruct 57, 126 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-024-09713-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-024-09713-x