Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Practice Architectures that Enable and Constrain Educators’ Risk-Taking Practices in High Quality Early Childhood Education

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purposeful and considered risk-taking can be an important aspect of early childhood education professional practice. Educator risk-taking can contribute towards the quality of education programs. Recent research shows that educators in high quality early childhood education services take a range of risks in their professional practice; yet we do not fully understand the conditions that make early childhood educator’s risk-taking possible. This lack of knowledge potentially inhibits early childhood educators from taking the kinds of risks that support high quality early childhood education. This article examines a qualitative case study that investigated the conditions within three high quality early childhood education settings that enabled and constrained educators’ risk-taking. By using the theory of practice architectures, we identify a range of cultural-discursive, material-economic and social-political arrangements that worked together to create the conditions for educators in the study to take risks in their professional practice. Through analysis of observations, interviews and documents, arrangements found within, and brought to, the participating services included a service philosophy that recognises the value of risk-taking, particular types of professional development, and trusting relationships between educators, educators and leaders, and educators and families. Findings from this study have implications for the early childhood sector and individual services in reviewing the arrangements that enable and constrain educators in taking the kinds of risks that contribute towards high quality early childhood education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We use the term educator as an all-encompassing term to describe any qualified adult involved in the education of children in prior-to-school or school environments.

  2. Long day child care in Australia is a centre-based service offering all day ECE for children aged birth to five years.

  3. Sessional kindergartens in Australia are centre-based services offering kindergarten programs for children in the one or two years before school.

  4. Bush and beach kindergarten programs are where children and educators spend extended time in natural outdoor settings.

  5. The style and layout of this figure was inspired by Mahony et al. (2015). The content is original.

References

  • Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority [ACECQA]. (2017). Guide to the national quality standards.

  • Australian Government Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations [DEEWR]. (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Canberra: DEEWR for the Council of Australian Governments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aven, T., & Renn, O. (2009). On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain. Journal of Risk Research, 12(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870802488883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, H. (2013). Critical reflection as a tool for change: Stories about quality improvement (Research in practice series; 20(2), 2013). Canberra: Early Childhood Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2018). Taking beautiful risks in education. Educational Leadership, 76(4), 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K., & Sumsion, J. (2007). Voices from the other side of the fence: Early childhood teachers’ experiences with mandatory regulatory requirements. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2007.8.1.30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundy, A., Luckett, T., Tranter, P. J., Naughton, G. A., Wyver, S. R., Ragen, J., et al. (2009). The risk is that there is ‘no risk’: A simple, innovative intervention to increase children’s activity levels. International Journal of Early Years Education, 17(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760802699878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, M., Press, F., Wong, S. (2020). Educators’ risk-taking in high quality early childhood education. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Cumming, T., Sumsion, J., & Wong, S. (2015). Rethinking early childhood workforce sustainability in the context of Australia’s early childhood education and care reforms. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40723-015-0005-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. (2009). Raising children who soar: A guide to healthy risk-taking in an uncertain world. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education. (2019). Curricular guidance for pre-school education.

  • Department for Education and Skills. (2015). Curriculum for Wales: Foundation phase framework.

  • Doyle-Jones, C. (2015). Importance of working collaboratively and risk-taking with digital technologies when teaching literacy. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing,

  • Edwards-Groves, C., Grootenboer, P., & Ronnerman, K. (2016a). Facilitating a culture of relational trust in school-based action research: Recognising the role of middle leaders. Educational Action Research, 24(3), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1131175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards-Groves, C., Olin, A., & Karlberg-Granlund, G. (2016b). Partnership and recognition in action research: Understanding the practices and practice architectures for participation and change. Educational Action Research, 24(3), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1129983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenech, M., Sumsion, J., & Shepherd, W. (2010). Promoting early childhood teacher professionalism in the Australian context: The place of resistance. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2010.11.1.89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieshaber, S., & McArdle, F. (2014). Social justice, risk and imaginaries. In M. Bloch, B. B. Swadener, & G. S. Cannella (Eds.), Reconceptualizing early childhood care and education: Critical questions, new imaginaries and social activism: A reader New York. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, I. (2010). Academic architectures: Academic perceptions of teaching conditions in an Australian University. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903082334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, H. (2000). Teaching in early childhood: Time to merge constructivist views so learning through play equals teaching through play. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 25(4), 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt-Taylor, J., & Heaslip, V. (2012). Protecting children or creating vulnerability? Community Practitioner, 85(12), 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, S. K., & Gigliotti, A. (2016). Having a go: Looking at teachers’ experience of risk-taking in technology integration. Education and Information Technologies, 21(5), 1351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9386-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Baccalaureate. (2013). IB learner profile.

  • Kemmis, S. (2018). Educational research and the good for humankind- Changing education to secure a sustainable world: A keynote address held on the occasion of the fiftieth anniversary of the foundation of the Finnish Institute for Educational Research. Paper presented at the Education, Fatherland and Humanity, Jyväskylä, Finland, August 2018.

  • Kemmis, S., & Smith, T. J. (2008). Enabling praxis: Challenges for education. Rotterdam: Sense Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P., & Bristol, L. (2014). Changing practices, changing education. Singapore: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Le Fevre, D. M. (2014). Barriers to implementing pedagogical change: The role of teachers’ perceptions of risk. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38(2014), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, H., Sandseter, E. B. H., & Wyver, S. (2012). Early childhood teachers’ beliefs about children’s risky play in Australia and Norway. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13(4), 300–316. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2012.13.4.300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, H., & Sweller, N. (2015). Affordances for risk-taking and physical activity in Australian early childhood education settings. Early Childhood Education Journal, 43(4), 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-014-0667-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, H., Wyver, S., & Gibson, F. (2011). The influence of play context and adult attitudes on young children’s physical risk-taking during outdoor play. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2011.548959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNaughton, G. (2005). Doing foucault in early childhood studies: Applying poststructural ideas. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacNaughton, G., & Smith, K. (2001). Action research, ethics and the risks of practicing freedom for early childhood professionals. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 26(4), 32–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacQuarrie, S., Nugent, C., & Warden, C. (2015). Learning with nature and learning from others: Nature as setting and resource for early childhood education. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 15(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2013.841095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madge, N., & Barker, J. (2007). Risk & childhood.

  • Mahon, K., Francisco, S., & Kemmis, S. (Eds.). (2016). Exploring education and professional practice: Through the lens of practice architectures. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, L., Walsh, K., Lunn, J., & Petriwskyj, A. (2015). Teachers facilitating support for young children experiencing parental separation and divorce. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(10), 2841–2852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-0088-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makovichuk, L., Hewes, J., Lirette, P., & Thomas, N. (2014). Play, participation, and possibilities: An early learning and child care curriculum framework for Alberta.

  • Maynard, T. (2007). Encounters with forest school and Foucault: A risky business? Education, 35(4), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270701602640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, L., & Laird, S. G. (2017). Parents’ and early childhood educators’ attitudes and practices in relation to children’s outdoor risky play. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-017-0856-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, N., & Giardiello, P. (Eds.). (2019). Empowering early childhood educators: International pedagogies as provocation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, S., & Slutsky, R. (2018). Teacher-child relationships make all the difference: Constructing quality interactions in early childhood settings. Early Child Development and Care, 188(5), 508–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2017.1417854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P. (2017). Power and resistance in early childhood education: From dominant discourse to democratic experimentalism. Journal of Pedagogy, 8(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1515/jped-2017-0001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New, R., Mardell, B., & Robinson, D. (2005). Early childhood education as risky business: Going beyond what’s “safe” to discovering what’s possible. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 7(2).

  • Niehues, A. N., Bundy, A., Broom, A., & Tranter, P. (2016). Reframing healthy risk taking: Parents’ dilemmas and strategies to promote children’s well-being. Journal of Occupational Science, 23(4), 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2016.1209424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2017). Starting strong.

  • Pace, J. L. (2019). Contained risk-taking: Preparing preservice teachers to teach controversial issues in three countries. Theory and Research in Social Education, 47(2), 228–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2019.1595240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponticell, J. A. (2003). Enhancers and inhibitors of teacher risk taking: A case study. Peabody Journal of Education, 78(3), 5. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327930PJE7803_02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Press, F., Harrison, L. J., Wong, S., Gibson, M., & Ryan, S. (2016). Exemplary early childhood educators at work: A Multi-level investigation. Bathurst: Charles Sturt University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rönnerman, K., Grootenboer, P., & Edwards-Groves, C. (2017). The practice architectures of middle leading in early childhood education. International Journal of Child Care & Education Policy, 11(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-017-0032-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandseter, E. B. H. (2009). Affordances for risky play in preschool: The importance of features in the play environment. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(5), 439–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0307-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandseter, E. B. H. (2012). Restrictive safety or unsafe freedom? Norwegian ECEC practitioners’ perceptions and practices concerning children’s risky play. Child Care in Practice, 18(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279.2011.621889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandseter, E. B. H. (2018). Risky play in the new framework plan for ECEC in Norway.

  • Sandseter, E. B. H., Little, H., & Wyver, S. (2012). Do theory and pedagogy have an impact on provisions for outdoor learning? A comparison of approaches in Australia and Norway. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 12(3), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2012.699800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., & Campbell, S. (2014). Social activism: The risky business of early childhood educators in neoliberal Australian classrooms. In M. Bloch, B. B. Swadener, & G. S. Cannella (Eds.), Reconceptualizing early childhood care and education: Critical questions, new imaginaries and social activism: A reader (pp. 291–301). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tayler, C., Ishimine, K., Cloney, D., Cleveland, G., & Thorpe, K. (2013). The quality of early childhood education and care services in Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(2), 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. E. (2010). Teaching efficacy, innovation, school culture and teacher risk taking. Ann Arbor: University of Louisville.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority [ACECQA]. (2020).

  • Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulloch, J., & Lupton, D. (2003). Risk and everyday life. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twyford, K., Le Fevre, D., & Timperley, H. (2017). The influence of risk and uncertainty on teachers’ responses to professional learning and development. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 2(2), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-10-2016-0028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Rooijen, M., Lensvelt-Mulders, G., Wyver, S., & Duyndam, J. (2019). Professional attitudes towards children’s risk-taking in play: Insights into influencing factors in Dutch contexts. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2019.1568893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Rooijen, M., & Newstead, S. (2017). Influencing factors on professional attitudes towards risk-taking in children’s play: A narrative review. Early Child Development and Care, 187(5–6), 946–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1204607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennergren, A.-C. (2014). The power of risk-taking in professional learning. In K. Ronnerman & P. Salo (Eds.), Lost in practice: Transforming Nordic educational action research. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, J. O. (2009). The Contribution of Sociology to the Discourse on Risk and Uncertainty. In J. O. Zinn (Ed.), Social Theories of Risk and Uncertainty (pp. 1–17). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, J. O. (2011). The biographical management of risk and uncertainty: British veterans. Historical social research (Köln), 36(3), 237–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, J. O. (2015). Towards a better understanding of risk-taking: Key concepts, dimensions and perspectives. Health, Risk & Society, 17(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2015.1023267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, J. O. (2016). Risk taking. In A. Burgess, A. Alemanno, & J. O. Zinn (Eds.), Routledge handbook of risk studies (pp. 344–353). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mandy Cooke.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cooke, M., Francisco, S. The Practice Architectures that Enable and Constrain Educators’ Risk-Taking Practices in High Quality Early Childhood Education. Early Childhood Educ J 49, 1073–1086 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01112-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01112-x

Keywords

Navigation