Abstract
Nowadays, email communication is considered the most common and widespread computer-based tool that students use to communicate with their professors. This paper provides a framework for evaluating email communication between students and professors and examines the factors that may influence students’ email style and professionalism. The research was conducted among Serbian and Slovenian students who contacted their professors by email. In order to evaluate the style of student email communication, the degree of formality, and the layout, we developed an evaluation form. Students were asked to complete an online questionnaire that assessed their attitudes toward culture, attitudes toward their professor and studies, digital literacy, use of social media, and self-perceptions of their communication skills. Responses were analysed and structural equation modeling was used to test seven hypotheses predicting the effects of factors that influence writing style in emails. As expected, the results show several differences in these factors in the two countries. First, in both countries, students’ perceptions of their own communication skills influence their email communication style. Second, grade point average has a significant effect on email communication in Serbia but not in Slovenia, while attitude toward the professor is a significant predictor of email communication in Slovenia but not in Serbia. Moreover, in both countries, attitude toward professor is influenced by attitude toward study. Third, digital literacy has a significant effect on students’ perceived communication skills in both countries, while culture affects communication skills only in Slovenia and social media use only in Serbia.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code availability
The code generated during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Marin, V. I., & Tur, G. (2018). A model of factors affecting learning performance through the use of social media in Malaysian higher education. Computers and Education, 121(April 2017), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.010
AlSaleem, B. I. (2018). The effect of facebook activities on enhancing oral communication skills for EFL learners. International Education Studies, 11(5), 144. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n5p144
Alsout, E., & Khedri, M. (2019). Politeness in Libyan postgraduate students’e-mail requests towards lecturers. Lanugage & Communication, 6, 57.
Aziz, N., Hashim, H., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). Using social media to enhance ESL writing skill among Gen-Z learners. Creative Education, 10(12), 3020–3027. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012226
Bal, E., & Bicen, H. (2017). The purpose of students’ social media use and determining their perspectives on education. Procedia Computer Science, 120, 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.226
Baron, N. S. (2003). Why Email Looks Like Speech Proofreading, Pedagogy, and Public Face. In J. Aitchison & D. M. Lewis (Eds.), New Media Language (pp. 85–95). Routledge.
Beaujean, A. A. (2014). Latent variable modeling using R: A step-by-step guide. In Latent variable modeling using R: A step-by-step guide. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315869780
Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2007). Students writing emails to faculty: An examination of E-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English. Language Learning and Technology, 11(2), 59–81. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44104
Bird, A., & Stevens, M. J. (2003). Toward an emergent global culture and the effects of globalization on obsolescing national cultures. Journal of International Management, 9(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2003.08.003
Bjørge, A. K. (2007). Power distance in english lingua franca email communication. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17, 60–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00133.x
Boateng, R., & Amankwaa, A. (2016). The impact of social media on student academic life in higher education. Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 16(4), 1–8.
Bolkan, S., & Holmgren, J. L. (2012). “You are such a great teacher and I hate to bother you but...”: Instructors’ perceptions of students and their use of email messages with varying politeness strategies. Communication Education, 61(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2012.667135
Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chejnová, P. (2014). Expressing politeness in the institutional e-mail communications of university students in the Czech Republic. Journal of Pragmatics, 60, 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.10.003
Chen, C. E. (2006). The development of e-mail literacy: from writing to peers to writing to authority figures. Language Learning and Technology, 10(2), 35–55. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44060
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2011). A direct comparison approach for testing measurement invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 15(2), 167–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428111421987
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Cooke, S. (2017). Social teaching: Student perspectives on the inclusion of social media in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 22(1), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9444-y
Credé, M., & Kuncel, N. R. (2008). Study habits, skills, and attitudes: The third pillar supporting collegiate academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(6), 425–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00089.x
Danielewicz-Betz, A. (2013). (Mis)use of e-mail in student-faculty interaction: Implications for university instruction in Germany, Saudi Arabia and Japan. The JALT CALL Journal, 9(1), 23–57. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v9n1.147
Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2015). Teaching email politeness in the EFL/ESL classroom. ELT Journal, 69(4), 415–424. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv031
Fatimawati, S., Mursalin, & Odja, A. H. (2020). The effectiveness of learning using social media to improve student’s communication skills in fluids’ topics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/2/022062
Field, A. (2016). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE Publications.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Frisby, B. N., & Martin, M. M. (2010). Instructor - student and student - student rapport in the classroom. Communication Education, 59(2), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903564362
Gao, F., Luo, T., & Zhang, K. (2012). Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008–2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 783–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01357.x
Gardt, A. (2004). Globalization and the future of German. Globalization and the Future of German. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197297
Giordan, M. (2004). Tutoring through the internet: How students and teachers interact to construct meaning. International Journal of Science Education, 26(15), 1875–1894. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2004.10065602
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hallajian, A., & David, M. K. (2014). “Hello and Good Day to you Dear Dr. …” Greetings and closings in supervisors-supervisees email exchanges. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.012
Hershkovitz, A., Abu Elhija, M., & Zedan, D. (2019). Whatsapp is the message: Out-of-class communication, student-teacher relationship, and classroom environment. In Journal of Information Technology Education: Research (Vol. 18, pp. 73–95). https://doi.org/10.28945/4183
Hidayat, K., & Pratama, R. A. (2019). Relationship between intensity of using social media and interpersonal communication skills in guidance counseling student at semarang state university. ASEAN/Asian Academic Society International Conference Proceeding Series, 2014–2016. Available on https://core.ac.uk/download/288223936.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2022.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (Cross Cultural Research and Methodology). SAGE Publications.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Iksan, Z. H., Zakaria, E., Meerah, T. S. M., Osman, K., Lian, D. K. C., Mahmud, S. N. D., & Krish, P. (2012). Communication skills among university students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.247
Jin, K. Y., Reichert, F., Cagasan, L. P., de la Torre, J., & Law, N. (2020). Measuring digital literacy across three age cohorts: Exploring test dimensionality and performance differences. Computers and Education, 157(June), 103968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103968
Jorgensen, T. D., Kite, B. A., Chen, P.-Y., & Short, S. D. (2018). Permutation randomization methods for testing measurement equivalence and detecting differential item functioning in multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis. In Psychological Methods (Vol. 23, Issue 4, pp. 708–728). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000152
Jorgensen, T. D., S, P., Schoemann, A. M., Rosseel, Y., Miller, P., Quick, C., Garnier-Villarreal, M., Selig, J., Boulton, A., Preacher, K., Coffmann, D., Rhemtulla, M., Robitzsch, A., Enders, C., Arslan, R., Clinton, B., Panko, P., Merkle, E., Chesnut, S., …, & Ben-Shachar, M. S. (2022). Useful tools for structural equation modeling. Available on https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/semTools/semTools.pdf. Accesed 1 Nov 2022.
Jošanov, B., Pucihar, A., & Jošanov-Vrgović, I. (2014). Opinions and behavior of students in social aspects of Internet use in Serbia and Slovenia. Skola Biznisa, 1(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.5937/skolbiz1-5993
Kaufmann, R., & Vallade, J. I. (2021). Online student perceptions of their communication preparedness. E-Learning and Digital Media, 18(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753020950873
Kim, C., & Keller, J. M. (2008). Effects of Motivational and Volitional Email Messages (MVEM) with personal messages on undergraduate students’ motivation, study habits and achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00701.x
Kim, D., Yoon, H. B., Yoo, D., Lee, S., Jung, H., Kim, S. J., Shin, J., Lee, S., & Yim, J. (2016). Etiquette for medical students’ email communication with faculty members: a single-institution study. BMC Medical Education, 16(129). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0628-y
Kim, K. T. (2019). The structural relationship among digital literacy, learning strategies, and core competencies among south korean college students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 19(2), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2019.2.001
Kim, L. S. (2003). Exploring the relationship between language, culture and identity. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 3(2).
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications.
Koufteros, X. A. (1999). Testing a model of pull production: A paradigm for manufacturing research using structural equation modeling. Journal of Operations Management, 17(4), 467–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00002-9
Lam, P. W. Y. (2014). Professional e-mail communication in higher education in Hong Kong: a case study, Text & Talk, 34(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0041
Lewin-Jones, J., & Mason, V. (2014). Understanding style, language and etiquette in email communication in higher education: a survey. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 19(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2014.872934
Liu, J., & Fang, F. (Gabriel). (2017). Perceptions, awareness and perceived effects of home culture on intercultural communication: Perspectives of university students in China. System, 67, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.04.003
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). Facebook and the others. Potentials and obstacles of social media for teaching in higher education. Computers & Education, 95, 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.012
Mascle, D. D. (2013). Writing self-efficacy and written communication skills. Business Communication Quarterly, 76(2), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569913480234
Miceli, G. N., & Brabaranelli, C. (2016). Structural Equations Modeling: Theory and Applications in Strategic Management. In G. B. Dagnino & M. C. Cinici (Eds.), Research Methods for Strategic Management (pp. 98–136). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/263953
MindTools. (2021). How good are your communication skills? Speaking, listening, writing, and reading effectively. Available on https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newCS_99.htm. Accessed 10 Jan 2022.
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers and Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
Nguyen, M. H., Gruber, J., Marler, W., Hunsaker, A., Fuchs, J., & Hargittai, E. (2022). Staying connected while physically apart: Digital communication when face-to-face interactions are limited. New Media and Society, 24(9), 2046–2067. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820985442
Omar, A., & Miah, M. (2012). Impact of technology on teens’ written language. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 1(1), 9–17.
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research (Vol 2). ERIC.
Pinto, D. (2019). Shifting responsibilities: Student e-mail excuses and how faculty perceive them. Lingua, 222, 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.03.006
Prašnikar, J., Pahor, M., & Svetlik, J. V. (2008). Are national cultures still important in international business?: Russia, Serbia, Slovenia in comparison. Management, 13(2), 1–26.
Prior, D. D., Mazanov, J., Meacheam, D., Heaslip, G., & Hanson, J. (2016). Attitude, digital literacy and self efficacy: Flow-on effects for online learning behavior. Internet and Higher Education, 29, 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.01.001
Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
Radaković, A. (2021). Peoples and nations: Cultural and political collective self-identification. National Identities, 23(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2019.1696763
Rosseel, Y., Jorgensen, T. D., Oberski, D., Vanbrabant, L., Merkle, E., Hallquist, M., Rhemtulla, M., Katsikatsou, M., Barendse, M., & Scharf, F. (2020). Package ‘lavaan’ (version 0.6–6). Available on https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lavaan/lavaan.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2022.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Shao, X., & Purpur, G. (2016). Effects of information literacy skills on student writing and course performance. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(6), 670–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.08.006
Sheer, V. C., & Fung, T. K. (2007). Can email communication enhance professor-student relationship and student evaluation of professor?: Some empirical evidence. In Journal of Educational Computing Research (Vol. 37, Issue 3, pp. 289–306). https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.37.3.d
Siddiq, F., Scherer, R., & Tondeur, J. (2016). Teachers’ emphasis on developing students’ digital information and communication skills (TEDDICS): A new construct in 21st century education. In Computers and Education (Vols. 92–93, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.006
Šorgo, A., Bartol, T., Dolničar, D., & Boh Podgornik, B. (2017). Attributes of digital natives as predictors of information literacy in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 749–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12451
Sullivan, A. M. (2016). Cultural heritage & new media: a future for the past. 15 John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, 604–646.
Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2010). Examining the impact of culture’s consequences: A three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede’s cultural value dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 405–439. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018938
Tatum, H. E., Schwartz, B. M., Schimmoeller, P. & Perry, N. (2013). Classroom participation and student-faculty interactions: Does gender matter?. The Journal of Higher Education, 84, 745–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2013.11777309
Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among university students: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(2), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-014-9080-3
Tess, P. A. (2013). The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual) – A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), A60–A68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.032
Toker, S., & Baturay, M. H. (2019). What foresees college students’ tendency to use facebook for diverse educational purposes? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0139-0
Uddin, S., & Jacobson, M. J. (2013). Dynamics of email communications among university students throughout a semester. Computers & Education, 64, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.014
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
Waldvogel, J . (2007). Greetings and closings in workplace email. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), 456–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00333.x
Wilson, J. H., & Ryan, R. G. (2013). Professor-student rapport scale: Six items predict student outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 40(2), 130–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628312475033
Wilson, J. H., Ryan, R. G., & Pugh, J. L. (2010). Professor-student rapport scale predicts student outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 37(4), 246–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986283.2010.510976
Funding
This work was supported by the Slovenian Research Agency under Grant numbers P5-0018 and BI-RS/18–19-054 and by the Department of Fundamental Disciplines, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad through the Project “Application of Information and communication technologies in the teaching of fundamental disciplines”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: Alenka Tratnik, Dragana Gak; Methodology: Anja Žnidaršič; Formal analysis and investigation: Anja Žnidaršič; Writing—original draft preparation: Alenka Tratnik, Dragana Gak, Alenka Baggia, Janja Jerebic, Uroš Rajkovič, Tatjana Grbić, Nataša Duraković, Slavica Medić, Anja Žnidaršič; Writing—review and editing: Alenka Tratnik, Alenka Baggia; Funding acquisition: Anja Žnidaršič, Tatjana Grbić; Resources: Alenka Tratnik, Dragana Gak, Alenka Baggia, Janja Jerebic, Uroš Rajkovič, Tatjana Grbić, Nataša Duraković, Slavica Medić, Anja Žnidaršič; Supervision: Alenka Tratnik.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Approved by the Ethical Committee for Research in Organizational Sciences, document no. 514–2/2019/2/902-DJ.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Competing interests
Authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tratnik, A., Gak, D., Baggia, A. et al. Factors influencing student-professor email communication in higher education. Educ Inf Technol 29, 3497–3523 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11944-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11944-w