Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of pre-service teachers’ sensitivity to cyberbullying, perceptions of digital ethics and awareness of digital data security

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Today, with digital technologies being in every aspect of our lives, cyberbullying and digital ethics, and digital security violations are emerging as concepts that threaten our digital world. It is thought that displaying ethical behavior and providing digital security in digital environments can increase sensitivity to cyberbullying. Here, it is necessary to learn and apply the concepts of digital ethics and security correctly. For this reason, we can say that the places where we can learn and apply these concepts in the best way are educational environments. Therefore, the adoption of digital ethics and digital security concepts by pre-service teachers, both for themselves and for their future students, will raise awareness about the sensitivity to cyberbullying. This study also revealed that the concepts of digital ethics and security should be considered to increase the sensitivity of pre-service teachers to cyberbullying. In the research, the scanning model, one of the quantitative research designs, was used. Data were collected from 879 pre-service teachers studying at a state university. Within the scope of the research, three scales were used for pre-service teachers: “Cyberbullying Sensitivity Scale,“ “Digital Data Security Scale” and “The information and Communication Technologies Usage Ethics Scale.“ T-test, ANOVA, MANOVA, and regression tests were used in the analysis of the data. Because of the research, it was seen that the digital data security awareness, cyberbullying sensitivities, and digital ethics perceptions of pre-service teachers did not differ according to grade level, but differed according to gender and department level. Additionally, while digital data security awareness did not differ according to the department, it did not differ according to the combined effect of gender and department variables. Additionally, it was concluded that digital data security awareness predicts sensitivity to cyberbullying. Suggestions were made regarding the findings obtained at the end of the research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data supporting this study’s findings are not openly available because of [reasons of sensitivity, e.g., human data] and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Aldemir, C., & Avşar, M. N. (2020). Pandemi Döneminde Dijital Vatandaşlik Uygulamaları [Digital citizenship applications in the pandemic era]. Eurasian Journal of Social and Economic Studies, 7(5), 148–169. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/asead/issue/54658/738205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcagök, S. (2020). Öğretmenlerin Dijital Vatandaşlığa Yönelik Algılarının İncelenmesi [Investigation of teachers’ perceptions of digital citizenship]. Centennial University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 17(1), 534–556. https://doi.org/10.33711/yyuefd.693832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashok, M., Madan, R., Joha, A., & Sivarajah, U. (2022). Ethical framework for Artificial Intelligence and Digital technologies. International Journal of Information Management, 62, 102433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avcı, Ü., & Arslan, E. (2019). The effect of in-service training with digital data security awareness and information literacy. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFS), 52(3), 893–916. https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.493124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydın, İ., & Arslan, K. (2021). Examining the cyberbullying awareness levels of senior preservice teachers: Example of Buca faculty of education. Kocaeli University Journal of Education, 4(2), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.33400/kuje.913253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlett, C. P., Gentile, D. A., Chng, G., Li, D., & Chamberlin, K. (2018). Social media use and cyberbullying perpetration: A longitudinal analysis. Violence and Gender, 5(3), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2017.0047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlett, C. P., Madison, C. S., Heath, J. B., & DeWitt, C. C. (2019). Please browse responsibly: A correlational examination of technology access and time spent online in the Barlett Gentile Cyberbullying Model. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayındır, N. (2021). Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Dijital Eğitimde Dijital Güvenlik İhtiyaçlarının Belirlenmesi [Determining the Digital Security Needs of Primary Preservice teachers in Digital Education]. (pp.627–634) 6th Internatıonal Eurasıan Educatıonal Research Congress, Eskişehir, Turkey.

  • Belsey, B. (2004). Cyberbullying Obtained from http://www.cyberbully.ca on 02.04.2022.

  • Bibri, S. E., & Allam, Z. (2022). The Metaverse as a virtual form of data-driven smart cities: The ethics of the hyper-connectivity, datafication, algorithmization, and platformization of urban society. Computational Urban Science, 2(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-022-00050-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. [Manual Of Data Analysis for Social Sciences] Ankara: Pegem Academy.

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2018). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. [Scientific Research Methods] Ankara: Pegem Academy.

  • Byrne, V. L. (2021). You might as well just all agree with each other:“ an initial study of cyberbullying victims’ social presence in online discussions. Computers & Education, 167, 104174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, M., Cristol, D., & Gimbert, B. (2018). Teachers as digital citizens: The influence of personal backgrounds, internet use and psychological characteristics on teachers’ levels of digital citizenship. Computers & Education, 121, 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claro, M., Salinas, Á., Cabello-Hutt, T., San Martín, E., Preiss, D. D., Valenzuela, S., & Jara, I. (2018). Teaching in a Digital Environment (TIDE): Defining and measuring teachers’ capacity to develop students’ digital information and communication skills. Computers & Education, 121, 162–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çubukçu, A., & Ve Bayzan, Ş. (2013). Perception of digital citizenship in turkey and methods of increasing this perception by using the internet conscious, safe, and effective. Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research, 5, 148–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, S., Kim, A., & Karmakar, S. (2020). Change-point analysis of cyberbullying-related Twitter discussions during COVID-19 (pp. 1–12). Arxiv.

  • Desmet, A., Aelterman, N., Bastiaensens, S., Van Cleemput, K., Poels, K., Vandebosch, H., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2015). Secondary school educators’ perceptions and practices in handling cyberbullying among adolescents: A cluster analysis. Computers & Education, 88, 192–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Pietro, R., & Cresci, S. (2021, December). Metaverse: Security and Privacy Issues. In 2021 Third IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy, and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications (TPS-ISA) (pp. 281–288). IEEE.

  • Diamanduros, T., Downs, E., & Jenkins, S. J. (2008). The role of school psychologists in the assessment, prevention, and intervention of cyberbullying. Psychology in the Schools, 45(8), 693–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duman, E., & Yilmaz, N. (2021). Investigation of the Effect of Cyberbullying awareness training for parents 1. Journal of Education Theory and Practical Research, 7(3), 406–421. https://doi.org/10.38089/ekuad.2021.84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elçi, A. C., & Ve Sarı, M. (2016). Digital citizenship in the information technology and software course: A scale development study. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(2), 3602–3613. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v13i2.3838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, P. C., Simão, A. M. V., Paiva, A., Martinho, C., Prada, R., Ferreira, A., & Santos, F. (2021). Exploring empathy in cyberbullying with serious games. Computers & Education, 166, 104155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statics using SPSS. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gahagan, K., Vaterlaus, J. M., & Frost, L. R. (2016). College student cyberbullying on social networking sites: Conceptualization, prevalence, and perceived bystander responsibility. Computers in human behavior, 55, 1097–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego-Arrufat, M. J. G. A., Torres-Hernández, N. T. H., Pessoa, T. P., Gallego-Arrufat, M. J., Torres-Hernández, N., & Pessoa, T. (2019). Competence of future teachers in the digital security area. Comunicar.Media Education Research Journal, 27(2).

  • Grandede Prado, M., Cañón-Rodríguez, R., & García-Martín, S. (2020). Seguridad digital, ¿ cómo se perciben los docentes en formación?IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (14),262–275.

  • Greiff, P., Reinken, C., & Hoppe, U. (2022). Ethical Perception of a Digital Study Assistant: Student Survey of Ethical Values. In CSEDU (1) (pp.92–104).

  • Guarini, A., Menin, D., Menabò, L., & Brighi, A. (2019). RPC teacher-based program for improving coping strategies to deal with cyberbullying. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(6), 948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudmundsdottir, G. B., Gassó, H. H., Rubio, J. C. C., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2020). Student teachers’ responsible use of ICT: Examining two samples in Spain and Norway. Computers & Education, 152, 103877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güngör, B., Tingiş, E., & Sarol, B. (2020). Investigation of cyberbullying levels of social studies preservice teachers. Journal of Innovative Research in Social Studies, 3(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.47503/jirss.826393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hızmalı, A. M., & Tosun, N. (2022). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Dijital Verı̇ Güvenliğı̇ Farkındalıklarının Çeşitlı̇ Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesı̇ [Investigation of Digital Data Security awareness of University students in terms of various variables]. The 14th International Scientific Research Congress (p. 137). Turkey: Ankara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, D. L., & Mitchell, S. N. (2009). Cyberbullying: Causes, effects, and remedies. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(4), 652–665. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230910981107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • İğdeli, F. (2018). Investigation of university students’ cyberbullying, cyber victimization, and cyberbullying sensitivities in terms of various variables. Unpublished Master Thesis, Anadolu University, Eskisehir.

  • Instefjord, E. J., & Munthe, E. (2017). Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Hernández, D., González-Calatayud, V., Torres-Soto, A., Martínez Mayoral, A., & Morales, J. (2020). Digital competence of future secondary school teachers: Differences according to gender, age, and branch of knowledge. Sustainability, 12(22), 9473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaluarachchi, C., Warren, M., & Jiang, F. (2020). Responsible use of technology to combat cyberbullying among adolescents. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 24, https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v24i0.2791.

  • Kara, M., Caner, S., Günay Gökben, A., Cengiz, C., İşgör Şimşek, E., & Yıldırım, S. (2018). Validation of an instrument for preservice teachers and an investigation of their new media literacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(7), 1005–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karakuş, S., & Turan, S. G. (2022). Examining the relationship between adults’ cyberbullying behaviors and digital citizenship skills. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 49, 409–427. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.983075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaygısız, E. G. (2020). Estate of violence: Cyberbullying. Academic Journal of the Human Rights and Equality Institution of Turkey, (4–5), 161–174.

  • Kelentrić, M., Helland, K., & Arstorp, A. T. (2017). Professional digital competence framework for teachers. The Norwegian Centre for ICT in Education, 1–74. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn1891-943x-2014-04-02

  • Kim, M., & Choi, D. (2018). Development of youth digital citizenship scale and implication for educational setting. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 155–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C., & Park, J. (2022). An Exploratory Study on the Production of Metaverse Ethics Education Contents for Adolescents (No. 8528). Easychair.

  • Koç, N. E., & Koç, E. (2021). Digital citizenship case in turkey during pandemic period. Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 11(3), 1019–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan, M., Law, N., & Pan, Q. (2022). Effectiveness of anti-cyberbullying educational programs: A socioecologically grounded systematic review and meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 130(July 2021), 107200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107200

  • Lauricella, A. R., Herdzina, J., & Robb, M. (2020). Early childhood educators’ teaching of digital citizenship competencies. Computers & Education, 158, 103989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q. (2009). Cyberbullying in schools: An examination of preservice teachers’ perception.Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 34(2).

  • Lopes Pereira, N., Ferenhof, A., H., & Spanhol, F. J. (2019). Strategies for the management of digital competences in higher education: A review in the literature. RELATEC: Latin American Magazine of Educational Technology, 18(1), 71–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (2018). Digital ethics now. Language and Literacy, 20(3), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.20360/langandlit29416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaou, D. (2017). Does cyberbullying impact youth suicidal behaviors? Journal of Health Economics, 56, 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.09.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novella-García, C., & Cloquell-Lozano, A. (2021). The ethical dimension of digital competence in teacher training. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3529–3541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyaba, A. T., & İnfal, S. (2021). Factors affecting university students’ perspectives on cyberbullying factors affecting. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 11(2), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2021.445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özbay, Ö., Doğan, U., Yıldız, E., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2019). Investigation of preservice teachers’ digital ethics levels in terms of some variables. TRT Academy, 6(12), 494–513. https://doi.org/10.37679/trta.913015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özcan, N. (2021). A qualitative research on Digital Ethics. Journal of Youth Studies, 9(25), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.52528/genclikarastirmalari.1004342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özer, E. (2021). Cyberbullying. Saraçoğlu, A.S., Aytaç, A., Derman, G.S., Talas, M., & Yücel, A.S. (Ed.), In Overview of Social Humanities and Educational Sciences (104–126. Ss.). İstanbul: Güven Plus Group Consulting Inc. Publications.

  • Öztürk, C. (2019). The investigation of relation between digital citizenship levels and tendencies to cyberbullying of 8th grade students Unpublished master’s thesis, Sakarya University Institute of Educational Sciences, Sakarya.

  • Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step by guide to data analysis using spss for Windows. Austalia: Australian Copyright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peker, A. (2020). The predictive role of attention-control on sensitivity related to cyber bullying of guidance preservice teachers. Journal of National Education, 49(225), 343–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polat, F. Y. (2022). Cyberbullying and cyber victimization in the digital media era Unpublished master’s thesis, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Social Sciences Institute, Muğla.

  • Rasheed, M. I., Malik, M. J., Pitafi, A. H., Iqbal, J., Anser, M. K., & Abbas, M. (2020). Usage of social media, student engagement, and creativity: The role of knowledge sharing behavior and cyberbullying. Computers & Education, 159, 104002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redmond, P., Lock, J. V., & Smart, V. (2018). Preservice teachers’ perspectives of cyberbullying. Computers & Education, 119, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redmond, P., Lock, J. V., & Smart, V. (2020). Developing a cyberbullying conceptual framework for educators. Technology in Society, 60, 101223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sari, D., Rejekiningsih, T., & Muchtarom, M. (2020). Students’ Digital Ethics Profile in the era of disruption: An overview from the internet use at risk in Surakarta City. Indonesia International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(03), 82. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i03.12207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Schultze, M., Zagorscak, P., Wölfer, R., & Scheithauer, H. (2016). Feeling cybervictims’ pain—the effect of empathy training on cyberbullying. Aggressive behavior, 42(2), 147–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statista (2021). General awareness of cyberbullying in select countries worldwide as of April 2018, by country. Accessed on 07.12.2022, https://www.statista.com/statistics/293192/cyber-bullying-awareness-in-selectcountriesaroundtheworld/

  • Şeşen, E. (2021). Looking at the Waldo Moment through Information Technologies and Digital Ethics. Library Archive and Museum Research Journal, 2(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.29228/lamre.51407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sizova, O. A., Medvedeva, T. Y., Trzhetsyak, I. A., Markova, S. M., Okuneva, P. E., Zanozin, N. V., & Ulyanova, R. A. (2021). The role of teacher in Moral and Ethıcal Educatıon of students. AD Alta-Journal of Interdıscıplınary Research, 11(1), 50–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Süslü, D. P., & Oktay, A. (2018). Investigating some variables related to cyberbullying and cyber victimization in high school students. Elementary Education Online, 17(4), 1877–1894. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.506884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: (sixth ed.) Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanrıkulu, T., Kınay, H., & Arıcak, O. T. (2013). Cyberbullying sensibility scale: Validity and reliability study. Trakya University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 3(1), 38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarhan, N. (2022). Digital Data Security awareness: A study with pharmacy students. Fabad Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 47(2), 193–200. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/fabadeczacilik/issue/72155/1134564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taşpınar, M. (2017). Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS Uygulamalı Nicel Veri Analizi. [SPSS Applied quantitative data analysis in Social Sciences]. Ankara: Pegem Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tekke, A., & Aybala, L. (2021). Ethics, information manipulation and cyber security in social media. Journal of Academic Reviews, 16(2), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.17550/akademikincelemeler.958167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toraman, L., & Usta, E. (2018). The analysis of the cases of being a digital native and cyber bully of the secondary school students in terms of various variables. Journal of Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Education, 37(2), 57–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Hernández, N., & Gallego-Arrufat, M. J. (2022). Indicators to assess preservice teachers’ digital competence in security: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 8583–8602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10978-w.

  • Torres-Hernández, N., Gallego_Arrufat, M. J., & Pessoa, T. (2019). Intervention and e-assessment with technologies of the competence in digital security. Digital Education Review, 35, 111–129.

  • Torun, E. D. (2014). Modeling of unethical behaviors in the use of information and communication technologies. Erciyes Journal of Communication, 3(3), 56–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasilev, Y. S., Zegzhda, D. P., & Poltavtseva, M. A. (2018). Problems of security in digital production and its resistance to cyber threats. Automatic Control and Computer Sciences, 52(8), 1090–1100. https://doi.org/10.3103/s0146411618080254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlaanderen, A., Bevelander, K. E., & Kleemans, M. (2020). Empowering digital citizenship: An anti-cyberbullying intervention to increase children’s intentions to intervene on behalf of the victim. Computers in human behavior, 112, 106459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Su, Z., Zhang, N., Xing, R., Liu, D., Luan, T. H., & Shen, X. (2022). A survey on Metaverse: Fundamentals, security, and privacy. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 1(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2022.3202047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, L. K., Wagner, J., Velasquez, B., & Behrens, P. I. (2017). Cyberbullying in higher education: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazar, T., & Keskin, Ä. (2016). Examination of prospective Teachers’ Digital competence in the context of lifelong learning. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 6(12), 133–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz, E., Şahin, Y. L., & Akbulut, Y. (2015). Development of the digital data security awareness scale. AJIT-e: Online Journal of Information Technologies, 6(21), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz, E., Şahin, Y. L., & Akbulut, Y. (2016). Teachers’ Digital Data Security awareness. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 6(2), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.29650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, S., Al-Majdhoub, F. M., Mubin, N. N., Chaniago, R. H., & Khan, F. R. (2021). Cyber AggressionVictimization among Malaysians Youth. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(1), 240–260. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i1.12616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., Llorente, A. M. P., & Gómez, M. C. S. (2021). Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 168, 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, J., Zheng, Y., Huang, X., Mo, D., Gong, J., Li, M., & Huang, J. (2021). Study of the influencing factors of cyberbullying among chinese college students incorporated with digital citizenship: From the perspective of individual students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 576. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.621418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zych, I., Baldry, A. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2017). School bullying and cyberbullying: prevalence, characteristics, outcomes, and Prevention. In Van V. Hasselt, & M. L. Bourke (Eds.), Handbook of behavioral criminology. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61625-4.

  • UNICEF (2020). Cyberbullying: What is it and how to stop it. Obtained from https://www.unicef.org/end-violence/how-to-stop-cyberbullying on 02.04.2022.

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from public, commercial, or not-for-profit funding agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammed Murat Gümüş.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval

The authors declare that the work is written with due consideration of ethical standards. The study was conducted by the ethical principles approved by the Human Experiments.

Informed consent

All the participants have given their written informed consent.

Consent for publication

All the participants have supported the publication of the research results.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gümüş, M.M., Çakır, R. & Korkmaz, Ö. Investigation of pre-service teachers’ sensitivity to cyberbullying, perceptions of digital ethics and awareness of digital data security. Educ Inf Technol 28, 14399–14421 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11785-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11785-7

Keywords

Navigation