Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The challenge to professionals of using social media: teachers in England negotiating personal-professional identities

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social media are a group of technologies such as Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn which offer people chances to interact with one another in new ways. Teachers, like other members of society, do not all use social media. Some avoid, some experiment with and others embrace social media enthusiastically. As a means of communication available to everyone in modern society, social media is challenging teachers, as other professionals in society, to decide whether to engage with these tools and, if so, on what basis – as an individual (personally), or as a teacher (professionally). Although teachers are guided by schools and codes of practice, teachers as individuals are left to decide whether and how to explore social media for either their own or their students' learning. This paper analyses evidence from interviews with 12 teachers from England about their use of social media as to the challenges they experience in relation to using the media as professional teachers.. Teachers are in society’s spotlight in terms of examples of inappropriate use of social media but also under peer pressure to connect. This paper explores their agency in responding. The paper focuses on how teachers deal with tensions between their personal and professional use of social media. These tensions are not always perceived as negative and some teachers' accounts revealed a unity in their identities when using social media. The paper reflects on the implications of such teachers' identities in relation to the future of social media use in education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Primary schools teach children aged 4–11 years of age.

  2. Secondary schools teach children aged 11–16 (or 18) years of age.

  3. These units take children referred out of mainstream education.

  4. Teachers working across schools, usually self-employed.

  5. These are usually called sixth-form colleges or just colleges and take children from 16 to 18 years beyond the age of compulsory education.

References

  • Alsup, J. (2006). Teacher identity discourses: Negotiating personal and professional spaces. Mahwah, ILL: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman, S. F., & Meijer, P. (2011). Conceptualizing teachers' identity: a dialogical approach. Teachers and Teacher Education, 27(2), 308–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baek, K., Holton, A., Harp, D., & Yashar, C. (2011). The links that bind: uncovering novel motivations for linking on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2243–2248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baek, Y. M., Kim, E., & Bae, Y. (2013). My privacy is okay, but theirs is endangered: why comparative optimism matters in online privacy concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 48–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. K., & White, K. M. (2011). In their own words: why teenagers don’t use social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(6), 395–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker-Doyle, K. (2011). The networked teacher: How new teachers build social networks for professional support. New York: Teachers Hall Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News Wales (2010) NASUWT upset by wales on code on sites like Facebook, 2010 Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-11281058

  • Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers' professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, V. (2013) Be smart when it comes to using social media, taken from the Times Educational Supplement webpages, available at; http://newteachers.tes.co.uk/content/be-smart-when-it-comes-using-social-media

  • British Educational Research Association (BERA) (2011). Revised ethical guidelines for educational research. London: BERA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, P. (2011). Networking Research: New Directions in Educational Inquiry. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, P., Fox, A., McCormick, R., Procter, R., & Honour, L. (2006). Teachers' networks in and out of school. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R. (2013). Living a private life in public social networks: an exploration of member self-disclosure. Decision Support System, 55, 661–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. T., Petronio, S., Agyeman-Budu, E. A., & Westermann, D. A. (2011). Blog scrubbing: exploring triggers that change privacy rules. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 2017–2027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, H., Lee, J., & Chung, S. (2010). Optimistic bias about online privacy risks: testing the moderating effects of perceived controllability and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 987–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L. (2014) Claire Perry: ban phones in schools and turn off the router to protect children, 29 January 2014 from wired.co.UK, available at: http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-01/29/claire-perry-overblocking-banning

  • Coupland, D. (1996). Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conole, G. (2010). Facilitating new forms of discourse for learning and teaching: harnessing the power of web 2.0 practices. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 25(2), 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2008). Committed for life? Variations in Teachers' work, Lives and Effectiveness. Journal of Educational Change, 9(3), 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, C. W., Elliott, B., & Kington, A. (2005). Reform, standards and teacher identity: challenges of sustaining commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 563–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deal, T. E., Purinton, T., & Waetjen, D. C. (2009). Making sense of social networks in schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dindar, M., & Akbulut, Y. (2014). Why do pre-service teachers quit Facebook? An investigation on ‘quitters forever’ and ‘quitters for a while’. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 170–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Digilit Project (2014) Digilit Leicester survey results. Available from: http://www.digilitleic.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/140812_Leicester-Gov_Final-web.jpg

  • Edwards, C., & Jones, F. (2009) Is my profile open? When teachers post ‘inappropriate’ material on social networking sites, The Berkeley Electronic Press, available at: http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=faye_jones

  • Film Collective (2012) Social networking – a teenager’s perspective, Youtube video available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtiBP10RYXE

  • Flinders, D. J. (1992). In search of ethical guidance: constructing a basis for dialogue. Qualitative Studies in Education, 5(2), 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forkosh-Baruch, A., & Hershkovitz, A. (2014). Teacher-student relationship in the SNS-era: ethical issues, paper presented at the Ed-Media annual conference, July. Finland: Tampere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forte, A. Humphreys, M. & Park, T. (2012) Grassroots Professional Development: How Teachers Use Twitter, Proceedings of the Sixth International AAAI (Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence) Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, June 4–7 2012, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org).

  • Fox, A. (2011) An exploration of individual emergent leaders' identity development through the use of learning biographies, Unpublished Doctorate thesis (PhD), Open University. Available through EthOS: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?did=3&uin=uk.bl.ethos.551617

  • Fox, A., McCormick, R., Procter, R., & Carmichael, R. (2007). The design and use of a mapping tool as a baseline means of identifying an organisation’s active networks. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 30(2), 127–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, A., & Wilson, E. (2009). “Support our networking and help us belong!”: listening to beginning secondary school science teachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(6), 701–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frampton, B. D., & Child, J. T. (2013). Friend or not to friend: coworker Facebook friend requests as an application of communication privacy management theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2257–2264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funkhauser, B. J., & Mauser, C. (2013). Drawing on technology: an investigation of preservice teacher beliefs in the context of an introductory educational technology course. Computers and Education, 62, 271–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Communities of networked expertise: professional and educational perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblett, C., & Deverson, J. (1964). Generation X. Madison, WI: Tandem Books Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, E. (2008). Whose space? Differences Among users and Nonusers of Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 276–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helleve, I., Almås, A. G., & Bjørkelo, B. (2013). Social networking sites in education – governmental recommendations and actual use. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 04, 192–207 available at: http://www.idunn.no/ts/dk/2013/04/social_networking_sites_in_education_governmental_recomme?mostRead=true.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M., & Hermans-Jansen (1995). Self-Narratives: The Construction of Meaning in Psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M., & Hermans-Konopka, A. (2010). The dialogical Self theory. Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herring, S.C. (2003) Gender and power in online communication, In (Eds), J. Holmes and M. Meyerhoff Handbook of Language and Gender (p202-228), Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Hershkovitz, A., Forkosh-Baruch, A., & Ang, R. (2014). "I miss my students": characterizing teachers seeking connection with their students via social networking sites, paper presented at the Ed-Media conference. June: Tampere University, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. F. (2012). Students' and teachers' use of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 662–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Network for Social Network Analysis (2014) Website available at: http://www.insna.org/

  • Jones, R.H. (2005) Sites of engagement as sites of attention: Time, space and culture in electronic discourse, In (Eds) S. Noris and R.H. Jones Discourse in Action: Mediated Discourse Analysis (p141-154), London: Routledge.

  • Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds?—bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78(9), 496–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmons, A., & Veletsianos, G. (2014). The fragmented educator 2.0: social networking sites, acceptable identity fragments, and the identity constellation. Computers and Education, 72, 292–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupiainen, R. (2013). Media and digital literacies in secondary school. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Cornu, R. (2013). Building early career teacher resilience: the role of relationships. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(4), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leijen, A., & Kullasepp, K. (2013). All roads lead to Rome: developmental trajectories of student teachers' professional and personal identity development. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 26(2), 104–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, T. H. (2010). Tools for the study and design of collaborative teacher learning. Teacher Education Quarterly, 4, 109–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in schools: a research of gender differences. School Psychology International, 27(2), 157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q. (2008). Cyberbullying in schools: an examination of preservice teachers' perception. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 34(2) available at: http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/viewArticle/494.

  • de Lima, J. A. (2007). Teachers' professional development in departmentalised, loosely coupled organisations: lessons for school improvement from a case study of two curriculum departments. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(3), 273–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (1999). Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 467–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, G., & Lomicka, L. (2014). Twitter as a tool to promote community among language teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(2), 187–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luehmann, A. L., & Tinelli, L. (2008). Teacher professional identity development with social networking technologies: learning reform through blogging. Educational Media International, 45(4), 323–333.

  • Marwick, A. (2010) Status update: Celebrity, publicity and self-branding in web 2.0, Unpublished PhD dissertation, New York University: New York, available at: http://www.tiara.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/marwick_dissertation_statusupdate.pdf

  • Manca, S., & Ribieri, M. (2014). Teachers' professional development in online social networking sites, paper presented at the Ed-Media conference. June: Tampere University, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkee, K., & Bulent, C. (2014). Legitimate peripheral participation of Pre-service science teachers: collaborative reflections in an online community of practice through twitter. Science Education International, 24(3), 306–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S. & Schwarz, H. (2000). It’s not what you know, it’s who you know: work in the information age, First Monday, 5(5). Available at: http://www.firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/issue/view/119

  • Owen, N.I, Fox, A. and Bird, T.M. (2015) The development of a small-scale survey instrument of UK teachers to study professional use (and non-use) of and attitudes to social media, International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1–24 (published online 5 May 2015).

  • Page, R. E. (2012). Stories and social media: Identities and Interaction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainie, L., Smith, A., & Duggan, M. (2013). Coming and going on Facebook. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/2013/PIP_Coming_and_going_on_facebook.pdf.

  • Richardson, J. C., & Alsup, J. (2014). From the classroom to the keyboard: how seven instructors created their online teacher identities, paper presented at the Ed-Media conference. June: Tampere University, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 578–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qualman, E. (2012). Socialnomics: How Social Media Transforms the Way We Live and Do Business. London: Wiley Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. (2014) Teacher banning orders double for abuse of social media, in Academies Weekly 21 November 2014, available at: http://academiesweek.co.uk/teacher-banning-orders-double-for-abuse-of-social-media/

  • Sfard, A. (2006). Telling ideas by the company they keep: a response to the critique by Mary juzwik. Educational Researcher, 35(9), 22–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: in search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, M. (2010) Social networking nightmares: cyberspeak no evil, taken from the National Education Association webpages, available at: http://www.nea.org/home/38324.htm

  • Smith, W. P., & Kidder, D. L. (2010). You’ve been tagged (then again, maybe not): employers and Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standage, T. (2013). Writing on the wall: Social media – the first two thousand years. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, K. & Simos, M. (2012) South Australian schools warned as incidence of cyber bullying of teachers skyrockets, taken from news.com.au webpages, available at: http://www.news.com.au/technology/south-australian-schools-warned-as-incidence-of-cyber-bullying-of-teachers-skyrockets/story-e6frfro0-1226478414345

  • Stutchbury, K.& Fox, A. (2009) Ethics in educational research: introducing a methodological tool for effective ethical analysis, Cambridge Journal of Education, 39 (4), 489–504.

  • Thurlow, C., Lengel, L., & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer-mediated-communication: Social interaction and the internet. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, D.R. (1998) Building your personal learning network. Available at: http://www.tobincls.com/learningnetwork.htm

  • Tow, W. N.-F. H., Dell, P., & Venable, J. R. (2010). Understanding information disclosure behaviour in Australian Facebook users. Journal of Information Technology, 25(1), 126–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turan, Z., Tinmaz, H., & Göktaş, Y. (2013). The reasons for nonuse of social networking websites by university students. Communicar, 41, 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2001). Process structure of semiotic mediation in human development. Human Development, 44(2), 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veletsianos, G. (2013). Open practices and identity: evidence from researchers and educators' social media participation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 639–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteman, N. (2009). The De/stabilization of identity in online fan communities. Convergence, 15(4), 391–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P. (2012). Blogs as liminal space: student teachers at the threshold. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21(1), 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, H. (2010). An examination of preservice teachers' perceptions about cyberbullying. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(4), 263–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D.H. (1998) Identity, context and interaction. Identities in talk. In (Eds.) Antaki, C. and Widdicombe, S. Identities in Talk. (p87-106), London: Sage.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison Fox.

Appendix 1: Interview schedule

Appendix 1: Interview schedule

  1. 1.

    Agree interviewee happy to be audio recorded and that the network map about to be produced can be used for analysis. Remind interviewee that participation is voluntary and data can be withdrawn before analysis.A transcript will be generated of the portion of the interview to be used as data and will be returned to the participant for any comments/amendments. Ask for a preferred pseudonym to be used and confirm that the school will only be mentioned by type and region.

  2. 2.

    On the piece of paper provided ask interviewee to represent with whom and how they communicate with others as part of their professional life ie. anyone (could be individuals, groups or organisations) with whom they learn, discuss, share ideas about teaching, learning and being a teaching professional. As they are drawing ask them to talk through their thinking, referring to the emerging map in a way which will help us connect the audio with the document where relevant.

  3. 3.

    Start by asking them to represent with whom they collect but explain that we are also interested in knowing the modes of communication, ie. whether face-to-face, phone, or various other virtual methods of communication. Ask them to identify which parts of their network connect via social media such as Twitter, Facebook (FB), LinkedIn etc.

  4. 4.

    When this is mainly complete ask the following questions:

    1. a)

      Explain how you think about the use of social media personally and professionally?

    2. b)

      Identify what have been the influences on how you connect using social media, ideally with examples that are relevant to your professional use of these media.

    3. c)

      Reflect on how your use of social media has changed, in particular as it affects your professional life.

    4. d)

      How would you summarise the role of social media in your professional learning, compared to other learning opportunities?

    5. e)

      Would you classify yourself as a social media enthusiast/sceptic/conscious luddite or other category of user for professional learning?

Prompts:

If users of FB/Twitter check approx. Numbers of friends/follows/followers.

If they have begun to categorise their map, suggest that they add a key.

Ensure that any new sources/modes of communication offered during the questions are added to the map.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fox, A., Bird, T. The challenge to professionals of using social media: teachers in England negotiating personal-professional identities. Educ Inf Technol 22, 647–675 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9442-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9442-0

Keywords

Navigation