Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Value of Plasma Methylated SFRP2 in Prognosis of Gastric Cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Secreted frizzled-related protein 2 (SFRP2) in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is related to gastric cancer (GC) proliferation. However, whether methylated SFRP2 in ctDNA serves as the biomarker in GC patients remains unknown.

Aims

To investigate the relationship between methylated SFRP2 and the clinical outcomes of GC patients.

Methods

One hundred and forty-eight GC patients receiving systemic chemotherapy were collected during 2015–2017. Aberrant SFRP2 methylation was detected before and after chemotherapy by digital PCR-based technologies.

Results

Baseline SFRP2 methylation positively correlated with lymph node status (P < 0.001), distant metastasis (P < 0.001) and TNM stage (P = 0.005). The top 50% methylated SFRP2 had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those with bottom 50% in stage III GC patients (median PFS, 11.0 vs. NR months; HR 13.05; 95% CI 3.05–55.95; median OS 17.0 vs. NR months; HR 7.80; 95% CI 1.81–33.60) and stage IV GC patients (median PFS, 4.0 vs. 7.0 months; HR 2.74; 95% CI 1.58–4.78; median OS 12.0 vs. 16.0 months; HR 3.14; 95% CI 1.67–5.92). Besides, the increased methylated SFPR2 from baseline to post-treatment was related to the worse PFS and OS among stage IV patients (median PFS, 5.0 vs. 7.0 months; HR 2.17; 95% CI 1.25–3.76; median OS 12.0 vs. 15.5 months; HR 3.51; 95% CI 1.94–6.35), but not to stage III patients.

Conclusions

SFRP2 methylation and dynamic change are associated with GC prognosis. Our findings provide potential biomarker detection approach in ctDNA for prognosis prediction and dynamic monitoring among GC patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Widschwendter M, Jones A, Evans I, et al. Epigenome-based cancer risk prediction: rationale, opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15:292–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kohler C, Barekati Z, Radpour R, Zhong XY. Cell-free DNA in the circulation as a potential cancer biomarker. Anticancer Res. 2011;31:2623–2628.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kang GH, Shim YH, Jung HY, et al. CpG island methylation in premalignant stages of gastric carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2001;61:2847–2851.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tamura G. Genetic and epigenetic alterations of tumor suppressor and tumor-related genes in gastric cancer. Histol Histopathol. 2002;17:323–329.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Waki T, Tamura G, Tsuchiya T, et al. Promoter methylation status of E-cadherin, hMLH1, and p16 genes in nonneoplastic gastric epithelia. Am J Pathol. 2002;161:399–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones PA, Baylin SB. The epigenomics of cancer. Cell. 2007;128:683–692.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rubbia-Brandt L, Giostra E, Brezault C, et al. Importance of histological tumor response assessment in predicting the outcome in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by liver surgery. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:299–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng YY, Yu J, Wong YP, et al. Frequent epigenetic inactivation of secreted frizzled-related protein 2 (SFRP2) by promoter methylation in human gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2007;97:895–901.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Su HY, Lai HC, Lin YW, et al. Epigenetic silencing of SFRP5 is related to malignant phenotype and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer through Wnt signaling pathway. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:555–567.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fukui T, Kondo M, Ito G, et al. Transcriptional silencing of secreted frizzled related protein 1 (SFRP 1) by promoter hypermethylation in non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncogene. 2005;24:6323–6327.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kohno H, Amatya VJ, Takeshima Y, et al. Aberrant promoter methylation of WIF-1 and SFRP1, 2, 4 genes in mesothelioma. Oncol Rep. 2010;24:423–431.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nojima M, Suzuki H, Toyota M, et al. Frequent epigenetic inactivation of SFRP genes and constitutive activation of Wnt signaling in gastric cancer. Oncogene. 2007;26:4699–4713.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Leung WK, Yu J, Ng EK, et al. Concurrent hypermethylation of multiple tumor-related genes in gastric carcinoma and adjacent normal tissues. Cancer Am Cancer Soc. 2001;91:2294–2301.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu J, Leung WK, Ebert MP, et al. Absence of cyclin D2 expression is associated with promoter hypermethylation in gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:1560–1565.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Heller RS, Dichmann DS, Jensen J, et al. Expression patterns of Wnts, Frizzleds, sFRPs, and misexpression in transgenic mice suggesting a role for Wnts in pancreas and foregut pattern formation. Dev Dyn. 2002;225:260–270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ilyas M. Wnt signalling and the mechanistic basis of tumour development. J Pathol. 2005;205:130–144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang Q, Huang T, Ye G, Wang B, Zhang X. Methylation of SFRP2 gene as a promising noninvasive biomarker using feces in colorectal cancer diagnosis: a systematic meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Leung WK, To KF, Chu ES, et al. Potential diagnostic and prognostic values of detecting promoter hypermethylation in the serum of patients with gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005;92:2190–2194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Diaz LJ, Bardelli A. Liquid biopsies: genotyping circulating tumor DNA. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:579–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shaw JA, Brown J, Coombes RC, et al. Circulating tumor cells and plasma DNA analysis in patients with indeterminate early or metastatic breast cancer. Biomark Med. 2011;5:87–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jin Miao, Yi Liu, Guodong Zhao, et al. SFRP2Feasibility of plasma-methylated for early detection of gastric cancer. Cancer Control. 2020;27:1148357823.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the grants from key Program of the Changzhou Commission of Health (ZD201709, to Dr. Haijiao Yan), and the Young Talents of the Changzhou Commission of Health (QN201902, to Dr. Xiaodong Li).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HY, WC, JW designed the experiments. HY, WC, KG, XM, XL, WL, JW performed the experiments. HY, WC, KG analyzed the data, HY and WC wrote the manuscript. JW supervised the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, H., Chen, W., Ge, K. et al. Value of Plasma Methylated SFRP2 in Prognosis of Gastric Cancer. Dig Dis Sci 66, 3854–3861 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06710-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06710-8

Keywords

Navigation