Abstract
Background
The rate of postoperative ileus following stoma closure is high in patients with Crohn’s disease and temporary enterostomy.
Aims
To evaluate the effect of chyme reinfusion on postoperative outcomes including ileus in these patients.
Methods
Patients were screened from January 2012 to December 2017 and divided into chyme reinfusion group (n = 33) and non-chyme reinfusion group (n = 84). The following 30-day postoperative outcomes were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses and propensity score matching were performed to identify risk factors for these postoperative outcomes.
Results
The incidence of postoperative ileus was significantly lower in the chyme reinfusion than in non-chyme reinfusion group, which had been confirmed by the results after matching (3/26 vs 11/26, p = 0.012). The rate of postoperative diarrhea was significantly lower in the chyme reinfusion group compared with non-chyme reinfusion group, whereas the difference was not significant after matching (2/26 vs 6/26, p = 0.191). Additionally, the postoperative length of stay was significantly shorter in the chyme reinfusion than in non-chyme reinfusion group before and after propensity score matching. In the multivariate analysis, chyme reinfusion was an independent protective factor for postoperative ileus (odds ratio 0.218; 95% confidence interval 0.05–0.95; p = 0.042) and for postoperative length of stay (coefficient − 0.191; 95% confidence interval − 0.350 to − 0.032, p = 0.019).
Conclusions
Chyme reinfusion was associated with lower rate of postoperative ileus and shorter length of stay following stoma closure in Crohn’s patients with temporary ileostomy. Further randomized clinical trial between patients with or without chyme reinfusion was needed to confirm these conclusions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alves A, Panis Y, Bouhnik Y, Pocard M, Vicaut E, Valleur P. Risk factors for intra-abdominal septic complications after a first ileocecal resection for Crohn’s disease: a multivariate analysis in 161 consecutive patients. Diseases Colon Rectum. 2007;50:331–336.
Fumery M, Seksik P, Auzolle C, et al. Postoperative complications after ileocecal resection in Crohn’s disease: a prospective study from the REMIND Group. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112:337–345. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2016.541.
Morar PS, Hodgkinson JD, Thalayasingam S, et al. Determining predictors for intra-abdominal septic complications following ileocolonic resection for Crohn’s disease-considerations in pre-operative and peri-operative optimisation techniques to improve outcome. J Crohns Colitis. 2015;9:483–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjv051.
Zhang T, Yang J, Ding C, et al. Preoperative intra-abdominal sepsis, not penetrating behavior itself, is associated with worse postoperative outcome after bowel resection for Crohn disease: a retrospective cohort study. Medicine. 2015;94:e1987. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000001987.
Bemelman WA, Warusavitarne J, Sampietro GM, et al. ECCO-ESCP consensus on surgery for Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2018;12:1–16.
Abrisqueta J, Abellan I, Lujan J, Hernandez Q, Parrilla P. Stimulation of the efferent limb before ileostomy closure: a randomized clinical trial. Diseases Colon Rectum. 2014;57:1391–1396. https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000000237.
Mennigen R, Sewald W, Senninger N, Rijcken E. Morbidity of loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:2192–2200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2660-8.
Loffler T, Rossion I, Bruckner T, et al. HAnd suture versus STApling for closure of loop ileostomy (HASTA trial): results of a multicenter randomized trial (DRKS00000040). Ann Surg 2012;256:828–835; discussion 835–826. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e318272df97.
Menahem B, Lubrano J, Vallois A, Alves A. Early closure of defunctioning loop ileostomy: is it beneficial for the patient? A meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2018;. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4603-0.
Ekelund KM, Ekblad E. Structural, neuronal, and functional adaptive changes in atrophic rat ileum. Gut. 1999;45:236–245.
Williams L, Armstrong MJ, Finan P, Sagar P, Burke D. The effect of faecal diversion on human ileum. Gut. 2007;56:796–801. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2006.102046.
Miedema BW, Karlstrom L, Hanson RB, Johnson GP, Kelly KA. Absorption and motility of the bypassed human ileum. Diseases Colon Rectum. 1990;33:829–835.
Oh NG, Son GM, Sin JY, Ding XZ, Adrian TE. Time-course of morphologic changes and peptide YY adaptation in ileal mucosa after loop ileostomy in humans. Diseases Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1287–1294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0915-2.
Levy E, Frileux P, Cugnenc PH, Honiger J, Ollivier JM, Parc R. High-output external fistulae of the small bowel: management with continuous enteral nutrition. Br J Surg. 1989;76:676–679.
Picot D, Layec S, Dussaulx L, Trivin F, Thibault R. Chyme reinfusion in patients with intestinal failure due to temporary double enterostomy: a 15-year prospective cohort in a referral centre. Clin Nutr. 2017;36:593–600.
Price AB, Morson BC. Inflammatory bowel disease: the surgical pathology of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Hum Pathol. 1975;6:7–29.
Rychter J, Clavé P. Intestinal inflammation in postoperative ileus: pathogenesis and therapeutic targets. Gut. 2013;62:1534–1535.
Gaertner WB, Madoff RD, Mellgren A, Kwaan MR, Melton GB. Postoperative diarrhea and high ostomy output impact postoperative outcomes after elective colon and rectal operations regardless of Clostridium difficile infection. Am J Surg. 2015;210:759–765.
Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:250–278.
Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jeyarajah S, Zacharakis E, Purkayastha S. The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6107 cases. Int J Colorectal Disease. 2009;24:711–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0660-z.
Miedema BW, Köhler L, Smith CD, Phillips SF, Kelly KA. Preoperative perfusion of bypassed ileum does not improve postoperative function. Dig Dis Sci. 1998;43:429–435. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018887212921.
Danielsen AK, Park J, Jansen JE, et al. Early closure of a temporary ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2017;265:284–290. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000001829.
Thibault R, Picot D. Chyme reinfusion or enteroclysis in nutrition of patients with temporary double enterostomy or enterocutaneous fistula. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2016;. https://doi.org/10.1097/mco.0000000000000304.
Acknowledgment
Yi Li and Weiming Zhu conceived and designed the study, acquisition, and interpretation of data and were involved in drafting of the manuscript; Yi Li and Jianfeng Gong were involved acquisition and interpretation of data; Ming Duan and Lei Gao were involved in acquisition and statistical analysis of data; Ming Duan and Lei Cao were involved in interpretation of data for the work, and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors agree the final approval of the version to be published.
Funding
This work was partly supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81670471 and 81570500) and Jiangsu Provincial Medical Youth Talent (QNRC2016900, to Yi Li).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors confirm that there are no conflicts of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duan, M., Cao, L., Gao, L. et al. Chyme Reinfusion Is Associated with Lower Rate of Postoperative Ileus in Crohn’s Disease Patients After Stoma Closure. Dig Dis Sci 65, 243–249 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05753-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05753-w