Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evidence-Based Practices Do Not Exist

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The original process model of evidence-based practice (EBP) is described, and contrasted with the empirically supported treatments (EST) initiative which designated selected interventions as meeting some evidentiary benchmark (e.g., supported by two-well-designed randomized controlled trials). EBP does not utilize lists of ESTs, and designating a given psychotherapy as empirically supported is actually antithetical to the EBP decision-making process. Much of the resistance to EBP within social work may be attributable to confusion between EBP as it was originally conceived as a mutual decision-making process occurring between the clinician and the client, and the promulgation of lists of EST and the subsequent urging that social workers select their psychotherapies from such lists. The latter is not scientifically justifiable, nor does it taken into account other variables crucial to EBP, such as professional values, clinical expertise, client preferences and values, and available resources. EBP as it was originally conceived has much to add to the practice of clinical social work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American psychological association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutron, I., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., & Ravuad, P. (2008). Methods and processes of the CONSORT group: Example of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments. Annals of Internal Medicine, 148, w-60–w-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein, D. (2008). Energy psychology: A review of the preliminary evidence. Psychotherapy: Research, Practice, Training, 45, 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambrill, E. (2006). Evidence-based practice and policy: Choices ahead. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 338–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambrill, E. (2011). Evidence-based practice and the ethics of discretion. Journal of Social Work, 11, 26–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O. (2007). Psychological treatments that cause harm. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, E., & Streiner, D. L. (2004). The evidence for and against evidence-based practice. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 4, 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Social Workers. (2008). Code of ethics. Downloaded from http://www.socialworkers.org/pubs/code/code.asp on June 1, 2011.

  • Pignotti, M., & Mercer, J. (2007). Holding therapy and dyadic developmental psychotherapy are not supported and acceptable practices: A systematic research synthesis revisited. Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 513–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pignotti, M., & Thyer, B. A. (2009). Some comments on “energy psychology: A review of the evidence”: Premature conclusions based on incomplete evidence? Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Training, Practice, 46, 257–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, A., & Parrish, D. (2007). Views of evidence-based practice among faculty in master of social work programs: A national survey. Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 110–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, D. L., Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R. B. (1997). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and team EBM?. NY: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Glasziou, P., & Haynes, R. B. (2010). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and team EBM? (4th ed.). NY: Churchill-Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thyer, B. A. (1989). First principles of practice research. British Journal of Social Work, 19, 309–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thyer, B. A. (1991). Guidelines for evaluating outcome studies in social work practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 1, 76–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thyer, B. A. (2002). How to write up a social work outcome study for publication? Journal of Social Work Research and Evaluation, 3(2), 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thyer, B. A. (2010). Introductory principles of social work research. In B. A. Thyer (Ed.), Handbook of social work research methods (pp. 1–24). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, S. (2001). Some considerations on the validity of evidence-based practice. British Journal of Social Work, 31, 57–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Social Work, Florida State University, 296 Champions Way, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA

    Bruce A. Thyer & Monica Pignotti

Authors
  1. Bruce A. Thyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Monica Pignotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce A. Thyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thyer, B.A., Pignotti, M. Evidence-Based Practices Do Not Exist. Clin Soc Work J 39, 328–333 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-011-0358-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-011-0358-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation