Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Analysis of Root Finding Algorithms for Implied Volatility Estimation of Ethereum Options

  • Published:
Computational Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a comparative analysis of traditional and hybrid root finding algorithms is performed in estimating implied volatility for Ethereum Options using the Black–Scholes model. Results indicate the efficiency of Newton–Raphson method in terms of algorithmic convergence as well as computational time. Since Newton–Raphson method may not always lead to convergence, the best approximation technique is chosen from the convergent bracketed methods. The hybrid Bisection–Regula Falsi method serves as the best choice for root estimation among the bracketed methods under consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the first author upon reasonable request.

Code Availability

Programming codes implemented in this study are available from the first author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Ashmore, D. (2023, May 5). Bitcoin price history 2009 to 2022. Forbes Advisor India. https://www.forbes.com/advisor/in/investing/cryptocurrency/bitcoin-price-history-chart/

  • Badr, E., Almotairi, S., & Ghamry, A. E. (2021). A comparative study among new hybrid root finding algorithms and traditional methods. Mathematics, 9(11), 1306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandi, F. M., & Reno, R. (2016). Price and volatility co-jumps. Journal of Financial Economics, 119(1), 107–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binance. (2017). Binance—Cryptocurrency exchange for Bitcoin, ethereum and altcoins. https://www.binance.com

  • Blazevic, D., & Marcusson, F. (2019). Volatility evaluation using conditional heteroscedasticity models on bitcoin. Ethereum and Ripple.

  • Chi, Y., & Hao, W. (2021). Volatility models for cryptocurrencies and applications in the options market. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 75, 101421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deribit—Crypto Options and Futures Exchange for Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana and More. (2016). Crypto options and futures exchange—Deribit. https://www.deribit.com/

  • du Plooy, R., & Venter, P. J. (2021). Pricing vanilla options using artificial neural networks: Application to the South African market. Cogent Economics & Finance, 9(1), 1914285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, J. C. (1995). The GARCH option pricing model. Mathematical Finance, 5(1), 13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethereum, W. (2014). Ethereum whitepaper. Ethereum. https://ethereum.org

  • Ethereum’s Price History. (2013–2023, $). Prices of Ethereum on a daily basis. https://www.globaldata.com/data-insights/financial-services/ethereums-price-history/

  • Fang, F., Ventre, C., Basios, M., Kanthan, L., Martinez-Rego, D., Wu, F., & Li, L. (2022). Cryptocurrency trading: A comprehensive survey. Financial Innovation, 8(1), 1–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giudici, G., Milne, A., & Vinogradov, D. (2020). Cryptocurrencies: Market analysis and perspectives. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 47, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, A. J., Wang, W., Chen, C. Y., & Härdle, W. K. (2020). Pricing cryptocurrency options. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 18(2), 250–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Investopedia. (2023a, March 31). Derivatives: Types, considerations, and pros and cons. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/derivative.asp

  • Investopedia. (2023b, April 24). What are options? Types, spreads, example, and risk metrics. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/o/option.asp

  • Investopedia. (2023c, April 18). Why should anyone invest in crypto? https://www.investopedia.com/tech/question-why-should-anyone-invest-crypto/

  • Jalan, A., Matkovskyy, R., & Aziz, S. (2021). The Bitcoin options market: A first look at pricing and risk. Applied Economics, 53(17), 2026–2041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsiampa, P. (2017). Volatility estimation for Bitcoin: A comparison of GARCH models. Economics Letters, 158, 3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, S., & Tahara, Y. (2009). A formula to compute implied volatility, with error estimate. Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, 15(2), 267–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., Oosterlee, C. W., & Bohte, S. M. (2019). Pricing options and computing implied volatilities using neural networks. Risks, 7(1), 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahrudinda, M., Munandar, D., & Purwani, S. (2021). Efficiency and convergence of Bisection, Secant, and Newton Raphson methods in estimating implied volatility. World Scientific News, 153(2), 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manaster, S., & Koehler, G. (1982). The calculation of implied variances from the Black-Scholes model: A note. The Journal of Finance, 37(1), 227–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansouri, P., Asady, B., & Gupta, N. (2015). The bisection–artificial bee colony algorithm to solve fixed point problems. Applied Soft Computing, 26, 143–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Options Strategies Center. (2023). What is implied volatility and why is it important in option trading?s. https://optionstrategiesinsider.com/blog/what-is-implied-volatility-and-why-is-it-important-in-option-trading/

  • Pagnottoni, P. (2019). Neural network models for Bitcoin option pricing. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 2, 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PitchBook. (2023). 13 VC firms investing in blockchain and cryptocurrency. https://pitchbook.com/blog/vc-firms-investing-in-blockchain-and-cryptocurrency

  • Sabharwal, C. L. (2019). Blended root finding algorithm outperforms bisection and regula falsi algorithms. Mathematics, 7(11), 1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapna, S., & Mohan, B. R. (2023). Estimation of implied volatility for Ethereum options using numerical approximation methods. In: Key Digital Trends Shaping the Future of Information and Management Science. ISMS 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (Vol. 671). Springer.

  • Scholes, M., & Black, F. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 637–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taneja, H. C., Batra, L., & Gaur, P. (2019, December). Entropy as a measure of implied volatility in options market. In AIP Conference proceedings (Vol. 2183, No. 1, p. 110005). AIP Publishing LLC.

  • Venter, P. J., Mare, E., & Pindza, E. (2020). Price discovery in the cryptocurrency option market: A univariate GARCH approach. Cogent Economics and Finance, 8(1), 1803524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venter, P. J., & Maré, E. (2021). Univariate and multivariate GARCH models applied to Bitcoin futures option pricing. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(6), 261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wintermeyer, L. (2021, August 12). Institutional money is pouring into the crypto market and its only going to grow. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/lawrencewintermeyer/2021/08/12/institutional-money-is-pouring-into-the-crypto-market-and-its-only-going-to-grow/

  • Woebbeking, F. (2021). Cryptocurrency volatility markets. Digital Finance, 3(3–4), 273–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zulfiqar, N., & Gulzar, S. (2021). Implied volatility estimation of bitcoin options and the stylized facts of option pricing. Financial Innovation, 7, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biju R. Mohan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sapna, S., Mohan, B.R. Comparative Analysis of Root Finding Algorithms for Implied Volatility Estimation of Ethereum Options. Comput Econ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-023-10446-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-023-10446-8

Keywords

Navigation