Abstract
In this paper, we explore the hedging performance of CSI 300 stock index futures under the minimum-variance and maximum-utility framework. We employ ten commonly used econometric models including constant and dynamic ones. Our empirical results indicate that for all futures contracts none of the single model can outperform all other models out-of-sample. In general, the dynamic hedge ratio models are significantly superior to the constant hedge ratio models under the both frameworks in CSI 300 market. Further we obtain the most robust hedging effectiveness by combining OHRs from dynamic hedge models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alquist, R., Kilian, L., Vigfusson, R. J. (2013). Forecasting the price of oil. In Handbook of economic forecasting (Vol. 2, pp. 427–507). Elsevier.
Baillie, R. T., & Myers, R. J. (1991). Bivariate GARCH estimation of the optimal commodity futures hedge. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 6, 109–124.
Bollerslev, T. (1986). A generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307–327.
Bollerslev, T. (1990). Modelling the coherence in short-run nominal exchange rates: a multivariate generalized ARCH model. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 498–505.
Chew, S. H., Epstein, L. G., & Segal, U. (1991). Mixture symmetry and quadratic utility. Econometrica, 59, 139–163.
Claeskens, G., Magnus, J. R., Vasnev, A. L., & Wang, W. (2016). The forecast combination puzzle: a simple theoretical explanation. International Journal of Forecasting, 32, 754–762.
Collins, R. A. (2000). The risk management effectiveness of multivariate hedging models in the soy complex. Journal of Futures Markets, 20, 189–204.
Conlon, T., & Cotter, J. (2013). Downside risk and the energy hedger’s horizon. Energy Economics, 36, 371–379.
Cotter, J., & Hanly, J. (2006). Re-examining hedging performance. Journal of Futures Markets, 26, 657–676.
Ederington, L. H. (1979). The hedging performance of the new futures markets. The Journal of Finance, 34, 157–170.
Engle, R. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of variance of U.K. inflation. Econometrica, 50, 987–1008.
Engle, R. (2002). Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20, 339–350.
Engle, R. F., & Kroner, K. F. (1995). Multivariate simultaneous generalized ARCH. Econometric Theory, 11, 122–150.
Epstein, L. G., & Segal, U. (1992). Quadratic social welfare functions. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 691–712.
Ghosh, A. (1993). Hedging with stock index futures: Estimation and forecasting with error correction model. Journal of Futures Markets, 13, 743–752.
Glosten, L. R., Jagannathan, R., & Runkle, D. E. (1993). On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. The Journal of Finance, 48, 1779–1801.
Gong, Y., Chen, Q., & Liang, J. (2018). A mixed data sampling copula model for the return-liquidity dependence in stock index futures markets. Economic Modelling, 68, 586–598.
Goyal, A., & Welch, I. (2008). A comprehensive look at the empirical performance of equity premium prediction. Review of Financial Studies, 21, 1455–1508.
Haigh, M. S., & Holt, M. T. (2002). Crack spread hedging: accounting for time-varying volatility spillovers in the energy futures markets. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 17, 269–289.
Hou, Y., & Li, S. (2013). Hedging performance of Chinese stock index futures: An empirical analysis using wavelet analysis and flexible bivariate GARCH approaches. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 24, 109–131.
Hou, Y., & Li, S. (2014). The impact of the CSI 300 stock index futures: Positive feedback trading and autocorrelation of stock returns. International Review of Economics & Finance, 33, 319–337.
Hsu, C. C., Tseng, C. P., & Wang, Y. H. (2008). Dynamic hedging with futures: A copula-based GARCH model. Journal of Futures Markets, 28, 1095–1116.
Kroner, K. F., & Sultan, J. (1993). Time varying distribution and dynamic hedging with foreign currency futures. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28, 535–551.
Lee, H. T. (2009). A copula-based regime-switching GARCH model for optimal futures hedging. Journal of Futures Markets, 29, 946–972.
Myers, R. J., & Thompson, S. R. (1989). Generalized optimal hedge ratio estimation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71, 858–868.
Polak, E. (1997). Optimization: Algorithms and Consistent approximations. New York: Springer.
Qu, H., Wang, T., Zhang, Y., & Sun, P. (2018). Dynamic hedging performance of the CSI 300 index futures: The realized minimum-variance hedge ratio approach. Rochester: Social Science Electronic Publishing.
Rapach, D. E., Strauss, J. K., & Zhou, G. (2010). Out-of-sample equity premium prediction: Combination forecasts and links to the real economy. The Review of Financial Studies, 23, 821–862.
Sen, A. K. (1982). Choice, welfare, and measurement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sen, A. K. (1986). Social choice theory. In K. Arrow & M. Intriligator (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical economics (Vol. 3). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Suo, Y., Wang, D., & Li, S. (2015). Risk estimation of CSI 300 index spot and futures in China from a new perspective. Economic Modelling, 49, 344–353.
Tangian, A.S. (1992). On constructing quadratic objective functions. FernUniversität Hagen, Discussion Paper 192
Wang, Y., Wu, C., & Yang, L. (2015). Hedging with futures: Does anything beat the naïve hedging strategy? Manag Sci, 61, 2870–2889.
Wei, Y., Wang, Y., & Huang, D. (2011). A copula-multifractal volatility hedging model for CSI 300 index futures. Physica A, 390, 4260–4272.
Weymark, J. (1991). A reconsideration of the Harsanyi-Sen debate on utilitarianism. In J. Elster & J. Roemer (Eds.), Interpersonal comparisons of well-being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yan, Z., & Li, S. (2018). Hedge ratio on Markov regime-switching diagonal Bekk-Garch model. Finance Research Letters, 24, 49–55.
Yun, W. C., & Kim, H. J. (2010). Hedging strategy for crude oil trading and the factors influencing hedging effectiveness. Energy Policy, 38, 2404–2408.
Funding
Funding was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71722015). Yudong Wang particularly acknowledges the financial support from the Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation of China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geng, Q., Wang, Y. Futures Hedging in CSI 300 Markets: A Comparison Between Minimum-Variance and Maximum-Utility Frameworks. Comput Econ 57, 719–742 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-020-09979-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-020-09979-z