Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring sources of public attitudes toward capital punishment in Taiwan

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Capital punishment policy deserves a more prominent place in the analysis of the politics of Taiwan. While Taiwan’s political culture is on a par with the mainstream of the world’s democratic politics, its public opinion on capital crime policy is under-researched. This study begins with an historical review of capital punishment in Taiwan. After that, we turn to an in-depth analysis of data from a random survey in Taipei and New Taipei, focusing on the government’s retentionist policy rather than an exploration of general attitudes toward the death penalty. Results indicate that support for death penalty policy and for the Ministry of Justice’s execution policy stems mainly from instrumental sources: Belief in the deterrent effect of capital sentences and faith in a “tough on crime” approach as a generic cure for crime. In contrast, those who believe in the efficacy of rehabilitation tend to oppose capital punishment policy. Unexpectedly, experience with crime victimization and perception of high crime levels in one’s residential neighborhood reduce support for capital punishment policy. We end our analysis with a call to political leaders to exercise enlightened leadership on the death sentence policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cao, L., & Hebenton, B. (2018). China and “La questione criminale” (“the criminal question”): Revolutionary and reformist periods. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 52, 98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bae, S. (2011). International norms, domestic politics, and the death penalty: Comparing Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Comparative Politics, 44(1), 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liao, F. F.-T. (2008). From seventy-eight to zero: Why executions declined after Taiwan’s democratization? Punishment & Society, 10(2), 153–170.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cao, L., Huang, L.-Y., & Sun, I. Y. (2014). Policing in Taiwan: From authoritarianism to democracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rigger, S. (2001). From opposition to power: Taiwan’s democratic progressive party. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stack, S., Cao, L., & Adamczyk, A. (2007). Crime volume and law and order culture. Justice Quarterly, 24(2), 291–308.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tyler, T. R., & Weber, R. (1982). Support for the death penalty: Instrumental response to crime, or symbolic attitude? Law and Society Review, 17, 21–45.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hsu, F.-S. (2017). The retrospective and prospective views of Taiwan death penalty. Essays on Criminal Policy and Crime Research, 20, 155–178 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  9. The Death Penalty in Taiwan. (2014). London. UK: The Death Penalty Project.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Amnesty International (2018). Abolitionist and Retentionist Countries as of July, 2018. Retrieved on April 20, 2019: https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/ACT5066652017ENGLISH.pdf.

  11. Hebenton, B., & Cao, L. (2019). Capital punishment in China: Public opinion, politics and governance. American Review of China Studies, 20(2), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bakken, B. (2014). Punishment in China. In L. Cao, I. Sun, & B. Hebenton (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Chinese criminology (pp. 38–48). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hood, R., & Hoyle, C. (2015). The death penalty: A worldwide perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson, D. T., & Zimring, F. E. (2009). The next frontier: National Development Political Change, and the death penalty in Asia. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fung, E. S. K. (2010). The intellectual foundations of Chinese modernity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dickson, B. J. (1998). Democratization in China and Taiwan: The adaptability of Leninist parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hebenton, B., & Jou, S. (2005). In search of criminological tradition: The development of criminology in Taiwan. Crime, Law & Social Change, 44, 215–250.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lai, Y. -L., Cao, L., & Zhao, J. S. (2010). The impact of political entity on confidence in legal authorities: A comparison between China and Taiwan. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(5), 934–941.

  19. Adamczyk, A. (2017). Cross-national public opinion about homosexuality: Examining attitudes across the globe. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marsh, R. M. (2005). Tolerance of civil liberties in a new democracy. Comparative Sociology, 4, 313–333.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, T. Y., & Chang, G. (2006). External threats and political tolerance in Taiwan. Political Research Quarterly, 59(3), 377–388.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weber, M. (1951). In H. H. Gerth (Ed.), The religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism, Trans. And. Glencoe: Free press.

  23. Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li, E. (2017). Penological developments in contemporary China: Populist punitiveness vs. penal professionalism. International Journal of Law Crime and Justice, 51, 58–71.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ministry of Justice [MOJ] (2005). The policy of gradual abolishment of death penalty report. Retrieved on April 25, 2019 from http://wwwmoj.gov.tw.

  26. Chen, X., Huang, F., & Wu, Z. (2007). The possibility of abolishing capital punishment and its feasible alternatives. A Research Final Reporter presented to Ministry of Justice (in Chinese).

  27. Chiu, H.-M. (2012). A study of the public attitude toward the death penalty. Leisure & Society Research, 5, 17–36 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hewitt, J. D., Regoli, A., Regoli, R. M., & Iadicola, P. (2004). A comparison of death penalty opinion among university students in the United States and Taiwan. Crime and Criminal Justice International, 3, 72–102.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson, D. T., & Miao, M. (2016). Chinese capital punishment in comparative perspective. In B. Liang & H. Lu (Eds.), The Death Penalty in China: Policy, Practice, and Reform (pp. 300–326). New York: Columbia University press.

  30. Jou, S. & Hebenton, B. (2020). Support for the death penalty in Taiwan? A study of value conflict and ambivalence. Asian Journal of Criminology, 15 (2),163–183

  31. Stack, S. (2004). Public opinion on the death penalty: Analysis of individual-level data from 17 nations. International Criminal Justice Review, 14, 69–98.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Unnever, J. D., & Cullen, F. T. (2007a). The racial divide in support for the death penalty: Does white racism matter? Social Forces, 85, 1281–1301.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Unnever, J. D., & Cullen, F. T. (2007b). Reassessing the racial divide in support for capital punishment: The continuing significance of race. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 44, 124–158.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hsieh, C.-C. (2009). Why they support the death penalty: Examining gender-specific models. Crime and Criminal Justice International, 12, 25–58 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jou, S. (2017). Can public opinion on death penalty be changed? National Taiwan University Law Journal,46 (2), 553–588 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lai, Y. -L., Wang, H. -M., & Kellar, M. (2012). Workplace violence in correctional institutions in Taiwan: A study of correctional officers' perceptions. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 36(1), 1–23.

  37. Jiang, S., & Wang, J. (2008). Correlates of support for capital punishment in China. International Criminal Justice Review, 18(1), 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  38. BBC News (2010). Taiwan justice minister resigns over death penalty, March 12, 2010. Retrieved on February 20, 2020, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8563838.stm.

  39. Ministry of Justice [MOJ] (1990, 2000, 2010, 2019). Crime Situations and Analyses Reports. Retrieved on April 20, 2019 from https://www.tpi.moj.gov.tw/290822/290894/290897/Lpsimplelist (in Chinese).

  40. Cao, L., & Cullen, F. T. (2001). Thinking about crime and control: A comparative study of Chinese and American ideology. International Criminal Justice Review, 11, 58–81.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jiang, S., Hu, M., & Lambert, E. G. (2018). Predictors of death penalty views in China. An empirical comparison between college students and citizens. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(14), 4714–4735.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nagin, D. S., & Pepper, J. V. (Eds.). (2012). Deterrence and the death penalty. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kovandzic, T. V., Vieraitis, L. M., & Boots, D. P. (2009). Does the death penalty save lives? New evidence from state panel data, 1977 to 2006. Criminology & Public Policy, 8(4), 803–843.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Land, K. C., Teske Jr., R. H., & Zheng, H. (2012). The differential short-term impacts of executions on felony and non-felony homicides. Criminology & Public Policy, 11(3), 541–563.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zimring, F., Fagan, J., & Johnson, D. T. (2010). Executions, deterrence and homicide: A tale of two cities. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 7(1), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Browning, S. L., & Cao, L. (1992). The impact of race on criminal justice ideology. Justice Quarterly, 9(4), 685–701.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lee, H., Cao, L., Kim, D., & Woo, Y. (2019). Police contacts and confidence in the police in a medium-sized city. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 56, 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ren, L., Cao, L., Lovrich, N., & Gaffney, M. (2005). Linking confidence in the police with the performance of the police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(1), 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hadley, M. L. (Ed.). (2001). The spiritual roots of restorative justice. SUNY Press.

  50. Roberts, J. V., & Stalans, L. J. (1997). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Chang, C., & Hoyle, C. (2019). Unsafe convictions in capital cases in Taiwan. London: The Death Penalty Project.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kinder, D. R. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, Vol. 2 (4th ed., pp. 778–867). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Greenberg, D., & West, V. (2008). Siting the death penalty internationally. Law & Social Inquiry, 33(2), 295–343.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Liu, R. (2013). The death penalty and religion. Research on Rule of Law, 11, 3–11 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Qiu, X. (2001). From religion to human rights: The origin of abolition of capital punishment. Comparative Criminal Law, 1, 55–56 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Cho, B. (2008). South Korea’s changing capital punishment policy. Punishment & Society, 10, 171–205.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sundt, J., Schwaeble, K., & Merritt, C. C. (2019). Good governance, political experiences, and public support for mandatory sentencing: Evidence from a progressive US state. Punishment & Society, 21(2), 141–161.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and post-modernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  59. The News Lens (2017). Has Taiwan’s crime become worse? Let’s look at the statistics (in Chinese), Retrieved on April 20, 2019 https://www.thenewslens.com/article/96858.

  60. Zhao, R., & Cao, L. (2010). Social change and anomie: A cross-national study. Social Forces, 88(3), 1209–1229.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Smith, N. (2019). Taiwan becomes first country in Asia to legalise same-sex marriage". The Telegraph (may 17, 2019): https://web.archive.org/web/20190517081651/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/05/17/taiwan-becomes-first-country-asia-legalise-same-sex-marriage/.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We’d like to thank Professor Nicholas P. Lovrich for providing informed commentary on the paper.

Funding

The data collection of this research was funded by a grant (MOST 102-2410-H-015-015-SSS) from Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology to the Central Police University in Taiwan, R.O.C. Points of view expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the MOST or the Ministry of Justice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Social Science and Humanities, Ontario Tech University, 55 Bond Street East, Oshawa, ON, Canada

    Liqun Cao

  2. Department of Crime Prevention and Corrections, Central Police University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, 33304

    Yung-Lien Lai & Chia-Chen Huang

Authors
  1. Liqun Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yung-Lien Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chia-Chen Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liqun Cao.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 3 Pearson’s r correlation matrix (n = 1736)
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, L., Lai, YL. & Huang, CC. Exploring sources of public attitudes toward capital punishment in Taiwan. Crime Law Soc Change 74, 571–588 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-020-09913-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-020-09913-2

Search

Navigation