Skip to main content
Log in

Cognitive biases involving readiness to categorise food in terms of calorie content in anorexia nervosa

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This research proposes that cognitive biases involving the categorisation of food in terms of calorie content may contribute to restrictive eating in anorexia nervosa (AN). The current study sought to discriminate the validity of two novel hypotheses: (1) People with AN more readily categorise food in terms of calorie content rather than in terms of alternative dimensions (e.g., tastiness), and (2) people with AN have difficulty reclassifying food initially categorised in terms of calorie content, in terms of alternative dimensions.

Methods

To test these hypotheses, a novel food categorisation task was developed and delivered to people with a self-reported lifetime diagnosis of AN (N = 48) and to people with no history of an eating disorder (N = 133). Participants categorised food in terms of calorie content or tastiness.

Results

Results revealed that the AN group, relative to the comparison group, was faster to categorise food in terms of calorie content and slower to reclassify food initially categorised in terms of calorie content.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that AN is characterised by both an inflated tendency to categorise food in terms of calorie content and to become subsequently stuck on this categorisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Additionally, a post-hoc decision was made to exclude people who identified as male (N = 42) or non-binary (N = 2) in an effort to more closely match the two groups.

  2. Using the 175 kcal/100 g cut-off to classify food items as high vs. low calorie was in accordance with prior research (Jensen et al., 2016). On the basis of this criteria, the AN group did not differ from the comparison group in terms of accuracy in correctly classifying food items as high vs. low calorie (M = 86.80, SD = 26.33 vs. M = 85.63, SD = 14.02; t(56.90) = 0.29, p = .770).

  3. To establish a lifetime diagnosis of AN, participants were required to self-report whether they had ever received a diagnosis of AN. Participants were also required to self-report current or past diagnoses of any other eating disorder or psychiatric illness (e.g., depression, anxiety). While several participants in the comparison group self-reported a history of other psychiatric illnesses, their exclusion from analyses did not change the observed pattern of results.

  4. There were no differences in readiness to categorise food in terms of calorie content versus tastiness between individuals with a self-reported current AN diagnosis and individuals with a self-reported past AN diagnosis.

  5. There were no differences in readiness to reclassify food initially categorised in terms of calorie content, in terms of tastiness, between individuals with a self-reported current AN diagnosis and individuals with a self-reported past AN diagnosis.

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council (FL170100167) and a Research Collaboration Award from the University of Western Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Dondzilo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dondzilo, L., Phillipou, A., Miles, S. et al. Cognitive biases involving readiness to categorise food in terms of calorie content in anorexia nervosa. Cogn Ther Res 48, 327–336 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-023-10462-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-023-10462-w

Keywords

Navigation