Abstract
This paper examines the case of a controversial beer advertisement which was promulgated in Bulgaria in 2001, and which provoked eight lawsuits against the brewery, its advertising agency, and the Bulgarian National Television. The case set a precedent in Bulgaria and generated considerable public interest and debate. To the best of the authors’ knowledge this is the first case in Eastern Europe when individuals have challenged companies in the courts of law because of offence caused by an advertisement. The present study discusses how the public bodies responsible for protecting consumer interests and the courts of first instance assessed the advertisement in the context of Bulgarian public policy regarding offensive advertising.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L. Feick H. Gierl (1996) ArticleTitleScepticism about advertising: A comparison of East and West German consumers International Journal of Research in Marketing 13 227–235
G. Ger R. Belk (1996) ArticleTitleCross-cultural differences in materialism Journal of Economic Psychology 17 55–77
P. Glick S. T. Fiske (1996) ArticleTitleThe ambivalent sexist inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 491–512
L. V. Karakasheva B. N. Boeva (1979) Organisation and management of the foreign economic activity in the capitalist countries Higher Institute of Economics “Karl Marx” Sofia
H. Kelly-Holmes (1998) ArticleTitleThe discourse of Western marketing professionals in Central and Eastern Europe: Their role in the creation of a context for marketing and advertising messages Discourse & Society 9 339–362
K. Merdjanska (1997) Forked tongue: On gender stereotypes in the Bulgarian language. T. Renne (Eds) Ana’s land: Sisterhood in Eastern Europe Westview Press Boulder, CO 158–163
A. Peltonen (1995) ArticleTitlePreliminary ruling on discriminatory advertising Journal of Consumer Policy 18 219–235
S. Sverdrup E. Stà (1992) ArticleTitleRegulation of sex discrimination in advertising: An empirical enquiry into the Norwegian case Journal of Consumer Policy 14 371–391
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Millan, E., Elliott, R. Offensive Advertising, Public Policy, and the Law: The Rulings on the Zagorka Case. J Consum Policy 27, 475–493 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-004-2719-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-004-2719-0