Skip to main content
Log in

Control Problems for Systems with Uncertainty

  • III. INVERSE PROBLEMS
  • Published:
Computational Mathematics and Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Different forms of control problems for linear systems under essential uncertainty are considered. Specifically, three problems are examined. First, the unknown disturbances are assumed bounded and only their bounds are known. The problem is solved under various assumptions regarding the order of the disturbances and the observed signals, as well as the properties of the system. Second, the estimation of the unknown input (i.e., the inversion problem or the inverse problem) is considered. This problem is solved by the controlled model method with the control designed to stabilize the difference between the observed outputs of the original system and the model. Robust stabilization algorithms produce estimates of the unknown signals with a desired accuracy. The third problem focuses on stabilization of switched systems. The dynamics of the chosen system is described at each instant by one of the systems from a given finite set. Switching between regimes may depend both on time and on the system phase vector. Two problems are solved successively: finding stabilizers (a unique stabilizer if possible) for each plant from the family, and then investigating the conditions when switching between stable regimes does not disrupt the stability of the switched system. Various stabilization methods are obtained for switched systems covering different switching schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Darouach, M. Zasadzinski, and S. J. Xu, “Full-order observers for linear systems with unknown inputs,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 39(3), 606–609 (1994).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Hou and P. C. Muller, “Design of observers for linear systems with unknown inputs,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 37(6), 871–875 (1992).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. A. V. Il’in, S. K. Korovin, V. V. Fomichev, and A. Khlavenko, “Observers for linear dynamical systems with uncertainty,” Diff. Uravn., 41(11), 1443–1457 (2005).

  4. S. K. Korovin and V. V. Fomichev, State Observers for Linear Systems with Uncertainty [in Russian], Fizmatlit, Moscow (2007).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. V. V. Fomichev and A. O. Vysotskii, “An algorithm to construct a cascade asymptotic observer for a system of maximum relative order,” Diff. Uravn., 55(4), 567–573 (2019.

  6. A. V. Il’in, S. K. Korovin, and V. V. Fomichev, Methods for Robust Inversion of Dynamical systems [in Russian], Fizmatlit, Moscow (2009).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. A. V. Il’in, S. K. Korovin, and V. V. Fomichev, “Inversion of systems with delays,” Diff. Uravn., 48(3), 405–413 (2012).

  8. A. V. Il’in, S. K. Korovin, and V. V. Fomichev, “Inversion algorithms for scalar dynamical system: the controlled model method,” Diff. Uravn., 33(3), 329–339 (1997).

  9. A. V. Il’in, S. K. Korovin, and V. V. Fomichev, “Inversion algorithms for linear controlled systems,” Diff. Uravn.,34(6), 744–745 (1997)

  10. D. Liberzon and A. S. Morse, “Basic problems in stability and design of switched systems,” IEEE Control Systems, 19(5), 59–70 (1999).

  11. M. S. Mahmoud, Switched Time-Delay Systems. Stability and Control, Springer Science+Business Media (2010).

  12. O. A. Shpilevaya and K. Yu. Kotov, “Switched systems: stability and design (a survey),” Avtometriya, 44(5), 71–87 (2008).

  13. S. N. Vasil’ev and A. I. Malikov, “On some results for the stability of switched and hybrid systems,” in: Topical Issues in Continuum Mechanics, 20thAnniversary of KazNTs RAN [in Russian], Vol. 1, pp. 23–81, Foliant, Kazan (2001).

  14. A. S. Fursov and E. F. Khusainov, “Super-stabilization of linear dynamical plants under operator disturbances,” Diff. Uravn., 50(7), 865–876 (2014).

  15. M. Rewienski and J. White, “Model order reduction for nonlinear dynamical systems based on trajectory piecewise-linear approximations,” Linear Algebra and its Applications, 415, 426–454 (2006).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Johansson, Piecewise Linear Control Systems. A Computational Approach, Springer (2003).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Z. Sun and S. S. Ge, Stability Theory of Switched Dynamical Systems. Springer-Verlag (2011).

  18. W. P. M. H. Heemels, B. Schutter, J. Lunze, and M. Lazar, “Stability analysis and controller synthesis for hybrid dynamical systems,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A.. 368: 4937–4960 (2010).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. J. P. Hespanha, “Uniform stability of switched linear systems: extensions of LaSalle's Invariance Principle,” Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions, 49(4): 470–482 (2004).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. A. S. Fursov and E. F. Khusainov, “On the stabilization of switched linear systems,” Diff. Uravn., 51(11): 1522–1533 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. S. Fursov and I. V. Kapalin, “Stabilization of switched linear systems by a variable-structure controller,” Diff. Uravn., 52(8): 1109–1120 (2016.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. A. S. Fursov, S. I. Minyawv, and E. A. Iskhakov, “Construction of a digital stabilizer for a switched linear system,” Diff. Uravn., 53(8): 1121–1127 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. S. Fursov, I. V. Kapalin, and Kh. Khonshan, “Stabilization of vector-input switched linear systems by a variable-structure controller,” Diff. Uravn., 53(11): 1532–1542 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. S. Fursov, S.I. Ninyaev, and V. S. Guseva, “Construction fo a digital stabilizer for a switched linear system with delayed control,” Diff. Uravn., 54(8): 1132–1141 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. S. Fursov, S. V. Emel’yanov, I. V. Kapalin, and E. S. Sagadinova, “Stabilization of vector-input switched linear systems with modes of different dynamical orders,” Diff. Uravn., 54(11): 1540–1546 (2018).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. V. R. Barsegyan, Control of Composite Dynamical Systems and Systems with Multipoint Intermediate Conditions [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  27. K. Yu. Polyakov, Foundations of the Theory of Digital Control Systems, A Textbook [in Russian], SPbGMTU (2002).

  28. S. K. Korovin, S. I. Minyaev, and A. S. Fursov, “An approach to simultaneous stabilization of linear dynamical objects with delay,” Diff. Uravn., 47(11): 1592–1598 (2011).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. B. T. Polyak, M. V. Khlebnikov, and P. S. Shcherbakov, Control of Systems with External Disturbances. A Method of Linear Matrix Inequalities [in Russian], LENAND, Moscow (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. S. Fursov, Simultaneous Stabilization: A Theory of Construction of a Universal Controller for a Family of Dynamical Plants [in Russian], ARGAMAK-MEDIA, Moscow (2016).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Il’in.

Additional information

Translated from Prikladnaya Matematika i Informatika, No. 61, 2019, pp. 70–84.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Il’in, A.V., Fomichev, V.V. & Fursov, A.S. Control Problems for Systems with Uncertainty. Comput Math Model 30, 390–402 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10598-019-09465-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10598-019-09465-8

Keywords

Navigation