Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Individual Peer Support: A Qualitative Study of Mechanisms of Its Effectiveness

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peer-delivered services for individuals with psychiatric conditions have proliferated over the past three decades. The values and principles underlying peer support have been explored, but we lack an understanding of its mechanisms of action. To shed light on the processes of peer support, we conducted a study with individuals who had received substantial individual peer support. We completed individual interviews, audiotaped, transcribed, and examined them using a thematic analysis approach. Our analyses suggest that individual peer support provided various practical, emotional, and social supports which were perceived as beneficial. Participants valued having someone to rely on, a friend, and someone to socialize with. We, however, found that individuals’ expectations of peer support did not always comport with available services. Participants viewed peer support as especially valuable because of the opportunity for a non-treatment based, normalizing relationship. We conclude that peer support complements rather than supplants needed traditional mental health services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. All names have been changed to preserve participant anonymity. “Heather” is a fictitious name given to this study participant.

References

  • Campbell, J. (2005). The historical and philosophical development of peer run support programs. In S. Clay, B. Schell, P. Corrigan, & R. Ralph (Eds.), On our own, together: Peer programs for people with mental illness (pp. 17–66). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinman, M., George, P., Dougherty, R. H., Daniels, A. S., Ghose, S. S., Swift, A., & Delphin-Rittmon, M. E. (2014). Peer support services for individuals with serious mental illnesses: Assessing the evidence. Psychiatric Services, 65(4), 429–441. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201300244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clay, S., Schell, B., Corrigan, P., & Ralph, R. (2005). On our own together: Peer programs for people with mental illness. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamarck, T., & Hoberman, H. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In I. Sarason & B. Sarason (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research and applications (pp. 73–94). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. A., Copeland, M. E., Jonikas, J. A., Hamilton, M.M., Razzano, L.A., Grey, D. D., … Boyd, S. (2012a). Results of a randomized controlled trial of mental illness self-management using Wellness Recovery Action Planning. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 38(4), 881–891. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbr01.

  • Cook, J. A., Steigman, P., Pickett, S., Diehl, S., Fox, A., Shipley, P., … Burke-Miller, J. K. (2012b). Randomized controlled trial of peer-led recovery education using Building Recovery of Individual Dreams and Goals through Education and Support (BRIDGES). Schizophrenia Research, 136 (1–3), 36–42. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2011.10.016.

  • Copeland, M., & Mead, S. (2004). Report of the moving ahead study. Waterbury, VT: State Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P. W., Mueser, K. T., Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., & Solomon, P. (2008). Peer Services and Supports. Principles and practice of psychiatric rehabilitation: an empirical approach (pp. 359–378). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, L., Chinman, M., Sells, D., & Rowe, M. (2006). Peer support among adults with serious mental illness: A report from the field. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32(3), 443–450. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbj043.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, P. (1996, September). Recovery and the conspiracy of hope. Paper presented at the There’s a person in here: The sixth annual mental health services conference of Australia and New Zealand, Brisbane, Australia.

  • Gartner, A., & Riessman, F. E. (1984). The self-help revolution. New York: Human Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, S. (2012). Personal communication about the use of practical supports in peer support to facilitate engagement and bonding.

  • Holter, M. C., Mowbray, C. T., Bellamy, C. D., MacFarlane, P., & Dukarski, J. (2004). Critical ingredients of consumer run services: Results of a national survey. Community Mental Health Journal, 40(1), 47–63. doi:10.1023/b:comh.0000015217.65613.46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, A. O., Del Re, A. C., Flückiger, C., & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 9–16. doi:10.1037/a0022186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, M., Teague, G., & Mc Donel Herr, E. (2005). Common ingredients as a fidelity measure for peer-run programs. In S. Clay, B. Schell, P. W. Corrigan, & R. O. Ralph (Eds.), On our own together: Peer programs for people with mental illness (pp. 213–238). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, A. (1983). The well-being of chronic mental patients: Assessing their quality of life. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40(4), 369–373. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790040023003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd-Evans, B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Harrison, B., Istead, H. Brown, E., Pilling. S., … Kendall, T. (2014). A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of peer support for people with severe mental illness. BMC Psychiatry, 14(39), 14–39. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-14-39.

  • MacCallum, J., & Beltman, S. (2002). Role models for young people: What makes an effective role model program. Hobart: Australian Clearing House for Youth Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, S., & MacNeil, C. (2006). Peer support: What makes it unique? International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 10(2), 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto, Y., & Sono, T. (2012). Lessons from peer support among individuals with mental health difficulties: A review of the literature. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 8, 22–29. doi:10.2174/1745017901208010022.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, G., Russinova, R., Gidugu, V., Yim, J. Y., & Sprague, C. (2012). Benefits and mechanisms of recovery among peer providers with psychiatric illnesses. Qualitative Health Research, 22(3), 304–319. doi:10.1177/1049732311420578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, N. (2012). A review of social isolation. A Journal of Primary Prevention, 33(2–3), 137–152. doi:10.1007/s10935-012-0271-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, V., Lowe, D., Hill, S., Prictor, M., Hetrick, S. E., Ryan, R., & Berends, L. (2013). Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2013, 3. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004807.pub2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riessman, F. (1998). Ten self-help principles. Perspectives, 3(2). Retrieved from http://www.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?type=doc&id=358

  • Rogers, C. R. (1956). Client-centered theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 3(2), 115–120. doi:10.1037/h0046548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. S., Kash-MacDonald, M., & Brucker, D. (2009). Systematic review of peer delivered services literature 1989–2009. Boston: Boston University, Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation.

  • Rogers, E. S., Maru, M., Johnson, G., Cohee, J. & Hinkel, J. (2012). The effects of peer support services for individuals with psychiatric disabilities experiencing a civil commitment: Results of a randomized trial. Boston University: Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation. (unpublished manuscript)

  • Russinova, Z., Rogers, E. S., Cook, K., Ellison, M. L., & Lyass, A. (2013). Conceptualization and measurement of mental health providers’ recovery-promoting competence: The Recovery Promoting Relationships Scale (RPRS). Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 36(1), 7–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salem, D. A., Gant, L., & Campbell, R. (1998). The initiation of mutual-help groups within residential treatment settings. Community Mental Health Journal, 34(4), 419–429. doi:10.1023/a:1018744225397.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sells, D., Black, R., Davidson, L., & Rowe, M. (2008). Beyond generic support: The incidence and impact of invalidation within peer-based and traditional treatment for clients with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 59(11), 1322–1327. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.59.11.1322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sells, D., Davidson, L., Jewell, C., Falzer, P., & Rowe, M. (2006). The treatment relationship in peer-based and regular case management services for clients with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 57(8), 1179–1184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, P. (2004). Peer support/peer provided services: Underlying processes, benefits, and critical ingredients. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27(4), 392–401. doi:10.2975/27.2004.392.401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gestel-Timmermans, H., Brouwers, E. P., Van Assen, M., & van Nieuwenhuizen, C. (2012). Effects of a peer-run course on recovery from serious mental illness: A randomized controlled trial. Psychiatric Services, 63(1), 54–60. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201000450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration to the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vasudha Gidugu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gidugu, V., Rogers, E.S., Harrington, S. et al. Individual Peer Support: A Qualitative Study of Mechanisms of Its Effectiveness. Community Ment Health J 51, 445–452 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-014-9801-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-014-9801-0

Keywords

Navigation