Abstract
Families with members living in different countries have embraced emerging technologies but little is known of the impact of mediated communication among these families. Economic globalization and the emergence of accessible information communication technologies have been parallel to the unprecedented number of higher education students who now travel abroad to study. Understanding the students’ experience may expand our knowledge on how the adoption of emerging technology is shaping transnational family relationships. In this study, international students were interviewed to share their perspectives of how mediated family communication may impact their wellbeing. Students from 14 countries and attending a university in Spain participated in 12 in-depth interviews and one focus group (n = 10). Overall, the results suggest emerging technologies enable the maintenance of close relationships, foster a sense of connectedness, and help students to better adapt to a new environment. Students’ choices of technology are influenced by accessibility factors and cost. The type of relationship students have with their families seem to become more pronounced with interactions mediated by emerging technology. Since members of the younger generation may be more technologically literate than their predecessors, a shift in the role of who controls the use of and supplies advice about technology is manifest, with young adults advising parents about technology choices. Therefore, the control of the communication—i.e., frequency and length—is transferred from parents to students. According to students, mediated family exchanges strengthen their physical, emotional, and social wellbeing. However, the continuous availability of the technology among family members may also be stressful.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguila, A. P. N. (2009). Living long-distance relationships through computer-mediated communication. Social Science Diliman, 5, 83–106.
Akyıl, Y., Bacigalupe, G., & Üstünel, C. Ö. (2017). Emerging technologies and family: A Cross-National Study of Family clinicians’ views. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 28, 1–19.
Alonso, A., & Oiarzabal, P. J. (2010). Diasporas in the new media age: Identity, politics, and community. Reno, NV: University of Nevada Press.
Antheunis, M. L., Schouten, A. P., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2011). Interactive uncertainty reduction strategies and verbal affection in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research. doi:10.1177/0093650211410420.
Aponte, R. (2009). The communications revolution and its impact on the family: Significant, growing, but skewed and limited in scope. Marriage & Family Review, 45, 576–586. doi:10.1080/01494920903396778.
Aphek, E. (2005). Learning and growing by giving: Children as agents of ICT. In United Nations ICT Task Force, pp 171–176. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?.
Aquino, R., Counselling, M. E., & Weber, L. (2009). Promoting the wellbeing and safety of international students: Considering how we can better welcome and serve international students. In CBIE Quebec Regional Conference. March 25, 2009.
Bacigalupe, G., & Cámara, M. (2012). Transnational families and social technologies: Reassessing immigration psychology. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38, 1425–1438. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2012.698211.
Bacigalupe, G., & Lambe, S. (2011). Virtualizing intimacy: Information communication technologies and transnational families in therapy. Family Process, 50, 12–26. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2010.01343.x.
Baldassar, L. (2007). Transnational families and aged care: The mobility of care and the migrancy of ageing. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33, 275–297. doi:10.1080/13691830601154252.
Baldassar, L. (2008). Missing kin and longing to be together: Emotions and the construction of co-presence in transnational relationships. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 29, 247–266. doi:10.1080/07256860802169196.
Baron, N. S. (2011). Concerns about mobile phones: A cross–national study. First Monday, 16. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/3335/3032.
Baym, N. K., Zhang, Y. B., Kunkel, A., Ledbetter, A., & Lin, M. C. (2007). Relational quality and media use in interpersonal relationships. New Media & Society, 9, 735–752. doi:10.1177/1461444807080339.
Bodycott, P. (2009). Choosing a higher education study abroad destination. Journal of Research in International Education, 8, 349–373. doi:10.1177/1475240909345818.
Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2009). Digital diasporas: Identity and transnational engagement. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2007). The SAGE Handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage.
Carling, J. (2008). The human dynamics of migrant transnationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31, 1452–1477. doi:10.1080/01419870701719097.
Carvalho, J., Fonseca, G., Francisco, R., Bacigalupe, G., & Relvas, A. P. (2016). Information and communication technologies and family: Patterns of use, life cycle and family dynamics. Journal of Psychology & Psychotherapy, 6(1), 1–3.
Cemalcilar, Z., Falbo, T., & Stapleton, L. M. (2005). Cyber communication: A new opportunity for international students’ adaptation? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 91–110. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.04.002.
Chen, Y. F., & Katz, J. E. (2009). Extending family to school life: College students’ use of the mobile phone. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67, 179–191. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.09.002.
Dekker, R., & Engbersen, G. (2012). How social media transform migrant networks and facilitate migration. IMI Working Papers Series, 64, 1–21.
Furukama, R., & Driessnack, M. (2012). Video-mediated communication to support distant family connectedness. Clinical Nursing Resarch. doi:10.1177/1054773812446150.
Gentzler, A. L., Oberhauser, A. M., Westerman, D., & Nadorff, D. K. (2011). College students’ use of electronic communication with parents: Links to loneliness, attachment, and relationship quality. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 71–74. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0409.
Gora, Y. (2009). Information and communication technologies (ICT) and effects on ‘togetherness’ in family households. In F. Pandrea & M. Armstrong (Eds.), Record of the Communications Policy & Research Forum (pp. 88–105). Sydney: Network Insight Pty Ltd.
Gordon, C. F., Juang, L. P, & Syed, M. (2007). Internet use and wellbeing among college students: Beyond frequency of use. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 674–688.
Hertlein, K. (2012). Digital dwelling: Technology in couple and family relationships. Family Relations, 61, 374–387. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00702.x.
Holmes, P., & Janson, A. (2008). Migrants’ communication practices with ICTs: Tools for facilitating migration and adaptation? International Journal of Technology, Knowledge & Society, 4, 51–62.
Holohan, Anne, Chin, Jeanette, Callaghan, Vic, & Muhlau, P. (2011). The digital home: A new locus of social science research. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), The Handbook of Emergent Technologies in Social Research (pp. 647–666). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jacobsen, W. C., & Forste, R. (2011). The wired generation: Academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students. Cyperpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 275–280. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0135.
Jones, C., & Hosein, A. (2010). Profiling university students’ use of technology: Where is the NET generation divide? The International Journal of Technology Knowledge and Society, 6, 43–58.
Jones, S. (2002). The internet goes to college: How students are living in the future with today’s technology. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 1–22. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2002/The-Internet-Goes-to-College.aspx.
Kim, H.-K., & Davis, K. (2009). Toward a comprehensive theory of problematic internet use: Evaluating the role of self-esteem, anxiety, flow, and the self-rated importance of internet activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 490–500. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.11.001.
Kline, S. L., & Liu, F. (2005). The influence of comparative media use on acculturation, acculturative stress, and family relationships of Chinese international students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(4), 367–390. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.07.001.
Lee, E.-J., Lee, L., & Jang, J. (2011). Internet for the internationals: Effects of internet use motivations on international students’ college adjustment. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 433–437. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0406.
Li, G., Chen, W., & Duanmu, J. L. (2010). Determinants of international students’ academic performance. A comparison between Chinese and other international students. Journal of Studies in International Education, 14, 389–405. doi:10.1177/1028315309331490.
Madell, D. E., & Muncer, S. J. (2007). Control over social interactions: An important reason for young people’s use of the internet and mobile phones for communication? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 10, 137–140. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9980.
Mesch, G. S., & Frenkel, M. (2011). Family imbalance and adjustment to information and communication technologies. In K. B. Wright & L. M. Webb (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 285–301). New York: Peter Lang.
Nguyen, M., Bin, Y. S., & Campbell, A. (2012). Comparing online and offline self-disclosure: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 103–111. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0277.
Niemz, K., Griffiths, M., & Banyard, P. (2005). Prevalence of pathological internet use among university students and correlations with self-esteem, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), and disinhibition. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 8, 562–570. doi:10.1089/cpb.2005.8.562.
O’Sullivan, B. (2000). What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26, 403–431. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00763.x.
OECD (2011). Education at a glance. Indicator C3—Who studies abroad and where? Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/32/48631079.pdf.
Sanders, W. S. (2011). Communication competence and apprehension during CMC in online face-to-face relationships. In K. B. Wright & L. M. Webb (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 79–97). New York: Peter Lang.
Schiffrin, H., Edelman, A., Falkenstern, M., & Stewart, C. (2010). The associations among computer-mediated communication, relationships, and wellbeing. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 299–306. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0173.
Smith, M. E., Nguyen, D. T., Lai, C., Leshed, G., & Baumer, E. P. S. (2012). Going to college and staying connected: Communication between college freshmen and their parents. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)’12 Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 789–798. doi:10.1145/2145204.2145322.
Suhail, K., & Bargees, Z. (2006). Effects of excessive internet use on undergraduate students in Pakistan. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 9, 297–307. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.297.
Wilding, R. (2006). ‘Virtual’ intimacies? Families communicating across transnational contexts. Global Networks, 6, 125–142. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00137.x.
Williams, A. L., & Merten, M. J. (2011). iFamily: Internet and social media technology in the family context. Family & Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 40, 150–170. doi:10.1111/j.1552-3934.2011.02101.x.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Maria Cámara, postdoctoral, and student assistants Allison McNulty, Gipson Vergeshe, and Nathalie Thomas, for their support in conducting interviews, and transcribing and analyzing the data. We also like to express our gratitude for the support of the University’s International Relations Office, International Spanish Center, and Master’s degree in International Humanitarian Action at the University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bacigalupe, G., Bräuninger, I. Emerging Technologies and Family Communication: The Case of International Students. Contemp Fam Ther 39, 289–300 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-017-9437-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-017-9437-7