Abstract
This article describes a process of live supervision that has been designed to encourage trainees to experience competing theoretical perspectives. It involves the use of separate T (treatment) and O (observation) teams who conceptualise the same case from two broadly defined theoretical perspectives, variously called first and second order, modern and postmodern, or family systems and social constructionist. The process requires trainees to adopt multiple positions rather than identify with one perspective, and provides a basis for comparing and potentially integrating them. We provide examples of the approach, discuss important contextual issues for supervisors to consider when implementing it, and examine ways of adapting it to a wide range of training contexts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boscolo, L., & Cecchin, G. (1982). Training in systemic therapy at the Milan Center. In R. Whiffen, & J. Byng-Hall (Eds.), Family therapy supervision: Recent developments in practice (pp. 153–165). London: Academic Press.
Champe, J., & Kleist, D. (2003). Live supervision: A review of the research. The Family Journal: Counseling and Psychotherapy for Couples and Families, 11, 268–275.
Dallos, R., & Urry, A. (1999). Abandoning our parents and grandparents: Does social constructionism mean the end of systemic family therapy? Journal of Family Therapy, 21, 161–186.
Lee, R. E., Nichols, D. P., Nichols, W. C., & Odom, T. (2004). Trends in family therapy supervision: The past 25 years and into the future. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30, 6–69.
Lowe, R. (2004). Family therapy: A constructive framework. London: Sage.
McNamee, S. (2004). Promiscuity in the practice of family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 26, 224–244.
Madanes, C. (1984). Behind the one-way-mirror: Advances in the practice of strategic therapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Morgan, M. M., & Sprenkle, D. H. (2007). Toward a common-factors approach to supervision. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33, 1–17.
Naden, M., Johns, K., Ostman, C., & Mahan, T. (2004). Student therapists grapple with modern and postmodern ideas: One program’s approach to training. Contemporary Family Therapy, 26, 465–480.
Pocock, D. (1999). Loose ends. Journal of Family Therapy, 21, 187–194.
Roberts, J., Matthews, W. J., Bodin, N., Cohen, D., Lewandowski, L., Novo, J., Pumilia, J., & Willis, C. (1989). Training with O (Observing) and T (Treatment) teams in live supervision: Reflections in the looking glass. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15, 397–410.
Schwartz, R., Liddle, H., & Breunlin, D. (1988). Muddles in live dupervision. In H. Liddle, D. Breunlin, & R. Schwartz (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy training and supervision (pp. 183–193). New York: Guilford Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lowe, R., Hunt, C. & Simmons, P. Towards Multi-positioned Live Supervision in Family Therapy: Combining Treatment and Observation Teams with First- and Second-order Perspectives. Contemp Fam Ther 30, 3–14 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-007-9052-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-007-9052-0