Correction to: Climatic Change

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02754-x

Part of the reference section on the article was included as Supplementary Material with the article online. The full reference section for the article is included here.

References

Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J et al (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ,Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 743; 17). Cambridge University press, Cambridge, UK

Aklin M, Urpelainen J (2013) Debating clean energy: frames, counter frames, and audiences. Glob Environ Chang 23(5):1225–1232

Anderson B, Bernauer T (2016) How much carbon offsetting and where? Implications of efficiency, effectiveness, and ethicality considerations for public opinion formation. Energy Policy 94:387–395

Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann 35(4):216–224

Ayers J (2011) Resolving the adaptation paradox: exploring the potential for deliberative adaptation policymaking in Bangladesh. Global Environmental Politics 11(1):62–88

Aytur SA, Hecht JS, Kirshen P (2015) Aligning climate change adaptation planning with adaptive governance: lessons from Exeter, NH. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education 155(1):83–98

Barrett G, Vera Schattan PC, Wyman M (2012) Assessing the policy impacts of deliberative civic engagement: comparing engagement in health policy practices in Canada and Brazil. Democracy in motion. Oxford University Press, New York

Beierle TC, Cayford J (2002) Democracy in practice: public participation in environmental decisions. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

Bellamy R, Lezaun J (2015) A review of deliberative public engagements with climate geoengineering. University of Oxford

Bellamy R, Lezaun J (2017) Crafting a public for geoengineering. Public Underst Sci 26(4):402–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515600965

Bellamy R, Chilvers J, Vaughan NE, Lenton TM (2013) ‘Opening up’ geoengineering appraisal: multi-criteria mapping of options for tackling climate change. Glob Environ Chang 23(5):926–937

Bellamy R, Chilvers J, Vaughan NE (2016) Deliberative mapping of options for tackling climate change: citizens and specialists ‘open up’ appraisal of geoengineering. Public Underst Sci 25(3):269–286

Bellamy R, Lezaun J, Palmer J (2017) Public perceptions of geoengineering research governance: an experimental deliberative approach. Glob Environ Chang 45:194–202

Bendick R, Dahlin KM, Smoliak BV, Kumler L, Jones SJ, Aktipis A et al (2010) Choosing carbon mitigation strategies using ethical deliberation. Weather Clim Soc 2(2):140–147

Benford RD, Snow DA (2000) Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annu Rev Sociol 26(1):611–639

Benjamin D, Por H, Budescu D (2017) Climate change versus global warming: who is susceptible to the framing of climate change? Environ Behav 49(7):745–770

Bernauer T, McGrath LF (2016) Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy. Nature Climate Change

Bertolotti M, Catellani P (2014) Effects of message framing in policy communication on climate change. Eur J Soc Psychol 44(5):474–486

Bertolotti M, Catellani P (2015) Agreement with climate change policies: framing the future and national versus supranational identity. Eur J Soc Psychol 45(7):847–857

Bherer L, Gauthier M, Simard L (2017) The professionalization of public participation. Taylor & Francis, New York

Biesbroek GR, Termeer CJ, Klostermann JE, Kabat P (2014) Rethinking barriers to adaptation: mechanismbased explanation of impasses in the governance of an innovative adaptation measure. Glob Environ Chang 26:108–118

Blue G (2015) Public deliberation with climate change: opening up or closing down policy options? Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 24(2):152–159

Blue G (2016) Framing climate change for public deliberation: what role for interpretive social sciences and humanities? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18(1):67–84

Blue G (2018) From facts to frames: dominant and alternative meanings of climate change. In: Hanson L (ed) Public deliberation on climate change: lessons from Alberta climate dialogue. Athabasca University Press, Edmonton, AB, pp. 133–146

Blue G, Dale J (2016) Framing and power in public deliberation with climate change: critical reflections on the role of deliberative practitioners. Journal of Public Deliberation 12(1)

Bosomworth K (2015) Climate change adaptation in public policy: frames, fire management, and frame reflection. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33(6):1450–1466

Büchs M, Saunders C, Wallbridge R, Smith G, Bardsley N (2015) Identifying and explaining framing strategies of low carbon lifestyle movement organizations. Glob Environ Chang 35:307–315

Bulkeley H (2010) Cities and the governing of climate change. Annu Rev Environ Resour 35:229–253

Calvert A, Warren ME (2014) Deliberative democracy and framing effects: why frames are a problem and how deliberative mini-publics might overcome them. In: Grönlund K, Bächtiger A, Setälä M (eds) Deliberative mini-publics: involving citizens in the democratic process. ECPR Press, Colchester, UK, pp. 203–224

Cann HW, Raymond L (2018) Does climate denialism still matter? The prevalence of alternative frames in opposition to climate policy. Environmental Politics 27(3):433–454

Carnesale A, Chameides W (eds) (2011) America’s climate choices. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.

Carpini MXD, Cook FL, Jacobs LR (2004) Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: a review of the empirical literature. Annu.Rev.Polit.Sci. 7:315–344

Chilvers J, Kearnes M (2016) In: Chilvers, Kearnes M (eds) Remaking participation. Routledge, Abingdon

Chilvers J, Kearnes M (2019) Remaking participation in science and democracy. Sci Technol Hum Values https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919850885

Chong D, Druckman JN (2007) Framing theory. Annu.Rev.Polit.Sci. 10:103–126

Chu EK (2016) The governance of climate change adaptation through urban policy experiments. Environ Policy Gov 26(6):439–451

Collins K, Ison R (2009) Jumping off Arnstein’s ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environ Policy Gov 19(6):358–373

Corner A, Pidgeon N (2015) Like artificial trees? The effect of framing by natural analogy on public perceptions of geoengineering. Clim Chang 130(3):425–438

Corner A, Parkhill KA, Pidgeon N (2011) ‘Experiment earth?’ Reflections on a public dialogue on geoengineering: reflections on a public dialogue on geoengineering. Cardiff University. Retrieved from http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/82861/

Corner A, Parkhill K, Pidgeon N, Vaughan NE (2013) Messing with nature? Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK. Glob Environ Chang 23(5):938–947

Corner A, Markowitz E, Pidgeon N (2014) Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 5(3):411–422

Curato N, Niemeyer S (2013) Reaching out to overcome political apathy: building participatory capacity through deliberative engagement. Politics & Policy 41(3):355–383

Curato N, Dryzek JS, Ercan SA, Hendriks CM, Niemeyer S (2017) Twelve key findings in deliberative democracy research. Daedalus 146(3):28–38

Damsø T, Kjær T, Christensen TB (2016) Local climate action plans in climate change mitigation–examining the case of Denmark. Energy Policy 89:74–83

Dawson A (2010) Climate justice: the emerging movement against green capitalism. South Atlantic Quarterly 109(2):313–338

de Boer J, Wardekker JA, van der Sluijs JP (2010) Frame-based guide to situated decision-making on climate change. Glob Environ Chang 20(3):502–510

Dewulf A (2013) Contrasting frames in policy debates on climate change adaptation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 4(4):321–330

Dietz T, Stern PC, Dan A (2009) How deliberation affects stated willingness to pay for mitigation of carbon dioxide emissions: an experiment. Land Econ 85(2):329–347

Dodge J (2014) Civil society organizations and deliberative policy making: interpreting environmental controversies in the deliberative system. Policy Sci 47(2):161–185

Döring M, Ratter B (2018) The regional framing of climate change: towards a place-based perspective on regional climate change perception in north Frisia. J Coast Conserv 22(1):131–143

Druckman JN, Nelson KR (2003) Framing and deliberation: how citizens’ conversations limit elite influence. Am J Polit Sci 47(4):729–745

Dryzek JS (2000) Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford University Press, New York

Dryzek JS, Lo AY (2015) Reason and rhetoric in climate communication. Environmental Politics 24(1):1–16

Dryzek JS, Norgaard RB, Schlosberg D (2013) Climate-challenged society. Oxford University Press

Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2011) Organized climate change denial. In: The Oxford handbook of climate change and society, pp. 144–160

Dupuis J, Knoepfel P (2013) The adaptation policy paradox: the implementation deficit of policies framed as climate change adaptation. Ecol Soc 18(4)

Edwards PB, Hindmarsh R, Mercer H, Bond M, Rowland A (2008) A three-stage evaluation of a deliberative event on climate change and transforming energy. Journal of Public Deliberation 4(1)

Einsiedel EF, Boyd AD, Medlock J, Ashworth P (2013) Assessing socio-technical mindsets: public deliberations on carbon capture and storage in the context of energy sources and climate change. Energy Policy 53:149–158

Entman RM (1993) Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Commun 43(4):51–58

Entman RM (2004) Projections of power: framing news, public opinion, and US foreign policy. University of Chicago Press

Fischer F (2003) Reframing public policy: discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford University Press

Fischer F (2017) Climate crisis and the democratic prospect: participatory governance in sustainable communities Oxford University Press

Fishkin JS (2011) When the people speak: deliberative democracy and public consultation. Oxford University Press

Fleming A, Vanclay F, Hiller C, Wilson S (2014) Challenging dominant discourses of climate change. Clim Chang 127(3–4):407–418

Flood S, Schechtman J (2014) The rise of resilience: evolution of a new concept in coastal planning in Ireland and the US. Ocean & Coastal Management 102:19–31

Foss A (2018) Divergent responses to sustainability and climate change planning: the role of politics, cultural frames and public participation. Urban Stud 55(2):332–348

Friedman W (2006) Reframing framing. Public Agenda’s Center for Advances in Public Engagement, New York

Fünfgeld H, McEvoy D (2014) Frame divergence in climate change adaptation policy: insights from Australian local government planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32(4):603–622

Fung A (2015) Putting the public back into governance: the challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Adm Rev 75(4):513–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361

Galbraith K, Price A (2013) The great Texas wind rush: how George Bush, Ann Richards, and a bunch of tinkerers helped the oil and gas state win the race to wind power. University of Texas Press

Gastil J, Levine P (2005) The deliberative democracy handbook: strategies for effective civic engagement in the twenty-first century. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

Gastil J, Knobloch KR, Kahan D, Braman D (2016) Participatory policymaking across cultural cognitive divides: two tests of cultural biasing in public forum design and deliberation. Public Adm 94(4):970–987

Goffman E (1974) Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press

Guber DL, Bosso CI (2012) Issue framing, agenda setting, and environmental discourse. S.Kamieniecki & M.Kraft, the Oxford Handbook of US Environmental Policy, , 437–460

Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 175–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500339646

Hall, T. E., Wilson, P., & Newman, J. (2011). Evaluating the short-and long-term effects of a modified deliberative poll on Idahoans' attitudes and civic engagement related to energy options. Journal of Public Deliberation, 7(1)

Hanson, L. L. (Ed.). (2018). Public deliberation on climate change: lessons from Alberta climate dialogue. Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press

Haque, M. M., Bremer, S., Aziz, S. B., & van der Sluijs, Jeroen P. (2017). A critical assessment of knowledge quality for climate adaptation in Sylhet division, Bangladesh. Clim Risk Manag, 16, 43–58

Hobson, K., & Niemeyer, S. (2011). Public responses to climate change: the role of deliberation in building capacity for adaptive action. Glob Environ Chang, 21(3), 957–971

Hobson, K., & Niemeyer, S. (2013). “What sceptics believe”: the effects of information and deliberation on climate change scepticism. Public Underst Sci, 22(4), 396–412

Hoffman, A. (2011). Talking past each other? Cultural framing of skeptical and convinced logics in the climate change debate. Organ Environ, 24(1)

Houser, M. (2018). Who framed climate change? Identifying the how and why of Iowa corn farmers’ framing of climate change. Sociol Rural, 58(1), 40–62

Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change Cambridge University Press

Hurlbert, M., & Gupta, J. (2016). Adaptive governance, uncertainty, and risk: policy framing and responses to climate change, drought, and flood. Risk Anal, 36(2), 339–356

Jang, S. M. (2013). Framing responsibility in climate change discourse: ethnocentric attribution bias, perceived causes, and policy attitudes. J Environ Psychol, 36, 27–36

Jordan, A. J., Huitema, D., Hildn, M., Van Asselt, H., Rayner, T. J., Schoenefeld, J. J., . . . Boasson, E. L. (2015). Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nat Clim Chang, 5(11), 977

Kadlec, A., & Friedman, W. (2007). Deliberative democracy and the problem of power. Journal of Public Deliberation, 3(1)

Kahane, D., & Blue, G. (2018). The theory and practice of deliberative democracy. In L. L. Hanson (Ed.), Public deliberation on climate change: lessons from Alberta climate dialogue (pp. 67–81). Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press

Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything: capitalism v. the climate. New York: Simon & Schuster

Koski, C., & Siulagi, A. (2016). Environmental harm or natural hazard? Problem identification and adaptation in US municipal climate action plans. Rev Policy Res, 33(3), 270–290

Kythreotis, A. P., & Bristow, G. I. (2017). The ‘resilience trap’: exploring the practical utility of resilience for climate change adaptation in UK city-regions. Reg Stud, 51(10), 1530–1541

Lachapelle, E., Montpetit, É, & Gauvin, J. (2014). Public perceptions of expert credibility on policy issues: the role of expert framing and political worldviews. Policy Stud J, 42(4), 674–697

Lafont, C. (2017). Can democracy be deliberative & participatory? The democratic case for political uses of mini-publics. Daedalus, 146(3), 85–105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00449

Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environ Commun, 4(1), 70–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030903529749

Lakoff, G. (2014). The all new don’t think of an elephant: know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing

Lawrence, J., & Haasnoot, M. (2017). What it took to catalyse uptake of dynamic adaptive pathways planning to address climate change uncertainty. Environ Sci Pol, 68, 47–57

Leeper, T. J., & Slothuus, R. (2018). Deliberation and framing. In A. Bächtiger, J. S. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge & M. E. Warren (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of deliberative democracy (). Oxford: Oxford University Press

Lo, A. Y. (2013). Agreeing to pay under value disagreement: reconceptualizing preference transformation in terms of pluralism with evidence from small-group deliberations on climate change. Ecol Econ, 87, 84–94

MacArthur, J. L. (2016). Challenging public engagement: participation, deliberation and power in renewable energy policy. J Environ Stud Sci, 6(3), 631–640

MacKinnon, M. P., Dale, J., & Lyons, S. H. (2018). On the ground: practitioners reflect on ABCD’s citizen deliberations. In L. L. Hanson (Ed.), Public deliberation on climate change: lessons from Alberta climate dialogue (pp. 169–195). Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press

Macnaghten, P., & Szerszynski, B. (2013). Living the global social experiment: an analysis of public discourse on solar radiation management and its implications for governance. Glob Environ Chang, 23(2), 465–474

Mah, D. N., & Hills, P. (2016). An international review of local governance for climate change: implications for Hong Kong. Local Environ, 21(1), 39–64

Marshall, G. (2015). Don’t even think about it: Why our brains are wired to ignore climate change Bloomsbury Publishing USA

Martens, L., McNutt, K., & Rayner, J. (2015). Power to the people? The impacts and outcomes of energy consultations in Saskatchewan and Nova Scotia. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne De Science Politique, 48(1), 1–27

Mathews, D. (2011). Naming and framing difficult issues to make sound decisions The Kettering Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.kettering.org/catalog/product/naming-and-framing-2016

McClure, L., & Baker, D. (2018). How do planners deal with barriers to climate change adaptation? A case study in Queensland, Australia. Landsc Urban Plan, 173, 81–88

McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change: political polarization in the American public’s views of global warming. Sociol Q, 52(2)

McCrum, G., Blackstock, K., Matthews, K., Rivington, M., Miller, D., & Buchan, K. (2009). Adapting to climate change in land management: the role of deliberative workshops in enhancing social learning. Environ Policy Gov, 19(6), 413–426

McEvoy, D., Fünfgeld, H., & Bosomworth, K. (2013). Resilience and climate change adaptation: the importance of framing. Planning Practice & Research, 28(3), 280–293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2013.787710

McNeeley, S. M., & Lazrus, H. (2014). The cultural theory of risk for climate change adaptation. Weather, Climate, and Society, 6(4), 506–519

Mees, H. (2016). Local governments in the driving seat? A comparative analysis of public and private responsibilities for adaptation to climate change in European and North American cities. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(4), 374–390

Melville, K., Willingham, T. L., & Dedrick, J. R. (2005). National issues forums: a network of communities promoting public deliberation. In J. Gastil, & P. Levine (Eds.), The deliberative democracy handbook: strategies for effective civic engagement in the twenty-first century (pp. 37–58). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

Miller, C. A. (2000). The dynamics of framing environmental values and policy: four models of societal processes. Environmental Values, 9(2), 211–233

Morrison, T. H., Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Lemos, M. C., Huitema, D., & Hughes, T. P. (2017). Mitigation and adaptation in polycentric systems: sources of power in the pursuit of collective goals. WIREs Climate Change, 8(5)

Moser, S. C. (2014). Communicating adaptation to climate change: the art and science of public engagement when climate change comes home. WIREs Climate Change, 5, 337–358. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.276

Moser, S. C. (2016). Reflections on climate change communication research and practice in the second decade of the 21st century: what more is there to say? Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang, 7(3), 345–369

Moser, S. C., & Pike, C. (2015). Community engagement on adaptation: meeting a growing capacity need. Urban Clim, 14, 111–115

Moser, S. C., & Berzonsky, C. L. (2015). There must be more: communication to close the cultural divide. In K. O'Brien, & E. Selboe (Eds.), The adaptive challenge of climate change (pp. 311-324) Cambridge University Press.

Mossler, M. V., Bostrom, A., Kelly, R. P., Crosman, K. M., & Moy, P. (2017). How does framing affect policy support for emissions mitigation? Testing the effects of ocean acidification and other carbon emissions frames. Glob Environ Chang, 45, 63–78

Myers, T. A., Nisbet, M. C., Maibach, E. W., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2012). A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. Clim Chang, 113(3–4), 1105–1112

Nabatchi, T. (2010). Addressing the citizenship and democratic deficits: the potential of deliberative democracy for public administration. Am Rev Public Adm, 40(4), 376–399

Nabatchi, T., & Gastil, J. (Eds.). (2012). Democracy in motion: evaluating the practice and impact of deliberative civic engagement. New York: Oxford University Press

Nalau, J., Preston, B. L., & Maloney, M. C. (2015). Is adaptation a local responsibility? Environ Sci Pol, 48, 89–98

Ney, S., & Verweij, M. (2015). Messy institutions for wicked problems: how to generate clumsy solutions?. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(6), 1679–1696

Niemeyer, S. (2013). Democracy and climate change: what can deliberative democracy contribute? Australian Journal of Politics & History, 59(3), 429–448

Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: why frames matter for public engagement. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev, 51(2), 12–23

O'Brien, K. L., & Wolf, J. (2010). A values-based approach to vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang, 1(2), 232–242

O'Lear, S., & Dalby, S. (2015). Reframing climate change: constructing ecological geopolitics Routledge

Ott, K. (2012). Variants of de-growth and deliberative democracy: a Habermasian proposal. Futures, 44(6), 571–581

Pallett, H., & Chilvers, J. (2013). A decade of learning about publics, participation, and climate change: institutionalising reflexivity? Environ Plan A, 45(5), 1162–1183

Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation. In Stephen D. Reese, Oscar H Gandy Jr & August E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 35–65). Mawhaw, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Peters, D., Axsen, J., & Mallett, A. (2017). The role of environmental framing in socio-political acceptance of smart grid: the case of British Columbia, Canada. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,

Pettenger, M. E. (Ed.). (2013). The social construction of climate change: power, knowledge, norms, discourses. London: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.

Phillips, L. (2012). Communicating about climate change in a citizen consultation: dynamics of exclusion and inclusion. In L. Phillips, A. Carvalho & J. Doyle (Eds.), Citizen voices: performing public participation in science and environment communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Pidgeon, N., Demski, C., Butler, C., Parkhill, K., & Spence, A. (2014). Creating a national citizen engagement process for energy policy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Supplement 4), 13606-13613

Pidgeon, N., Parkhill, K., Corner, A., & Vaughan, N. (2013). Deliberating stratospheric aerosols for climate geoengineering and the SPICE project. Nat Clim Chang, 3(5), 451

Potter, E., & Oster, C. (2008). Communicating climate change: public responsiveness and matters of concern. Media International Australia, 127(1), 116–126

Pratt, J. (2015). A guidebook for issue framing. The Kettering Foundation. Retrieved from http://commons.kettering.org/system/files/documents/Issue%20Framing%20Guidebook%202015%20FINAL.pdf

Rabe, B. G. (2007). Beyond Kyoto: climate change policy in multilevel governance systems. Governance, 20(3), 423–444

Rasmussen, L. V., Kirchhoff, C. J., & Lemos, M. C. (2017). Adaptation by stealth: climate information use in the Great Lakes region across scales. Clim Chang, 140(3–4), 451–465

Raymond, L. (2016). Reclaiming the atmospheric commons: the regional greenhouse gas initiative and a new model of emissions trading MIT Press

Rayner, S. (2010). How to eat an elephant: a bottom-up approach to climate policy. Clim Pol, 10(6), 615–621

Rayner, S., & Malone, E. L. (Eds.). (1998). Human choice and climate change. Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Press

Rickard, L. N., Yang, Z. J., Seo, M., & Harrison, T. M. (2014). The “I” in climate: the role of individual responsibility in systematic processing of climate change information. Glob Environ Chang, 26, 39–52

Rickards, L., Wiseman, J., & Kashima, Y. (2014). Barriers to effective climate change mitigation: the case of senior government and business decision makers. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang, 5(6), 753–773

Romsdahl, R. J., Blue, G., & Kirilenko, A. (2018). Action on climate change requires deliberative framing at local governance level. Clim Chang, 149(3–4), 277–287

Romsdahl, R. J., Kirilenko, A., Wood, R. S., & Hultquist, A. (2017). Assessing national discourse and local governance framing of climate change for adaptation in the United Kingdom. Environ Commun, 11(4), 515–536

Sanders, D. (2012). The effects of deliberative polling in an EU-wide experiment: five mechanisms in search of an explanation. Br J Polit Sci, 42(3), 617–640

Sapiains, R., Beeton, R. J., & Walker, I. A. (2016). Individual responses to climate change: framing effects on pro-environmental behaviors. J Appl Soc Psychol, 46(8), 483–493

Schlosberg, D., Collins, L. B., & Niemeyer, S. (2017). Adaptation policy and community discourse: risk, vulnerability, and just transformation. Environmental Politics, 26(3), 413–437

Schoen, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. Basic Books

Shaw, A., Burch, S., Kristensen, F., Robinson, J., & Dale, A. (2014). Accelerating the sustainability transition: exploring synergies between adaptation and mitigation in British Columbian communities. Glob Environ Chang, 25, 41–51

Shaw, C., Hurth, V., Capstick, S., & Cox, E. (2018). Intermediaries’ perspectives on the public’s role in the energy transitions needed to deliver UK climate change policy goals. Energy Policy, 116, 267–276

Shaw, C., & Nerlich, B. (2015). Metaphor as a mechanism of global climate change governance: a study of international policies, 1992–2012. Ecol Econ, 109, 34–40

Simon Rosenthal, C., Rosenthal, J. A., Moore, J. D., & Smith, J. (2015). Beyond (and within) city limits: climate policy in an intergovernmental system. Rev Policy Res, 32(5), 538–555. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12136

Soria-Lara, J. A., & Banister, D. (2017). Dynamic participation processes for policy packaging in transport backcasting studies. Transp Policy, 58, 19–30

Stevenson, H., & Dryzek, J. S. (2014). Democratizing global climate governance Cambridge University Press.

Strauss, A.L., 1987. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press.

Tabara, J. D., Clair, A. L. S., & Hermansen, E. A. (2017). Transforming communication and knowledge production processes to address high-end climate change. Environ Sci Pol, 70, 31–37

Tabuchi, H. (2017, Jan. 28,). In America’s heartland, discussing climate change without saying ‘climate change’. The New York Times Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/28/business/energy-environment/navigating-climate-change-in-americas-heartland.html

Talpin, J., & Wojcik, S. (2010). Deliberating environmental policy issues: comparing the learning potential of online and face-to-face discussions on climate change. Policy Internet, 2(2), 61–93

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. J Bus, , S278

Vink, M. J., Boezeman, D., Dewulf, A., & Termeer, C. J. (2013). Changing climate, changing frames: Dutch water policy frame developments in the context of a rise and fall of attention to climate change. Environ Sci Pol, 30, 90–101

Webler, T., Tuler, S., Dow, K., Whitehead, J., & Kettle, N. (2016). Design and evaluation of a local analytic-deliberative process for climate adaptation planning. Local Environ, 21(2), 166–188

Wiest, S. L., Raymond, L., & Clawson, R. A. (2015). Framing, partisan predispositions, and public opinion on climate change. Glob Environ Chang, 31, 187 198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.006

Williams, L., Macnaghten, P., Davies, R., & Curtis, S. (2017). Framing ‘fracking’: exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom. Public Underst Sci, 26(1), 89–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515595159

Willis, H. H., MacDonald Gibson, J., Shih, R. A., Geschwind, S., Olmstead, S., Hu, J., . . . Moore, M. (2010). Prioritizing environmental health risks in the UAE. Risk Anal, 30(12), 1842–1856

Wong-Parodi, G., Fischhoff, B., & Strauss, B. (2015). Resilience vs. adaptation: framing and action. Clim Risk Manag, 10, 1–7

Young, N., & Coutinho, A. (2013). Government, anti-reflexivity, and the construction of public ignorance about climate change: Australia and Canada compared. Global Environmental Politics, 13(2), 89–108