Abstract
In this study, we tried to show the direct and indirect effect of precipitation and temperature on the production of citrus in Tunisia of a governorate i and the neighboring governorates. To do this, we used a new original analysis of spatial econometrics to take into account in an efficient and finely manner the spatial effects, individual and temporal effects of the spatial autocorrelation. This analysis was done on the basis of global spatial autocorrelation test and the spatial autoregressive model (SAR) as well as the spatial Durbin model (SDM). It appears from our results that the available water in the groundwater table of the governorate i can be an effective solution for the farmer who resides there provided that the means are implemented so that he can benefit. Our robustness results based on the cointegration dynamic panel data, also shows the effect of temperature via the hydric resources of the governorate i and that the neighboring governorates represent a negative spillover effect.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
High-High
Low-Low
See Appendix 1 Table 5.
See Appendix 1 Table 5.
Plant Phenology deals with the chronology of seasonal periodic phenomena of growth and development of plants. It is to observe what is called phenological phases or phenophases, such as foliage, flowering, fruit ripening and leaf drop.
The biosphere is one of geochemical layers of the earth. It consists of all living beings.
AVFA
References
Anselin L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geogr Anal 27(2):93–115
Anselin L, Bera A, Florax RJ, Yoon M (1996) Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Reg Sci Urban Econ 26(1):77–104
Anselin L, Bongiovanni R, Lowenberg De Boer J (2004) A Spatial Econometric Approach to the economics of site-specific nitrogen management in corn production. Am J Agric Econ 86(3):675–687
Ben Zaied Y, Ben Cheikh N (2015) Long-run versus short-run analysis of climate change impacts on agricultural crops. Environ Model Assess 20(3):259–271
Breitung J (2002) Nonparametric tests for unit roots and cointégration. J Econ 108:343–364
Breitung J (2005) A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data. Econ Rev 24:151–173
Delecolle R, Soussana JF, Legros JP (1999) Impacts attendus des changements climatiques sur l’agriculture française. CR Acad Agric Fr 85:45–51
Deschênes O, Greenstone M (2007) The economic impacts of climate change: evidence from agricultural output and random fluctuations in weather. Am Econ Rev 97(1):354–385
Deschênes O, Greenstone M (2012) The economic impacts of climate change: evidence from agricultural output and random fluctuations in weather: replay. Am Econ Rev 102(7):3761–3773
Elhorst JP (2010) Dynamic panels with endogenous interactions effects when T is small. Reg Sci Urban Econ 40:272–282
Fischer G, Sun L (2001) Model-based analysis of future land-use development in China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 85:163–176
Giannakopoulos S, Moriondo M, Lesager P, Tin T (2005) “Climate change impacts in the Mediterranean resulting from a 2°C global temperature rise,” A report for a WWF
Hurlin C, Mignon V (2005) Une synthèse des tests de racine unitaire sur données de panel. Economie et prévision 115:253–294
Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115:53–74
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
IPCC (2001) “Climate change 2007”, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Chang
Jinxia W, Mendelsohn R, Dinar A, Huang J, Rozelle S, Zhang L (2008) The impact of climate change on china’s agriculture. Agric Econ 40:323–337
Kumar KS, Parikh J (2001) Indian agriculture and climate sensitivity. Glob Environ Chang 11(2):147–154
Lee J, Nadolnya D, Hartarska V (2012) “Impact of climate change on agricultural in Asian countries: Evidence from panel study”, paper selected at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Birmingham, February 4–7, 2012
LeSage JP, Pace KR (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton
Levin A, Lin CF, Chu C (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. J Econ 108:1–24
Mawussé KNO (2009) Energy consumption and GDP growth in WAEMU countries: A panel data analysis. MPRA Paper No 15521
Molua E (2006) Turning up the heat on African agriculture: The impact of climate change on Cameroon’s agriculture. Afr J Agric Res Econ 2(1):45–65
Pedroni P (1999) critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61:653–670
Raymond G (2009) “The impact of climate change on India agriculture,” mimeo, University of Maryland College Park
Reinsborough M (2003) A Ricardian model of climate change in Canada. Can J Econ 36:21–40
Rosenzweig CE, Tubiello F, Goldberg R, Bloomfield J (2002) Increased crop damage in the US from excess precipitation under climate change. Glob Environ Chang 12:197–202
Temesgen T (2007) Measuring the economic impact of climate change on Ethiopian agriculture: A Ricardian approach. World Bank Policy Research Paper No. 4342
Weber M, Hauer G (2003) A regional analysis of climate change impacts on canadian agriculture. Can Public Policy 29(2):163–180
Whittle P (1954) On stationary processes in the plane. Biometrica 41:434–449
Zouabi O, Peridy N (2015) The impact of climate change on agriculture: an application of a spatial panel data analysis to Tunisia. Clim Change 133(2):301–320
Acknowledgments
This paper is funded by the LAREQUAD & LEAD Laboratories. Furthermore, we are grateful to Nicolas Peridy (LEAD, France), Mohamed Safouane Ben Aissa (LAREQUAD, Tunisia) and Wassim Jbai (Tunis Business School, TBS, Tunisia) for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zouabi, O., Kadria, M. The direct and indirect effect of climate change on citrus production in Tunisia: a macro and micro spatial analysis. Climatic Change 139, 307–324 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1784-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1784-0