Skip to main content
Log in

The direct and indirect effect of climate change on citrus production in Tunisia: a macro and micro spatial analysis

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we tried to show the direct and indirect effect of precipitation and temperature on the production of citrus in Tunisia of a governorate i and the neighboring governorates. To do this, we used a new original analysis of spatial econometrics to take into account in an efficient and finely manner the spatial effects, individual and temporal effects of the spatial autocorrelation. This analysis was done on the basis of global spatial autocorrelation test and the spatial autoregressive model (SAR) as well as the spatial Durbin model (SDM). It appears from our results that the available water in the groundwater table of the governorate i can be an effective solution for the farmer who resides there provided that the means are implemented so that he can benefit. Our robustness results based on the cointegration dynamic panel data, also shows the effect of temperature via the hydric resources of the governorate i and that the neighboring governorates represent a negative spillover effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. High-High

  2. Low-Low

  3. See Appendix 1 Table 5.

  4. See Appendix 1 Table 5.

  5. See Appendix 1 Tables 6 and 7.

  6. Plant Phenology deals with the chronology of seasonal periodic phenomena of growth and development of plants. It is to observe what is called phenological phases or phenophases, such as foliage, flowering, fruit ripening and leaf drop.

  7. The biosphere is one of geochemical layers of the earth. It consists of all living beings.

  8. AVFA

References

  • Anselin L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geogr Anal 27(2):93–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L, Bera A, Florax RJ, Yoon M (1996) Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Reg Sci Urban Econ 26(1):77–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L, Bongiovanni R, Lowenberg De Boer J (2004) A Spatial Econometric Approach to the economics of site-specific nitrogen management in corn production. Am J Agric Econ 86(3):675–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Zaied Y, Ben Cheikh N (2015) Long-run versus short-run analysis of climate change impacts on agricultural crops. Environ Model Assess 20(3):259–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung J (2002) Nonparametric tests for unit roots and cointégration. J Econ 108:343–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung J (2005) A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data. Econ Rev 24:151–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delecolle R, Soussana JF, Legros JP (1999) Impacts attendus des changements climatiques sur l’agriculture française. CR Acad Agric Fr 85:45–51

  • Deschênes O, Greenstone M (2007) The economic impacts of climate change: evidence from agricultural output and random fluctuations in weather. Am Econ Rev 97(1):354–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deschênes O, Greenstone M (2012) The economic impacts of climate change: evidence from agricultural output and random fluctuations in weather: replay. Am Econ Rev 102(7):3761–3773

  • Elhorst JP (2010) Dynamic panels with endogenous interactions effects when T is small. Reg Sci Urban Econ 40:272–282

  • Fischer G, Sun L (2001) Model-based analysis of future land-use development in China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 85:163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannakopoulos S, Moriondo M, Lesager P, Tin T (2005) “Climate change impacts in the Mediterranean resulting from a 2°C global temperature rise,” A report for a WWF

  • Hurlin C, Mignon V (2005) Une synthèse des tests de racine unitaire sur données de panel. Economie et prévision 115:253–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115:53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA

  • IPCC (2001) “Climate change 2007”, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Chang

  • Jinxia W, Mendelsohn R, Dinar A, Huang J, Rozelle S, Zhang L (2008) The impact of climate change on china’s agriculture. Agric Econ 40:323–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar KS, Parikh J (2001) Indian agriculture and climate sensitivity. Glob Environ Chang 11(2):147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Nadolnya D, Hartarska V (2012) “Impact of climate change on agricultural in Asian countries: Evidence from panel study”, paper selected at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Birmingham, February 4–7, 2012

  • LeSage JP, Pace KR (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton

  • Levin A, Lin CF, Chu C (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. J Econ 108:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawussé KNO (2009) Energy consumption and GDP growth in WAEMU countries: A panel data analysis. MPRA Paper No 15521

  • Molua E (2006) Turning up the heat on African agriculture: The impact of climate change on Cameroon’s agriculture. Afr J Agric Res Econ 2(1):45–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (1999) critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61:653–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond G (2009) “The impact of climate change on India agriculture,” mimeo, University of Maryland College Park

  • Reinsborough M (2003) A Ricardian model of climate change in Canada. Can J Econ 36:21–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig CE, Tubiello F, Goldberg R, Bloomfield J (2002) Increased crop damage in the US from excess precipitation under climate change. Glob Environ Chang 12:197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temesgen T (2007) Measuring the economic impact of climate change on Ethiopian agriculture: A Ricardian approach. World Bank Policy Research Paper No. 4342

  • Weber M, Hauer G (2003) A regional analysis of climate change impacts on canadian agriculture. Can Public Policy 29(2):163–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittle P (1954) On stationary processes in the plane. Biometrica 41:434–449

  • Zouabi O, Peridy N (2015) The impact of climate change on agriculture: an application of a spatial panel data analysis to Tunisia. Clim Change 133(2):301–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is funded by the LAREQUAD & LEAD Laboratories. Furthermore, we are grateful to Nicolas Peridy (LEAD, France), Mohamed Safouane Ben Aissa (LAREQUAD, Tunisia) and Wassim Jbai (Tunis Business School, TBS, Tunisia) for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oussama Zouabi.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 Descriptive statistics of citrus production in micro-spatial scale
Table 5 Panel unit root tests results for Model 3 (Citrus)
Table 6 Pedroni (1999, 2004) panel cointegration results
Table 7 Database

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zouabi, O., Kadria, M. The direct and indirect effect of climate change on citrus production in Tunisia: a macro and micro spatial analysis. Climatic Change 139, 307–324 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1784-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1784-0

JEL classification

Navigation