Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Patterns of hydrological drought indicators in major U.S. River basins

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Climate non-stationarity, changes in land use and water management practices affect regional hydrological extremes. This research considers extreme low streamflow (“low flow” henceforth) and flow deficit characteristics, which are important indicators of water scarcity within the broader context of droughts. The results indicate that the number of stations with positive significant trends in low flows is generally higher than the number of stations with negative significant trends; however, the fraction of total number of stations with negative trends has been increasing in the last four decades while the fraction of total number of stations with positive trends have been decreasing, making a gradual reduction in the wetting tendency in low flows in the conterminous U.S. Regional differences in low flow trends are notable, which echo the local climatic changes and soil moisture trends documented in the recent National Climate Assessment (NCA), as well as the changes in cropping and irrigation practices, and creation of forest plantations. A reversal of trend is seen for some northern regions since 1980s. Patterns in return periods and corresponding return values of low flows are also examined, which suggests changing risk conditions that are important for water-resources decision-making. Persistent low flow conditions in a river can lead to chronic water scarcity—a main driver of societal and cross-boundary conflicts. Thus, this research identifies “hotspot” locations where suitable adaptive management measures are most needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Curran CA, Eng K, Konrad CP (2012) Analysis of low flows and selected methods for estimating low-flow characteristics at partial-record and ungaged stream sites in western Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5078, 46 p

  • DeFries R, Eshleman KN (2004) Land-use change and hydrologic processes: a major focus for the future. Hydrol Process 18:2183–2186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Déry SJ, Wood EF (2005) Decreasing river discharge in northern Canada. Geophys Res Lett 32

  • Douglas EM, Vogel RM, Kroll CN (2000) Trends in foods and low flows in the United States: impact of spatial correlation. J Hydrol 240:90–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falke JA, Fausch KD, Magelky R, Aldred A, Durnford DS, Riley LK, Oad R (2011) The role of groundwater pumping and drought in shaping ecological futures for stream fishes in a dryland river basin of the western great plains, USA. Ecohydrology 4:682–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn RH (2003) Development of regression equations to estimate flow durations and low-flow-frequency statistics in New Hampshire streams: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 02-4298

  • Huber DB, Mechem DB, Brunsell NA (2014) The effects of great plains irrigation on the surface energy balance, regional circulation, and precipitation. Climate 2:103–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2001) Third assessment report. Working Group II: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability; chapter 4: hydrology and water resources. https://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg2/pdf/wg2TARchap4.pdf

  • Kendall MG (1975) Rank correlation methods. Charles Griffin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lins HF (2012) USGS Hydro-Climatic Data Network 2009 (HCDN–2009): U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2012–3047. 4 p. available only at http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2012/3047/

  • Lins HF, Slack JR (1999) Streamflow trends in the United States. Geophys Res Lett 26:227–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann HB (1945) Non-parametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13:245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin GR, Arihood LD (2010) Methods for estimating selected low-flow frequency statistics for unregulated streams in Kentucky. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010-5217

  • McCabe GJ, Wolock DM (2002) Trends and temperature sensitivity of moisture conditions in the conterminous United States. Clim Res 20:19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melillo JM, Terese R, Gary WY (2014) Climate change impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program 841 pp. doi:10.7930/J0Z31WJ2

  • Milly PCD, Dunne KA, Vecchia AV (2005) Global patterns of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature 438:347–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M, Hirsch RM, Kundzewicz ZW, Lettenmaier DP, Stouffer RJ (2008) Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science 319:573–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novotny EV, Stefan HG (2006) Stream flow in Minnesota: indicator of climate change. J Hydrol 334:319–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal I, Anderson BT, Salvucci GD, Gianotti DJ (2013) Shifting seasonality and increasing frequency of precipitation in wet and dry seasons across the US. Geophys Res Lett 40:4030–4035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal I, Towler E, Livneh B (2015) How can we better understand low river flows as climate changes? EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 96. doi:10.1029/2015EO033875

  • Pyrce R (2004) Hydrological low flow indices and their uses. Report 04-2004. Watershed Science Centre

  • Reilly CF, Kroll CN (2003) Estimation of 7-day, 10-year low-streamflow statistics using baseflow correlation. Water Resour Res 3:1236. doi:10.1029/2002WR001740

    Google Scholar 

  • Ries KG, Friesz PJ (2000) Methods for estimating low-flow statistics for Massachusetts streams. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 00-4135

  • Ryberg KR and Vecchia AV (2012) waterData- An R package for retrieval, analysis, and anomaly calculation of daily hydrologic time series data, version 1.0. Open-File Report 2012-1168, U.S. Geological Survey

  • Schilling KE, Jha MK, Zhang YK, Gassman PW, Wolter CF (2008) Impact of land use and land cover change on the water balance of a large agricultural watershed: Historical effects and future directions. Water Resour Res 44:W00A09. doi:10.1029/2007WR006644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen PK (1968) Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. J Am Stat Assoc 63:1379–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffield J, Eric FW (2008) Projected changes in drought occurrence under future global warming from multi-model, multi-scenario, IPCC AR4 simulations. Clim Dyn 31:79–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren TJ, Chase TN, Pielke RA, Kittel TGF, Baron JS (1998) Evidence that local land use practices influence regional climate, vegetation, and stream flow patterns in adjacent natural areas. Glob Chang Biol 4:495–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomer MD, Schilling KE (2009) A simple approach to distinguish land-use and climate-change effects on watershed hydrology. J Hydrol 376:24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (2012) Background information on the definition and characteristics of low flows, the relationship between low flows and aquatic life criteria, and design flows. Flow 101. DFLOW. http://water.epa.gov/scitech/datait/models/dflow/flow101.cfm

  • van Vliet MTH, Yearsley JR, Ludwig F, Vögele S, Lettenmaier DP, Kabat P (2012) Vulnerability of US and European electricity supply to climate change. Nat Clim Chang 2(9):676–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanShaar JR, Haddeland I, Lettenmaier DP (2002) Effects of land-cover changes on the hydrological response of interior Columbia river basin forested catchments. Hydrol Process 16:2499–2520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite DA, Buchanan-Smith M (2005) Drought as hazard: understanding the natural and social context. In: Drought and water crises: science, technology, and management issues

  • World Meteorological Organization (WMO) (2009) WMO statement on the status of the global climate in 2009. ISBN 978-92-63-11055-8

  • Yulianti JS, Burn DH (1998) Investigating links between climatic warming and low streamflow in the prairies region of Canada. Can Water Resour J 23:45–60. doi:10.4296/cwrj2301045

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We extend our thanks to Dr. Erin Towler from NCAR for reading the revised manuscript for helping us locating the editorial mistakes, as well as providing valuable scientific comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA

    Maryam Pournasiri Poshtiri & Indrani Pal

Authors
  1. Maryam Pournasiri Poshtiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Indrani Pal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Indrani Pal.

Electronic supplementary material

Fig. S1

(DOCX 121 kb)

Fig. S2

(DOCX 376 kb)

Fig. S3

(DOCX 362 kb)

Fig. S4

(PPTX 364 kb)

Fig. S5

(DOCX 126 kb)

Fig. S6

(DOCX 400 kb)

Fig. S7

(DOCX 227 kb)

Fig. S8

(PPTX 171 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Poshtiri, M.P., Pal, I. Patterns of hydrological drought indicators in major U.S. River basins. Climatic Change 134, 549–563 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1542-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1542-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation