Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries: revisiting the assumptions

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The United Nations Framework on Climate Change (UNFCCC), at its thirteenth meeting in 2005 (COP-11), agreed to start a work program to explore a range of policy approaches and positive incentives for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD). This process was further encouraged in the 2007 COP-13 with the explicit consideration of REDD activities as a means to enhance mitigation action by developing countries in the future. This paper outlines the context of this ongoing political process by reviewing the science indicating that land-use change is a key contributor of greenhouse emissions globally and the assumptions that REDD activities may be competitive—in terms of cost effectiveness—in comparison to other mitigation options. The paper then examines REDD proposals submitted by Parties before COP-13 and identifies key economic, technological, methodological and institutional challenges associated with their implementation. These proposals are discussed in the light of major drivers of deforestation and ongoing efforts to address deforestation. This reveals another set of challenges which, if not taken into account, may undermine REDD effectiveness. The paper aims to aid the policy process and contribute to the best possible design of a REDD framework under the future climate regime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achard F, Eva HD, Mayaux P, Stibig HJ et al (2004) Improved estimates of net carbon emissions from land cover change in the tropics for the 1990s. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 18:GB2008. doi:10.1029/2003GB002142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asner GP, Knapp DE, Broadbent E et al (2005) Selective logging in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 310:480–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benítez PC, McCallum I, Obersteiner M et al (2007) Global potential for carbon sequestration: geographical distribution, country risk and policy implications. Ecol Econ 60:572–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd E, Hultman N, Timmons Roberts J, et al (2009) Reforming the CDM for sustainable development: lessons learned and policy futures. Environ Sci Policy 12(7):820–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown K, Pearce DW (eds) (1994) The causes of tropical deforestation. UCL, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown K, Boyd E, Corbera E et al (2004) How do CDM projects contribute to sustainable development? Technical report 16, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research

  • Bruner AG, Gullison RE, Rice RE et al (2001) Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291(5501):125–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomitz KM, Gray DA (1995) Roads, land use, and deforestation, a spatial model applied to Belize. World Bank Econ Rev 10(3):487–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomitz KM, Buys P, DeLuca G et al (2006) At loggerheads? Agricultural expansion, poverty reduction, and the environment in the tropics. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbera E (2008) Who owns forest carbon? Paper presented at the Rural Property and Inequality Workshop, University of East Anglia, 1–2 September 2008

  • Corbera E, Brown K (2008) Building institutions to trade ecosystem services: marketing forest carbon in Mexico. World Dev 36(10):1956–1979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbera E, Kosoy N, Martínez Tuna M (2006) Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: case studies from Meso-America. Glob Environ Change 17:365–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbera E, Brown K, Adger WN (2007) The equity and legitimacy of markets for ecosystem services. Dev Change 38(4):587–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbera E, González Soberanis C, Brown K (2009) Institutional dimensions of payments for ecosystem services. An analysis of Mexico’s carbon forestry programme. Ecol Econ 68:743–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowles PD, Rakotoarisoa S, Rasolonirinamanana H et al (2001) Facilitation, participation, and learning in an ecoregionbased planning process: The case of AGERAS in Toliara, Madagascar. In: Buck LE, Geisler CC, Schelhas J et al (eds) Biological diversity: balancing interests through adaptive collaborative management. CRC Press

  • Cox PM, Betts RA, Jones CD et al (2000) Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature 408:184–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropper M, Puri J, Griffiths C (2001) Predicting the location of deforestation. Land Econ 77(2):172–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis C, Daviet F, Nakhooda S et al (2009) A review of 25 readiness plan idea notes from the World Bank forest carbon partnership facility. WRI working paper. World Resources Institute, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong BHJ, Hellier A, Castillo-Santiago MA et al (2005) Application of the ‘CLIMAFOR’ approach to estimate baseline carbon emissions of a forest conservation project in the Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, Mexico. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Chang 10:265–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFries RS, Houghton RA, Hansen MC (2002) Carbon emissions from tropical deforestation and regrowth based on satellite observations for the 1980s and 90s. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:14256–14261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFries R, Asner GP, Achard F et al (2005) Monitoring tropical deforestation for emerging carbon markets. In: Mountinho P, Schwartzman S (eds) Tropical deforestation and climate change. IPAM and Environmental Defense, Belem, pp 35–44

  • DeFries R, Achard F, Brown S et al (2006) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation in developing countries: considerations for monitoring and measuring. Paper presented at the GOFC-GOLD workshop on monitoring tropical deforestation for compensated reductions, Jena, Germany, 21–22 March 2006

  • Deininger K, Minten B (1996) Determinants of forest cover and the economics of protection: an application to Mexico. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon RK, Brown S, Houghton RA et al (1994) Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263:185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley NA, Belokurov O, Borodin L et al (2004) Are protected areas working? An analysis of protected areas. WWF International, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling J, Yasué M (2008) Generating carbon finance through avoided deforestation and its potential to create climatic, conservation and human development benefits. Philos Trans R Soc B 363:1917–1924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espach R (2006) When is sustainable forestry sustainable? The forest stewardship council in Argentina and Brazil. Glob Environ Polit 6(2):55–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewers R (2006) Interaction between economic development and forest cover determine deforestation rates. Glob Environ Change 16:161–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faminow MD (1998) Cattle, deforestation, and development in the Amazon: an economic, agronomic, and environmental perspective. CAB International, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2006) FAO global forest resource assessment 2005. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2001) Global forest resources assessment 2000. FAO, Rome

  • Ferraro PJ, Kiss A (2002) Direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science 298:1718–1719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field CB, Behrenfeld MJ, Randerson JT et al (1998) Primary production of the biosphere: integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science 281:237–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freestone D (2009) The international climate change legal and institutional framework: an overview. In: Freestone D, Streck C (eds) Legal aspects of carbon trading: Kyoto, Copenhagen and beyond. Oxford University Press

  • Fuchs D (2006) Private actors in tropical deforestation governance. Wittenberg-Zentrum Für Globale Ethik. Diskussionspapier Nr. 2006-2

  • Geist H, Lambin E (2001) What drives tropical deforestation? A meta-analysis of proximate and underlying causes of deforestation based on subnational case study evidence. LUCC (Land Use and Land Use Cover Change), Louvain

  • Government of Brazil (2008) Amazon Fund Brazil. http://www.mma.gov.br/estruturas/208/_arquivos/amazon_fund_brazil_2008_site.pdf

  • Grainger A (1993) Controlling tropical deforestation. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieg-Gran M (2006) The cost of avoiding deforestation: report prepared for the Stern review of the economics of climate change. International Institute for Environment and Development, London

  • Haites E (2004) Estimating the market potential for the clean development mechanism: review of models and lessons learned. PCFplus report, Washington DC, 19 June

  • Hansen MC, DeFries RS (2004) Detecting long-term global forest change using continuous fields of tree-cover maps from 8-km Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) data for the years 1982-99. Ecosystems 7:695–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herold M, Achard F, DeFries R et al (2006) Report of the workshop on monitoring tropical deforestation for compensated reductions. In: GOFC-GOLD symposium on forest and land cover observations, Jena, Germany, 21–22 March 2006

  • Hoare AL (2006) Divided forests: towards fairer zoning of forest lands. The Rainforest Foundation

  • Houghton RA (2003) Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850–2000. Tellus 55:378–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton RA (2005) Tropical deforestation as a source of greenhouse gas emissions. In: Moutinho P, Schwartzman S (eds) Tropical deforestation and climate change. IPAM and Environmental Defense, Belem

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton RA, Hackler JL (2002) Carbon flux to the atmosphere from land-use changes. Oak Ridge, CDIAC. Online at: http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/trends/landuse/landuse.htm (July 25, 2005)

  • Humphreys D (2006) Logjam. Deforestation and the crisis of global governance. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2000) Land use, land-use change and forestry. Special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (IEA) (2005) G8 climate change action plan and the investment framework the technology and financing context and issues. Montreal, CoP11 UK/IEA Side-event, 5 December 2005

  • International Energy Agency (IEA) (2006) Energy technology perspectives in support of the gleneagles plan of action: scenarios & strategies to 2050. OECD/IEA, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • International Tropical Timber Organisation (ITTO) (2005) Status report of tropical forest management 2005. ITTO, Yokohama

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) IPCC fourth assessment report, working group III. Chapter 9, Forestry. Available online at: www.ipcc.ch

  • IUCN (2006) Working for conservation. Programme Report 2006. Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaimowitz D, Angelsen A (1998) Economic models of tropical deforestation: a review. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Indonesia

  • Lele U, Viana V, Veríssimo A, et al (2000) Brazil forests in the balance: challenges of conservation with development. TheWorld Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lescuyer G, Emerit A, Essiane Mendoula E et al (2001) Community involvement in forest management: a full-scale experiment in the South Cameroon Forest. Rural Development Forestry Network, Overseas Development Institute

  • Mamingi N, Chomitz KM, Gray DA et al (1996) Spatial patterns of deforestation in Cameroon and Zaire. World Bank, Washington, DC, Working paper 8, Research Project on Social and Environmental Consequences of Growth-Oriented Policies, Policy Research Department

  • Mayrand K, Paquin M (2004) Payments for environmental services: a survey and assessment of current schemes. Unisfera International Centre, Montreal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey&Company (2009) Pathways to a low-carbon economy: version 2 of the global greenhouse gas abatement cost curve

  • Melillo JM, McGuire AD, Kicklighter DW et al (1993) Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production. Nature 363:234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens B, Lambin EF (2000) Land cover-change trajectories in southern Cameroon. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 90(3):467–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens B, Poccard-Chapuis R, Piketty MG et al (2002) Crossing spatial analyses and livestock economics to understand deforestation processes in the Brazilian Amazon: the case of São Félix do Xingú in South Pará. Agriculturan Economics 27:269–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Mission Permanente de la France auprès de l’Office des Nations Unies à Genève (2006) Innovative ways to fund development: an international solidarity contribution. Embassy of France, Geneva

  • Morton D, DeFries R, Shimabukuro Y et al (2005) Rapid assessment of annual deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon using MODIS data. Earth Interact 9:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Piña C, Guevara A, Torres JM et al (2008) Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico’s forests: analysis, negotiations and results. Ecol Econ 65:725–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson G, Hellerstein D (1997) Do roads cause deforestation? Using satellite images in econometric analysis of land use. Am J Agric Econ 79:80–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobre CA, Sellers P, Shukla J (1991) Regional climate change and Amazonian deforestation model. J Climate 4:957–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni L, Streck C, Dutschke M (2007) Mobilizing public and private resources for the protection of tropical forests. CATIE and BIOCONSULT

  • Rudel T, Coomes O, Moran E et al (2005) Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change. Glob Environ Change 15:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santilli M, Moutinho P, Schwartzman S et al (2005) Tropical deforestation and the Kyoto protocol: an editorial essay. Clim Change 71:267–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sathaye JA, Makundi W, Dale L et al (2007) GHG mitigation potential, costs and benefits in global forests: a dynamic partial equilibrium approach. Energy J 3:127–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlamadinger B, Ciccarese L, Dutschke M et al (2005) Should we include avoidance of deforestation in the international response to climate change? In: Murdiyarso D, Herawati H (eds) Carbon forestry: who will benefit? Proceedings of workshop on carbon sequestration and sustainable livelihoods. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, pp 26–41

  • Schwarze R, Niles J, Olander J (2002) Understanding and managing leakage in forest-based greenhouse-gas-mitigation projects. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 360(1797):1685–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva-Dias MA, Rutledge F, Kabat S et al (2002) Cloud and rain processes in a biosphere-atmosphere interaction context in the Amazon Region. J Geophys Res (Atmospheres) 107(D20):1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Skutsch M, Bird N, Trines E et al (2006) Clearing the way for reducing emissions from tropical deforestation. Environ Sci Policy 10(4):322–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares-Filho BS, Nepstad D, Curran L et al (2006) Modelling conservation in the Amazon basin. Nature 440:520–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohngen B, Sedjo R (2006) Carbon sequestration costs in global forests. Energy J 27:109–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern N (2006) Stern review: the economics of climate change. HM Treasury UK Government, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Stoll-Kleeman S, Bender S, Berghöfer A et al (2006) Linking governance and management perspectives with conservation success in protected areas and biosphere reserves. Discussion paper 01 of the Governance and Biodiversity Research Group, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

  • Subak S (2000) Forest protection and reforestation in Costa Rica: evaluation of a clean development mechanism prototype. Environ Manag 26(3):283–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmermann A, Oberhuber J, Bacher A et al (1999) Increased El Niño frequency in a climate model forced by future greenhouse warming. Nature 398:694–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth K, Hoar TJ (1997) El Niño and climate change. Geophys Res Lett 24:3057–3060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trines E, Höhne N, Jung M et al (2006) Integrating agriculture, forestry and other land use in future climate regimes: methodological issues and policy options. WAB report 500101002. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Bilthoven

  • UNFCCC (2006b) Background paper for the workshop on reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries part II policy approaches and positive incentives, Rome, Italy, 30 August–1 September 2006

  • UNFCCC (2007) Views on the range of topics and other relevant information relating to reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries: submissions from parties. FCCC/SBSTA/2007/MISC.2

  • UNFCCC (2009) Ad Hoc working group on long-term cooperative group under the convention. Fourth Session Poznan, 1–11 December 2008. FCCC/AWGLCA/2008/16/Rev.1

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2006a) Background paper for the workshop on reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries part I scientific, socio-economic, technical and methodological issues related to deforestation in developing countries, Rome, Italy, 30 August–1 September 2006

  • Vera Diaz MC, Schwartzman S (2005) Carbon offsets and land use in the Brazilian Amazon. In: Moutinho P, Schwartzman S (eds) Tropical deforestation and climate change. IPAM and Environmental Defense, Belem

  • von Amsberg J (1998) Economic parameters of deforestation. World Bank Econ Rev 12(1):133–153

    Google Scholar 

  • White A, Cannell MGR, Friend AD (1999) Climate change impacts on ecosystems and the terrestrial carbon sink: a new assessment. Glob Environ Change 9(S1):S21–S30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2007a) State and trends of the carbon market 2007. Washington DC. May 2007. In cooperation with the International Emissions Trading Association

  • World Bank (2007b) Forest carbon partnership facility. A framework for piloting activities to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. World Bank, Washington DC

  • World Resources Institute (2005) Navigating the numbers greenhouse gas data and international climate policy. World Resources Institute, Washington DC

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of International Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK

    Esteve Corbera & Katrina Brown

  2. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK

    Esteve Corbera & Katrina Brown

  3. Overseas Development Group, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK

    Manuel Estrada

Authors
  1. Esteve Corbera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manuel Estrada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Katrina Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esteve Corbera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corbera, E., Estrada, M. & Brown, K. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries: revisiting the assumptions. Climatic Change 100, 355–388 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9773-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9773-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation