Abstract
This paper examines the effects of climatic and non-climatic factors on the mean and variance of corn, soybean and winter wheat yield in southwestern Ontario, Canada over a period of 26 years. Average crop yields increase at a decreasing rate with the quantity of inputs used, and decrease with the area planted to the crop. Climate variables have a major impact on mean yield with the length of the growing season being the primary determinant across all three crops. Increases in the variability of temperature and precipitation decrease mean yield and increase its variance. Yield variance is poorly explained by both seasonal and monthly climate variable models. Projections of future climate change suggest that average crop yield will increase with warmer temperatures and a longer growing season which is only partially offset by forecast increases in the variability of temperature and rainfall. The projections would also depend on future technological developments, which have generated significant increases in yield over time despite changing annual weather conditions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams RM, McCar BA, Segerson K, Rosenzweig C, Bryant KJ, Dixon BL, Conner R, Evenson RE, Ojima D (1999) The economic effects of climate change on US agriculture. In: Mendelsohn R, Neumann JE (eds) The impact of climate change on the United States Economy, chap 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 18–55
Adams RM, Wu J, Houston L (2003) Climate change and California, appendix IX: the effects of climate change on yields and water use of major California crops. California Energy Commission, Public Interest Energy Research, Scramento CA. Available online at: http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/2003-10-31_500-03-058CF_A09.PDF
CCAF (2002) Climate change impacts and adaptation: a Canadian perspective. Agriculture. Government of Canada, Ottawa
Chang CC (2002) The potential impacts of climate change on Taiwan’s agriculture. Agric Econ 27:51–64
Chen CC, McCarl BA, Schimmelpfennig DE (2004) Yield variability as influenced by climate: a statistical investigation. Clim Change 66(1–2):239–261
Dixon BL, Hollinger SE, Garcia P, Tirupattur V (1994) Estimating corn yield response models to predict impacts of climate change. J Agric Res Econ 19:58–68
Granger OE (1980) The impact of climatic variation on the yield of selected crops in three California counties. Agric Meteorol 22:367–386
Hansen L (1991) Farmer response to changes in climate: the case of corn production. J Agric Res Econ 43:18–25
Judge GG, Griffiths WE, Hill RC, Lutkepohl H, Lee TC (1985) The theory and practice of econometrics. John Wiley and Sons, New York
Just RE, Pope RD (1978) Stochastic specification of production functions and economic implications. J Econom 7:67–86
Just RE, Pope RD (1979) Production function estimation and related risk considerations. Am J Agric Econ 61:276–284
Kaufmann RK, Snell SE (1997) A biophysical model of corn yield: integrating climatic and social determinants. Am J Agric Econ 79:178–190
Lobell DB, Asner GP (2003) Climate and management contributions to recent trends in US agricultural yields. Science 299:1032
McKenney DW, Pedlar JH, Papadopol P, Hutchinson MF (2006) The development of 1901–2000 historical monthly climate models for Canada and the United States. Agric Meteorol 138:69–81
Mendelsohn R, Dinar A (1999) Climate change, agriculture and developing countries: does adaptation matter? The World Bank Research Observer 14:277–293
Mendelsohn R, Reinsborough M (2007) A Ricardian analysis of US and Canadian farmland. Clim Change 81:9–17
Pannell DJ (2006) Flat earth economics: the far-reaching consequences of flat payoff functions in economic decision making. Rev Agric Econ 28:553–566
Philips DL, Lee JJ, Dodson RF (1996) Sensitivity of the US Corn Belt to climate change and elevated CO2:I. corn and soybean yields. Agric Syst 52:481–502
Rajsic P, Weersink A (2008) Do farmers waste fertilizer?: a comparison of ex post optimal nitrogen rates and ex ante recommended rates by model, site and year. Agric Syst 97:56–67
Reidsma P, Ewert F, oude Lansink A (2007) Analysis of farm performance in Europe under different climatic and management conditions to improve understanding of adaptive capacity. Clim Change 84:403–422
Reinsborough MJ (2003) A Ricardian model of climate change in Canada. Can J Econ 36:22–40
Rickard B, Fox G (1999) Have grain yields in Ontario reached a plateau? Food Rev Int 15:1–17
Rosenzweig C, Iglesias A, Yang XB, Epstein PR, Chivian E (2001) Change and extreme weather events. Implications for food production, plant diseases, and pests. Global Change Human Health 2(1):90–104
Saha A, Havenner A, Talpaz H (1997) Stochastic production function estimation: small sample properties of ML versus FGLS. Appl Econ 29:459–469
Segerson K, Dixon BL (1999) Climate change and agriculture: the role of farmer adaptation. In: Mendelsohn R, Neumann JE (eds) The impact of climate change on the United States economy, chap 4. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 75–93
Southworth J, Pfeiffer RA, Habeck M, Randolph JC, Doering OC, Johnston JJ, Rao DG (2002) Changes in soybean yields in the Midwestern United States as a result of future changes in climate variability and CO2 fertilization. Clim Change 53:447–475
Waggoner PE (1979) Variability of annual wheat yields since 1909 and among nations. J Agric Meteorol 20:41–45
Weber M, Hauer G (2003) A regional analysis of climate change impacts on Canadian agriculture. Can Public Policy 24(1):163–180
Weiss A, Hays CJ, Won J (2003) Assessing winter wheat responses to climate change scenarios: a simulation study in the U.S. Great Plains. Clim Change 58:119–147
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cabas, J., Weersink, A. & Olale, E. Crop yield response to economic, site and climatic variables. Climatic Change 101, 599–616 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9754-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9754-4