Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative analysis of real and \(\mathcal{P}\mathcal{T}\)-symmetric Scarf potentials

  • Published:
Czechoslovak Journal of Physics Aims and scope

Abstract

The Scarf I and Scarf II potentials are discussed within a common mathematical framework, which is then specified to handle the two potentials separately both in the conventional Hermitian and in the \(\mathcal{P}\mathcal{T}\)-symmetric setting. The physically admissible solutions are identified in each case together with the corresponding energy eigenvalues. Several main differences between the \(\mathcal{P}\mathcal{T}\)-symmetric Scarf I and II potentials are pointed out. These include the presence and absence of the quasi-parity quantum number, the sign of the pseudo-norm, the mechanism of the spontaneous breakdown of \(\mathcal{P}\mathcal{T}\) symmetry and the non-\(\mathcal{P}\mathcal{T}\) orthogonality of otherwise admissible solutions in the Scarf I potential. Similarities and differences with respect to the corresponding Hermitian systems are also pointed out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Cooper, A. Khare, and U. Sukhatme: Supersymmetry in Quantum Mechanics, World Scientific, Singapore, 2001.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. L. Infeld and T.E. Hull: Rev. Mod. Phys. 23 (1951) 21.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. L.E. Gendenshtein: Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. Pisma Red. 38 (1983) 299; (Eng. transl.: JETP Lett. 38 (1983) 35).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Lévai: J. Phys. A 22 (1989) 689.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Cooper, J.N. Ginocchio, and A. Khare: Phys. Rev. D 36 (1987) 2458.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. C.M. Bender and S. Boettcher: Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 5243.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Lévai and M. Znojil: J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33 (2000) 7165.

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Lévai and M. Znojil: Mod. Phys. Lett. A 30 (2001) 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Bagchi and R. Roychoudhury: J. Phys. A 33 (2000) L1.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Znojil: J. Phys. A 33 (2000) L61.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Znojil: J. Phys. A 33 (2000) 4561.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Znojil: Phys. Lett. A 259 (1999) 220.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Znojil and G. Lévai: Phys. Lett. A 271 (2000) 327.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Znojil: Phys. Lett. A 264 (1999) 108.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. G. Lévai, A. Sinha, and P. Roy: J. Phys. A 36 (2003) 7611.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Sinha, G. Lévai, and P. Roy: Phys. Lett. A 322 (2004) 78.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Z. Ahmed: Phys. Lett. A 282 (2001) 343.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. B. Bagchi and C. Quesne: Phys. Lett. A 273 (2000) 285.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. G. Lévai, F. Cannata, and A. Ventura: J. Phys. A 34 (2001) 839.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. G. Lévai, F. Cannata, and A. Ventura: J. Phys. A 35 (2002) 5041.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. G. Lévai and M. Znojil: J. Phys. A 35 (2002) 8793.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. B. Bagchi, C. Quesne, and M. Znojil: Mod. Phys. Lett. A 16 (2001) 2047.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. B. Bagchi, S. Mallik, and C. Quesne: Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16 (2001) 2859.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. G. Lévai: to be published in J. Phys. A

  25. D.T. Trinh: J. Phys. A 38 (2005) 3665.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. C.M. Bender and B. Tan: J. Phys. A 39 (2006) 1945.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. G. Lévai, F. Cannata, and A. Ventura: Phys. Lett. A 300 (2002) 271.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. G.A. Natanzon: Teor. Mat. Fiz. 38 (1971) 146.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun: Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  30. J.W. Dabrowska, A. Khare, and U.P. Sukhatme: J. Phys. A 21 (1988) L195.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. A. Khare and U.P. Sukhatme: J. Phys. A 21 (1988) L501.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. W.M. Frank and D.J. Land: Rev. Mod. Phys. 43 (1971) 36.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz: Quantum Mechanics, Pergamon, London, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lévai, G. Comparative analysis of real and \(\mathcal{P}\mathcal{T}\)-symmetric Scarf potentials. Czech J Phys 56, 953–966 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10582-006-0391-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10582-006-0391-0

Key words

Navigation