Abstract
Quick drying after water or sweat absorption is an important function of underwear. In this study, the hydroxy groups of cotton knitted fabrics (CFs) were partially acetylated, maintaining the original fabric structure. The following three heterogeneous acetylation processes were used: Ac-I (Ac2O/H2SO4/toluene), Ac-II (Ac2O/H2SO4/AcOH/water), and Ac-III (Ac2O/AcONa) systems (Ac2O, acetic anhydride; AcOH, acetic acid; AcONa, sodium acetate). Acetylated cotton knitted fabrics (AcCFs) with degree of substitution (DS) ≤ 0.5 and yields of > 80% were prepared. AcCFs prepared with the Ac-III system gave high degree of polymerization (DP) values of > 1500, whereas those prepared with the Ac-II system exhibited low DP values of ≤ 400. The moisture contents of AcCFs at 20 °C and 65% relative humidity decreased from 7.1 to 4.7% with increasing DS value up to 0.46; introducing hydrophobic acetyl groups into the CFs decreased their hydrophilic nature. Quick drying similar to that of a polyester fabric was achieved for some of the AcCFs with DS values of < 0.2. When the acetyl groups in the AcCFs were homogeneously distributed across each fiber width (achieved for AcCFs prepared with the Ac-II system), quick drying was evident in the AcCFs. The crystallinities and crystal widths of cellulose I for the AcCFs with DS values of ≤ 0.28 were almost unchanged compared with those of the original CFs. However, neither the crystallinities nor crystal widths of cellulose I were directly related to quick drying after water absorption. Thermal degradation of the AcCFs varied between the acetylation systems, and depended on the DP values and/or the presence of sulfate ester groups in the AcCFs.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Cotton knitted fabrics (CFs) are comfortable and compatible with human skin as well as offering quick sweat absorption, and thus underwear is mainly produced from cotton or cotton-based fabrics. However, slow sweat-drying properties are often a shortcoming of CFs. Some polyester fabrics and polyester/cotton blended fabrics have been developed to improve sweat-drying rates or quick-drying performance after water or sweat absorption (Yoo et al. 2000; Demiryürek and Uysaltürk 2013; Liu et al. 2013; Kuramoto 2016; Mizuhashi et al. 2016; Atasağun et al. 2018; Dai et al. 2019), despite their lesser compatibility with human skin. Furthermore, fine particles formed by abrasion during laundry treatment of polyester clothes might cause marine micro/nano-plastic problems (Napper and Thomson 2016; De Falco et al. 2018; Fontana et al. 2020; Šaravanja et al. 2022). Therefore, if underwear CFs exhibit both high sweat-absorption properties and quick sweat drying, demand for such CFs might expand as functional underwear for consumers. However, these two aforementioned functions of CFs are commonly in opposition to one another.
Polyesters are more hydrophobic than cotton cellulose. Thus, if suitable quantities of hydrophobic groups are introduced into hydroxy groups of CFs through covalent bonds, the partially hydrophobic substituent-containing CFs are expected to have both of the aforementioned functions with an optimum balance. In this study, three acetylation reactions under various conditions were applied to a CF sample to improve quick drying after water absorption. First, the original fabric structure should be maintained after acetylation; i.e., heterogeneous acetylation to the CF is required. Second, the degrees of substitution (DS) of the acetyl groups should be as low as possible for maintaining hydrophilicity or sweat absorption.
The following three acetylation systems were used in this study: (Ac-I) acetic anhydride (Ac2O), conc. H2SO4, and toluene system (used as the acetylation reagent, esterification catalyst, and organic solvent without dissolution in the system, respectively; Watanabe et al. 1968; Taira et al. 2020); (Ac-II) Ac2O, conc. H2SO4, acetic acid (AcOH), and water system (in which water helps prevent dissolution of the cotton knitted fabric in the acetylation medium; Tsuji et al. 1960a, 1960b; Shaikh et al. 2009; Tatsumi and Inoue 2016); and (Ac-III) Ac2O and sodium acetate (AcONa) system (used as the acetylation reagent/solvent and base catalyst, respectively, without using another solvent; Koroskenyi and McCarthy 2001). The quantities of chemicals and solvents, as well as the acetylation temperatures and reaction times, were varied to prepare acetylated cotton knitted fabrics (AcCFs). The yields, DS values, viscosity-average degrees of polymerization (DPv), and moisture contents at 20 °C and 65% relative humidity (RH) of the AcCFs, were measured, and their fiber surface morphologies, X-ray diffraction (XRD) crystallinities, distributions of acetyl groups, and thermogravimetric (TG) properties were analyzed. The obtained results are discussed for explaining the mechanism of quick water-drying properties of the AcCFs.
Many studies on partial acetylation of cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) have been conducted in terms of improving their thermal stabilities and compatibilities in melt compounding with synthetic polymers (Sofla et al. 2019; Huang et al. 2019; Beaumont et al. 2020; Koso et al. 2022). Acetylation of cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) surfaces has also been investigated to add a surface-hydrophobic nature and thus improve their compatibility with hydrophobic polymers for good reinforcement. This is because in the literature, partial acetylation of the hydroxy groups of CNFs improves their thermal degradation temperatures from ~ 300 °C for the original CNFs to ~ 350 °C (suitable for melt compounding with synthetic polymers; Agustin et al. 2017; Yano et al. 2018; Lee et al. 2020; Semba et al. 2021), although the reported acetylation reactions were performed with organic solvents such as N-methyl-2-pyrolidone. However, no studies on acetylation of CFs to improve quick drying after water absorption have been reported, to the present authors’ knowledge.
Materials and methods
Samples
Cotton knitted fabrics (100%) with the yarn count, fabric weight, and thickness of 40/1, 190 g/m2, and 1.1 mm, respectively. An alkali-treated CF was prepared by soaking the original CF in 18% NaOH at 60 °C for 6 min under 120–130% uniaxial stretching, followed by thorough washing with water until the washing effluent was neutral (Utsumi 1965; Wakida et al. 2002). These CFs were heated in water containing a nonionic surfactant (1 g/L; RS-400, Sanyo Kasei Kogyo, Kyoto, Japan) and Na2CO3 (5 g/L) at 70 °C for 20 min followed by thorough washing with water. Then, surfactant-treated CF samples that had not been dried were bleached in H2O2-containing water (3.8 g/L) at 70 °C and pH 10.6 (adjusted with dilute aqueous NaOH) for 20 min followed by thorough washing with water. These treatments were performed to remove impurities and knitting oils present in the original fabrics. The samples were dried at 20 °C and 65% RH for > 1 d until no change in mass was detected. Figure S1 in the Electronic Supplementary Material shows scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the original and alkali-treated CFs. Ac2O, 98% H2SO4, AcONa, and toluene were of special grades (Fujifilm Wako Chemicals, Osaka, Japan). Glacial AcOH (> 99.7%) was obtained from Alfar Aesar (Haverhill, MA, USA). These chemicals were used as received.
Acetylation with Ac2O/H2SO4/toluene (Ac-I) system
Cotton knitted fabrics or alkali-treated CF (9.5 g by dry mass) and AcOH (200 g) were placed in a stainless dyeing pod (440 mL). The lid of the pod was closed and the pod was rotated at 30 °C for 30 min with a mini-color dyeing system (12EL, TEXAM, Nagoya, Japan) as pretreatment. The AcOH-containing fabric was picked up from the pod and squeezed to decrease the AcOH/fabric mass to ~ 23.75 g (i.e., ~ 150% pick-up rate) with a padding machine. This AcOH-containing cotton knitted fabric was placed in the dyeing pod; then, AcOH (200 g) and H2SO4 (0.5 g) were added to the pod. The pod was rotated at 30 rpm and 30 °C for 1 min with the mini-color dyeing system for mixing. The AcOH/H2SO4-containing fabric was picked up from the pod and squeezed to decrease the AcOH/H2SO4/fabric mass to ~ 23.75 g with the padding machine, then placed in a glass reactor. Ac2O (77 g) and toluene (185 g) were added to the glass reactor, and the mixture was heated at 30 °C from 10 min to 18 h. The AcCF was picked up from the reaction mixture and washed thoroughly with ethanol, water, and hot water, in that order. The wet AcCFs were dried at 40 °C for 1 h followed by drying at 20 °C and 65% RH for > 1 d.
Acetylation with Ac2O/H2SO4/water (Ac-II) system
Cotton knitted fabrics (3.6 g by dry mass), AcOH (1.26 g), and water (52.8 g) were placed in the stainless dyeing pod, and the pod was rotated at 25 °C for 1 h with the mini-color dyeing system for mixing. The AcOH/water/fabric sample was picked up from the pod and squeezed to decrease the mass to ~ 7.2 g (i.e., AcOH/water/fabric mass ratio of ~ 0.08/3.52/3.6) with the padding machine. Then, the AcOH/water/fabric sample was added to a mixture consisting of designated quantities of Ac2O, H2SO4, AcOH, and water in the pod. The mixture was rotated for acetylation under various conditions (Table S1 of the Electronic Supplementary Material). The AcCFs were picked up and washed thoroughly with water, hot water, and water in that order. The wet AcCFs were heated at 40 °C for 1 h followed by drying at 20 °C and 65% RH for > 1 d.
Acetylation with Ac2O/AcONa (Ac-III) system
To the stainless dyeing pod (1 L), CF (15 g) as well as designated quantities of AcONa and water were added. The pod was rotated at 25 °C for 15 min with the mini-color dyeing system for mixing. The water/AcONa/fabric sample was picked up from the pod and squeezed to decrease the mass to ~ 34.5 g with the padding machine, and the water in the mixture was largely removed at 120 °C for 3 min with a pin tenter (OPT-1A, Tsuji Dyeing Machine MFG Osaka, Japan). The dried AcONa/fabric sample was soaked in Ac2O (324 g) for 20 s in a glass beaker. The Ac2O/AcONa/fabric sample was squeezed to decrease the mass to ~ 37.5 g and placed in polyethylene/aluminum double sealing bags. The mixture was reacted under various conditions to prepare AcCFs followed by washing thoroughly with water, hot water, and water in that order. Table S1 in the Electronic Supplementary Material shows detailed acetylation conditions. The samples were heated at 40 °C for 1 h followed by drying at 20 °C and 65% RH for > 1 d.
Evaluation of quick drying of wet fabrics
Quick drying of the wet fabrics was measured from the volatile residual water contents (BOKEN Test Standard BQE A 028) (Kuramoto 2016). Deionized water (0.6 mL) was added to a fabric sample (10 cm × 10 cm); then, the time-dependent water/fabric masses were monitored at 20 °C and 65% RH. The residual water content of the fabric sample was obtained with Eq. (1),
where Wt is the water content (g) after time t (min), and W0 is the water content (g) immediately after water addition. The quick-drying performance of fabrics was defined as the t (min) when the residual water content decreased to 10 w/w%.
Analyses of fabric samples
The moisture content of AcCFs conditioned at 20 °C and 65% RH was measured after drying the conditioned samples in an oven at 105 °C for 2 h in accordance with JIS L-1096 8.10. Degrees of substitution (DS) of the AcCFs were determined by saponification and back-titration in accordance with ASTM 817–12. Yields of the AcCFs were calculated from the mass recovery ratios of the AcCFs, considering their DS values in accordance with Eq. (2),
where 162.1, 1.0, and 43.0 are the gram/mol values of glucosyl unit, proton, and acetyl group, respectively.
The air-dried fabric sample was cut into short fibers with scissors, and the sample (~ 0.04 g by dry mass) was dissolved in 0.5 M copper ethylenediamine (EDA) hydroxide [Cu(EDA)2(OH)2, 20 mL] by stirring the mixture for ~ 30 min. The intrinsic viscosities of the solutions were measured at 25 °C with a Cannon–Fenske capillary viscometer (ISO/FDIS 5351 2010). The obtained intrinsic viscosity [η] values were calculated to the corresponding DPv values with the Mark–Houwink–Sakurada equation: [η] = 0.909 × DPv0.9 (Marx 1955; Isogai et al. 1989; Ono et al. 2023). Surface SEM images of the AcCFs were obtained for gold-spattered samples at 15 kV (TM 4000 Plus II, Hitachi-High-Tech, Tokyo, Japan). X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the AcCFs were obtained with Cu Kα radiation (XRD-6100, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) from 5° to 45° at diffraction angle 2θ, 40 kV, and 30 mA. Crystallinities of cellulose I for the AcCFs were calculated from the XRD patterns by the following three methods: Method A (Segal et al. 1959), Method B: the relative diffraction intensity of the (1 − 1 0) peak to the background (Isogai and Usuda 1990), and Method C: peak deconvolution/least squares/peak-area calculation methods using Gaussian and Lorentzian functions (Ono et al. 2021, 2022) (Fig. S2 in the Electronic Supplementary Material), which was slightly different from those reported by Yao et al. (2020). Thermogravimetric (TG) curves of the AcCFs (~ 8.5 mg each) were obtained (DTG-60, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) from room temperature to ~ 600 °C at 10 °C/min under an N2 gas stream at 300 mL/min. PeakFit (ver. 4.12; Hulinks, Tokyo, Japan) was used for peak deconvolution. X-ray fluorescence analysis (XFA; ZSX-Primus IV, Rigaku, Tokyo Japan) was used for elemental analysis of the AcCFs (φ 30 mm).
Distribution of acetyl groups in the acetylated fabrics and fibers
A red reactive dye (5% by dry mass of sample; Cibacron scarlet LS-2G, Ciba Specialty Chemicals, Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was applied to the AcCFs with Na2CO3 (20 g/L) and Na2SO4 (80 g/L) at 60 °C for 30 min, followed by soaping with water containing a detergent (2 g/L) at 60 °C for 10 min and thorough successive washing with water. The L*a*b* color coordinates of the dye-treated cotton knitted fabrics were measured with a spectrophotometer (CM-3600d, Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan). The AcCF samples were thermally pressed with poly(propylene) (PP) pellets at 200 °C for 20 s to embed the AcCF in the PP matrix. Cross sections of the AcCF/PP composite were cut with a diamond knife. The degree of C = O absorption in the cross sections was measured at several points by microscopic Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (Spotlight 400-attached PerkinElmer Frontier IR, Waltham, MA, USA). An imaging attenuated total reflectance (ATR) probe was used at 8-cm−1 resolution and 1.56-μm pixel size.
Results and discussion
Acetylation of cotton knitted fabrics
The CFs were heterogeneously acetylated to partially introduce hydrophobic acetyl groups into cellulose, maintaining the original fabric structure. Three acetylation methods [i.e., Ac-I) the Ac2O/H2SO4/toluene, Ac-II) Ac2O/H2SO4/AcOH/water, and Ac-III) Ac2O/AcONa systems] were applied to the CFs (Figs. 1 and S3, and Table S1 in the Electronic Supplementary Material). The quick water-drying properties of the AcCFs were studied in terms of their yields, DS values, DPv values, moisture contents, fiber surface morphologies, distributions of acetyl groups, XRD crystallinities, and TG behavior. In the Ac-I and Ac-III systems, the original fabric structures were maintained after acetylation. In the Ac-II system, the CFs were dissolved in the acetylation medium when the CF/water mass ratio was 1/0–1/0.9. When the CF/water mass ratio was 1/1.2–1/6, the AcCFs were fine powders. Thus, the CF/water mass ratio was adjusted to 1/7.5 and 1/9 in the Ac-II system (Fig. 1).
The morphologies of the CF surfaces were observed by SEM (Fig. 2). Fine cotton cellulose fibrils were observed on all of the fiber surfaces. The AcCF sample with DS 1.32 prepared with the Ac-I system exhibited smooth fiber surfaces almost similar to those of the original CF. However, the fiber surfaces of the AcCF sample with DS 2.10 were partially damaged. The AcCF sample with DS 0.07 prepared with the Ac-II system exhibited smooth fiber surfaces, whereas that with DS 0.10 exhibited substantially damaged fiber surfaces. The use of conc. H2SO4 and water in the Ac-II system may have caused such fiber damages with substantial depolymerization, as discussed in the following section. The fiber surfaces of the AcCF sample with DS 0.28 (prepared with the Ac-III system) were mostly smooth. Thus, the fiber surfaces were damaged depending on the acetylation system and the obtained DS value.
Yields as well as DS and DP v values of the acetylated cotton fabrics
The mass recovery ratios of the AcCFs were plotted against their DS values (Fig. S4 in the Electronic Supplementary Material). The mass recovery ratios roughly increased with increasing DS value. The yields were calculated from the mass recovery ratios of the AcCFs and their DS values in accordance with Eq. (2), and thus should be ≤ 100% (Fig. 3a). The yields of the AcCFs prepared with the Ac-I system were almost 100% for the entire range of DS values. However, the AcCFs samples that were prepared with the Ac-II and Ac-III systems were prone to decreasing yield with increasing DS. Cellulose acetates with DS values of 0.3–0.9 are water-soluble (Kamide et al. 1981, 1987; Miyamoto et al. 1985; Iijima et al. 1992; Gomez-Bujedo et al. 2004; Cao et al. 2016; Pang et al. 2016). Thus, cellulose acetate molecules with low DS values in the AcCFs might have become increasingly water-soluble, resulting in decreased yield.
The cellulose acetates prepared in this study have heterogeneous chemical structures consisting of cellulose and partially acetylated cellulose molecules with various ratios. Furthermore, the acetate ester groups might have been partially or mostly removed from the cellulose acetate molecules during dissolution in strongly alkaline 0.5 M Cu(EDA)2(OH)2. Thus, the DPv values obtained in this study exhibited approximate DP values. All the samples were dissolved in 0.5 M Cu(EDA)2(OH)2, and reliable viscosities of the solutions with small standard deviations were obtained (Fig. 3b). The AcCFs roughly decreased in terms of DPv with increasing DS. AcCFs prepared with the Ac-III system gave higher DPv values than those of the other AcCFs at similar DS values. The DPv values of AcCFs with DS values lower than 0.14 prepared with the Ac-II system substantially decreased from 2300 for the original CF to 300–400. Thus, H2SO4 (the acetylation catalyst) corresponded to depolymerization. In particular, when both H2SO4 and water were in the acetylation system, substantial acid hydrolysis was unavoidable.
Figure S5a in the Electronic Supplementary Material shows the relationship between the reaction time at 30 °C in the Ac-I system and the DS values of the AcCFs. The DS value increased with increasing reaction time. The alkali-treated cotton fabric gave higher DS values at the same reaction time. Figure S5b shows the relationship between the mass ratio of water/CF in the Ac-II system and the DS values of the AcCFs. At low water/CF mass ratios of < 0.9, the DS values of the AcCFs were higher than 1.2. However, these samples were soluble in the reaction media, and the original fabric structure was lost. When the water/CF mass ratios were > 7.5, the original fabric structures were maintained. Figure S6 shows relationships between the AcONa/CF mass ratios, reaction time at 80 °C, or reaction temperature for 4 h versus the DS values of the AcCFs prepared with the Ac-III system. As the AcONa/CF mass ratio increased or the reaction temperature increased, the DS value of the products increased. The reaction time at 80 °C had almost no influence on the DS values within the tested reaction times.
Quick drying of acetylated cotton fabrics after water absorption
Figure 4 shows the moisture contents of the AcCFs prepared under various conditions after conditioning at 20 °C and 65% RH. The moisture contents decreased with increasing DS of the AcCFs. Partial introduction of hydrophobic acetyl groups into the CF resulted in partial reduction of the hydrophilic nature of the original CF. Figure S7 in the Electronic Supplementary Material shows the relationships between the DPv values of the AcCFs and their moisture contents. No clear relationship between these two factors was obtained.
Figure 5 shows the relationship between the DS values of the AcCFs and the drying times to 10% water content after water absorption, used as an index of quick drying. The target drying time was 58 ± 3.3 min, obtained from a polyester fabric. Some AcCFs with DS values of 0.06–0.12 prepared with the Ac-I and Ac-II systems exhibited drying times of < 65 min, which is close to that of the polyester fabric. Thus, quick drying similar to that of the polyester fabric after water absorption was achieved by partial acetylation of the CF under suitable conditions. AcCFs prepared with the Ac-III system exhibited longer drying times or inferior quick drying after water absorption than the other AcCFs.
Figure S8a shows the relationship between the moisture content of the AcCFs at 20 °C, 65% RH, and a drying time to 10% water content after water absorption. Some of the AcCFs prepared with the Ac-I and Ac-II systems exhibited moisture contents of 6.5–7.4%, similar to that of the original CF. Thus, AcCFs prepared with the Ac-I and Ac-II systems under suitable conditions exhibited quick drying after water absorption, whereas they absorbed moisture similarly to that of the original CF. These properties might be beneficial as underwear for good comfort and quick sweat absorption, although their low DPv values (and probably low mechanical strengths) prepared with the Ac-II system (Fig. 3b) should be considered during production.
Figure S8b in the Electronic Supplementary Material shows the relationship between the DPv values of the AcCFs versus drying time to 10% water content after water absorption. It was difficult to obtain a conclusion from the results in Fig. S8b because of the insufficient number of data points.
Distribution of acetyl groups in AcCFs and their fibers
Figure S9 shows photographs of reactive red dye-treated AcCFs, and Fig. S10 shows the relationship between the optical a* values of the AcCFs versus either DS values or drying time to 10% water content after water absorption. The a* value decreased with increasing DS of acetyl groups of the samples, because the reactive red dye molecules cannot react with or adsorb on acetyl groups. However, no clear relationships were obtained in Fig. S10. This is probably because the acetylation used in this study was a heterogeneous liquid/fabric reaction, and the water drying time might be influenced not only by acetyl groups on the fabric surface but also those inside the fabric.
Then, the distributions of acetyl groups across each fiber width for the AcCFs were analyzed in terms of the fiber cross sections by microscopic FTIR–ATR, in which the infrared (IR) absorption ratios of A1730/A1030 were used as markers of degrees of acetylation. The IR absorption intensities at 1730 and 1030 cm−1 were regarded as peaks ascribed to the acetyl C = O group and cellulose backbone in the AcCFs, respectively (Fig. S11 in the Electronic Supplementary Material). The distribution was not straightforward; AcCFs prepared with the Ac-I and Ac-III systems exhibited rather heterogeneous distributions of acetyl groups between one surface and the opposite surface sides. In contrast, AcCFs prepared with the Ac-II system exhibited homogeneous distributions of acetyl groups between one surface and opposite surface sides. The aforementioned homogeneous distributions might correspond to high quick-drying performance (Fig. 5).
XRD patterns, crystallinities, and crystal widths of acetylated cotton fabrics
The alkali-treated CF was used for acetylation only in the Ac-I system. This is because, in the initial stage of this study, the alkali-treated CF was expected to have higher DS values than the original CF by acetylation. The DS values for the alkali-treated CF after acetylation were higher than those of AcCFs prepared from the original CF at the same reaction time (Fig. S5a), yet the differences in DS between the two CFs were insubstantial. This is probably because the crystallinity of cellulose I of the alkali-treated CF was ~ 81%, which was close to that (~ 85%) of the original CF, when calculated by the Method A (Fig. S2). However, a small diffraction peak owing to the (1–10) plane of cellulose II was detected in the XRD pattern of the alkali-treated cotton fabric (Fig. S12). The original CF was then used in the other acetylation systems.
Figure 6 shows XRD patterns of the AcCFs prepared with the Ac-I system. Figures S13 and S14 in the Electronic Supplementary material show those prepared with the Ac-II as well as Ac-III systems, respectively. The original cellulose I crystal structures were mostly maintained for AcCFs with DS values of ≤ 1.3; heterogeneous acetylation of the CF mostly proceeded on the crystalline cellulose microfibril surfaces over the aforementioned DS range. The AcCF sample with DS 2.20 mainly exhibited a cellulose I-type crystal structure, although a small diffraction peak at ~ 9° because of a cellulose triacetate I crystal structure was detected (Watanabe et al. 1968; Sikorski et al. 2004; Wada and Hori 2009; Taira et al. 2020).
Figure 7a and b show the crystallinities of cellulose I for the AcCFs (measured by the three methods) and the crystal widths calculated from the full width at half height of the (2 0 0) peak with Scherrer’s equation, respectively. The crystallinities measured by the three methods gave similar results. The original crystallinities were mostly maintained up to DS 0.28, and then linearly decreased with increasing DS. Thus, some of the crystalline regions in the original CF became disordered with increasing DS of acetylation. In contrast, the crystal widths were mostly unchanged over a wide DS range of ≤ 1.32.
Figure S15 in the Electronic Supplementary Material shows the relationship between the DPv values of the AcCFs and their crystallinities with cellulose I. No clear relationship was obtained. Based on the results for the AcCFs (Fig. 7), Fig. 8 shows a schematic of a single cellulose microfibril in the cotton fabric during heterogeneous acetylation. Over the DS range of ≤ 1.32, the original crystal width of ~ 6 nm was maintained, whereas crystalline regions of cellulose decreased for acetylated fabrics with a DS of > 0.28. The DPv value decreased with increasing DS of the AcCFs.
TG of acetylated cotton fabrics
TG analysis was applied to the CF and alkali-treated CF sample (Fig. 9a). The CF and alkali-treated CF exhibited almost the same TG curves, and exhibited a temperature of ~ 330 °C at 5% mass loss by thermal degradation.
Regarding AcCFs prepared with the Ac-I system, the thermal degradation temperatures clearly decreased to ~ 250 °C for DS values from 0.06 to 1.32 (Fig. 9b). Thus, these AcCFs were thermally unstable. When AcCFs with DS values of ≤ 0.14 were prepared with the Ac-II system, the TG curves were almost the same as that of the original CF. The AcCF sample with DS 1.18 was somewhat unstable to thermal degradation (Fig. 9c). In contrast, AcCFs prepared with the Ac-III system clearly exhibited increased thermal degradation temperatures (Fig. 9d). Figure S16 shows the relationships between the DS values, moisture contents, crystallinities of cellulose I, or DPv values of the AcCFs versus their temperatures at 5% mass loss in the TG curves. No clear relationships were obtained between any of the four factors in Fig. S16 and the thermal degradation temperatures.
It has been reported that CNCs containing protonated sulfate ester groups exhibit lower thermal degradation temperatures of < 200 °C (Kargarzadeh et al. 2012; Vanderfleet et al. 2019, 2022; D’Acierno et al. 2020), as in the case of the AcCFs prepared with the Ac-I system in this study. Thus, the relative sulfur contents of the original CF, two AcCFs with DS values of 0.06 and 1.32 prepared with the Ac-I system, as well as two AcCFs with DS values of 0.10 and 0.11 prepared with the Ac-II system were analyzed by XFA. The two AcCFs prepared with the Ac-I system had sulfur contents of 4.1 and 3.5 µg/cm2, whereas the other two AcCFs and the original CF had lower sulfur contents of 0.1–0.3 µg/cm2 (Fig. S17). Thus, the results of the low thermal degradation temperatures of the AcCFs prepared with the Ac-I system correspond to the presence of thermally unstable protonated sulfate ester groups. The Ac-I system introduced not only acetyl ester groups but also sulfate ester groups into CF, whereas the Ac-II system caused no sulfate ester formation, irrespective of the presence of H2SO4 in the acetylation system. The higher DPv values of the AcCFs with the Ac-III system might correspond to the higher thermal degradation temperatures compared with those prepared with the Ac-II system, although these samples contained almost no sulfate ester groups. As a consequence, AcCFs prepared with the Ac-III system at 80 °C for 4 h have higher thermal degradation temperatures than that of the original CF, and have high DPv values that are close to that of the original CF.
Conclusions
AcCFs with DS of ≤ 0.5 and yields of > 80% were prepared with three heterogeneous acetylation systems. The AcCFs prepared with the Ac-III system exhibited high DPv values of > 1500, whereas those prepared with the Ac-II system exhibited low DP values of ≤ 400. Acid hydrolysis of the cellulose molecules was evident during acetylation with H2SO4 and water at 40 or 80 °C. The moisture contents of the AcCFs at 20 °C and 65% RH decreased from 7.1% to ~ 4.7% with increasing DS up to 0.46; introducing hydrophobic acetyl groups into the CFs decreased their hydrophilic nature. Quick-drying performance was achieved for some AcCFs with DS values of < 0.2, prepared with the Ac-II system, similar to that of a polyester fabric. The homogeneous distributions of acetyl groups across each fiber width in the AcCFs prepared with the Ac-II system might correspond to substantial quick drying. However, the DPv values of these AcCFs substantially decreased to < 400, and their mechanical properties might be insufficient for use in commercial underwear. The crystal widths of cellulose I for AcCFs with DS values of ≤ 1.38 were ~ 6 nm, and were unchanged from that of the original CF. The crystallinities of cellulose I were unchanged for AcCFs with DS values of ≤ 0.28. Neither the crystallinities nor the crystal widths of cellulose I for the AcCFs corresponded to quick drying after water absorption. Thermal degradation of the AcCFs depended on their DPv values and/or the presence of protonated sulfate ester groups in the AcCFs.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
References
Agustin MB, Nakatsubo F, Yano H (2017) Improved resistance of chemically-modified nanocellulose against thermally-induced depolymerization. Carbohydr Polym 164:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.084
Atasağun HG, Okur A, Psikuta A, Rossi RM, Annaheim S (2018) Determination of the effect of fabric properties on the coupled heat and moisture transport of underwear-shirt fabric combinations. Text Res J 88:1319–1331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517517700192
Beaumont M, Winklehner S, Veigel S, Mundigler N, Gindl-Altmutter W, Potthast A, Rosenau T (2020) Wet esterification of never-dried cellulose: a simple process to surface-acetylated cellulose nanofibers. Green Chem 22:5605–5609. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0gc02116d
Cao J, Sun X, Lu C, Zhou Z, Zhang X, Yuan G (2016) Water-soluble cellulose acetate from waste cotton fabrics and the aqueous processing of all-cellulose composites. Carbohydr Polym 149:60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.086
D’Acierno F, Hamad WY, Michal CA, MacLachlan MJ (2020) Thermal degradation of cellulose filaments and nanocrystals. Biomacromol 21:3374–3386. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00805
Dai B, Li K, Shi LX, Wan XZ, Liu X, Zhang FL, Jiang L, Wang ST (2019) Bioinspired Janus textile with conical micropores for human body moisture and thermal management. Adv Mater 31:2904113. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201904113
De Falco F, Gullo MP, Gentile G, Di Pace E, Cocca M et al (2018) Evaluation of microplastic release caused by textile washing processes of synthetic fabrics. Environ Pollut 236:916–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.057
Demiryürek O, Uysaltürk D (2013) Thermal comfort properties of Viloft/cotton and Viloft/polyester blended knitted fabrics. Text Res J 83:1740–1753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517513478458
Fontana GD, Mossotti R, Montarsolo A (2020) Assessment of microplastics release from polyester fabrics: the impact of different washing conditions. Environ Pollut 264:113960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.113960
Gomez-Bujedo S, Fleury E, Vignon MR (2004) Preparation of cellouronic acids and partially acetylated cellouronic acids by TEMPO/NaClO oxidation of water-soluble cellulose acetate. Biomacromol 5:565–571. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm034405y
Huang L, Wu Q, Wang Q, Wolcott M (2019) One-step activation and surface fatty acylation of cellulose fibers in a solvent-free condition. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:15920–15927. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01974
Iijima H, Kowsaka K, Kamide K (1992) Determination of sequence distribution of substituted and unsubstitued glucopyranose units in water-soluble cellulose acetate chain as revealed by enzymatic degradation. Polym J 24:1077–1097. https://doi.org/10.1295/polymj.24.1077
ISO/FDIS 5351 (2010) Pulps Determination of limiting viscosity number in cupriethylenediamine (CED) solution
Isogai A, Usuda M (1990) Crystallinity indexes of cellulosic materials. Sen’i Gakkaishi 46:324–329. https://doi.org/10.2115/fiber.46.8_324
Isogai A, Mutoh N, Onabe F, Usuda M (1989) Viscosity measurements of cellulose/SO2-amine-dimethylsulfoxide solution. Sen’i Gakkaishi 45:299–306. https://doi.org/10.2115/fiber.45.7_299
Kamide K, Saito M, Abe T (1981) Dilute solution properties of water-soluble incompletely substituted cellulose acetate. Polym J 13:421–431. https://doi.org/10.1295/polymj.13.421
Kamide K, Okajima K, Kowsaka K, Matsui T (1987) Solubility of cellulose acetate prepared by different methods and its correlationships with average acetyl group distribution on glucopyranose units. Polym J 19:1405–1412. https://doi.org/10.1295/polymj.19.1405
Kargarzadeh H, Ahmad I, Abdullah I, Dufresne A, Zainudin SY, Sheltami RM (2012) Effects of hydrolysis conditions on the morphology, crystallinity, and thermal stability of cellulose nanocrystals extracted from kenaf bast fibers. Cellulose 19:855–866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2175-7
Koroskenyi B, McCarthy SP (2001) Synthesis of acetylated konjac glucomannan and effect of degree of acetylation on water absorbency. Biomacromol 2:824–826. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm010014c
Koso T, Beaumont M, Tardy BL, Rico del Cerro D, Eyley S, Thielemans W, Rojas OJ, Kilpeläinen I, King AWT (2022) Highly regioselective surface acetylation of cellulose and shaped cellulose constructs in the gas-phase. Green Chem 24:5604–5613. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2gc01141g
Kuramoto M (2016) Testing method of water, absorbing quick drying property, ratified by ISO from Japan. Sen’i Gakkaishi 72:5145–5217. https://doi.org/10.2115/fiber.72.P-514
Lee JH, Park SH, Kim SH (2020) Surface alkylation of cellulose nanocrystals to enhance their compatibility with polylactide. Polymers 12:178. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12010178
Liu H, Yang Y, Shen S, Zhong Z, Zheng L, Feng P (2013) Research on Influence of fabric texture and stretch on absorption and quick-drying of seamless underwear. Adv Tex Eng Mater 672:622–626. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.627.622
Marx M (1955) Viskosimetrische molekulargewichtsbestimmung von cellulose in kupfer-äethylendiamin. Makromol Chem 14:157–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.1955.020160118
Miyamoto T, Sato Y, Shibata T (1985) 13C-NMR spectral studies on the distribution of substituents in water-soluble cellulose acetate. J Polym Sci Polym Chem Ed 23:1373–1381. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1985.170230511
Mizuhashi H, Kamijo M, Yoshida H, Kubo M (2016) Evaluation of thermal wearing comfort of underwear made by blended yarn with polypropylene. J Fiber Sci Technol 72:220–226. https://doi.org/10.2115/fiberst.2016-0032
Napper IE, Thomson RC (2016) Release of synthetic microplastic plastic fibres from domestic washing machines: effects of fabric type and washing conditions. Mar Pollut Bull 112:39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.09.025
Ono Y, Takeuchi M, Zhou Y, Isogai A (2021) TEMPO/NaBr/NaClO and NaBr/NaClO oxidations of cotton linters and ramie cellulose samples. Cellulose 28:6035–6049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-03944-1
Ono Y, Takeuchi M, Isogai A (2022) Characterization of solid-state structures, molar masses, and microfibril structures of cellulose in never-dried cotton fibers and ramie bast fibers. Cellulose 29:9105–9119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04835-9
Ono Y, Hou G, Chitbanyong K, Takeuchi M, Isogai A (2023) Molar masses and molar mass distributions of commercial regenerated cellulose materials and softwood dissolving pulp determined by SEC/MALLS. Cellulose 30 (in press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05414-2
Pang J, Liu X, Yang J, Lu F, Wang B, Xu F, Ma M, Zhang X (2016) Synthesis of highly polymerized water-soluble cellulose acetate by the side reaction in carboxylate ionic liquid q-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate. Sci Rep 6:33725. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33725
Šaravanja A, Pušić T, Dekanić T (2022) Microplastics in wastewater by washing polyester fabrics. Materials 15:2683. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15072683
Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE Jr, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-Ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051755902901003
Semba T, Ito A, Kitagawa K, Kataoka H, Nakatsubo F, Kuboki T, Yano H (2021) Polyamide 6 composites reinforced with nanofibrillated cellulose formed during compounding: effect of acetyl group degree of substitution. Composites A 145:106385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106385
Shaikh HM, Pandare KV, Nair G, Varma AJ (2009) Utilization of sugarcane bagasse cellulose for producing cellulose acetates: novel use of residual hemicellulose as plasticizer. Carbohydr Polym 76:23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.09.014
Sikorski P, Wada M, Heux L, Shintani H, Stokke BT (2004) Crystal structure of cellulose triacetate I. Macromolecules 37:4547–4553. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma0498520
Sofla MRK, Batchelar W, Kosinkova J, Pepper R, Brown R, Rainey T (2019) Cellulose nanofibres from bagasse using a high speed blender and acetylation as a pretreatment. Cellulose 26:4799–4814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02441-w
Taira S, Tsuruhara M, Saito R, Koda K, Uraki Y, Konno H, Shimamoto S (2020) Cellulose acetate with CTA I polymorph can be defibrated into nanofibers to produce a highly transparent nanopaper. Cellulose 27:4991–5001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03156-z
Tatsumi D, Inoue S (2016) Material properties of cellulose acetate prepared from celluloses having different molecular weights. J Soc Mater Sci 65:371–375. https://doi.org/10.2472/jsms.65.371
Tsuji W, Kitamaru R, Sakaguchi Y (1960a) Studies on the fibrous acetylation of cotton I. Acetylation of cotton fabric by the liquid phase method. Sen’i Gakkaishi 16:1020–1026. https://doi.org/10.2115/fiber.16.1020
Tsuji W, Kitamaru R, Sakaguchi Y, Kimura F (1960b) Studies on the fibrous acetylation of cotton II. Acetylation of cotton fabric by the semi-liquid phase method (so-called padding method). Sen’i Gakkaishi 16:1026–1031. https://doi.org/10.2115/fiber.16.1026
Utsumi N (1965) On the submicroscopic changes of cotton fibers due to mercerization. Sen’i Gakkaishi 21:579–585. https://doi.org/10.2115/fiber.21.579
Vanderfleet OM, Reid MS, Bras J, Heux L, Godoy-Vargas J, Panga MKR, Cranston ED (2019) Insight into thermal stability of cellulose nanocrystals from new hydrolysis methods with acid blends. Cellulose 26:507–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2175-7
Vanderfleet OM, D’Acierno F, Isogai A, MacLachlan MJ, Michael CA, Cranston ED (2022) Effects of surface chemistry and counterion selection in the thermal behavior of carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals. Chem Mater 34:8248–8261. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c01665
Wada M, Hori R (2009) X-Ray diffraction study of the thermal expansion behavior of cellulose triacetate I. J Polym Sci Polym Phys 47:517–523. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.21657
Wakida T, Lee M, Park SJ, Hayashi A (2002) Hot mercerization of cottons. Sen’i Gakkaishi 58:304–307. https://doi.org/10.2115/fiber.58.304
Watanabe S, Takai M, Hayashi J (1968) An X-ray study of cellulose triacetate. J Polym Sci Part C Polym Symp 23:825–835. https://doi.org/10.1002/polc.5070230238
Yano H, Omura H, Honma Y, Okumura H, Sano H, Nakatsubo F (2018) Designing cellulose nanofiber surface for high density polyethylene reinforcement. Cellulose 25:3351–3362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1787-2
Yao W, Weng Y, Catchmark JM (2020) Improved cellulose X-ray diffraction analysis using Fourier series modeling. Cellulose 27:5563–5579. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576716013297
Yoo HS, Kim HuYS, EA, (2000) Effects of heat and moisture transport in fabrics and garments determined with a vertical plate sweating skin model. Text Res J 70:542–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051750007000612
Acknowledgments
We thank Michael Scot Long, Ph.D, Edanz for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by The University of Tokyo. This study was supported in part by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO), Japan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SO and CT contributed to conception, design, and the experiments. AI supervised the proposed concept. SO performed almost all experiments, and wrote the original draft. All authors performed data analysis, and read and approved the final manuscript for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence this study.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Onodera, S., Tanaka, C. & Isogai, A. Acetylation of cotton knitted fabrics for improved quick drying after water absorption. Cellulose 31, 3993–4006 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-024-05846-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-024-05846-4