Abstract
There are growing research interests in flax fibers due to their renewable ‘green’ origin and high strength. However, these natural fibers easily absorb moisture and have poor adhesion with polymer matrix leading to low interfacial strength for the composites. A hybrid chemical treatment technique combining alkali (sodium hydroxide) and silane treatments is adopted in the current study to modify flax fibers for improved performances of flax/polypropylene composites. Changes in chemical composition, microstructure, wettability, surface morphology, crystallinity and tensile properties of single flax fiber before and after chemical treatments were comprehensively characterized using techniques including SEM, FTIR, AFM, XRD, micro-fiber tester, etc. It was found that hemicellulose and lignin at the fiber surface were removed due to alkali treatment, which helped to reduce moisture absorption of the composites. Alkali-treated flax fibers were later subjected to silane treatment, which helped to improve the compatibility between flax fiber and polypropylene matrix. After alkali-silane hybrid chemical treatment, moisture absorption of the composites was further decreased. At the same time, the interfacial bonding strength between flax and polypropylene is significantly enhanced. All these results validate the great advantage of the hybrid chemical treatment approach for flax/polypropylene composites, which has the potential to promote the application of chemical treatment techniques in the plant fiber composite industry.
Graphic abstract
Data availability
The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time due to technical or time limitations.
References
Akter T, Nur HP, Sultana S, Islam MR, Abedin MJ, Islam Z (2018) Evaluation of mechanical properties of both benzoyl peroxide treated and untreated teak sawdust reinforced high density polyethylene composites. Cellulose 25:1171–1184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1620-3
Alvarez VA, Vázquez A (2006) Influence of fiber chemical modification procedure on the mechanical properties and water absorption of MaterBi-Y/sisal fiber composites. Compos Part A 37:1672–1680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.10.005
Alvarez VA, Ruscekaite RA, Vazquez A (2003) Mechanical properties and water absorption behaviour of composites made from a biodegradable matrix and alkaline-treated sisal fibres. J Compos Mater 37:1575–1588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998303035180
ASTM (2017) D3039 / D3039M-17, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials, ASTM International West Conshohocken, PA, USA. doi:https://doi.org/10.1520/D3039_D3039M-17
ASTM (2015) D7264 / D7264M-15, Standard Test Method for Flexural Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. doi:https://doi.org/10.1520/D7264_D7264M-15
Asyraf MRM, Rafidah M, Azrina A, Razman MR (2021) Dynamic mechanical behaviour of kenaf cellulosic fibre biocomposites: a comprehensive review on chemical treatments. Cellulose 28:2675–2695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-03710-3
Azwa ZN, Yousif BF, Manalo AC, Karunasena W (2013) A review on the degradability of polymeric composites based on natural fibres. Mater Des 47(9):424–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.11.025
Balaji AN, Nagarajan KJ (2017) Characterization of alkali treated and untreated new cellulosic fiber from Saharan aloe vera cactus leaves. Carbohydr Polym 174:200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.065
Borchani KE, Carrot C, Jaziri M (2015) Untreated and alkali treated fibers from Alfa stem: effect of alkali treatment on structural, morphological and thermal features. Cellulose 22(3):1577–1589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0583-5
Célino A, Gonçalves O, Jacquemin F, Fréour S (2014) Qualitative and quantitative assessment of water sorption in natural fibres using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Polym 101:163–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.023
César dos Santos J, Ávila de Oliveira L, Panzera TH, Remillat CDL, Farrow I, Placet V, Scarpa F (2020) Ageing of autoclaved epoxy/flax composites: effects on water absorption, porosity and flexural behaviour. Compos B Eng 202:108380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108380
Cheng M, Zhong Y, Kureemun U, Cao D, Hu H, Lee HP, Li S (2020) Environmental durability of carbon/flax fiber hybrid composites. Compos Struct 234:111719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111719
Cho D, Lee HS, Han SO (2009) Effect of fiber surface modification on the interfacial and mechanical properties of kenaf fiber-reinforced thermoplastic and thermosetting polymer composites. Compos Interfaces 16:711–729. https://doi.org/10.1163/092764409X12477427307537
Conzatti L, Brunengo E, Utzeri R, Castellano M, Hodge P, Stagnaro P (2018) Macrocyclic oligomers as compatibilizing agent for hemp fibres/biodegradable polyester ecocomposites. Polymer 146:396–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.05.053
Dalmis R, Köktaş S, Seki Y, Kılınç AÇ (2020) Characterization of a new natural cellulose based fiber from Hierochloe Odarata. Cellulose 27:127–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02779-1
Doan TTL, Brodowsky H, Mäder E (2012) Jute fibre/epoxy composites: surface properties and interfacial adhesion. Compos Sci Technol 72(10):1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.03.025
Dong Z, Hou X, Sun F, Zhang L, Yang Y (2014) Textile grade long natural cellulose fibers from bark of cotton stalks using steam explosion as a pretreatment. Cellulose 21(5):3851–3860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0401-5
Esteves B (2009) Wood modification by heat treatment: a review. BioResources 4(1):370–404. https://doi.org/10.1515/HF.2009.036
French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21(2):885–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0030-4
French AD, Santiago Cintrόn M (2013) Cellulose polymorphy, crystallite size, and the Segal crystallinity index. Cellulose 20(1):583–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9833-y
Ganster J, Fink HP (2006) Novel cellulose fibre reinforced thermoplastic materials. Cellulose 13(3):271–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-005-9045-9
Georgiopoulos P, Kontou E, Georgousis G (2018) Effect of silane treatment loading on the flexural properties of PLA/flax unidirectional composites. Composites Communications 10:6–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2018.05.002
Huner U (2018) Effect of chemical surface treatment on flax-reinforced epoxy composite. J Nat Fibers 15(6):808–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2017.1369207
Ivanova A, Zaretskaya A (2011) Imparting waterproof properties to cotton surface. Prot Met Phys Chem Surf 47:369–371. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070205111030063
Jayaramudu J, Guduri BR, Rajulu AV (2010) Characterization of new natural cellulosic fabric Grewia tilifolia. Carbohyd Polym 79(4):847–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.10.046
John MJ, Anandjiwala RD (2009) Chemical modification of flax reinforced polypropylene composites. Compos A 40(4):442–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.01.007
Jonoobi M, Harun J, Manju M, Oksman K (2009) Chemical composition, crystallinity and thermal degradation of bleached and unbleached kenaf bast (Hibiscus cannabinus) pulp and nanofiber. BioResources 4(2):626–639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-009-1028-2
Joseph K, Thomas S, Pavithran C (1996) Effect of chemical treatment on the tensile properties of short sisal fibre-reinforced polyethylene composites. Polymer 37(23):5139–5149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(96)00144-9
Kabir MM, Wang H, Lau KT, Cardona F (2012) Chemical treatments on plant-based natural fibre reinforced polymer composites: an overview. Compos B Eng 43(7):2883–2892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.053
Li Y, Li G, Zou Y, Zhou Q, Lian X (2014) Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from partly mercerized cotton by mixed acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 21(1):301–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0146-6
Liu Y, Xie J, Wu N, Wang L, Ma Y, Tong J (2019) Influence of silane treatment on the mechanical, tribological and morphological properties of corn stalk fiber reinforced polymer composites. Tribol Int 131:398–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2018.11.004
Luo Z, Li P, Cai D, Chen Q, Qin P, Tan T, Gao H (2017) Comparison of performances of corn fiber plastic composites made from different parts of corn stalk. Ind Crops Prod 95:521–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.11.005
Maache M, Bezazi A, Amroune S, Scarpa F, Dufresne A (2017) Characterization of a novel natural cellulosic fiber from Juncus effusus L. Carbohyd Polym 171:163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.096
Maqsood HS, Bashir U, Wiener J, Puchalski M, Sztajnowski S, Militky J (2017) Ozone treatment of jute fibers. Cellulose 24(3):1543–1553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1164-y
Masłowski M, Miedzianowska J, Strzelec K (2019) Silanized cereal straw as a novel, functional filler of natural rubber biocomposites. Cellulose 26:1025–1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2093-8
Moghaddam MK, Mortazavi SM (2016) Physical and chemical properties of natural fibers extracted from Typha Australis Leaves. J Nat Fibers 13:353–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2015.1029199
Moonart U, Utara S (2019) Effect of surface treatments and filler loading on the properties of hemp fiber/natural rubber composites. Cellulose 26(12):7271–7295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02611-w
Mwaikambo LY, Ansell MP (2002) Chemical modification of hemp, sisal and kapok fibers by alkalization. J Appl Polym Sci 84:2222–2234. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.10460
Nadlene R, Sapuan SM, Jawaid M, Ishak MR, Yusriah L (2016) The effects of chemical treatment on the structural and thermal, physical, and mechanical and morphological properties of roselle fiber-reinforced vinyl ester composites. Polym Compos 39(1):274–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.23927
Owens DK, Wendt R (1969) Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 13:1741–1747. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1969.070130815
Paiva MC, Ammar I, Campos AR, Cheikh RB, Cunha AM (2007) Alfa fibres: mechanical, morphological and interfacial characterization. Compos Sci Technol 67:1132–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.05.019
Popescua CM, Larsson PT, Olaru N, Vasile C (2012) Spectroscopic study of acetylated kraft pulp fibers. Carbohydr Polym 88:530–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.12.046
Porras A, Maranon A, Ashcroft IA (2015) Characterization of a novel natural cellulose fabric from Manicaria saccifera palm as possible reinforcement of composite materials. Compos B Eng 74:66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.12.033
Ramamoorthy SK, Skrifvars M, Rissanen M (2015) Effect of alkali and silane surface treatments on regenerated cellulose fibre type (lyocell) intended for composites. Cellulose 22(1):637–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0526-6
Rashid B, Leman Z, Jawaid M, Ghazali MJ, Ishak MR (2016) Physicochemical and thermal properties of lignocellulosic fiber from sugar palm fibers: effect of treatment. Cellulose 23(5):2905–2916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1005-z
Rodriguez ES, Stefani PM, Vazquez A (2007) Effects of fibers’ alkali treatment on the resin transfer molding processing and mechanical properties of jute-vinylester composites. J Compos Mater 41(14):1729–1741. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998306069889
Saha P, Manna S, Chowdhury SR, Sen R, Roy D, Adhikari B (2010) Enhancement of tensile strength of lignocellulosic jute fibers by alkali-steam treatment. Biores Technol 101(9):3182–3187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.010
Salim M, Ariawan D, Ahmad Rasyid M, Ahmad Thirmizir M, Mat Taib R, Mohd Ishak Z (2017) Effect of fibre surface treatment on interfacial and mechanical properties of non-woven kenaf fibre reinforced acrylic based polyester composites. Polym Compos 40:E214–E226. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.24605
Sayeed MMA, Paharia A (2019) Optimisation of the surface treatment of jute fibres for natural fibre reinforced polymer composites using Weibull analysis. J Text Inst 110(11):1588–1595. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2019.1610998
Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-Ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29(10):786–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051755902901003
Seki Y, Kılınç AÇ, Dalmis R, Atagür M, Köktaş S, Göktaş AA, Çelik E, Seydibeyoğlu M, Önay AB (2018) Surface modification of new cellulose fiber extracted from Conium maculatum plant: a comparative study. Cellulose 25(6):3267–3280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1797-0
Senthamaraikannan P, Kathiresan M (2018) Characterization of raw and alkali treated new natural cellulosic fiber from Coccinia grandis.L. Carbohydr Polym 186:332–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.096
Sepe R, Bollino F, Boccarusso L, Caputo F (2018) Influence of chemical treatments on mechanical properties of hemp fiber reinforced composites. Compos B Eng 133:210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.030
Shanmugasundaram N, Rajendran I, Ramkumar T (2018) Characterization of untreated and alkali treated new cellulosic fiber from an Areca palm leaf stalk as potential reinforcement in polymer composites. Carbohyd Polym 195:566–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.127
Sheng K, Qian S, Wang H (2014) Influence of permanganate pretreatment on mechanical properties and thermal behavior of moso bamboo particle reinforced PVC composites. Polym Compos 35:1460–1465. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.22799
Silva MC, Lopes OR, Colodette JL, Porto AO, Rieumont J, Chaussy D, Belgacem MN, Silva GG (2008) Characterization of three non-product materials from a bleached eucalyptus kraft pulp mill, in view of valorizing them as a source of cellulose fibers. Ind Crops Prod 27:288–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.11.005
Väisänen T, Batello P, Lappalainen R, Tomppo L (2018) Modification of hemp fibers (Cannabis Sativa L.) for composite applications. Ind Crops Prod 111:422–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.049
Valadez-Gonzalez A, Cervantes-Uc JM, Olayo R (1999) Effect of fiber surface treatment on the fiber-matrix bond strength of natural fiber reinforced composites. Compos B 30(3):309–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-8368(98)00054-7
Van de Weyenberg I, Chi Truong T, Vangrimde B, Verpoest I (2006) Improving the properties of UD flax fibre reinforced composites by applying an alkaline fibre treatment. Compos A 37(9):1368–1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.08.016
Venkateshwaran N, Perumal AE, Arunsundaranayagam D (2013) Fiber surface treatment and its effect on mechanical and visco-elastic behaviour of banana/epoxy composite. Mater Des 47:151–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.001
Vilay V, Mariatti M, Taib RM, Todo M (2008) Effect of fiber surface treatment and fiber loading on the properties of bagasse fiber-reinforced unsaturated polyester composites. Compos Sci Technol 68(3):631–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.005
Yan LB, Chouw N, Yuan XW (2012) Improving the mechanical properties of natural fibre fabric reinforced epoxy composites by alkali treatment. J Reinf Plast Comp 31(6):425–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684412439494
Živković I, Fragassa C, Pavlović A, Brugo T (2017) Influence of moisture absorption on the impact properties of flax, basalt and hybrid flax/basalt fiber reinforced green composites. Compos B Eng 111:148–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.018
Funding
This research work was supported by “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities” (WUT: 2019III074GX) and the Foshan Xianhu Laboratory of the Advanced Energy Science and Technology Guangdong Laboratory.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xiao, X., Zhong, Y., Cheng, M. et al. Improved hygrothermal durability of flax/polypropylene composites after chemical treatments through a hybrid approach. Cellulose 28, 11209–11229 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04179-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04179-w