Skip to main content
Log in

Practice to Research and Back in a Social Service Agency: Trying to DO BETTER

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child & Youth Care Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is a growing emphasis of evidence-based program requirements being integrated into social welfare policies for youth care services in the U.S. This trend highlights the need for increased practitioner understanding and involvement in the research process to develop and implement evidence-based programs for youth with emotional and behavioral disorders who receive residential services.

Objective

The purpose of this review was to provide residential care practitioners and researchers with an understanding of a transdisciplinary translational research approach for social service agencies and the research activities that can be included.

Method

A review of the literature from a collaborative project between a social service agency and university that resulted in the development and testing of an aftercare intervention for youth departing residential programs was used to explain the framework.

Result

The DO BETTER framework outlines a process that (1) focuses on input from practitioners and consumers to help determine problems that impact youth and families, (2) involves research and practitioner partnerships to conduct a variety of research activities to create solutions and (3) provides results that are useful for practitioners. The research activities of the project illustrate the iterative processes of practice to research and back to practice that included youth, caregivers, practitioners, researchers, and experts from other disciplines.

Conclusion

The framework is provided to help researchers plan for collaborative research with social service agencies, and to help non-researchers in agencies become more familiar with research activities to increase their involvement in program design, testing, implementation and sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A., Caparara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Regalia, C., & Scabini, E. (2011). Impact of family efficacy beliefs on quality of family functioning and satisfaction with family life. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 60(3), 421–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00442.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M. S., Damschroder, L., Hagedorn, H., Smith, J., & Kilbourne, A. M. (2015). An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychology, 3(32), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-015-0089-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018. (2018). Retrieved November 12, 2019, from https://www.congress.gov/115/bills/hr1892/BILLS-115hr1892enr.pdf.

  • Boys Town.org. (2019). Boys Town Hotline. Retrieved November 18, 2019, from https://www.boystown.org/hotline/Pages/default.aspx.

  • Briggs, E. C., Greeson, J. K., Layne, C. M., Fairbank, J. A., Knoverek, A. M., & Pynoos, R. S. (2012). Trauma exposure, psychosocial functioning, and treatment needs of youth in residential care: Preliminary findings from the NCTSN core data set. Journal of Child and Adolescent Trauma, 5(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R., Herron, R., & Barnes, B. (2006). Common sense parenting (3rd ed.). Boys Town, NE: Boys Town Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cargo, M., & Mercer, S. L. (2008). The value and challenges of participatory research: Strengthening its practice. Annual Review of Public Health, 29, 325–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, P., Brown, H., & Saldana, L. (2011). Observational measure of implementation progress in community based settings: The stages of implementation completion (SIC). Implementation Science, 6(116), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christenson, S. L., Evelo, D., Sinclair, M., & Thurlow, M. (1997). Check & Connect: A model for promoting students’ engagement in school. Retrieved November 12, 2019, from http://ici.umn.edu/checkandconnect/.

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., Ambron, S. R., Dornbusch, S. M., Hess, R. D., Hornik, R. C., et al. (1981). Toward reform of program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, H., Nutley, S., & Walter, I. (2007). Academic advice to practitioners—The role and use of research-based evidence. Public Money & Management, 27(4), 232–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2007.00585.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 157–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, E. M., Dorsey, S., & Mustillo, S. A. (2004). Intensive home and community interventions. Child Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 13(4), 857–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fixsen, D. L., Blasse, K. A., Naoom, S. F., & Wallace, F. (2009). Core implementation components. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731509335549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fixsen, D. L., Schultes, M. T., & Blasé, K. A. (2016). Bildung-Psychology and implementation science. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(6), 666–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.1204292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman-Hoffman, V. L., Middleton, J. C., McKeeman, J. L., Stambaugh, L. F., Christian, R. B., et al. (2017). Quality improvement, implementation, and dissemination strategies to improve mental health care for children and adolescents: A systemic review. Implementation Science, 12(93), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasgow, R. E., Vinson, C., Chambers, D., Khoury, M. J., Kaplan, R. M., & Hunter, C. (2012). National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation Science: Current and future directions. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7), 1274–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grywacz, J. G., & Allen, J. W. (2017). Adaptive the ideas of translational science for translational family science. Family Relations, 66(4), 568–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, S. F. (2015). Translational research and youth development. Applied Developmental Science, 19(2), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1888691.2014.968279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, A., & Linn, J. F. (2008). Scaling-up. A framework and lessons for development effectiveness from literature and practice. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harvard School of Public Health. (2019). Harvard transdisciplinary research in energetics and cancer center. Retrieved from https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/trec/aboutus/definitions/.

  • Haynes, B. (1999). Can it work? Does it work? Is it worth it? BMJ, 319(7211), 652–653. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7211.652.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, G. W., Beach, S. R. H., & Brody, G. H. (2010). Microtrial methods for translating gene environment dynamics into preventive interventions. Prevention Science, 11, 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/211121-01077-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, J., & Bo, A. (2018). Prevention science and child/youth development: Randomized explanatory trials for integrating theory, method, and analysis in program evaluation. Journal of the Society for Social Work & Research, 9(4), 651–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, S., Thompson, R., Stenberg, N., Schnur, E., Ross, J., Butler, L., et al. (2015). Attitudes, perceptions, and utilization of evidence-based practices in residential care. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 32, 144–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2015.1046275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leichtman, M., & Leichtman, M. L. (2001). Facilitating the transition from residential treatment into the community: I. The problem. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 19(1), 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, R. E. (2004). Future directions in residential treatment. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 13(2), 279–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims and Offenders, 4, 124–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W., Howell, J. C., Kelly, M. R., Chapman, G., & Carver, G. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of juvenile justice programs: A new perspective on evidence-based practice. Washington DC: Center for Juvenile Justice Reform at Georgetown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. S., & Schaefer, K. (2000). Mental health and dangerousness: Characteristics and outcomes of children and adolescents in residential placements. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 9(1), 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, W. A., Cogua-Lopez, J., Fleming, C. B., & Scheier, L. M. (2018). Challenges facing evidence-based prevention: Incorporating an abductive theory of method. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 41, 155–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, W. A., Fleming, C. B., Ringle, J. L., Thompson, R. W., Haggerty, K. P., & Snyder, J. J. (2015). Reducing risks for problem behaviors during the high school transition: Proximal outcomes in the Common Sense Parenting trial. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(9), 2568–2578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, W. A., January, S.-A. A., Fleming, C. B., Thompson, R. W., Parra, G. R., Haggerty, K. P., et al. (2016). Parent training to reduce problem behaviors over the transition to high school: Tests of indirect effects through improved emotion regulation skills. Children and Youth Services Review, 61, 176–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillen, C. J., Lee, B. R., & Jonson-Reid, M. (2008). Outcomes for youth residential treatment programs using administrative data from the child welfare system: A risk-adjustment application. Administration and Policy In Mental Health, 35(3), 189–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middlemiss, W. (2016). Building a foundation for resiliency from the inside out. Family Relations, 65, 7–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkler, M., Glover Blackwell, A., Thompson, M., & Tamir, H. (2003). Community-based participatory research: Implications for public health funding. Public Health Advocacy Forum, 93(8), 1210–1213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. A., Fisher, C. A., Hastings, C. E., Silverman, L. B., & Wallen, G. R. (2010). A thematic analysis of theoretical models for translational science in nursing: Mapping the field. Nursing Outlook, 58, 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2010.07.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moen, R. D., & Norman, C. L. (2010). Circling back: Clearing up myths about the Deming Cycle and seeing how it keeps evolving. Quality Progress, 43(11), 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowbray, C. T., Holter, M. C., Teague, G. B., & Bybee, D. (2003). Fidelity criteria Development, measurement, and validation. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(3), 315–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubio, D. M., Schoenbaum, E. E., Lee, L. S., Schteingart, D. E., Marantz, P. R., Anderson, P. R., et al. (2010). Defining translational research: Implications for training. Academic Medicine, 85(3), 470–475. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ccd618.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Saldana, L. (2014). The stages of implementation completion for evidence-based practice: protocol for a mixed methods study. Implementation Science, 9(43), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldana, L., Chamberlain, P., Wang, W., & Brown, C. H. (2011). Predicting program start-up using the stages of implementation measure. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 39(6), 419–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, H. S., Fisher, P. A., & Shonkoff, J. P. (2017). From innovation to impact at scale: Lessons learned from a cluster of research-community partnerships. Child Development, 88(5), 1435–1446. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12904.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, D. D., Shaw, G. M., Wise, P. H., Norton, M. E., Druzin, M. L., et al. (2013). Transdisciplinary translational science and the case of preterm birth. Journal of Perintology, 33, 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2012.133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teddie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. W., Duppong Hurley, K., Trout, A. L., Huefner, J. C., & Daly, D. L. (2017). Closing the research to practice gap in therapeutic residential care: Service provider- university partnerships focused on evidence-based practice. Journal of Emotional an Behavioral Disorders, 25(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426686757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trout, A. L., & Epstein, M. H. (2007). On the way home: A family-centered academic reintegration intervention model (CFDA# R324B070034). U.S: Department of Education Institute for Educational Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-91-4-0467B.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trout, A. L., & Epstein, M. H. (2010). Developing aftercare, Phase I: Consumer feedback. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(3), 445–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trout, A. L., Hagaman, J. L., Chmelka, M. B., Gehringer, R., Epstein, M. H., & Reid, R. (2008). The academic, behavioral, and mental health status of children and youth at entry to residential care. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 25, 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865710802533654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trout, A. L., Hoffman, S., Epstein, M. H., & Thompson, R. W. (2014a). Family teacher and parent perceptions of youth needs and preparedness for transition upon youth discharge from residential care. Journal of Social Work, 14(6), 594–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trout, A. L., Hoffman, S., Huscroft-D’Angelo, J., Epstein, M. H., Duppong Hurley, K., & Stevens, A. L. (2014b). Youth and parent perceptions of aftercare supports at discharge from residential care. Child and Family Social Work, 19(3), 304–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trout, A. L., Jansz, C., Epstein, M. H., & Tyler, P. (2013a). Evaluating service delivery in aftercare for school-aged youth departing out-of-home care. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 7, 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2013.770356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trout, A. L., Lambert, M. C., Epstein, M. H., Tyler, P., Stewart, M., Thompson, R. W., et al. (2013b). Comparison of On the Way Home aftercare supports to usual care following discharge from a residential setting: An exploratory pilot randomized controlled trial. Child Welfare, 92(3), 27–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trout, A. L., Lambert, M. C., Thompson, R., Duppong Hurley, K., & Tyler, P. (2019). On the Way Home: Promoting caregiver empowerment, self-efficacy, and adolescent stability during family reunification following placements in residential care. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571x.2019.1681047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trout, A., Tyler, P., Stewart, M., & Epstein, M. (2012). On the Way Home: Program description and preliminary findings. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(6), 1115–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.01.046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, V., Easton, J. Q., & Supplee, L. H. (2017). Research-practice partnerships: Building two way streets of engagement. Social Policy Report, 30(4), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, P. M., Thompson, R. W., Trout, A. L., Lambert, M. C., & Synhorst, L. L. (2016). Availability of aftercare for youth departing group homes. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 33(3–4), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2016.1232183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, P. M., Thompson, R. W., Trout, A. L., Lambert, M. C., & Synhorst, L. L. (2017). Important elements of aftercare services for youth departing group homes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(6), 1603–1613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0673-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, P. M., Trout, A. L., Epstein, M. H., & Thompson, R. (2014). Provider perspectives on aftercare services for youth in residential care. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 31(3), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2014.943571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, P. M., Trout, A. L., Huscroft-D’Angelo, J., Synhorst, L., & Lambert, M. C. (2018). Promoting stability for youth returning from residential care: Attorney perspectives. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 69(3), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, U. M., & Petr, C. G. (2004). Promoting successful transitions from day school to regular school environments for youths with serious emotional disorders. Children & Schools, 26(3), 175–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S., Price, C. S., Kerns, S. E. U., Dastrup, S. R., & Brown, S. R. (2019). Title IV-E prevention services clearinghouse. Handbook of standards and procedures. Version 1.0. Office of Planning Research and Evaluation. Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by Grants Numbers R324B070034 and R324A120260 from the U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. The statements in this manuscript do not necessarily represent the views of the U. S. Department of Education; Institute of Education Sciences; [R324B070034; R324A120260].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick M. Tyler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have declared any conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tyler, P.M., Mason, W.A., Vollmer, B. et al. Practice to Research and Back in a Social Service Agency: Trying to DO BETTER. Child Youth Care Forum 50, 149–165 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-020-09548-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-020-09548-3

Keywords

Navigation