Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with 3rd Generation P2Y12 Inhibitors in STEMI Patients: Impact of Body Mass Index on Loading Dose–Response

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Editorial to this article was published on 18 August 2023

An Invited Editorial to this article was published on 02 August 2023

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to assess the association between body mass index (BMI) and platelet reactivity in STEMI patients treated with oral 3rd generation P2Y12 inhibitors.

Methods

Overall, 429 STEMI patients were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to BMI (BMI < 25 vs ≥ 25 kg/m2). A propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to balance potential confounders in patient baseline characteristics. Platelet reactivity was assessed by VerifyNow at baseline and after 3rd generation P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor or prasugrel) loading dose (LD). Blood samples were obtained at baseline (T0), 1 h (T1), 2 h (T2), 4–6 h (T3), and 8–12 h (T4) after the LD. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) was defined as a platelet reactivity unit value ≥ 208 units.

Results

After propensity score matching, patients with BMI ≥ 25 had similar values of baseline platelet reactivity, while they had higher level of platelet reactivity at 1 and 2 h after the LD and higher rate of HRPT. Furthermore, multivariate analysis demonstrated that BMI ≥ 25 was an independent predictor of HTPR at 2 h (OR 2.01, p = .009). Conversely, starting from 4 h after the LD, platelet reactivity values and HRPT rates were comparable among the two study groups.

Conclusions

A BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 is associated with delayed pharmacodynamic response to oral 3rd generation P2Y12 inhibitor LD, and it is a strong predictor of HTPR in STEMI patients treated by dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor or prasugrel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, GP, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2018;39(3):213–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018;39(2):119–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Sangen NMR, Rozemeijer R, Chan P, Yin DRPP, et al. Patient-tailored antithrombotic therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(10):1038–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Parodi G, Marcucci R, Valenti R, et al. High on treatment platelet reactivity after clopidogrel loading and long-term cardiovascu- lar events among patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI. JAMA. 2011;306:1215–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Scudiero F, Zocchi C, De Vito E, et al. Relationship between CHA2DS2-VASc score, coronary artery disease severity, residual platelet reactivity and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Int J Cardiol. 2018;262:9–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mourikis P, Zako S, Dannenberg L, et al. Aspirin antiplatelet effects are associated with body weight. Vascul Pharmacol. 2020;125–126:106635.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Norgard NB, Monte SV, Fernandez SF, Ma Q. Aspirin responsiveness changes in obese patients following bariatric surgery. Cardiovasc Ther. 2017;35(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-5922.12268.

  8. Parodi G, Valenti R, Bellandi B, et al. Comparison of prasugrel and ticagrelor loading doses in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: RAPID (Rapid Activity of Platelet Inhibitor Drugs) primary PCI study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(15):1601–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Parodi G, Bellandi B, Valenti R, et al. Comparison of double (360 mg) ticagrelor loading dose with standard (60 mg) prasugrel loading dose in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: the Rapid Activity of Platelet Inhibitor Drugs (RAPID) primary PCI 2 study. Am Heart J. 2014;167(6):909–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Parodi G, Xanthopoulou I, Bellandi B, et al. Ticagrelor crushed tablets administration in STEMI patients: the MOJITO study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(5):511–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Parodi G, Talanas G, Mura E, et al. Orodispersible ticagrelor in acute coronary syndromes: the TASTER study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78(3):292–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Powell-Wiley TM, Poirier P, Burke LE, et al. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143(21):e984–1010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Canonico ME, Sanna GD, Siciliano R, et al. Not-high before-treatment platelet reactivity in patients with STEMI: prevalence, clinical characteristics, response to therapy and outcomes. Platelets. 2021;15:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537104.2021.1915973.

  14. Garcia-Garcia HM, McFadden EP, Farb A, et al. Academic Research Consortium. Standardized end point definitions for coronary intervention trials: the academic research consortium-2 consensus document. Circulation. 2018;137(24):2635–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ronco C, Bellomo R, Kellum JA. Acute kidney injury. Lancet. 2019;394(10212):1949–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Burrai F, Sanna GD, Moccia E, et al. Beneficial effects of listening to classical music in patients with heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. J Card Fail. 2020;26(7):541–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Calle EE, Thun MJ, Petrelli JM, Rodriguez C, Heath CW Jr. Body-mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(15):1097–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bogers RP, Bemelmans WJ, Hoogenveen RT, et al. Association of overweight with increased risk of coronary heart disease partly independent of blood pressure and cholesterol levels: a meta-analysis of 21 cohort studies including more than 300 000 persons. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(16):1720–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tune JD, Goodwill AG, Sassoon DJ, Mather KJ. Cardiovascular consequences of metabolic syndrome. Transl Res. 2017;183:57–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Scudiero F, Valenti R, Marcucci R, et al. Platelet reactivity in hepatitis C virus-infected patients on dual antiplatelet therapy for acute coronary syndrome. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(18):e016441.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Neergaard-Petersen S, Hvas AM, Kristensen SD, Grove EL. Platelets and antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2016;42(3):234–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Badimon L, Hernández Vera R, Padró T, Vilahur G. Antithrombotic therapy in obesity. Thromb Haemost. 2013;110:681–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Janson B, Thursky K. Dosing of antibiotics in obesity. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;25:634–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schilling U, Dingemanse J, Ufer M. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of approved and investigational P2Y12 receptor antagonists. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020;59(5):545–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Butler K, Teng R. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of ticagrelor in volunteers with severe renal impairment. J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;52:1388–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Small DS, Wrishko RE, Ernest CS, Ni L, Winters KJ, Farid NA, et al. Prasugrel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in subjects with moderate renal impairment and end-stage renal disease. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2009;34:585–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pankert M, Quilici J, Loundou AD, et al. Impact of obesity and the metabolic syndrome on response to clopidogrel or prasugrel and bleeding risk in patients treated after coronary stenting. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113(1):54–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mayer K, Orban M, Bernlochner I, et al. Predictors of antiplatelet response to prasugrel during maintenance treatment. Platelets. 2015;26(1):53–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(20):2001–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Storey RF, Bliden KP, Tantry US, Angiolillo DJ, Gurbel PA. Platelet reactivity during ticagrelor maintenance therapy: a patient-level data meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2014;168(4):530–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wells B, Gentry M, Ruiz-Arango A, Dias J, Landolfo CK. Relation between body mass index and clinical outcome in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98(4):474–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schüpke S, Neumann FJ, Menichelli M, ISAR-REACT 5 Trial Investigators, et al. Ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(16):1524–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Henrich A, Claussen CH, Dingemanse J, Krause A. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of drug interactions at the P2Y12 receptor between selatogrel and oral P2Y12 antagonists. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2021;10(7):735–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to the Cath Lab staff and the CCU fellows and nurses for their precious help in collecting and processing blood samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Fernando Scudiero, Mario Enrico Canonico, and Guido Parodi. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Fernando Scudiero and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guido Parodi.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

Prof. Guido Parodi reported receiving consulting or lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Chiesi, Daiichi Sankyo/Eli Lilly, and Merck Sharp Dohme. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 9.46 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 8.33 KB)

Supplementary Figure 1.

histogram of BMI distribution in the enrolled patients (PNG 574 KB)

High Resolution (TIFF 8101 KB)

Supplementary Figure 2.

Scattered plots depicting PRU values according to BMI (PNG 1.17 MB)

High Resolution (TIFF 154 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scudiero, F., Canonico, M.E., Sanna, G.D. et al. Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with 3rd Generation P2Y12 Inhibitors in STEMI Patients: Impact of Body Mass Index on Loading Dose–Response. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 37, 695–703 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-022-07322-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-022-07322-2

Keywords

Navigation