Skip to main content
Log in

Cardiac and respiratory motion extraction for MRI using pilot tone–a patient study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the cardiac and respiratory signals extracted from Pilot Tone (PT) in patients clinically referred for cardiovascular MRI. Twenty-three patients were scanned under free-breathing conditions using a balanced steady-state free-precession real-time (RT) cine sequence on a 1.5T scanner. The PT signal was generated by a built-in PT transmitter integrated within the body array coil, and retrospectively processed to extract respiratory and cardiac signals. For comparison, ECG and BioMatrix (BM) respiratory sensor signals were also synchronously recorded. To assess the performances of PT, ECG, and BM, cardiac and respiratory signals extracted from the RT cine images were used as the ground truth. The respiratory motion extracted from PT correlated positively with the image-derived respiratory signal in all cases and showed a stronger correlation (absolute coefficient: 0.95 ± 0.09) than BM (0.72 ± 0.24). For the cardiac signal, PT trigger jitter (standard deviation of PT trigger locations relative to ECG triggers) ranged from 6.6 to 83.3 ms, with a median of 21.8 ms. The mean absolute difference between the PT and corresponding ECG cardiac cycle duration was less than 5% of the average ECG RR interval for 21 out of 23 patients. We did not observe a significant linear dependence (p > 0.28) of PT delay and PT jitter on the patients’ BMI or cardiac cycle duration. This study demonstrates the potential of PT to monitor both respiratory and cardiac motion in patients clinically referred for cardiovascular MRI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon requests.

References

  1. Wang Y, Rossman PJ, Grimm RC, Riederer SJ, Ehman RL (1996) Navigator-echo-based real-time respiratory gating and triggering for reduction of respiration effects in three-dimensional coronary MR angiography. Radiology 198(1):55–60. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.198.1.8539406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Santelli C, Nezafat R, Goddu B, Manning WJ, Smink J, Kozerke S, Peters DC (2011) Respiratory bellows revisited for motion compensation: preliminary experience for cardiovascular MR. Magn Reson Med 65(4):1097–1102. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Larson AC, Kellman P, Arai A, Hirsch GA, McVeigh E, Li D, Simonetti OP (2005) Preliminary investigation of respiratory self-gating for free-breathing segmented cine MRI. Magn Reson Med 53(1):159–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20331

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Feng L, Grimm R, Block KT, Chandarana H, Kim S, Xu J, Axel L, Sodickson DK, Otazo R (2014) Golden-angle radial sparse parallel MRI: combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling for fast and flexible dynamic volumetric MRI. Magn Reson Med 72(3):707–717. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Feng L, Axel L, Chandarana H, Block KT, Sodickson DK, Otazo R (2016) XD-GRASP: golden-angle radial MRI with reconstruction of extra motion-state dimensions using compressed sensing. Magn Reson Med 75(2):775–788. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Crowe ME, Larson AC, Zhang Q, Carr J, White RD, Li D, Simonetti OP (2004) Automated rectilinear self-gated cardiac cine imaging. Magn Reson Med 52(4):782–788. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Damji AA, Snyder RE, Ellinger DC, Witkowski FX, Allen PS (1988) RF interference suppression in a cardiac synchronization system operating in a high magnetic field NMR imaging system. Magn Reson Imaging 6(6):637–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/0730-725x(88)90086-0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tournoux F, Donal E, Leclercq C, De Place C, Crocq C, Solnon A, Cohen-Solal A, Mabo P, Daubert J-C (2007) Concordance between mechanical and electrical dyssynchrony in heart failure patients: a function of the underlying cardiomyopathy? J Cardiovasc Electrophys 18(10):1022–1027. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00900.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Speier P, Fenchel M, Rehner R, PT-Nav (2015) :. A novel respiratory Navigation Method for continuous Acquisition based on modulation of a pilot tone on the MR-Receiver. ESMRMB 2015. In 32nd Annual Scientific Meeting.

  10. Schroeder L, Wetzl J, Maier A, Lauer L, Bollenbeck J, Fenchel M, Speier P (2016) A Novel Method for Contact-Free Cardiac Synchronization Using the Pilot Tone Navigator. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of ISMRM; p. 410. https://cds.ismrm.org/protected/16MProceedings/PDFfiles/0410.html

  11. Vahle T, Bacher M, Rigie D, Fenchel M, Speier P, Bollenbeck J, Schäfers KP, Kiefer B, Boada FE (2020) Respiratory motion detection and correction for MR using the pilot tone: applications for MR and simultaneous PET/MR examinations. Invest Radiol 55(3):153–159. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000619

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ludwig J, Speier P, Seifert F, Schaeffter T, Kolbitsch C (2021) Pilot tone-based motion correction for prospective respiratory compensated cardiac cine MRI. Magn Reson Med 85(5):2403–2416. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Solomon E, Rigie DS, Vahle T, Paška J, Bollenbeck J, Sodickson DK, Boada FE, Block KT, Chandarana H (2021) Free-breathing radial imaging using a pilot-tone radiofrequency transmitter for detection of respiratory motion. Magn Reson Med 85(5):2672–2685. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Falcão MBL, Di Sopra L, Ma L, Bacher M, Yerly J, Speier P, Rutz T, Prša M, Markl M, Stuber M, Roy CW (2022) Pilot tone navigation for respiratory and cardiac motion-resolved free-running 5D flow MRI. Magn Reson Med 87(2):718–732. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bacher M (2017) Cardiac triggering based on locally generated pilot-tones in a commercial MRI scanner: a feasibility study. Graz University of Technology

  16. Bacher M, Speier P, Bollenbeck J, Fenchel M, Stuber M (2018) Pilot tone navigation enables contactless prospective cardiac triggering: initial volunteer results for prospective cine. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of ISMRM; p. 2960. https://cds.ismrm.org/protected/18MProceedings/PDFfiles/2960.html

  17. Bacher M, Gatehouse P, Wage R, Pavon et al (2020) Performance analysis of a fully automatic real-time capable pilot tone cardiac triggering framework. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual SCMR Scientific Sessions, p. 749586. https://scmr.org/page/PastMeetings

  18. Runge VM, Richter JK, Heverhagen JT (2019) Motion in magnetic resonance: New Paradigms for Improved Clinical diagnosis. Invest Radiol 54(7):383–395. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmad R, Xue H, Giri S, Ding Y, Craft J, Simonetti OP (2015) Variable density incoherent spatiotemporal acquisition (VISTA) for highly accelerated cardiac MRI. Magn Reson Med 74(5):1266–1278. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hansen MS, Sørensen TS (2013) Gadgetron: an open source framework for medical image reconstruction. Magn Reson Med 69(6):1768–1776. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen C, Liu Y, Schniter P, Jin N, Craft J, Simonetti O, Ahmad R (2019) Sparsity adaptive reconstruction for highly accelerated cardiac MRI. Magn Reson Med 81(6):3875–3887. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27671

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hyvarinen A (1999) Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Trans Neural Networks 10(3):626–634. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.761722

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen C, Chandrasekaran P, Liu Y, Simonetti OP, Tong M, Ahmad R (2022) Ensuring respiratory phase consistency to improve cardiac function quantification in real-time CMR. Magn Reson Med 87(3):1595–1604. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Denslow S, Buckles DS (1993) Pulse oximetry-gated acquisition of cardiac MR images in patients with congenital cardiac abnormalities. Am J Roentgenol 160(4):831–833. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.160.4.8456674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pruitt A, Rich A, Liu Y, Jin N, Potter L, Tong M, Rajpal S, Simonetti O, Ahmad R (2021) Fully self-gated whole-heart 4D flow imaging from a 5-minute scan. Magn Reson Med 85(3):1222–1236. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (Grant numbers R01HL135489 and R01HL151697).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RA and CC conceived of the study, designed data processing strategy, and drafted the manuscript. PS, NJ, and YL were involved in sequence programming. RA, YL, and CC were involved in the image reconstruction. PS, NJ, RA, OPS, MT and CC were involved in the processing and interpretation of the data. MT was involved in patient recruitment. All authors were involved in the editing of the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chong Chen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Ning Jin, Mario Bacher and Peter Speier are employees of Siemens Healthcare. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval

The data were collected at The Ohio State University with the ethical approval for recruitment and consent given by an Internal Review Board (2019H0076).

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1: Figure S1

. The dependence of PT delay and PT jitter on the patients’ BMI/cardiac cycle duration, where patient #21 (red star) is excluded due to high arrhythmic load and weak cardiac contraction. No significant linear relationship is observed since the correlation coefficient is not significantly (p > 0.28) different from zero. The red dashed curve is the confidence bounds with 95% confidence

Supplementary Material 2: Figure S2

. The bivariate tiled histograms of PT delay and ECG cardiac cycle duration. The bin colors represent the number of data points inside the bin with darker blue indicating smaller values. Note the color map is scaled differently across patients to improve visualization. The mean and standard deviation of PT delay are shown in the top left corner. For a specific patient, there is no significant dependence of PT delay on the ECG RR interval

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, C., Liu, Y., Simonetti, O.P. et al. Cardiac and respiratory motion extraction for MRI using pilot tone–a patient study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 40, 93–105 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02966-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02966-z

Keywords

Navigation