Skip to main content
Log in

Feasibility, safety and long-term outcomes of complex left main bifurcation treatment using the nano-inverted-t stenting: a multicentre prospective registry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of double stenting techniques in distal bifurcation left main (LM) disease has gaining interest over the latest years. We present the 3-year multicentre registry outcomes of dual stenting using ultra-thin strut stents and the Nano-Inverted-T (NIT) technique in complex unprotected true LM bifurcation disease. We analysed the procedural and medical data of consecutive patients enrolled between 1st January 2014 and 1st December 2019 in a multicentre registry for complex LM bifurcation disease treated with the double stenting technique called NIT due contraindications and/ or refusal to surgical treatment. Target lesion failure (TLF) was defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, target-vessel MI (TVMI) and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). Among two hundred-ninety-five patients (138 males, mean age 70.3 ± 12.8 years), post-operative success was achieved in 100% of cases. Contrast volume, procedural time, and radiation exposure were 139.2 ± 23.4 ml, 15.3 ± 4.9 min, and 1080 ± 1034 cGy/m2, respectively. At a mean follow-up of 39.5 ± 0.6 months TLF rate was 6.1% (n = 18) while TLR and cardiovascular mortality rates were 3.0 (n = 9) and 2.6% (n = 8), respectively. Clinically-driven angiographic follow-up was available in 26.4% of patients at a mean time from the procedure of 7.5 ± 0.4 months. Clinically restenosis rate was 3.3%.

Revascularization of complex LM bifurcation disease using the NIT double stenting technique resulted feasible and safe with a low incidence of TLF, excellent survival rate and no stent thrombosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AMI:

Acute myocardial infarction

CCS:

Canadian cardiovascular score class

EBC:

European bifurcation club

DK:

Double-kissing

ISR:

In-stent restenosis

LM:

Left main

NIT:

Nano-inverted T

PCI:

Percutaneuos coronary intervention

STEMI:

ST-elevation myocardial infarction

TLF:

Target lesion failure

References

  1. Banning AP, Lassen JF, Burzotta F, Lefèvre T, Darremont O, Hildick-Smith D, Louvard Y, Stankovic G (2019) Percutaneous coronary intervention for obstructive bifurcation lesions: the 14th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention 15:90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mäkikallio T, Holm NR, Lindsay M, Spence MS, Erglis A, Menown IB, Trovik T, Eskola M, Romppanen H, Kellerth T, Ravkilde J, Jensen LO, Kalinauskas G, Linder RB, Pentikainen M, Hervold A, Banning A, Zaman A, Cotton J, Eriksen E, Margus S, Sørensen HT, Nielsen PH, Niemelä M, Kervinen K, Lassen JF, Maeng M, Oldroyd K, Berg G, Walsh SJ, Hanratty CG, Kumsars I, Stradins P, Steigen TK, Fröbert O, Graham AN, Endresen PC, Corbascio M, Kajander O, Trivedi U, Hartikainen J, Anttila V, Hildick-Smith D, Thuesen L, Christiansen EH, NOBLE study investigators (2016) Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 388:2743-2752

  3. Stone GW, Sabik JF, Serruys PW, Simonton CA, Généreux P, Puskas J, Kandzari DE, Morice MC, Lembo N, Brown WM 3rd, Taggart DP, Banning A, Merkely B, Horkay F, Boonstra PW, van Boven AJ, Ungi I, Bogáts G, Mansour S, Noiseux N, Sabaté M, Pomar J, Hickey M, Gershlick A, Buszman P, Bochenek A, Schampaert E, Pagé P, Dressler O, Kosmidou I, Mehran R, Pocock SJ, Kappetein AP, Trial Investigators EXCEL (2016) Everolimus-Eluting stents or bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 375:2223–2235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim YH, Lee JH, Roh JH, Ahn JM, Yoon SH, Park DW, Lee JY, Yun SC, Kang SJ, Lee SW, Lee CW, Seung KB, Shin WY, Lee NH, Lee BK, Lee SG, Nam CW, Yoon J, Yang JY, Hyon MS, Lee K, Jang JS, Kim HS, Park SW, Park SJ (2015) Randomized Comparisons Between Different Stenting Approaches for Bifurcation Coronary Lesions With or Without Side Branch Stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8:550–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zimarino M, Briguori C, Amat-Santos IJ, Radico F, Barbato E, Chieffo A, Cirillo P, Costa RA, Erglis A, Gamra H, Gil RJ, Kanic V, Kedev SA, Maddestra N, Nakamura S, Pellicano M, Petrov I, Strozzi M, Tesorio T, Vukcevic V, De Caterina R, Stankovic G, Club EuroBifurcation (2019) Mid-term outcomes after percutaneous interventions in coronary bifurcations. Int J Cardiol 283:78–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Falk V, Head SJ, Jüni P, Kastrati A, Koller A, Kristensen SD, Niebauer J, Richter DJ, Seferovic PM, Sibbing D, Stefanini GG, Windecker S, Yadav R, Zembala MO, ESC Scientific Document Group (2019) 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 40:87–165

  7. Rigatelli G, Zuin M, Dell’Avvocata F, Vassilev D, Daggubati R, Nguyen T, Van Viet TN, Foin N (2017) Evaluation of coronary flow conditions in complex coronary artery bifurcations stenting using computational fluid dynamics: impact of final proximal optimization technique on different double-stent techniques. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 18:233–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rigatelli G, Zuin M, Vassilev D, Dinh H, Giatti S, Carraro M, Zanon F, Roncon L, Dung HT (2019) Culotte versus the novel nano-crush technique for unprotected complex bifurcation left main stenting: difference in procedural time, contrast volume and X-ray exposure and 3-years outcomes. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 35:207–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rigatelli G, Zuin M, Dell'Avvocata F, Vassilev D, Daggubati R, Nguyen T, Nguyễn MTN, Foin N (2018) Complex coronary bifurcation treatment by a novel stenting technique: bench test, fluid dynamic study and clinical outcomes.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 92:907–914

  10. Ad N, Holmes SD, Patel J, Pritchard G, Shuman DJ, Halpin L (2016) Comparison of EuroSCORE II, original EuroSCORE, and the society of thoracic surgeons risk score in cardiac surgery patients. Ann Thorac Surg 102:573–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, Morice MC, Colombo A, Dawkins K, van den Brand M, Van Dyck N, Russell ME, Mohr FW, Serruys PW (2005) The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. Eurointervention 1:219–227

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Medina A, Suarez de Lezo J, Pan M (2006) A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions. Rev EspCardiol 59:183

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, White HD (2019) ESC Scientific Document Group, fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Eur Heart J 40:237–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS (1999) Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation 100:1872–1878

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen SL, Sheiban I, Xu B, Jepson N, Paiboon C, Zhang JJ, Ye F, Sansoto T, Kwan TW, Lee M, Han YL, Lv SZ, Wen SY, Zhang Q, Wang HC, Jiang TM, Wang Y, Chen LL, Tian NL, Cao F, Qiu CG, Zhang YJ, Leon MB (2014) Impact of the complexity of bifurcation lesions treated with drug-eluting stents: the DEFINITION study (Definitions and impact of complEx biFurcation lesIons on clinical outcomes after percutaNeous coronary IntervenTIOn using drug-eluting steNts). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7:1266–76

  16. Rigatelli G, Zuin M, Ronco F, Caprioglio F, Cavazzini D, Giatti S, Braggion G, Perilli S, Nguyen VT (2018) Usefulness of the Finet law to guide stent size selection in ostial left main stenting: comparison with standard angiographic estimation. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 19:751–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kang SJ, Lee JY, Ahn JM, Mintz GS, Kim WJ, Park DW, Yun SC, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee CW, Park SW, Park SJ (2011) Validation of intravascular ultrasound-derived parameters with fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary stenosis severity. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 4:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chieffo A, Latib A, Caussin C, Presbitero P, Galli S, Menozzi A, Varbella F, Mauri F, Valgimigli M, Arampatzis C, Sabate M, Erglis A, Reimers B, Airoldi F, Laine M, Palop RL, Mikhail G, Maccarthy P, Romeo F, Colombo A (2013) A prospective, randomized trial of intravascular-ultrasound guided compared to angiography guided stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: the AVIO trial. Am Heart J 65:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rigatelli G, Zuin M, Baracca E, Galasso P, Carraro M, Mazza A, Lanza D, Roncon L, Daggubati R (2019) Long-term clinical outcomes of isolated ostial left anterior descending disease treatment: Ostial stenting versus left main cross-over stenting. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2019.01.030

  20. Ormiston JA, Webster MW, Webber B, Stewart JT, Ruygrok PN, Hatrick RI (2008) The “crush” technique for coronary artery bifurcation stenting: insights from micro-computed tomographic imaging of bench deployments. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 1:351–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen X, Li X, Zhang JJ, Han Y, Kan J, Chen L, Qiu C, Santoso T, Paiboon C, Kwan TW, Sheiban I, Leon MB, Stone GW, Chen SL, Investigators DKCRUSH-V (2019) 3-year outcomes of the DKCRUSH-V trial comparing DK crush with provisional stenting for left main bifurcation lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 12:1927–1937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen SL, Xu B, Han YL, Sheiban I, Zhang JJ, Ye F, Kwan TW, Paiboon C, Zhou YJ, Lv SZ, Dangas GD, Xu YW, Wen SY, Hong L, Zhang RY, Wang HC, Jiang TM, Wang Y, Sansoto T, Chen F, Yuan ZY, Li WM, Leon MB (2015) Clinical outcome after DK crush versus culotte stenting of distal left main bifurcation lesions: the 3-year follow-up results of the DKCRUSH-III study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8:1335–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Iannaccone M, Gatti P, Barbero U, Bassignana A, Gallo D, de Benedictis M, Helft G, Morbiducci U, Doronzo B, D'Ascenzo F (2019) Impact of strut thickness and number of crown and connectors on clinical outcomes on patients treated with second-generation drug eluting stent. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28228

  24. Chen SL, Santoso T, Zhang JJ, Ye F, Xu YW, Fu Q, Kan J, Zhang FF, Zhou Y, Xie DJ, Kwan TW (2017). Clinical outcome of double kissing crush versus provisional stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the 5-year follow-up results from a randomized and multicenter DKCRUSH-II study (Randomized study on double kissing crush technique versus provisional stenting technique for coronary artery bifurcation lesions) (2017). Circ Cardiovasc Interv 10:e004497. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.00449

  25. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, Clement DL, Coca A, de Simone G, Dominiczak A, Kahan T, Mahfoud F, Redon J, Ruilope L, Zanchetti A, Kerins M, Kjeldsen SE, Kreutz R, Laurent S, Lip GYH, McManus R, Narkiewicz K, Ruschitzka F, Schmieder RE, Shlyakhto E, Tsioufis C, Aboyans V, Desormais I, Authors/Task Force Members (2018). 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens 36:1953–2041.https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000001940

  26. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC, Casula M, Badimon L, Chapman MJ, De Backer GG, Delgado V, Ference BA, Graham IM, Halliday A, Landmesser U, Mihaylova B, Pedersen TR, Riccardi G, Richter DJ, Sabatine MS, Taskinen MR, Tokgozoglu L, Wiklund O, ESC Scientific Document Group (2020). 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J 41:111–188

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianluca Rigatelli.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Approval was obtained from the local ethics committee. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rigatelli, G., Zuin, M., Vassilev, D. et al. Feasibility, safety and long-term outcomes of complex left main bifurcation treatment using the nano-inverted-t stenting: a multicentre prospective registry. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 37, 1107–1119 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-02106-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-02106-x

Keywords

Navigation