Skip to main content
Log in

Appropriate device selection for transcatheter atrial septal defect closure using three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Detail morphological evaluation for ASD is essential to achieve successful transcatheter closure. Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) is emerging, but few studies have comprehensively verified the usefulness of 3D-TEE. We divided 329 patients who underwent transcatheter ASD closure at our university hospital into 157 in the Conventional group evaluated with 2-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and balloon sizing (BS), and 172 in the 3D-TEE group evaluated with 3D-TEE additionally. We assessed usefulness of 3D-TEE and consider appropriate device selection procedure. Overall, the percentage with re-sizing of device tended to be lower in the 3D-TEE group than in the Conventional group (10.1% vs 6.0%, p = 0.187). Among preprocedural modalities, the device size was mainly decided based on the BS diameter. A logistic regression analysis demonstrated that large atrial septum aneurysms (ASA) were associated with a ≥ 2 mm discrepancy of the BS diameter from the preprocedural 3D-TEE diameter (p < 0.05). Compared to the Amplatzer Septal Occluder, the differences in device size and the preprocedural ASD measurement were greater when using the Occlutech Figulla Flex II Occluder (FFII). Particularly, among the patients implanted with FFIIs, the discrepancies of the device size from the 3D-TEE measurement were greater in patients with large ASA than those with small ASA. Preprocedural 3D-TEE is useful to select the appropriate device size. Particularly, it is necessary to select a much larger device than that derived from the preprocedural 3D-TEE measurement when using FFII in patients with a septal aneurysm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

2D:

Two-dimensional

3D:

Three-dimensional

ASD:

Atrial septal defect

ASO:

Amplatzer septal occluder

BS:

Balloon sizing

FFII:

Occlutech figulla Flex II occluder

ICE:

Intracardiac echo

TEE:

Transesophageal echocardiography

References

  1. Oster M, Bhatt AB, Zaragoza-Macias E, Dendukuri N, Marelli A (2019) Interventional therapy versus medical therapy for secundum atrial septal defect: a systematic review (part 2) for the 2018 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 73:1579–1595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stout Karen K, Daniels Curt J, Aboulhosn Jamil A, Bozkurt B, Broberg Craig S, Colman Jack M, Crumb Stephen R, Dearani Joseph A, Fuller S, Gurvitz M et al (2019) 2018 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 139:e698–e800

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alnasser S, Lee D, Austin PC, Labos C, Osten M, Lightfoot DT, Kutty S, Shah A, Meier L, Benson L et al (2018) Long term outcomes among adults post transcatheter atrial septal defect closure: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 270:126–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mylotte D, Quenneville SP, Kotowycz MA, Xie X, Brophy JM, Ionescu-Ittu R, Martucci G, Pilote L, Therrien J, Marelli AJ (2014) Long-term cost-effectiveness of transcatheter versus surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect in adults. Int J Cardiol 172:109–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang JK, Tsai SK, Lin SM, Chiu SN, Lin MT, Wu MH (2008) Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect without balloon sizing. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 71:214–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta SK, Sivasankaran S, Bijulal S, Tharakan JM, Harikrishnan S, Ajit K (2011) Trans-catheter closure of atrial septal defect: balloon sizing or no Balloon sizing - single centre experience. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 4:28–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jang JY, Heo R, Cho MS, Bae J, Hong JA, Lee S, Ahn JM, Park DW, Kim DH, Kang DH et al (2018) Efficacy of 3D transoesophageal echocardiography for transcatheter device closure of atrial septal defect without balloon sizing. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 19:684–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alsaileek AA, Omran A, Godman M, Najm HK (2007) Echocardiographic visualization of laceration of atrial septum during balloon sizing of atrial septal defect. Eur J Echocardiogr 8:155–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hascoet S, Hadeed K, Marchal P, Dulac Y, Alacoque X, Heitz F, Acar P (2015) The relation between atrial septal defect shape, diameter, and area using three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography and balloon sizing during percutaneous closure in children. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:747–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Seo JS, Song JM, Kim YH, Park DW, Lee SW, Kim WJ, Kim DH, Kang DH, Song JK (2012) Effect of atrial septal defect shape evaluated using three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography on size measurements for percutaneous closure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 25:1031–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baumgartner H, De Backer J, Babu-Narayan SV, Budts W, Chessa M, Diller GP, Lung B, Kluin J, Lang IM, Meijboom F et al (2020) 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Johri AM, Witzke C, Solis J, Palacios IF, Inglessis I, Picard MH, Passeri JJ (2011) Real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in patients with secundum atrial septal defects: outcomes following transcatheter closure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24:431–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sadiq N, Ullah M, Sultan M, Akhtar K (2014) Transthoracic echocardiography as a measuring and guiding tool for transcatheter device closure of secundum atrial septal defect in young children. J Invasive Cardiol 26:245–248

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shimizu S, Kawamura A, Arai T, Ohno Y, Mogi S, Kodaira M, Anzai A, Kawakami T, Kanazawa H, Hayashida K et al (2013) Intracardiac echocardiography for percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects: initial experiences in Japan. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 28:368–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Takaya Y, Akagi T, Kijima Y, Nakagawa K, Sano S, Ito H (2015) Long-term outcome after transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect in older patients: impact of age at procedure. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8:600–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thanopoulos BD, Laskari CV, Tsaousis GS, Zarayelyan A, Vekiou A, Papadopoulos GS (1998) Closure of atrial septal defects with the amplatzer occlusion device: preliminary results. J Am Coll Cardiol 31:1110–1116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Haas NA, Happel CM, Soetemann DB, Hanslik A, Moysich A, Kececioglu D, Laser KT (2016) Optimal septum alignment of the Figulla Flex occluder to the atrial septum in patients with secundum atrial septal defects. EuroIntervention 11:1153–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kenny D, Eicken A, Dahnert I, Boudjemline Y, Sievert H, Schneider MB, Gori T, Hijazi ZM (2019) A randomized, controlled, multi-center trial of the efficacy and safety of the Occlutech Figulla Flex-II Occluder compared to the Amplatzer Septal Occluder for transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 93:316–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Amin Z (2014) Echocardiographic predictors of cardiac erosion after Amplatzer septal occluder placement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 83:84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thanopoulos BD, Dardas P, Ninios V, Eleftherakis N, Karanasios E (2013) Transcatheter closure of large atrial septal defects with deficient aortic or posterior rims using the “Greek maneuver”. A multicenter study. Int J Cardiol 168:3643–3646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McElhinney DB, Quartermain MD, Kenny D, Alboliras E, Amin Z (2016) Relative risk factors for cardiac erosion following transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects: a case–control study. Circulation 133:1738–1746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kijima Y, Akagi T, Takaya Y, Taniguchi M, Nakagawa K, Kusano K, Sano S, Ito H (2016) Deficient surrounding rims in patients undergoing transcatheter atrial septal defect closure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 29:768–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Moore J, Hegde S, El-Said H, Beekman R, Benson L, Bergersen L, Holzer R, Jenkins K, Ringel R, Rome J et al (2013) Transcatheter device closure of atrial septal defects a safety review. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6:433–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferreira SM, Ho SY, Anderson RH (1992) Morphological study of defects of the atrial septum within the oval fossa: implications for transcatheter closure of left-to-right shunt. Br Heart J 67:316–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Boon I, Vertongen K, Paelinck BP, Demulier L, Van Berendoncks A, De Maeyer C, Marchau F, Panzer J, Vandekerckhove K, De Wolf D (2018) How to size ASDs for percutaneous closure. Pediatr Cardiol 39:168–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee PH, Song JK, Kim JS, Heo R, Lee S, Kim DH, Song JM, Kang DH, Kwon SU, Kang DW et al (2018) Cryptogenic stroke and high-risk patent foramen ovale: The DEFENSE-PFO Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 71:2335–2342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee JY, Song JK, Song JM, Kang DH, Yun SC, Kang DW, Kwon SU, Kim JS (2010) Association between anatomic features of atrial septal abnormalities obtained by omni-plane transesophageal echocardiography and stroke recurrence in cryptogenic stroke patients with patent foramen ovale. Am J Cardiol 106:129–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ms. Makiko Dan, Kumiko Abe, Yasuko Hatori, Akemi Okamoto, Makiko Kondo, Junko Shinohara, Mai Iwao, Tomoko Okazeri, Yurie Ensaka, Sachiko Matsumoto, Kazuaki Nagatsuka, and Namiki Yoshie for technical assistance. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuji Itabashi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

H. Kanazawa received a consulting fee from Japan Lifeline, as well as a funding grant from Abbott. The remaining authors report no relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest, including related consultancies, shareholdings, or funding grants.

Ethical approval

The study protocol was in accordance with Helsinki 1975 declaration and was approved by the Keio University School of Medicine Ethics Committee (20160258).

Informed consent

All patients provided informed consent to participate.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 443 KB)

Supplementary file2 (MP4 17882 KB)

Supplementary file3 (MP4 19526 KB)

Supplementary file4 (MP4 22865 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kitakata, H., Itabashi, Y., Kanazawa, H. et al. Appropriate device selection for transcatheter atrial septal defect closure using three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 37, 1159–1168 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-02095-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-02095-x

Keywords

Navigation