Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relationship between beat to beat coronary artery motion and image quality in prospectively ECG-gated two heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective was to investigate the influence of the beat-to-beat movement of the coronary arteries on image quality of multi-segment reconstruction (MSR) images. Although MSR improves temporal resolution, image quality would be degraded by beat-to-beat movement of the coronary arteries. In a retrospectively review, 18 patients (mean age, 67.0 years) who underwent coronary CT angiography using a 320-detector row CT were included. The displacement and diameter of coronary artery segments for each of the identified nine landmarks was recorded. The motion ratio was calculated as the division of displacement by diameter. Image quality (IQ) was graded by a four-point scale. The correlation between MSR IQ score and the motion ratio showed stronger negative correlation than that between MSR IQ score and the displacement (r = −0.54 vs. r = −0.36). The average motion ratio for segments in which half-scan reconstruction (HSR) IQ was better than MSR IQ (29.1%, group A) was higher than that for segments in which MSR IQ was better than HSR IQ (16.0%, group C). The motion ratio in group C was lower than 25%. Difference in IQ scores of the HSR images was more frequent in group A than in the remaining segments in which the motion ratio was lower than 25% (16.7% vs. 66.0%; P < 0.0002). The motion ratio could be a better index than the displacement to evaluate the influence of the motion of coronary arteries on image quality. MSR images would be impaired by a motion ratio larger than 25%. Image impairment of one of the HSR images might also impair MSR images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hendel RC, Kramer CM, Patel MR, Poon M (2006) ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 Appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1475–1497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vanhoenacker PK, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Van Heste R et al (2007) Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis. Radiology 244:419–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2006) Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 16:2739–2747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2318–2323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F et al (2009) Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy. Circulation 120:823–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ding Z, Friedman MH (2000) Quantification of 3-D coronary arterial motion using clinical biplane cineangiograms. Int J Card Imaging 16:331–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Achenbach S. (2007) CT coronary angiography. Half-Scan vs. multi-segment reconstruction for computed tomography coronary angiography. SOMATOM Sessions. http://www.medical.siemens.com/siemens/en_US/cs_cardio_FBAs/files/Case_Study/Achenbach_MultiSegment_Reconstruction.pdf. Accessed 4 September 2010

  8. Halliburton SS, Stillman AE, Flohr T et al (2003) Do segmented reconstruction algorithms for cardiac multi-slice computed tomography improve image quality? Herz 28:20–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kitagawa K, Lardo AC, Lima JAC, George RT (2009) Prospective ECG-gated 320 row detector computed tomography: implications for CT angiography and perfusion imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A et al (2006) Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography––initial experience. Eur J Radiol 57:331–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Flohr T, Ohnesorge B (2001) Heart rate adaptive optimization of spatial and temporal resolution for electrocardiogram-gated multislice spiral CT of the heart. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25:907–923

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vembar M, Garcia MJ, Heuscher DJ et al (2003) A dynamic approach to identifying desired physiological phases for cardiac imaging using multislice spiral CT. Med Phys 30:1683–1693

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC et al (2007) Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation 116:1290–1305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tatsugami F, Matsuki M, Shigesato H et al. A new imaging technique using real prep with 320 detector coronary CT angiography [article in Japanese]. Paper presented at: Meeting of Japan Society of Cardiovascular Radiology, Kumamoto, Japan, 3 July 2010

  15. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: report of the Ad Hoc Committee for grading of coronary artery disease, council on cardiovascular surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51:5–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Pshychol Meas 20:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T et al (2006) Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 241:378–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Horiguchi J, Yun S, Hirai N et al (2006) Timing on 16-slice scanner and implications for 64-slice cardiac CT: do you start scanning immediately after breath hold? Acad Radiol 13:173–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Herzog C, Nguyen SA, Savino G et al (2007) Does two-segment image reconstruction at 64-section CT coronary angiography improve image quality and diagnostic accuracy? Radiology 244:121–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang YT, Yang CY, Hsiao JK et al (2009) The influence of reconstruction algorithm and heart rate on coronary artery image quality and stenosis detection at 64-detector cardiac CT. Korean J Radiol 10:227–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ebert TJ, Eckberg DL, Vetrovec GM et al (1984) Impedance cardiograms reliably estimate beat-by-beat changes of left ventricular stroke volume in humans. Cardiovasc Res 18:354–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ding Z, Friedman MH (2000) Dynamics of human coronary arterial motion and its potential role in coronary atherogenesis. J Biomech Eng 122:488–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Duerinckx A, Atkinson DP (1997) Coronary MR angiography during peak-systole: work in progress. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:979–986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We have not received any funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, 113-0033, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

    Nobuo Tomizawa, Shuhei Komatsu, Masaaki Akahane & Kuni Ohtomo

  2. Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Tokyo Metropolitan Regional Office, 1-6 Tsukuda 2-Chome, 104-0051, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

    Rumiko Torigoe

  3. Department of Radiology, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, 108-8639, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan

    Shigeru Kiryu

Authors
  1. Nobuo Tomizawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuhei Komatsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Masaaki Akahane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rumiko Torigoe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shigeru Kiryu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kuni Ohtomo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nobuo Tomizawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tomizawa, N., Komatsu, S., Akahane, M. et al. Relationship between beat to beat coronary artery motion and image quality in prospectively ECG-gated two heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28, 139–146 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9759-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9759-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation