Skip to main content
Log in

Existentialist Perspectives on the Problem and Prevention of Moral Disengagement

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We bring the distinct and complementary existentialist perspectives of Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir to bear on the phenomenon of moral disengagement in managerial decision-making. Existentialist thinking is a rich source of insight on this phenomenon, because—as we demonstrate—the concept of moral disengagement overlaps significantly with the notion of ‘a consciousness in bad faith’ in Sartre’s writing, and the notion of ‘not willing oneself free’ in De Beauvoir’s writing. These concepts play a critical role in existentialist ethics, and thus existentialists carefully deliberated the phenomenon that these concepts aim to illuminate. Rather than being motivated by self-interest as implied by the bulk of extant empirical work on moral disengagement, existentialist perspectives suggest that moral disengagement can instead be motivated by an overwhelming sense of responsibility towards diverse others. From an existentialist perspective, the temptation to morally disengage will not only be felt by individuals that have a strong, trait-like propensity for moral disengagement, but by managers in general. This temptation is likely to be felt in the specific context of right vs. right dilemmas, which have up to now rarely been studied by moral disengagement scholars. Even though existentialist thought paints the problem of moral disengagement as more widespread and entrenched in the human condition, it also suggests ways of preventing moral disengagement. In arguing for these preventative approaches, we make careful distinctions between Sartre and De Beauvoir, thereby becoming the first to argue that De Beauvoir offers a unique contribution to our understanding of ethical decision-making in management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This type of reasoning works to displace or diffuse one’s sense of being personally responsible and is particularly likely to arise in business organizations because hierarchy and group decision-making are common to such settings (Detert et al., 2008).

  2. Please note while Sartre was not the only existentialist to discuss freedom and responsibility, in this section, we rely specifically on the way he uses and explores these constructs. Also note that while Sartre addressed the notion of an existentialist ethics in Existentialism is a Humanism (2007), as well as very briefly at the end of Being and Nothingness (1992)later to be reprinted as part of an essay titled, Existentialism and Human Emotions (1985)—it was Hazel Barnes who acted on the call to develop a comprehensive existentialist ethics (1978). It is true that Sartre's Notebooks for an Ethics (1992)—published posthumouslycould be considered a more direct representation of his philosophy as it relates to ethics. Yet, we aver that the ideas in his notebooks represent a shift toward Marxism and away from the Existentialism of his earlier thought in Being and Nothingness (1943). Sartre's notebooks deal with the themes of alienation, oppression, and violence with emphasis on history and society rather than the individual’s condition and their situational ethics. Thus, we focus on Barnes for the discussion of an Existentialist ethics that builds on Being and Nothingness.

  3. Here, Barnes is pointing to advertising practices. She refers to “…cynical manipulators, often collectively termed Madison Avenue, who publicly and subliminally coerce us into fitting their own commercial image” (1978, p. 85).

  4. De Beauvoir (1976) uses a slew of terms to state this distinction; subject and object; awareness and facticity; "lack of being" and "being" (following Sartre’s nothingness and being); intentionality and fact.

  5. De Beauvoir claims that Western Philosophy has tended to deny this two-fold human condition, either by exalting one of these facets of our existence above the other, or by reducing one to the other (see e.g., her references to Kantian thought, 1976, p. 33).

  6. Emphasis is our own.

  7. Beauvoir’s ethics effectively exhibits the third, most sophisticated stage of moral development according to Gilligan’s model (1993): realizing and operating from the assumption that the self and the other are interdependent (Arp, 2000).

References

  • Andrew, B. S. (2003). Beauvoir’s place in philosophical thought. In C. Card (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Simone De Beauvoir. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arp, K. (2000). A different voice in the phenomenological tradition: Simone de Beauvoir and the ethic of care. In Feminist phenomenology (pp. 71–81). Springer.

  • Arp, K. (2001). The Bonds of Freedom. Carus Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badaracco, L. (1997). Defining moments: When managers must choose between right and right. Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Caprara, G.-V., & Zsolnai, L. (2000). Corporate transgressions through moral disengagement. Journal of Human Values, 6(1), 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Prentice-Hall series in social learning theory. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action (Vol. 1). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of personality and social psychology, 71(2), 364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. A. (1982). The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, H. E. (1978). An existentialist ethics. The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., Zhao, H., & Miao, Q. (2015). Personal motives, moral disengagement, and unethical decisions by entrepreneurs: Cognitive mechanisms on the “slippery slope.” Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1), 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsky, A. (2011). Investigating the effects of moral disengagement and participation on unethical work behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0889-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chugh, D., Kern, M. C., Zhu, Z., & Lee, S. (2014). Withstanding moral disengagement: Attachment security as an ethical intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 88–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Beauvoir, S. (1976). The ethics of ambiguity. Citadel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beauvoir, S. (1986). Idéalisme moral et Réalisme Politique. In L’Existentialisme et la sagesse des nations. Les Editions Nagel.

  • Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detmer, D. (1988). Freedom as a value: A critique of the ethical theory of Jean-Paul Sarte. Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, K. T. (2005). Towards authenticity: A sartrean perspective on business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(4), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-1178-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, S. (2006). Beauvoir’s idea of ambiguity. The philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir: Critical essays, 201–213.

  • Kleist, C. (2013). Using Sartre’s critique of dialectical reason for managerial decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1266-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D., & Molinsky, A. (2008). Navigating the bind of necessary evils: Psychological engagement and the production of interpersonally sensitive behavior. Source the Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 847–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molinsky, A., & Margolis, J. (2005). Necessary evils and interpersonal sensitivity in organizations. Source the Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 245–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C., Detert, J. R., Klebe Treviño, L., Baker, V. L., & Mayer, D. M. (2012). Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology, 65(1), 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, I. (1999). Existentialists and mystics: Writings on philosophy and literature. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, A., Le, H., North-Samardzic, A., & Cohen, M. (2020). Moral disengagement at work: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(3), 535–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04173-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogunfowora, B., Bourdage, J. S., & Nguyen, B. (2013). An exploration of the dishonest side of self–monitoring: Links to moral disengagement and unethical business decision making. European Journal of Personality, 27(6), 532–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P. (1989). No exit & three other plays. Vintage International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P. (2007). Existentialism is a humanism. Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J. P. (1992). Notebooks for an ethics. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P. (1943). Being and nothingness. Éditions Gallimard, Philosophical Library.

  • Schaefer, U., & Bouwmeester, O. (2021). Reconceptualizing moral disengagement as a process: Transcending overly liberal and overly conservative practice in the field. Journal of Business Ethics, 172(3), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04520-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schott, R. M. (2003). Beauvoir on the ambiguity of evil. In C. Card (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Simone De Beauvoir. Cambridge University Press.

  • Solomon, R. C. (2008). Are we victims of circumstances? Hegel and Jean-Paul Sartre on corporate responsibility and bad faith. In Cutting-edge issues in business ethics (pp. 9–20). Springer.

  • Stevens, G. W., Deuling, J. K., & Armenakis, A. A. (2012). Successful psychopaths: Are they unethical decision-makers and why? Journal of Business Ethics, 105(2), 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uyterhoeven, H. (1989). General managers in the middle. Harvard Business Review, 67(5), 136–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, A. (2008). Sartrean existentialism and ethical decision-making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9477-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, T., Gino, F., & Margolis, J. D. (2018). Does “could” lead to good? On the road to moral insight. Academy of Management Journal, 61(3), 857–895. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0839

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helet Botha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no employment, funding, or financial conflicts of interest to declare. Under non-financial interests, we do declare that the second author is a former EIC of the Journal of Business Ethics.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Botha, H., Freeman, R.E. Existentialist Perspectives on the Problem and Prevention of Moral Disengagement. J Bus Ethics 185, 499–511 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05130-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05130-0

Keywords

Navigation