Skip to main content
Log in

MBA CEOs, Short-Term Management and Performance

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is ample discussion of MBA self-serving values in the corporate social responsibility literature, and yet empirical studies regarding the corporate manifestations and consequences of those values are scant. In a comprehensive study of major US public corporations, we find that MBA CEOs are more apt than their non-MBA counterparts to engage in short-term strategic expedients such as positive earnings management and suppression of R&D, which in turn are followed by compromised firm market valuations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We are not implying that MBA education leads to short-term practices that are destructive of firm value. It may be that individuals who favor such practices chose MBA business educations versus programs in the arts or sciences, the latter of which may find favor with those planning careers that are more socially or technically oriented.

  2. To enhance the validity of our estimates, we drop SIC years with less than 10 observations.

  3. Results stayed the same if we include the top 10 programs only.

  4. In analyses, not reported, we confirmed that positive earnings management and reducing R&D did increase contemporaneous return on assets.

  5. The estimates of the indirect effect are assumed to be normally distributed given the sample size.

  6. There are currently numerous other measures of EM but these could not be used in our analysis due to the unavailability of data, the specialized nature of a measure to particular circumstances (M&A, restructuring, and management buybacks) or industry, and changes in reporting regulations. For example, Moehrle (2002), measured EM through the decision to reverse and the amount of reversal of restructuring charges; he hand-collected data through newspaper searches. Schrand and Wong (2003) used a method specific to the banking industry, which does not pertain to our sample. Balsam et al. (2003) gauged EM through the timing of allocation of the value of stock option grants which is no longer practical due to changes in statutory regulations. Picconi (2006) used off balance sheet items and Dhaliwal et al. (2004) used control variables to which we had no access.

References

  • Aglietta, M., & Reberioux, A. (2005). Corporate governance adrift: A critique of shareholder value. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, A., Lobo, G., & Zhou, J. (2006). Job security and income smoothing: An empirical test of the Fudenberg and Tirole (1995) model. Unpublished working paper, Texas A&M University.

  • Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. The American Economic Review, 62(5), 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arce, D. G. (2007). Is agency theory self-activating? Economic Inquiry, 45(4), 708–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balsam, S., Krishnan, J., & Yang, J. S. (2003). Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 71–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, V. L., III, & Mueller, G. C. (2002). CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management Science, 48(6), 782–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebchuck, L., & Grinstein, Y. (2005). The growth of executive pay. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(2), 280–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (2009). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bédard, J., Chtourou, S. M., & Courteau, L. (2004). The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(2), 13–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B., & Van Reenen, J. (2012). Firm performance and wage evidence from across the corporate hierarchy. CEP discussion paper 1088, May.

  • Beneish, M., & Vargus, M. (2002). Insider trading, earnings quality, and accrual mispricing. The Accounting Review, 4, 755–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W., & O’Toole, J. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 93(5), 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstresser, D., & Philippon, T. (2006). CEO incentives and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 80(3), 511–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2003). Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1169–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 257–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat, S., Bolton, B., & Subramanian, A. (2010). CEO education. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, Fall: CEO turnover and firm performance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizjak, J. M., Brickley, J. A., & Coles, J. L. (1993). Stock-based incentive compensation and investment behavior. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16(1–3), 349–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bublitz, B., & Ettredge, M. (1989). The information in discretionary outlays: Advertising, research, and development. Accounting Review, 64(1), 108–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgstahler, D. & Dichev, I. (1997). Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, N., & Kedia, S. (2006). The impact of performance-based compensation on misreporting. Journal of Financial Economics, 79, 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushee, B. (1998). The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review, 73, 305–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J., & Irons, M. (1991). Are economists different and if so why? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 171–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, L. K., Lakonishok, J., & Sougiannis, T. (2001). The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. The Journal of Finance, 56(6), 2431–2456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, S. H., Martin, J. D., & Kensinger, J. W. (1990). Corporate research and development expenditures and share value. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2), 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Q., & Warfield, T. D. (2005). Equity incentives and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 441–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. J., Peirce, E., Hartman, L. P., Hoffman, W. M., & Carrier, J. (2007). Ethics, CSR, and sustainability education in the Financial Times top 50 global business schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(4), 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, M. (2003). The end of the MBA as we know it? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2(4), 365–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornett, M., Marcus, A., & Tehranian, H. (2008). Corporate governance and pay-for-performance: The impact of earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 87, 357–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bondt, W. F. M., & Thaler, R. (1985). Does the stock market overreact? The Journal of finance, 40(3), 793–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50, 344–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P. M., Hutton, A., & Sloan, R. (1996). Economic consequences of accounting for stock-based compensation. Journal of Accounting Research, 40, 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P. M., & Sloan, R. (1991). Executive incentives and the horizon problem: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14, 51–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. Accounting Review, 70(2), 193–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFond, M., & Jiambalvo, J. (1994). Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17, 145–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFond, M., & Park, C. (1997). Smoothing income in anticipation of future earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 23, 115–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGeorge, F., Patel, J., & Zeckhauser, R. (1999). Earnings management to exceed thresholds. Journal of Business, 72(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal, D. S., Gleason, C. A., & Mills, L. F. (2004). Last‐chance earnings management: using the tax expense to meet analysts' forecasts. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(2), 431–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, L. (1990). The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory. Academy of Management Review, 15(3), 369–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efendi, J., Srivastava, A., & Swanson, E. (2007). Why do corporate managers misstate financial statements? The role of option compensation and other factors. Journal of Financial Economics, 85, 667–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, R. Z. (2002). Determinants of earnings management ethics among accountants. Journal of Business Ethics, 40(1), 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enzle, M., & Anderson, S. (1993). Surveillant intentions and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(2), 257–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espeland, W. N., & Hirsch, P. M. (1990). Ownership changes, accounting practice and the redefinition of the corporation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(1–2), 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J., & Robertson, J. (2003). Ethics in the business school curriculum. Business and Society Review, 110(3), 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2005). Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 8–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2009). How and why theories matter: A comment on Felin and Foss (2009). Organization Science, 20(3), 669–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M., & Rosenzweig, K. (1995). Attitudes of students and accounting practitioners concerning the ethical acceptability of earnings management. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(6), 433–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, B., & Schulze, G. (2000). Does economics make citizens corrupt? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43, 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (2010). Managing for stakeholders: Trade-offs or value creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(1), 7–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In New York Times Magazine, September 13.

  • Froud, J., Johal, S., Leaver, A., & Williams, K. (2006). Financialization and strategy: Narrative and numbers. Oxford: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geletkanycz, M. A., & Black, S. S. (2001). Bound by the past? Experience-based effects on commitment to the strategic status quo. Journal of Management, 27(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practice. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 13–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, C. M., & Smith, K. G. (1991). Research notes and communications management and organizational change: A note on the railroad industry. Strategic Management Journal, 12(7), 557–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., Black, S., & Fredrickson, J. W. (1992). Executive leadership of the high technology firm: What is special about it. Advances in global high-technology management, 2, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Fukutomi, G. D. (1991). The seasons of a CEO’s tenure. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 719–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T., Ibarra, H., & Peyer, U. (2010). The best-performing CEOs in the world. Harvard Business Review, 88(1), 104–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T., Ibarra, H., & Peyer, U. (2013). The best-performing CEOs in the world. Harvard Business Review, 91(1), 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O., & Exit, V. (1970). Loyalty. Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (2005). Agency costs of overvalued equity. Financial Management, 34(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. E. (2001). Ethically related judgments by observers of earnings management. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(4), 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 233–265). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, W. A., & Vieito, J. P. (2013). CEO gender and firm performance. Journal of Economics and Business, 67, 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, T. A. (2002). Addressing the crisis in confidence in corporations: Root causes, victims, and strategies for reform. The Academy of Management Executive, 16(3), 139–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, W., & O’Sullivan, M. (2000). Maximizing shareholder value: A new ideology for corporate governance. Economy and Society, 29(1), 13–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Breton, I., & Miller, D. (2015). The paradox of resource vulnerability: Considerations for organizational curatorship. Strategic Management Journal, 36(3), 397–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonhardt, D. (2000). A matter of degree? Not for consultants. New York Times, October 1, Section 31: 1–18.

  • Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(3), 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt, C. A., & Wiedman, C. I. (2004). How are earnings managed? An examination of specific accruals. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(2), 461–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martelli, J., & Abels, P. (2010). The education of a leader: Education credentials and other characteristics of chief executive officers. Journal of Education for Business, 85, 209–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marwell, G., & Ames, R. (1981). Economists free ride, does anyone else? Journal of Public Economics, 15, 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mergenthaler, R., Rajgopal, S., & Srinivasan, S. (2009). CEO and CFO career penalties to missing quarterly analysts forecasts. Unpublished working paper. Harvard Business School.

  • Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1982). Predation, reputation, and entry deterrence. Journal of Economic Theory, 27(2), 280–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005). Managing for the long run. Boston: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Shamsie, J. (2001). Learning across the life cycle: Experimentation and performance among the Hollywood studio heads. Strategic Management Journal, 22(8), 725–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Xu, X. (2016). A fleeting glory: Self-serving behavior among celebrated MBA CEOs. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(3), 286–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Xu, X., & Mehrotra, V. (2015). When is human capital a valuable resource? The performance effects of Ivy League selection among celebrated CEOs. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 930–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (2004). Managers, not MBAs. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. (2004). An open letter to the deans and the faculties of American business schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 185–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neubaum, D., Pagell, M., Drexler, J., McKee-Ryan, F., & Larson, E. (2009). Business education and its relationship to student personal moral philosophies and attitudes towards profits. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(1), 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. (2003). Corporate governance for crooks? The case for corporate virtue. Working paper 164. University of Zurich.

  • Palmer, D. A., Jennings, P. D., & Zhou, X. (1993). Late adoption of the multidivisional form by large US corporations: Institutional, political, and economic accounts. Administrative science quarterly, 38(1), 100–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22, 435–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (2005). Why do bad management theories persist? A comment on Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 96–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picconi, M. (2006). The perils of pensions: Does pension accounting lead investors and analysts astray? The Accounting Review, 81(4), 925–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangan, S. (1998). Earnings management and the performance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 50(1), 101–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rechner, P. L., & Dalton, D. R. (1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safdar, I. (2003). Executive stock option exercise, earnings management, and stock returns. Unpublished working paper, University of Rochester.

  • Schrand, C. M., & Wong, M. H. (2003). Earnings management using the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets under SFAS No. 109. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(3), 579–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate finance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. E., & Thevaranjan, A. (2010). A moral solution to the moral hazard problem. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, A. (1994). Debt-covenant violations and managers’ accounting responses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17, 281–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teoh, S., Welch, I., & Wong, T. (1998). Earnings management and the long run market performance of IPOs. Journal of Finance, 53(6), 1935–1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Useem, M., & Karabel, J. (1986). Pathways to top corporate management. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 184–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakelin, K. (2001). Productivity growth and R&D expenditure in UK manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 30(7), 1079–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbach, M. S. (1988). Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 431–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. C. J., Huang, S., Kuo, L., & Wu, W. H. (2010). Management education for sustainability: A web-based content analysis. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(3), 520–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yim, S. (2013). The acquisitiveness of youth: CEO age and acquisition behavior. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(1), 250–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danny Miller.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 4.

Table 4 Robustness test for MBA, short-term management and performance

Appendix 2

See Table 5.

Table 5 Earnings management, R&D, and compensation growth

Appendix 3

See Table 6.

Table 6 MBA CEOs, top schools, and short-term management

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miller, D., Xu, X. MBA CEOs, Short-Term Management and Performance. J Bus Ethics 154, 285–300 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3450-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3450-5

Keywords

Navigation