Skip to main content
Log in

Order Ethics: Bridging the Gap Between Contractarianism and Business Ethics

Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contract-based approaches have been a focus of attention in business ethics. As one of the grand traditions in political philosophy, contractarianism is founded on the notion that we will never resolve deep moral disagreement. Classical philosophers like Hobbes and Locke, or recent ones like Rawls and Gaus, seek to solve ethical conflicts on the level of social rules and procedures. Recent authors in business ethics have sought to utilize contract-based approaches for their field and to apply it to concrete business dilemmas. However, the application of contractarianism to management contexts can cause difficulties. Our article discusses this conceptual problem of contractarian business ethics and presents the idea of order ethics as an alternative. Order ethics, as we argue, can make a difference by conceptually bridging the gap between contractarianism and business ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. This is, for instance, the case if consumers reward a company for conforming to the consumers’ ethical standards.

  2. Interestingly, Buchanan already applied simple capital and investment theory to morals (Buchanan 2000: 159).

References

  • Andreoni, J. (1988). Why free ride? Strategies and learning in public goods experiments. Journal of Public Economics, 37, 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. (1994). Game theory and the social contract, Vol. 1: Playing fair. Cambridge, London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. (1998). Game theory and the social contract, Vol. 2: Just playing. Cambridge, London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatright, J. R. (2000). Contract theory and business ethics: A review of ties that bind. Business and Society Review 105, 4, 452–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1980). The power to tax: Analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1985). The reason of rules: Constitutional political economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1990). The domain of constitutional economics. Constitutional Political Economy, 1, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (2000). The limits of liberty: Between anarchy and Leviathan. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (2009). Economists have no clothes. In M. Baurmann & B. Lahno (Eds.), Rationality, Markets, and Morals. Perspectives in Moral Science (Vol. 0, pp. 151–156).

  • Buchanan, J. M. (2010). Chicago school thinking: Old and new, unpublished paper. Center for Study of Public Choice, George Mason University: Fairfax, Virginia.

  • Buchanan, J. M. (2011). The limits of market efficiency. Rationality, Markets, and Morals, 2, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, E. F. (2002). Business ethics: A helpful hybrid in search of integrity. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(2), 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. D., & Dunfee, T. W. (1995). Integrative social contract theory: A communitarian conception of economics ethics. Economics and Philosophy, 11(1), 85–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. D., & Dunfee, T. W. (1999). Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. D., & Dunfee, T. W. (2000). Book review dialogue: Tightening the ties that bind-defending a contractarian approach to business ethics. American Business Law Journal, 37, 579–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. D., & Dunfee, T. W. (2002). Ties that bind in business ethics: Social contracts and why they matter. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26, 1853–1865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francé-Gómez, P. (2003). Some Difficulties in Sacconi’s View about Corporate Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(2), 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaus, G. (2011). The order of public reason: A theory of freedom and morality in a diverse and bounded world. Cambride: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, F. (1986). Morals by agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gürerk, Ö., et al. (2006). The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. Science, 312, 108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O. D. (1987). Incomplete contracts. In J. Eatwell, et al. (Eds.), The new Palgrave: A dictionary of economics (Vol. 2, pp. 752–759). London, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O. D., & Holmström, B. R. (1987). The theory of contracts. In T. F. Bewley (Ed.), Advances in economic theory, Chapter 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, D. M., & McPherson, M. S. (2006). Economic analysis, moral philosophy, and public policy (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, J., Moriarty, J., & Norman, W. (2010). Business ethics and (or as) political philosophy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(3), 427–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, L. (2013). The modern social contract tradition. In C. Luetge (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophical foundations of business ethics (pp. 631–645). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heugens, P., Kaptein, M., & van Oosterhout, H. (2004). Ties that grind? Corroborating a typology of social contracting problems. Journal of Business Ethics 49, 3, 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heugens, P., van Oosterhout, H., & Kaptein, M. (2006). Foundations and applications for contractualist business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 68, 3, 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1651/1991). Leviathan, ed. R. Tuck, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hodgson, B. J. (2000). Economics as a moral science. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, B. J. (2001). Can the beast be tamed? Reflections on John McMurty’s unequal freedoms: The global market as an ethical system. Journal of Business Ethics, 33(1), 72–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S., & Sunstein, C. R. (2000). The cost of rights: Why liberty depends on taxes. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homann, K. (2007). Globalisation from a business ethics point of view. In K. Homann, P. Koslowski, & C. Luetge (Eds.), Globalisation and business ethics (pp. 3–11). Aldershot/London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homann, K., & Blome-Drees, F. (1992). Wirtschafts-und Unternehmensethik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homann, K., & Kirchner, C. (1995). Ordnungsethik. Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie, 14, 189–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, M. (1988). A social contract theory of organizations. Notre-Dame, IN: University of Notre-Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D. M. (1990). Corporate culture and economic theory. In J. E. Alt & K. A. Shepsle (Eds.), Perspectives on positive political economy (pp. 90–143). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, C. (2005). Economic ethics, business ethics and the idea of mutual advantages. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(2), 108–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, C. (2008). Public reason and order ethics: A critical assessment. In Adela Cortina, et al. (Eds.), Public reason and applied ethics: The ways of practical reason in a pluralist society (pp. 177–188). Aldershot, London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, C. (2012a). Economic Ethics, In: R. Chadwick (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (Vol. 2, 2nd Ed., pp. 13–19). Oxford: Elsevier.

  • Luetge, C. (2012b). Fundamentals of order ethics: Law, business ethics and the financial crisis. Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie Beihefte, 130, 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, C. (2013). The idea of a contractarian business ethics. In C. Luetge (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophical foundations of business ethics (pp. 647–658). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, C. (2015). Order ethics or moral surplus: What holds a society together?. Lanham, MD: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, C. (2016). Order ethics and the problem of social glue. University of St. Thomas Law Journal, forthcoming.

  • Luetge, C., & Mukerji, N. (Eds.) (2016). Order ethics: An ethical framework for the social market economy. Heidelberg, New York: Springer, forthcoming.

  • Moriarty, J. (2005). On the relevance of political philosophy to business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3), 455–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, W. (2011). Business ethics as self-regulation: Why principles that ground regulations should be used to ground beyond-compliance norms as well. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(S1), 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. M. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R. A., & Margolis, J. D. (1999). Towards an ethics of organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(4), 619–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pies, I., Hielscher, S., & Beckmann, M. (2009). Moral commitment and the societal role of business: An ordonomic approach to corporate citizenship. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3), 375–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pies, I., Winning, A. V., Sardison, M., & Girlich, K. (2010). Sustainability in the petroleum industry. Theory and practice of voluntary self-commitments. Halle, Saale: The Chair of Business Ethics at Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Revised edition, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness. A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, M. C, Jr. (1998). Corporate speech and civic virtue. In A. L. Allen & M. C. Regan Jr (Eds.), Debating democracy’s discontent: Essays on American politics, law, and public philosophy (pp. 289–306). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, J. R. (1997). Grounding hypernorms: Towards a contractarian theory of business ethics. Economics and Philosophy, 13, 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, J. R. (2001). How binding the ties? Business ethics as integrative social contracts. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11, 379–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacconi, L. (2000). The social contract of the firm: Economics, ethics and organisation. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sacconi, L. (2006). A social contract account for CSR as an extended model of corporate governance (I): Rational bargaining and justification. Journal of Business Ethics 68, 3, 259–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacconi, L. (2007). A social contract account for CSR as an extended model of corporate governance (II): Compliance, reputation and reciprocity. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(1), 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Oosterhout, H., Wempe, B., & van Willigenburg, T., (2004). Contractualism and the project for an integrative organizational ethics. In S. Welcomer (Ed.), IABS proceedings the fifteenth annual conference. Jackson Hole, Wyoming.

  • Vanberg, V. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and the ‘game of catallaxy’: The perspective of constitutional economics. Constitutional Political Economy, 18(3), 199–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner-Tsukamoto, S. (2005). an economic approach to business ethics: Moral agency of the firm and the enabling and constraining effects of economic institutions and interactions in a market economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner-Tsukamoto, S. (2008). Contrasting the behavioural business ethics approach and the institutional economic approach to business ethics: Insights from the study of Quaker employers. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 835–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wempe, B. (2004). On the use of the social contract model in business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13, 332–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wempe, B. (2008a). Contractarian business ethics: Credentials and design criteria. Organization Studies, 29, 1337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wempe, B. (2008b). Four design criteria for any future contractarian theory of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 81, 3, 697–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wempe, B. (2009). Extant social contracts and the question of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 88, 4, 741–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P. (1985). Persons, rights and corporations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Luetge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luetge, C., Armbrüster, T. & Müller, J. Order Ethics: Bridging the Gap Between Contractarianism and Business Ethics. J Bus Ethics 136, 687–697 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2977-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2977-6

Keywords

Navigation