Skip to main content
Log in

Custom and Moral Sentiment: Cross-Cultural Aspects of Postgraduate Student Perceptions of Leadership Ethicality

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent crisis in a prominent German car manufacturer generated by unethical leadership practices has brought into sharp focus, once again, the need for radical and fundamental ethical transformation among members of capitalism’s leadership elite. The divide between ethics and business needs to be closed and to do this effectively in a globalized world, cross-cultural aspects of moral sentiment need to be better understood. The current paper contributes to the extant literature in this regard by describing and analyzing cross-cultural aspects of German and South African student’s ‘sympathy’ towards business ethical phenomena, using Adam Smith’s ‘Theory of Moral Sentiment’ as a theoretical framework and qualitative methods. The paper constructs a heuristic device based on Adam Smith’s theoretical framework and then proceeds to empirically analyze the theory by investigating German and South African student moral sentiments towards specific ethical leadership behaviors. The study indicates that while there is general cross-cultural homogeneity in moral approbation among students for fundamental aspects of ethical leadership behavior, nuanced custom-based differences emerge from the qualitative analysis. Following Adam Smith, fine grained differences in moral sentiment arising from ‘custom’ are evident. Thus, although ethicality of specific leadership behavior is found to be viewed similarly by both groups of students, significant nuanced differences arise in German students who emphasize intellectual autonomy over the conservatism favored by their South African counterparts. Practical aspects of these findings are briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, J. L., & Sengupta, J. (2000). Additivity versus attenuation: The role of culture in the resolution of information incongruity. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9, 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom, A., & Willis, E. (2007). Competing paradigms and health research. In M. Saks & J. Allsop (Eds.), Researching health: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozma, I. F. (2011). The relation between globalization and personal values across 53 countries and 28 years. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tennessee. Retrieved October 15, 2014, from http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1175.

  • Cresswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draucker, C. B., Martsolf, D. S., Ratchneewan, R., & Rusk, T. B. (2007). Theoretical sampling and category development in grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17(8), 1137–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economist. (2015). Dirty secrets. September 28–30.

  • Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki. T., Utriainen, T., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. Sage Open January–March, 1–10.

  • Eyles, C. (2009). A grounded theory study of homeopathic practitioners’ perceptions and experiences of the homeopathic consultation. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southampton.

  • Ferber, R. (1977). Research by convenience. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 57–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., Bhawuk, D. P. S., Nishii, L. H., & Bechtold, D. J. (2004). Individualism and collectivism. In R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman, & V. Gupta (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghauri, P., & Gronhaug, K. (2002). Research methods in business studies: A practical guide. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardcourt, W. (2014). The future of capitalism: A consideration of alternatives. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38, 1307–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higginbottom, G. M. (2004). Sampling issues in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher, 12, 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. M., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBEStudy of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1990). Cultural change in advanced industrial societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kam, C. D., Wilking, J. R., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2007). Beyond the “Narrow Data Base”: Another convenience sample for experimental research. Political Behavior, 29(4), 415–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B. I., Lowe, K. B., & Gibson, C. B. (2006). A quarter century of culture’s consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3), 285–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyngäs, H., Elo, S., Pölkki, T., Kääriäinen, M., & Kanste, O. (2011). Sisällönanalyysi suomalaisessa hoitotieteellisessä tutkimuksessa (The use of content analysis in Finnish nursing science research). Hoitotiede, 23(2), 138–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, M. D., & Goetz, J. P. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Journal of Educational Research, 52, 31–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, J. W. (2003). Theory-testing, generalization, and the problem of external validity. Sociological Theory, 21, 236–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. G, Jr. (1982). On the external validity of experiments in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 225–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1995). Designing qualitative research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective’. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mencl, J., & May, D. R. (2009). The effects of proximity and empathy on ethical decision making: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 201–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster. (2014). The free dictionary. Retrieved October 10, 2014, from http://www.merriam-ebster.com/dictionary/culture.

  • Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38, 379–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M. (2007). Sampling in grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A., & Merunka, D. R. (2014). Convenience samples of college students and research reproducibility. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1035–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2012). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quazi, A. M., & O’Brien, D. (2000). An empirical test of a cross-national model of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(1), 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, D. A., Egri, C. P., Furrer, O., Kuo, M.-H., Li, Y., Wangenheim, F., et al. (2014). Societal-level versus individual-level predictions of ethical behavior: A 48-society study of collectivism and individualism. Journal of Business Ethics, 122, 282–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. R. (2009). Research methods for social work (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Books/Cole, Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and craft of the learning organization. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1759 [1976]). The theory of moral sentiments (A. L. Macfie & D. D. Raphael, Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Steel, P., & Taras, V. (2010). Culture as a consequence: A multi-level multivariate meta-analysis of the effects of individual and country characteristics on work-related cultural values. Journal of International Management, 16, 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (1989). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strobel, M., Tumasjan, A., & Welpe, I. (2010). Do business ethics pay off? The influence of ethical leadership on organizational attractiveness. Journal of Psychology, 218(4), 213–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(1), 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szmigin, I., & Rutherford, R. (2013). Shared value and the impartial spectator test. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 171–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thyer, B. A. (2001). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. In The handbook of social work research methods (pp. 273–293). Sage (Online). Retrieved August 5, 2012, from http://srmo.sagepub.com/downloadsmodoc.form.

  • Triandis, H. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In J. Berman (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1989 (pp. 41–133). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. A., Sully de Luque, M., Washburn, N. T., & House, R. J. (2006). Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: A GLOBE study of 15 countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 823–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P. H. (1991). Adam Smith and his legacy for modern capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the Editor, Dr. D. Poff, for her helpful suggestions in improving the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. A. L. Coldwell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coldwell, D.A.L. Custom and Moral Sentiment: Cross-Cultural Aspects of Postgraduate Student Perceptions of Leadership Ethicality. J Bus Ethics 145, 201–213 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2951-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2951-3

Keywords

Navigation