Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Consumer Ethics: The Role of Self-Regulatory Focus

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study investigates the influence of self-regulatory focus on consumer ethical beliefs (i.e., consumers’ judgment of various unethical consumer practices). The self-regulatory focus framework is highly influential and applies to an impressively wide spectrum of topics across a diverse array of domains. However, previous research has not yet examined the link between this personality construct and the consumer ethics field. Findings indicate that promotion affects one’s attitude toward questionable consumer practices with those having a stronger (versus weaker) promotion focus being more likely to believe these consumer misbehaviors to be acceptable. Further, this study shows that prevention influences one’s perception of morally dubious consumer practices with those having a stronger (versus weaker) prevention focus being more inclined to believe these questionable consumer activities to be unacceptable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Aaker, J.L. and A.Y. Lee: 2001, ‘‘I’ Seek Pleasures and ‘We’ Avoid Pains: The Role of Self- Regulatory Focus in Information Processing and Persuasion’, Journal of Consumer Research 28(1), 33-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Khatib, J.A., S.J. Vitell, R. Rexeisen and M.Y.A. Rawwas: 2005, ‘Inter-Country Differences of Consumer Ethics in Arab Countries’, International Business Review 14(4), 495-516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Rafee S. and T.P. Cronan: 2006, ‘Digital Piracy: Factors that Influence Attitude towards Behavior’, Journal of Business Ethics 63(3), 237-259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, E.B.: 2005, ‘Behavioral Consequences of Affect: Combining Evaluative and Regulatory Mechanism’, Journal of Consumer Research 32(3), 355-361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brebels, L., D. De Cremer and S. Constantine: 2008, ‘Retaliation as a Response To Procedural Unfairness: A Self-Regulatory Approach’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95(6), 1511-1525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, C., A.P. Buunk, A. Dijkstra and J.M. Peiro: 2008, ‘The Relationship between Goal Orientation, Social Comparison Responses, Self-Efficacy and Performance’, European Psychologist 13(3), 188-196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C.S. 1996 ‘Some Ways in Which Goals Differ and Some Implications of Those Differences’. In: P.M. Gollwitzer and J.A. Bargh (eds). The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behaviour. Guilford Press, New York, pp. 645-671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C.S.: 2004, ‘Negative Affects Deriving from The Behavioral Approach System’, Emotion 4(11), 3-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, S.C. and M.F. Scheier: 1998, On the Self-Regulation of Behavior (Cambridge University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C.S. and T.L. White: 1994, ‘Behavioral Inhibition, Behavioral Activation, and Affective Responses to Impending Reward and Punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67(2), 319-333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, A., S. Wong and P. Leung: 1998, ‘Ethical Beliefs of Chinese Consumers in Hong Kong’, Journal of Business Ethics 17(11), 1163-170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou, J. and L. Pan: 2008, ‘The Impact of Social Darwinism Perception, Status Anxiety, Perceived Trust of People, and Cultural Orientation on Consumer Ethical Beliefs’, Journal of Business Ethics 78(4), 487-502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.B. and E.B. Andrade: 2004, ‘Affective Intuition and Task-Contingent Affect Regulation’, Journal of Consumer Research 31(2), 358-367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, E. and E.T. Higgins: 1997, ‘Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 69(2), 117-132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dholakia, U.M., M. Gopinath, R.P. Bagozzi and R. Nataraajan: 2006, ‘The Role of Self- Regulatory Focus in The Experience and Self-Control of Desire for Temptations’, Journal of Consumer Psychology 16(2), 163-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferber, R.: 1977, ‘Research by Convenience’, Journal of Consumer Research 4(1), 57-58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O.C. and S.J. Skinner: 1988, ‘Ethical Behavior and Bureaucratic Structure in Marketing Research Organizations’, Journal of Marketing Research 25(1), 103-109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Förster, J. and E.T. Higgins: 2005, ‘How Global Versus Local Perceptions Fits Regulatory Focus’, Psychological Science 16(8), 631-636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Förster, J., E.T. Higgins and A.T. Bianco: 2003, ‘Speed/Accuracy Decisions in Task Performance: Built-In Trade-Off or Separate Strategic Concerns?’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 90(1), 148-164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franken, I.H.A., P. Muris and E. Rassin: 2005, ‘Psychometric Properties of The Dutch BIS/BAS Scales’, Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 27(1), 25-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, R.S. and J. Förster: 2001, ‘The Effects of Promotion and Prevention Cues on Creativity’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(6), 1001-1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukukawa, K.: 2003, ‘A Theoretical Review of Business and Consumer Ethics Research: Normative and Descriptive Approach’, Marketing Review 3(4), 381-402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, R.A. and G. Punj: 2004, ‘Repercussions of Promoting an Ideology of Consumption: Consumer Misbehavior’, Journal of Business Research 57(11), 1239-1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J.A.: 1990, ‘Brain Systems that Mediate Both Emotion and Cognition’, Cognition and Emotion 4(3), 269-288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., W. Black, B. Babin, R.E. Anderson and R.L. Tatham: 2006, Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th edition (Prentice Hall, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L.C. and E. Ogbonna: 2002, ‘Exploring Service Sabotage: The Antecedents, Types, and Consequences of Frontline, Deviant, Antiservice Behaviors’, Journal of Service Research 4(3), 163-183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E.T.: 1987, ‘Self-Discrepancy: A Theory Relating Self and Affect’, Psychological Review 94(3), 319-340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E.T.: 1997, ‘Beyond Pleasure and Pain’, American Psychologist 52(12), 1280-1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E.T.: 1998 ‘Promotion and Prevention Regulatory Focus as a Motivational Principle’. In: M.P. Zanna (ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Volume 3. Academic Press, New York, pp. 1-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E.T.: 1999, ‘Promotion and Prevention as a Motivational Duality: Implications for Evaluative Processes’. In S. Chaiken and Y. Trope (eds.). Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology. Guilford Press, New York, pp. 503-525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E.T., R.S. Friedman, R.E. Harlow, L.C. Idson, O.N. Ayduk and A. Taylor: 2001, ‘Achievement Orientations from Subjective Histories of Success: Promotion Pride Versus Prevention Pride’, European Journal of Social Psychology 31(1), 3-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E.T., C.J.R. Roney, E. Crowe and C. Hymes: 1994, ‘Ideal Versus Ought Predilections for Approach and Avoidance Distinct Self-Regulatory Systems’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66(2), 276-286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E.T. and I. Silberman 1998 ‘Development of Regulatory Focus: Promotion and Prevention as Ways of Living’. In: J. Heckhausen and C.S. Dweck (eds). Motivation and Self-Regulation across the Life Span. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 78-113.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E.T. and S. Spiegel: 2004, ‘Promotion and Prevention Strategies for Self-Regulation: A Motivated Cognition Perspective’, in R.F. Baumeister and K.D. Vohs (eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications (Guilford, New York), pp. 171-187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs-Kleyn, N.H.: 1998, ‘Unethical Consumer Behaviour: An Exploratory Investigation’, Management Dynamics 7(1), 35-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G.: 1984, ‘Culture Dimensions in Management and Planning’, Asia Pacific Journal of Management 1(2), 81-99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G.: 1991, Culture and Organizations: Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival – Software of the mind (McGraw-Hill, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, C., S. Ratneshwar and D.G. Mick 2000 ‘Consumer Goal Structures and Goal- Determination Processes’. In: S. Ratneshwar, D.G. Mick and C. Huffman (eds). The Why of Consumption. Routledge, London, pp. 9-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassarjian, R., J.G. Olsen and L. Sims: 1981, ‘Toward Conceptualizing and Measuring Cognitive Structures’, Advances in Consumer Research 8(1), 122-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J., M. Hurst and A. Uskul: 2008, ‘Prevention-Focused Self-Regulation and Aggressiveness’, Journal of Research in Personality 42(4), 800-820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, B., D.M. Hardesty and T.L. Childers: 2008, ‘Consumer Emotional Intelligence: Conceptualization, Measurement, and the Prediction of Consumer Decision Making’, Journal of Consumer Research 35(1), 154-166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemke, L.W.: 1992, The Sociology of Shoplifting: Boosters and Snitches Today (Praeger, Westport CT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauriola, M., P.M. Russo, F. Lucidi, C. Violani and I.P. Levin: 2005, ‘The Role of Personality in Positively and Negatively Framed Risky Health Decisions’, Personality and Individual Differences 38(1), 45-59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leone, L., M. Perugini and R.P. Bagozzi: 2005, ‘Emotions and Decision Making: Regulatory Focus Moderates the Influence of Anticipated Emotions on Action Evaluations’, Cognition and Emotion 19(8), 1175-1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, N., L.C. Idson, C.J. Camacho and E.T. Higgins: 1999, ‘Promotion and Prevention Choices between Stability and Change’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77(6), 1135-1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, N., D.C. Molden, L.C. Idson and E.T. Higgins: 2001, ‘Promotion and Prevention Focus on Alternative Hypotheses: Implications for Attributional Functions’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80(1), 5-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, P., C.H. Jordan and Z. Kunda: 2002, ‘Motivation by Positive or Negative Role Models: Regulatory Focus Influences Who Will Best Inspire Us’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83(4), 854-864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, T., D. Sherman and J. Updegraff: 2004, ‘Dispositional Motivations and Message Framing: A Test of the Congruency Hypothesis in College Students’, Health Psychology 23(3), 330-334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, V. W., G. Balabanis, B. B. Schlegelmilch and T. B. Cornwell: 2009, `Measuring Unethical Consumer Behavior across Four Countries', Journal of Business Ethics 88(2), 395-412

  • Muncy, J.A. and J.K. Eastman: 1998, ‘Materialism and Consumer Ethics: An Exploratory Study’, Journal of Business Ethics 17(2), 137-145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muncy, J.A. and S.J. Vitell: 1992, ‘Consumer Ethics: An Investigation of the Ethical Beliefs of the Final Consumer’, Journal of Business Research 24(4), 297-311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R.A.: 1994, ‘A Meta-Analysis of Chronbach’s Coefficient Alpha’, Journal of Consumer Research 21(2), 381-391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham, M.T. and T. Avnet: 2004, ‘Ideals and Oughts and The Reliance on Affect Versus Substance in Persuasion’, Journal of Consumer Research 30(4), 503-518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham, M.T. and E.T. Higgins 2005 ‘Promotion and Prevention in Consumer Decision- Making: The State of the Art and Theoretical Propositions’. In: E.S. Ratneshwar and D.G. Mich (eds). Inside Consumption Consumer Motives, Goals and Desires. Routledge, London/New York, pp. 8-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P.M., S.B. MacKenzie and N.P. Podsakoff: 2003, ‘Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of The Literature and Recommended Remedies’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 88(5), 879-903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rallapalli, K.C., S.J. Vitell, F.A. Wiebe and J.H. Barnes: 1994, ‘Consumer Ethical Beliefs and Personality Traits: An Exploratory Analysis’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(7), 487-495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C.P. and A.A. Al-Wugayan: 2005, ‘Gender and Cultural Differences in Consumer Ethics in a Consumer-Retailer Interaction Context’, Journal of International Consumer Marketing 18(1/2), 45-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawwas, M.Y.A. and A. Singhapakdi: 1998, ‘Do Consumers’ Ethical Beliefs Vary with Age? A Substantiation of Kohlberg’s Typology in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 6(2), 26-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawwas, M.Y.A., Z. Swaidan and M. Oyman: 2005, ‘Consumer Ethics: A Cross-Cultural Study of the Ethical Beliefs of Turkish and American Consumers’, Journal of Business Ethics 57(2), 183-195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, K.L. and L.C. Harris: 2009, ‘Dysfunctional Customer Behavior Severity: An Empirical Examination’, Journal of Retailing 85(3), 321-335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roney, C.J., E.T. Higgins and J. Shah: 1995, ‘Goals and Framing: How Outcome Focus Influences Motivation and Emotion’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21(11), 1151-1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlegelmilch, B.B. and D.C. Robertson: 1995, ‘The Influence of Country and Industry on Ethical Perceptions of Senior Executives in the U.S. and Europe’, Journal of International Business Studies 26(4), 859-881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seibt, B. and J. Förster: 2004, ‘Stereotype Threat and Performance: How Self-Stereotypes Influence Processing by Inducing Regulatory Foci’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87(1), 38-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semin, G.R., E.T. Higgins, L.G. de Montes, Y. Estourget and J.F. Valencia : 2005, ‘Linguistic Signatures of Regulatory Focus : How Abstraction Fits Promotion More Than Prevention’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89(1), 36-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, J. and E.T. Higgins: 2001, ‘Regulatory Concerns and Appraisal Efficiency: The General Impact of Promotion and Prevention’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80(5), 693-705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, J., E.T. Higgins and R. Friedman: 1998, ‘Performance Incentives and Means: How Regulatory Focus Influence Goal Attainment’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(2), 285-293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenhaut, S. and P. Van Kenhove: 2006, ‘An Empirical Investigation of the Relationships among a Consumer’s Personal Values, Ethical Ideology, and Ethical Beliefs’, Journal of Business Ethics 64(2), 137-155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summerville, A. and N.J. Roese: 2008, ‘Self-Report Measures of Individual Differences in Regulatory Focus: A Cautionary Note’, Journal of Research in Personality 42(1), 247-254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaidan, Z., M.Y.A. Rawwas and J. Al-Khatib: 2004, ‘Consumer Ethics: Moral Ideologies and Ethical Beliefs of a Micro-Culture in the US’, International Business Review 13(6), 749-761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaidan, Z., S.J. Vitell and M.Y.A. Rawwas: 2003, ‘Consumer Ethics: Determinants of Ethical Beliefs of African Americans’, Journal of Business Ethics 46(2), 175-186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S.J.: 2003, ‘Consumer Ethics: Review, Synthesis and Suggestions for the Future’, Journal of Business Ethics 43(1-2), 33-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S.J., J.R. Lumpkin and M.Y.A. Rawwas: 1991, ‘Consumer Ethics: An Investigation of the Ethical Beliefs of Elderly Consumers’, Journal of Business Ethics 10(5), 365-375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S.J. and J.A. Muncy: 1992, ‘Consumer Ethics: An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing Ethical Judgments of the Final Consumer’, Journal of Business Ethics 11(8), 585-597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S.J. and J.A. Muncy: 2005, ‘The Muncy-Vitell Consumer Ethics Scale: A Modification and Application’, Journal of Business Ethics 62(3), 267-275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S.J., S.L. Nwachukwu and J.H. Barnes (1993): ‘The Effects of Culture on Ethical Decision-Making: An Application of Hofstede’s Typology’, Journal of Business Ethics 12(10), 753-760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S.J. and J.G.P. Paolillo: 2003, ‘Consumer Ethics: The Role of Religiosity’, Journal of Business Ethics 46(2), 151-162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S.J., J.J. Singh and J.G.P. Paolillo: 2007, ‘Consumers’ Ethical Beliefs: The Roles of Money, Religiosity and Attitude toward Business’, Journal of Business Ethics 73(4), 369-379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S.J., A. Singhapakdi and J. Thomas: 2001, ‘Consumer Ethics: An Application and Empirical Testing of the Hunt-Vitell Theory of Ethics’, Journal of Consumer Marketing 18(2), 153-178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. and A.Y. Lee: 2006, ‘The Role of Regulatory Focus in Preference Construction’, Journal of Marketing Research 43(1), 23-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C., J.S. McMullen, M.J. Neubert and X. Yi: 2008, ‘The Influence of Leader Regulatory Focus on Employee Creativity’, Journal of Business Venturing 23(5), 587-602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi, S. and H. Baumgartner: 2008, ‘Motivational Culpability and The Role of Anticipated Feelings in Positively Valenced Persuasive Message Framing’, Psychology & Marketing 25(11), 1007-1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, R. and M.T. Pham: 2004, ‘Promotion and Prevention Across Mental Accounts: When Financial Products Dictate Consumers’ Investment Goals’, Journal of Consumer Research 31(1), 125-135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, R. and J. Myers-Levy: 2007, ‘Exploring The Cognitive Mechanism That Underlies Regulatory Focus Effects’, Journal of Consumer Research 34(1), 89-96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Economics and Business Administration, Department of Marketing, Ghent University, Tweekerkenstraat 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    Tine De Bock & Patrick Van Kenhove

Authors
  1. Tine De Bock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patrick Van Kenhove
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tine De Bock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Bock, T., Van Kenhove, P. Consumer Ethics: The Role of Self-Regulatory Focus. J Bus Ethics 97, 241–255 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0507-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0507-0

Key words

Search

Navigation