Abstract
Purpose
The PIK3R1 gene encodes the regulatory subunit—p85a—of the PI3K signaling complex. Prior studies have found that pathogenic somatic alterations in PIK3R1 are enriched in human breast cancers but the genomic landscape of breast cancer patients harboring PIK3R1 mutations has not been extensively characterized.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 6,009 patient records that underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) using the Tempus xT solid tumor assay. All patients had breast cancer with known HER2 (+/-) and hormone receptor (HR; +/-) status and were classified according to the presence of PIK3R1 mutations including short variants and copy number alterations.
Results
The frequency of PIK3R1 mutations varied according to subtype: 6% in triple negative (TNBC, 89/1,475), 2% in HER2-/HR+ (80/3,893) and 2.3% in HER2+ (15/641) (p < 0.001). Co-mutations in PTEN, TP53 and NF1 were significantly enriched, co-mutations in PIK3CA were significantly less prevalent, and tumor mutational burden was significantly higher in PIK3R1-mutated HER2- samples relative to PIK3R1 wild-type. At the transcriptional-level, PIK3R1 RNA expression in HER2- disease was significantly higher in PIK3R1-mutated (excluding copy number loss) samples, regardless of subtype.
Conclusion
This is the largest investigation of the PIK3R1 mutational landscape in breast cancer patients (n = 6,009). PIK3R1 mutations were more common in triple-negative breast cancer (~ 6%) than in HER2 + or HER2-/HR + disease (approximately 2%). While alterations in the PI3K/AKT pathway are often actionable in HER2-/HR + breast cancer, our study suggests that PIK3R1 could be an important target in TNBC as well.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Raw data for this study were generated at Tempus Labs. When possible, derived data supporting the findings of this study have been made available within the paper and any Supplementary Figures/Tables.
References
Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012) Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490:61–70
Oskouian B, Saba JD (2010) Cancer Treatment Strategies Targeting Sphingolipid Metabolism. In: Chalfant C, Poeta MD (eds) Sphingolipids as Signaling and Regulatory molecules. Springer New York, New York, NY, pp 185–205
Vallejo-Díaz J, Chagoyen M, Olazabal-Morán M et al (2019) The opposing roles of PIK3R1/p85α and PIK3R2/p85β in Cancer. Trends Cancer Res 5:233–244
Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U et al (2012) The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov 2:401–404
Cheung LWT, Hennessy BT, Li J et al (2011) High frequency of PIK3R1 and PIK3R2 mutations in endometrial cancer elucidates a novel mechanism for regulation of PTEN protein stability. Cancer Discov 1:170–185
Kandoth C, McLellan MD, Vandin F et al (2013) Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types. Nature 502:333–339
Park SW, Kang MR, Eom HS et al (2010) Somatic mutation of PIK3R1 gene is rare in common human cancers. Acta Oncol 49:125–127
Mizoguchi M, Nutt CL, Mohapatra G, Louis DN (2004) Genetic alterations of phosphoinositide 3-kinase subunit genes in human glioblastomas. Brain Pathol 14:372–377
Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X et al (2008) An integrated genomic analysis of human Glioblastoma Multiforme. Science 321:1807–1812
Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2008) Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 455:1061–1068
Wood LD, Parsons DW, Jones S et al (2007) The genomic landscapes of human breast and colorectal cancers. Science 318:1108–1113
Cizkova M, Vacher S, Meseure D et al (2013) PIK3R1 underexpression is an Independent prognostic marker in Breast cancer. BMC Cancer 13:545
Thorpe LM, Spangle JM, Ohlson CE et al (2017) PI3K-p110α mediates the oncogenic activity induced by loss of the novel Tumor suppressor PI3K-p85α. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:7095–7100
Turturro SB, Najor MS, Yung T et al (2019) Somatic loss of PIK3R1 may sensitize Breast cancer to inhibitors of the MAPK pathway. Breast Cancer Res Treat 177:325–333
Cobleigh MA, Abukhdeir AM (2021) Binimetinib activity in PIK3R1-mutant patient-derived xenografts (PDX) implanted into immunodeficient mice. J Clin Oncol 39:e13062–e13062
Beaubier N, Bontrager M, Huether R et al (2019) Integrated genomic profiling expands clinical options for patients with cancer. Nat Biotechnol 37:1351–1360
Beaubier N, Tell R, Lau D et al (2019) Clinical validation of the Tempus xT next-generation targeted oncology sequencing assay. Oncotarget 10:2384–2396
Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F et al (2013) STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29:15–21
Bray NL, Pimentel H, Melsted P, Pachter L (2016) Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat Biotechnol 34:525–527
Urick ME, Rudd ML, Godwin AK et al (2011) PIK3R1 (p85α) is somatically mutated at high frequency in primary endometrial cancer. Cancer Res 71:4061–4067
Sun M, Hillmann P, Hofmann BT et al (2010) Cancer-derived mutations in the regulatory subunit p85α of phosphoinositide 3-kinase function through the catalytic subunit p110α. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107:15547–15552
Quayle SN, Lee JY, Cheung LWT et al (2012) Somatic mutations of PIK3R1 promote gliomagenesis. PLoS ONE 7:e49466
Chagpar RB, Links PH, Pastor MC et al (2010) Direct positive regulation of PTEN by the p85 subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:5471–5476
Li X, Lau AYT, Ng ASN et al (2021) Cancer-associated mutations in the p85α N-terminal SH2 domain activate a spectrum of receptor tyrosine kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101751118
Sjöblom T, Jones S, Wood LD et al (2006) The consensus coding sequences of human breast and colorectal cancers. Science 314:268–274
Jaiswal BS, Janakiraman V, Kljavin NM et al (2009) Somatic mutations in p85alpha promote tumorigenesis through class IA PI3K activation. Cancer Cell 16:463–474
Kan Z, Jaiswal BS, Stinson J et al (2010) Diverse somatic mutation patterns and pathway alterations in human cancers. Nature 466:869–873
Shah SP, Roth A, Goya R et al (2012) The clonal and mutational evolution spectrum of primary triple-negative breast cancers. Nature 486:395–399
Zehir A, Benayed R, Shah RH et al (2017) Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients. Nat Med 23:703–713
Chen L, Yang L, Yao L et al (2018) Characterization of PIK3CA and PIK3R1 somatic mutations in Chinese Breast cancer patients. Nat Commun 9:1357
Jiang Y-Z, Ma D, Suo C et al (2019) Genomic and Transcriptomic Landscape of Triple-negative breast cancers: subtypes and treatment strategies. Cancer Cell 35:428–440e5
Mariotto AB, Etzioni R, Hurlbert M et al (2017) Estimation of the number of women living with metastatic Breast Cancer in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 26:809–815
Abukhdeir AM, Cobleigh M (2023) Abstract 2248: activity of targeted agents in PIK3R1 mutated patient-derived xenografts. Cancer Res 83:2248–2248
Razavi P, Chang MT, Xu G et al (2018) The genomic Landscape of Endocrine-Resistant Advanced breast cancers. Cancer Cell 34:427–438e6
Pearson A, Proszek P, Pascual J et al (2020) Inactivating NF1 mutations are enriched in advanced Breast Cancer and contribute to endocrine therapy resistance. Clin Cancer Res 26:608–622
Wróblewska H, Gorczyca WA (2001) [Phosphodiesterases of cyclic GMP]. Postepy Hig Med Dosw 55:611–627
Mishra RR, Belder N, Ansari SA et al (2018) Reactivation of cAMP pathway by PDE4D Inhibition represents a Novel Druggable Axis for overcoming tamoxifen resistance in ER-positive Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 24:1987–2001
André F, Ciruelos E, Rubovszky G et al (2019) Alpelisib for PIK3CA-Mutated, hormone receptor-positive advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 380:1929–1940
Razavi P, Dickler MN, Shah PD et al (2020) Alterations in PTEN and ESR1 promote clinical resistance to alpelisib plus aromatase inhibitors. Nat Cancer 1:382–393
Yan L-X, Liu Y-H, Xiang J-W et al (2016) PIK3R1 targeting by miR-21 suppresses Tumor cell migration and invasion by reducing PI3K/AKT signaling and reversing EMT, and predicts clinical outcome of Breast cancer. Int J Oncol 48:471–484
Griffith OL, Spies NC, Anurag M et al (2018) The prognostic effects of somatic mutations in ER-positive Breast cancer. Nat Commun 9:3476
Acknowledgements
MC thanks the Brian Piccolo Cancer Research Fund, the Brinson Foundation and the Sherman Fairchild Foundation for their support.
Funding
This study was funded by Tempus Labs, Inc., a for-profit company.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study was performed on de-identified data under IRB exemption Pro00042950 - granted from the Advarra, Inc Institutional Review Board (IRB) on April 15, 2020 based on the Department of Health and Human Services regulations found at “45 CFR 46.104(d)(4)”.
Competing interests
Individuals with Tempus Labs affiliation (KVL, EM, BM, AJH) receive/ed either direct salary and/or equity shares from Tempus Labs as part of their employment for work on this project.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
AMA contributed to this article in his personal capacity, while an employee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The views expressed are his own and do not necessarily represent the views of the Food and Drug Administration or the United States Government. He is currently an employee of AstraZeneca.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Cobleigh, M.A., Layng, K.V., Mauer, E. et al. Comparative genomic analysis of PIK3R1-mutated and wild-type breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 204, 407–414 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-07196-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-07196-4