Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative genomic analysis of PIK3R1-mutated and wild-type breast cancers

  • Original Laboratory Investigation
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The PIK3R1 gene encodes the regulatory subunit—p85a—of the PI3K signaling complex. Prior studies have found that pathogenic somatic alterations in PIK3R1 are enriched in human breast cancers but the genomic landscape of breast cancer patients harboring PIK3R1 mutations has not been extensively characterized.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 6,009 patient records that underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) using the Tempus xT solid tumor assay. All patients had breast cancer with known HER2 (+/-) and hormone receptor (HR; +/-) status and were classified according to the presence of PIK3R1 mutations including short variants and copy number alterations.

Results

The frequency of PIK3R1 mutations varied according to subtype: 6% in triple negative (TNBC, 89/1,475), 2% in HER2-/HR+ (80/3,893) and 2.3% in HER2+ (15/641) (p < 0.001). Co-mutations in PTEN, TP53 and NF1 were significantly enriched, co-mutations in PIK3CA were significantly less prevalent, and tumor mutational burden was significantly higher in PIK3R1-mutated HER2- samples relative to PIK3R1 wild-type. At the transcriptional-level, PIK3R1 RNA expression in HER2- disease was significantly higher in PIK3R1-mutated (excluding copy number loss) samples, regardless of subtype.

Conclusion

This is the largest investigation of the PIK3R1 mutational landscape in breast cancer patients (n = 6,009). PIK3R1 mutations were more common in triple-negative breast cancer (~ 6%) than in HER2 + or HER2-/HR + disease (approximately 2%). While alterations in the PI3K/AKT pathway are often actionable in HER2-/HR + breast cancer, our study suggests that PIK3R1 could be an important target in TNBC as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Raw data for this study were generated at Tempus Labs. When possible, derived data supporting the findings of this study have been made available within the paper and any Supplementary Figures/Tables.

References

  1. Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012) Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490:61–70

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Oskouian B, Saba JD (2010) Cancer Treatment Strategies Targeting Sphingolipid Metabolism. In: Chalfant C, Poeta MD (eds) Sphingolipids as Signaling and Regulatory molecules. Springer New York, New York, NY, pp 185–205

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Vallejo-Díaz J, Chagoyen M, Olazabal-Morán M et al (2019) The opposing roles of PIK3R1/p85α and PIK3R2/p85β in Cancer. Trends Cancer Res 5:233–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U et al (2012) The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov 2:401–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheung LWT, Hennessy BT, Li J et al (2011) High frequency of PIK3R1 and PIK3R2 mutations in endometrial cancer elucidates a novel mechanism for regulation of PTEN protein stability. Cancer Discov 1:170–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kandoth C, McLellan MD, Vandin F et al (2013) Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types. Nature 502:333–339

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Park SW, Kang MR, Eom HS et al (2010) Somatic mutation of PIK3R1 gene is rare in common human cancers. Acta Oncol 49:125–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mizoguchi M, Nutt CL, Mohapatra G, Louis DN (2004) Genetic alterations of phosphoinositide 3-kinase subunit genes in human glioblastomas. Brain Pathol 14:372–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X et al (2008) An integrated genomic analysis of human Glioblastoma Multiforme. Science 321:1807–1812

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2008) Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 455:1061–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wood LD, Parsons DW, Jones S et al (2007) The genomic landscapes of human breast and colorectal cancers. Science 318:1108–1113

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cizkova M, Vacher S, Meseure D et al (2013) PIK3R1 underexpression is an Independent prognostic marker in Breast cancer. BMC Cancer 13:545

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Thorpe LM, Spangle JM, Ohlson CE et al (2017) PI3K-p110α mediates the oncogenic activity induced by loss of the novel Tumor suppressor PI3K-p85α. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:7095–7100

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Turturro SB, Najor MS, Yung T et al (2019) Somatic loss of PIK3R1 may sensitize Breast cancer to inhibitors of the MAPK pathway. Breast Cancer Res Treat 177:325–333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cobleigh MA, Abukhdeir AM (2021) Binimetinib activity in PIK3R1-mutant patient-derived xenografts (PDX) implanted into immunodeficient mice. J Clin Oncol 39:e13062–e13062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Beaubier N, Bontrager M, Huether R et al (2019) Integrated genomic profiling expands clinical options for patients with cancer. Nat Biotechnol 37:1351–1360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Beaubier N, Tell R, Lau D et al (2019) Clinical validation of the Tempus xT next-generation targeted oncology sequencing assay. Oncotarget 10:2384–2396

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F et al (2013) STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29:15–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bray NL, Pimentel H, Melsted P, Pachter L (2016) Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat Biotechnol 34:525–527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Urick ME, Rudd ML, Godwin AK et al (2011) PIK3R1 (p85α) is somatically mutated at high frequency in primary endometrial cancer. Cancer Res 71:4061–4067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun M, Hillmann P, Hofmann BT et al (2010) Cancer-derived mutations in the regulatory subunit p85α of phosphoinositide 3-kinase function through the catalytic subunit p110α. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107:15547–15552

  22. Quayle SN, Lee JY, Cheung LWT et al (2012) Somatic mutations of PIK3R1 promote gliomagenesis. PLoS ONE 7:e49466

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Chagpar RB, Links PH, Pastor MC et al (2010) Direct positive regulation of PTEN by the p85 subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:5471–5476

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Li X, Lau AYT, Ng ASN et al (2021) Cancer-associated mutations in the p85α N-terminal SH2 domain activate a spectrum of receptor tyrosine kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101751118

  25. Sjöblom T, Jones S, Wood LD et al (2006) The consensus coding sequences of human breast and colorectal cancers. Science 314:268–274

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jaiswal BS, Janakiraman V, Kljavin NM et al (2009) Somatic mutations in p85alpha promote tumorigenesis through class IA PI3K activation. Cancer Cell 16:463–474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kan Z, Jaiswal BS, Stinson J et al (2010) Diverse somatic mutation patterns and pathway alterations in human cancers. Nature 466:869–873

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shah SP, Roth A, Goya R et al (2012) The clonal and mutational evolution spectrum of primary triple-negative breast cancers. Nature 486:395–399

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zehir A, Benayed R, Shah RH et al (2017) Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients. Nat Med 23:703–713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen L, Yang L, Yao L et al (2018) Characterization of PIK3CA and PIK3R1 somatic mutations in Chinese Breast cancer patients. Nat Commun 9:1357

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Jiang Y-Z, Ma D, Suo C et al (2019) Genomic and Transcriptomic Landscape of Triple-negative breast cancers: subtypes and treatment strategies. Cancer Cell 35:428–440e5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mariotto AB, Etzioni R, Hurlbert M et al (2017) Estimation of the number of women living with metastatic Breast Cancer in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 26:809–815

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Abukhdeir AM, Cobleigh M (2023) Abstract 2248: activity of targeted agents in PIK3R1 mutated patient-derived xenografts. Cancer Res 83:2248–2248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Razavi P, Chang MT, Xu G et al (2018) The genomic Landscape of Endocrine-Resistant Advanced breast cancers. Cancer Cell 34:427–438e6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Pearson A, Proszek P, Pascual J et al (2020) Inactivating NF1 mutations are enriched in advanced Breast Cancer and contribute to endocrine therapy resistance. Clin Cancer Res 26:608–622

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wróblewska H, Gorczyca WA (2001) [Phosphodiesterases of cyclic GMP]. Postepy Hig Med Dosw 55:611–627

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mishra RR, Belder N, Ansari SA et al (2018) Reactivation of cAMP pathway by PDE4D Inhibition represents a Novel Druggable Axis for overcoming tamoxifen resistance in ER-positive Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 24:1987–2001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. André F, Ciruelos E, Rubovszky G et al (2019) Alpelisib for PIK3CA-Mutated, hormone receptor-positive advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 380:1929–1940

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Razavi P, Dickler MN, Shah PD et al (2020) Alterations in PTEN and ESR1 promote clinical resistance to alpelisib plus aromatase inhibitors. Nat Cancer 1:382–393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Yan L-X, Liu Y-H, Xiang J-W et al (2016) PIK3R1 targeting by miR-21 suppresses Tumor cell migration and invasion by reducing PI3K/AKT signaling and reversing EMT, and predicts clinical outcome of Breast cancer. Int J Oncol 48:471–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Griffith OL, Spies NC, Anurag M et al (2018) The prognostic effects of somatic mutations in ER-positive Breast cancer. Nat Commun 9:3476

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

MC thanks the Brian Piccolo Cancer Research Fund, the Brinson Foundation and the Sherman Fairchild Foundation for their support.

Funding

This study was funded by Tempus Labs, Inc., a for-profit company.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melody A. Cobleigh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was performed on de-identified data under IRB exemption Pro00042950 - granted from the Advarra, Inc Institutional Review Board (IRB) on April 15, 2020 based on the Department of Health and Human Services regulations found at “45 CFR 46.104(d)(4)”.

Competing interests

Individuals with Tempus Labs affiliation (KVL, EM, BM, AJH) receive/ed either direct salary and/or equity shares from Tempus Labs as part of their employment for work on this project.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

AMA contributed to this article in his personal capacity, while an employee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The views expressed are his own and do not necessarily represent the views of the Food and Drug Administration or the United States Government. He is currently an employee of AstraZeneca.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cobleigh, M.A., Layng, K.V., Mauer, E. et al. Comparative genomic analysis of PIK3R1-mutated and wild-type breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 204, 407–414 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-07196-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-07196-4

Keywords

Navigation