Correction to: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (2021) 185:317–330 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05958-y


In the original publication, representative image of Figs. 5b(vi) and 6c were uploaded twice by error. The revised Figs. 5 and 6 is given in this erratum.

Fig. 5
figure 1

Wound-healing assay of PZP wild-type and knockout cells. a, b The left panels shows wound at 0 h, whereas the right one indicates wound width at 48 h. c, d Data presented as mean ± SD relative wound width. Relative wound width was calculated using the formula R.W.W. = (T/O)*100 where ‘T’ is wound width at 48 h and ‘O’ is wound width at 0 h. Data presented as mean ± SD relative wound width of cells; **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 (Student’s t-test)

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 2

In vitro tumorigenic transwell migration assay of PZP WT and KO cells. a, c Transwell migration of MCF7 and T47D, b, d average number of cells (minimum 3 images at 400 × magnifcation) migrating through 8 µM transwells

Full size image