Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental Investigation on Shear-Stress Partitioning for Flexible Plants with Approximately Zero Basal-to-Frontal Area Ratio in a Wind Tunnel

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shear-stress partitioning is investigated for one type of flexible plant for very small values of the basal-to-frontal area ratio σ (0.001–0.007). The plant model is made of plastic with irregular structures, which are different from previously investigated rigid regular or flexible roughness elements with larger σ values. The distribution of the surface shear stress and the total shear stress at four plant densities with five plant heights are measured in a wind tunnel using Irwin-type sensors and a load cell, respectively. The wind-tunnel experiments prove that, for these flexible plants, the plant height and lateral cover usually decrease with increasing friction velocity, especially for taller plants, while the plant coverage generally increases. However, these characteristics may be inconsistent with flexible roughness elements with very large σ values (and usually very low aspect ratios) because these elements are less flexible. The present flexible plants generally result in lower shear-stress ratios compared with other roughness elements, which is also proven by the higher values of β (the ratio of the drag coefficient of an isolated roughness element to that of the bare surface) and a constant m (accounting for the difference between the average and peak surface shear stresses) from the present experiments (β = 184–210 and m = 0.68–0.79). The peak mean stress ratio of the present flexible plants is not a constant (1.07–1.54) because it is affected by the lateral cover, which is different from previous studies that consider the ratio to be constant without regard for the lateral cover.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown S, Nickling WG, Gillies JA (2008) A wind tunnel examination of shear stress partitioning for an assortment of surface roughness distributions. J Geophys Res 113:F02S06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley DM, Nickling WG (2003) Drag partition for regularly-arrayed rough surfaces. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 107:445–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies JA, Nickling WG, King J (2002) Drag coefficient and plant form response to wind speed in three plant species: Burning Bush (Euonymus alatus), Colorado Blue Spruce (Picea pungens glauca.), and Fountain Grass (Pennisetum setaceum). J Geophys Res 107(D24):4760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies JA, Nickling WG, King J (2007) Shear stress partitioning in large patches of roughness in the atmospheric inertial sublayer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 122:367–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagishima A, Tanimoto J, Nagayama K, Meno S (2009) Aerodynamic parameters of regular arrays of rectangular blocks with various geometries. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 132:315–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin HPAH (1981) A simple omnidirectional sensor for wind-tunnel studies of pedestrian-level winds. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 7:219–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King J, Nickling WG, Gillies JA (2006) Aeolian shear stress ratio measurements within mesquite-dominated landscapes of the Chihuahuan Desert, New Mexico, USA. Geomorphology 82:229–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster N, Baas A (1998) Influence of vegetation cover on sand transport by wind: field studies at Owens Lake, California. Earth Surf Proc Landf 23:69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leenders JK, Sterk G, Van Boxel JH (2011) Modelling wind-blown sediment transport around single vegetation elements. Earth Surf Proc Landf 36:1218–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JK (1971) Drag measurements in roughness arrays of varying densities and distribution. Agric Meteorol 8:269–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musick HB, Gillette DA (1990) Field evaluation of relationships between a vegetation structural parameter and sheltering against wind erosion. Land Degrad Rehabil 2:87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musick HB, Trujillo SM, Truman CR (1996) Wind-tunnel modelling of the influence of vegetation structure on saltation threshold. Earth Surf Process Landf 21:589–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach MR (1992) Drag and drag partition on rough surfaces. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 60:375–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach MR, Gillette DA, Leys JF (1993) The effect of roughness elements on wind erosion threshold. J Geophys Res 98:3023–3029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlicting H (1936) Experimentelle untersuchungen zum rauhigkeitsproblem. Ing Archiv 7:1–34 (in German)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao Y, Yang Y (2008) A theory for drag partition over rough surfaces. J Geophys Res 113:F02S05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddoway FH, Chepil WS, Armbrust DV (1965) Effect of kind, amount, and placement of residue on wind erosion control. Trans ASAE 8:327–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tegen I, Harrison SP, Kohfeld K, Prentice IC, Coe M, Heimann M (2002) Impact of vegetation and preferential source areas on global dust aerosol: results from a model study. J Geophys Res 107(D21):4576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter B, Gromke C, Lehning M (2012a) Shear-stress partitioning in live plant canopies and modifications to Raupach’s model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 144:217–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter B, Gromke C, Leonard KC, Manes C, Lehning M (2012b) Spatio-temporal surface shear-stress variability in live plant canopies and cube arrays. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 143:337–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe SA, Nickling WG (1993) The protective role of sparse vegetation in wind erosion. Prog Phys Geogr 17:50–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe SA, Nickling WG (1996) Shear stress partitioning in sparsely vegetated canopies. Earth Surf Process Landf 21:607–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt VE, Nickling WG (1997) Drag and shear stress partitioning in sparse desert creosote communities. Can J Earth Sci 34:1486–1498

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41330746, 41630747), PCSIRT (No. IRT_15R06) and State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology (No. 2017-ZY-01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liqiang Kang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, L., Zhang, J., Yang, Z. et al. Experimental Investigation on Shear-Stress Partitioning for Flexible Plants with Approximately Zero Basal-to-Frontal Area Ratio in a Wind Tunnel. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 169, 251–273 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-018-0373-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-018-0373-3

Keywords

Navigation