Abstract
We evaluate the accuracy of the speed-up provided in several wind-loading standards by comparison with wind-tunnel measurements and numerical predictions, which are carried out at a nominal scale of 1:500 and full-scale, respectively. Airflow over two- and three-dimensional bell-shaped hills is numerically modelled using the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes method with a pressure-driven atmospheric boundary layer and three different turbulence models. Investigated in detail are the effects of grid size on the speed-up and flow separation, as well as the resulting uncertainties in the numerical simulations. Good agreement is obtained between the numerical prediction of speed-up, as well as the wake region size and location, with that according to large-eddy simulations and the wind-tunnel results. The numerical results demonstrate the ability to predict the airflow over a hill with good accuracy with considerably less computational time than for large-eddy simulation. Numerical simulations for a three-dimensional hill show that the speed-up and the wake region decrease significantly when compared with the flow over two-dimensional hills due to the secondary flow around three-dimensional hills. Different hill slopes and shapes are simulated numerically to investigate the effect of hill profile on the speed-up. In comparison with more peaked hill crests, flat-topped hills have a lower speed-up at the crest up to heights of about half the hill height, for which none of the standards gives entirely satisfactory values of speed-up. Overall, the latest versions of the National Building Code of Canada and the Australian and New Zealand Standard give the best predictions of wind speed over isolated hills.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Therefore, for future work, before applying the proposed profiles in Fluent, it is essential to understand the differences in wall treatment between the Fluent and CFX packages, and to modify the profiles in such a way that they produce a homogeneous ABL in the Fluent software.
References
ANSYS Inc. (2011) ANSYS CFX-pre user’s guide. ANSYS Inc., Southpointe, Canonsburg
AS/NZS1170.2 (2011) Australia/New Zealand Standard, Structural design actions, Part 2: wind actions. Jointly published by Standards Australia Limited/Standards New Zealand, Sydney, NWS and Wellington
ASCE-7 (2016) Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston
Australian Standard (1989) Australian Standard, SAA Loading code, part 2: wind loads. Standards Australia, North Sydney
Balogh M, Parente A, Benocci C (2012) RANS simulation of ABL flow over complex terrains applying an Enhanced k–ε model and wall function formulation: implementation and comparison for fluent and OpenFOAM. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 104–106:360–368
Bilal M, Sridhar N, Araya G, Parameswaran S, Brikelund Y (2015) Wind flow over a complex terrain in Nygardsfjell, Norway. In: ASME 9th international conference on energy sustainability, June 28–July 2 2015, San Diego, CA, pp 1–9
Bitsuamlak G, Stathopoulos T, Bedard C (2004) Numerical modelling of wind flow over different types of topography. Structures Congress: building on the past, securing the future, 22–26 May, 2004, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, pp 1–11
Blocken B, Carmeliet J (2004) Modelling atmospheric boundary-layer flow with Fluent: curing the wall-function roughness incompatibility. The Fluent Benelux User Group Meeting, 5–6 October, 2004, Leuven, Belgium
Blocken B, Carmeliet J (2006) The influence of the wind-blocking effect by a building on its wind-driven rain exposure. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 94(2):101–127
Blocken B, Stathopoulos T, Carmeliet J (2007) CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: wall function problems. Atmos Environ 41:238–252
Blocken B, Hout AVD, Dekker J, Weiler O (2015) CFD simulation of wind flow over natural complex terrain: case study with validation by field measurements for Ria de Ferrol, Galicia, Spain. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 147:43–57
Bowen AJ (1983) The prediction of mean wind speeds above simple 2D hill shape. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 15:259–270
Breuer M, Peller N, Rapp C, Manhart M (2009) Flow over periodic hills—numerical and experimental study in a wide range of Reynolds numbers. Comput Fluids 38:433–457
BS NA EN 1991-1-4 (2010) (English): UK National Annex to Eurocode 1. Actions on structures. General actions. Wind actions
BS6399-2 (1997) Loading for buildings—part 2: code of practice for wind loads. Published under the authority of the Standards Board, BSI 10-1998
Cao S, Wang T, Ge Y, Tamura Y (2012) Numerical study on turbulent boundary layers over two-dimensional hills—effects of surface roughness and slope. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 104–106:342–349
Carpenter P, Locke N (1999) Investigation of wind speeds over multiple two-dimensional hills. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 83:109–120
Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache PJ, Freitas CJ, Coleman H, Raad PE (2008) Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. ASME J Fluids Eng 130:1–4
Chaudhari A, Vuorinen V, Agafonova O, Hellsten A, Hamalainen J (2014) Large-Eddy simulations for atmospheric boundary layer flows over complex terrains with applications in wind energy. In: Joint 11th World Congress on Computational Mechanics, the 5th European conference on computational mechanics, and the 6th European conference on computational fluid dynamics, Barcelona, Spain, pp 5205–5216
Cook NJ (1985) The designer’s guide to wind loading of building structures (Part 1), 1st edn. Butterworths, London
Deaves DM, Harris RI (1978) A mathematical model of the structure of strong winds. Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA), Report 76, London
Diebold M, Higgins C, Fang J, Bechmann A, Parlange MB (2013) Flow over hills: a large-eddy simulation of the Bolund case. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 148:177–194
EN 1991-1-4 (2005) (English): Eurocode 1: actions on structures—part 1–4: general actions—wind actions [Authority: The European Union Per Regulation 305/2011, Directive 98/34/EC, Directive 2004/18/EC]
Ferreira AD, Silva MC, Viegas DX, Lopes AG (1991) Wind tunnel simulation of the flow around two dimensional hills. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 38:109–122
Flay RGJ, Turner R, Revell M, Carpenter P, Cenek P, King AB (2012) Wind speed up over hills and complex terrain, and the risk to infrastructure. In: 18th Australasian fluid mechanics conference, 3–7 December, 2012, Launceston, Australia
Flay RGJ, Carpenter P, Revell M, Cenek P, Turner R, King A (2013a) Full-scale wind engineering measurements in New Zealand. In: The 8th Asia-Pacific conference on wind engineering, 10–14 December, 2013, Chennai, India
Flay RGJ, Turner R, Revell M, Carpenter P, Cenek P, King A (2013b) Wind speed-up measurements over Belmont Hill in complex terrain. In: 6th European and African conference on wind engineering, 7–13 July, Cambridge, UK
Flay RGJ, Nayyerloo M, King AB, Revell MJ (2015) Comparison of wind speed hill-shape multipliers calculated by seven wind loading standards with full-scale measurements. 17th Australasian Wind Engineering Society Workshop, 10–13 February, 2015, Wellington, New Zealand
Franke J, Hirsch C, Jensen AG, Krus HW, Schatzmann M, Westbury PS, Miles SD, Wisse JA, Wright NG (2004) Recommendations on the use of CFD in wind engineering. In: Proceedings of the international conference urban wind engineering and building aerodynamics, 5–7 May, Rhode-Saint-Genèse, Belgium
Franke J, Hellsten A, Schlunzen H, Carissimo BE (2007) Best practice guideline for the CFD simulation of flows in the urban environment. Cost action 732: quality assurance and improvement of microscale meteorological models, University of Hamburg, Meteorological Institute, Hamburg, Germany
Hargreaves DM, Wright NG (2007) On the use of the k–ɛ model in commercial CFD software to model the neutral atmospheric boundary layer. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 95:355–369
Hewer FE (1998) Non-linear numerical model predictions of flow over an isolated hill of moderate slope. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 87:381–408
Hunt JR, Leibovich S, Richards KJ (1988) Turbulent shear flow over low hills. Q J R Meteorol Soc 114:1435–1470
Irwin HPAH (1981) A simple omnidirectional sensor for wind-tunnel studies of pedestrian-level winds. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 7:219–239
Ishihara T, Hibi K (2002) Numerical study of turbulent wake flow behind a three-dimensional steep hill. Wind Struct 5(2–4):317–328
Ishihara T, Hibi K, Oikawa S (1999) A Wind tunnel study of turbulent flow over a three-dimensional steep hill. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 83:95–107
Ishihara T, Fujino Y, Hibi K (2001) A wind tunnel study of separated flow over a two-dimensional ridge and a circular hill. Wind Eng 89:573–576
Jackson PS, Hunt JCR (1975) Turbulent wind flow over a low hill. Q J R Meteorol Soc 101:929–955
Kaimal JC, Finnigan JJ (1994) Atmospheric boundary layer flows: their structure and measurement. Oxford University Press, New York
Kim HG, Patel VC (2000) Test of turbulence models for wind flow over terrain with separation and recirculation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 94:5–21
Kim HG, Lee CM, Lim HC, Kyong NH (1997) An experimental and numerical study on the flow over two-dimensional hills. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 66:17–33
Launder BE, Spalding DB (1974) The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 3:269–289
Liu Z, Ishihara T, Tanaka T, He X (2016) LES study of turbulent flow fields over a smooth 3-D hill and a smooth 2-D ridge. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 153:1–12
Loureiro JB, Alho AT, Freire AP (2008) The numerical computation of near-wall turbulent flow over a steep hill. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 96:540–561
Menter FR (1994) Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. Am Inst Aeronaut Astronaut 32(8):1598–1605
Miller C, Gibbons M, Beatty K, Boissonnade A (2013) Topographic speed-up effects and observed roof damage on Bermuda following Hurricane Fabian 2003. Weather Forecast 28:159–174
Moreira GA, Dos Santos AA, Do Nascimento CA, Valle RM (2012) Numerical study of the neutral atmospheric boundary layer over complex terrain. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 143:393–407
NBC (2015) National Building Code of Canada, National Research Council of Canada (NRC), Ottawa, Canada
O’Sullivan JP, Archer RA, Flay RGJ (2011) Consistent boundary conditions for flows within the atmospheric boundary layer. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 99:65–77
Popinet S (2003) Gerris: a tree-based adaptive solver for the incompressible Euler equations in complex geometries. J Comput Phys 190:572–600
Raithby GD, Stubley GD, Taylor PA (1987) The Askervein Hill project: a finite control volume prediction of three-dimensional flows over the hill. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 39:247–267
Ramechecandane S, Gravdahl AR (2012) Numerical investigation on wind flow over complex terrain. Wind Eng 36(3):273–296
Richards PJ, Hoxey RP (1993) Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models using the k–ɛ turbulence model. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 46 & 47:145–153
Richards PJ, Norris SE (2011) Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models revisited. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 99:257–266
Richards PJ, Norris SE (2015) Appropriate boundary conditions for a pressure driven boundary layer. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 142:43–52
Taylor PA, Gent PR (1974) A model of atmospheric boundary-layer flow above an isolated two-dimensional hill: an example of flow above gentle topography. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 7:349–362
Teunissen HW (1983) Wind tunnel and full scale comparisons of mean flow over an isolated low hill. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 15:271–286
Troen I, Petersen EL (1989) European wind atlas. Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde
User’s Guide—NBC 2015 Structural Commentaries (Part 4 of Division B), Commentary I: wind load and effects
Wilcox DC (1993) Turbulence modeling for CFD, 1st edn. DCW Industries, La Canada
Wood N (1995) The onset of separation in neutral, turbulent flow over hills. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 76(137):164
Wood N, Mason PJ (1993) The pressure force induced by neutral, turbulent flow over hills. Q J R Meteorol Soc 119:1233–1267
Yang Y, Gu M, Chen S, Jin X (2009) New inflow boundary conditions for modelling the neutral equilibrium atmospheric boundary layer in computational wind engineerring. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 97:88–95
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Safaei Pirooz, A.A., Flay, R.G.J. Comparison of Speed-Up Over Hills Derived from Wind-Tunnel Experiments, Wind-Loading Standards, and Numerical Modelling. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 168, 213–246 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-018-0350-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-018-0350-x