Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Impact of the Winter Monsoon on Marine Surface-Layer Turbulence

  • Article
  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During winter the East-Asia monsoon is the dominant climatological phenomenon in the north-west Pacific, especially around the Japan Islands. Previous studies based on satellite and radiosonde observations revealed that cold and dry strong flow from Siberia over the warm Kuroshio Extension enhances instability of the marine boundary layer and reduces vertical wind shear. Since active convection manifests as intensification of near-surface turbulence, in situ meteorological buoy data were analyzed, confirming that turbulence intensity or equivalently the gust factor increases during the winter north-westerly monsoon. Concurrently, a hindcast atmospheric simulation was conducted to quantify the thermal and vapour fluxes in the marine boundary layer. When large gust factors or turbulence intensity are observed, the buoyancy production plays an important role in the turbulent kinetic energy budget. To further clarify the respective roles of the sensible and latent heat fluxes at the sea surface, atmospheric model experiments showed that the sensible heat flux predominantly contributes to the increase in turbulence intensity. On the other hand, the latent heat flux mainly affects the generation of clouds at the top of the marine boundary layer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The wind fluctuations at lower wind speeds tend to obey the Weibull distribution with a smaller shape parameter (Nishida and Waseda 2013).

  2. While bulk Richardson number is a function of height and time, we assumed the ratio of \(Ri_{B}\) (1.8 m) and \(Ri_{B}\) (20 m) as constant.

References

  • Beljaars ACM, Holtslag AAM (1991) Flux parameterization over land surface for atmospheric models. J Appl Meteorol 30:327–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beljaars ACM (1994) The parameterization of surface flux in large-scale models under free convection. Q J R Meteorol Soc 121:255–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury WMS, Deaves DM (1994) The dependence of gust factor probabilities on convective activity: analysis conducted for Eurotunnel. Meteorol Appl 1:159–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury WMS, Deaves DM, Hunt JCR, Kershaw R, Nakamura K, Hardman ME, Bearman PW (1994) The importance of convective gusts. Meteorol Appl 1:365–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown RD, Swail VR (1991) Over-water gust factors. Ocean Eng 18:363–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chelton DB, Xie S-P (2010) Coupled ocean-atmosphere interaction at oceanic mesoscales. Oceanography 23:52–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumbel EJ (1958) Statistics of extremes. Columbia University Press, New York 371 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasse L (1984) Cumulukonvektion und Konvektionsrollen. Promet Meteorol Fortbild 13(2/3):38–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Hein P, Brown RA (1988) Observations of longitudinal roll vortices during arctic cold air outbreaks over open water. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 45:177–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen TG, Campbell TJ, Allard A, Small RJ, Smith TA (2011) Turbulent heat fluxes during an intense cold-air outbreak over the Kuroshio Extension Region: results from a high-resolution coupled atmosphere-ocean model. Ocean Dyn 61(5):657–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justus CG, Hargraves WR, Yalcin A (1976) Nationwide assessment of potential output from wind powered generators. J Appl Meteorol 15:673–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konda M, Ichikawa H, Tomita H, Cronin MF (2010) Surface heat flux variations across the Kuroshio Extension as observed by surface flux buoys. J Clim 23:5206–5221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minobe S, Kuwano-Yoshida A, Komori N, Xie S-P, Small RJ (2008) Influence of the Gulf Stream on the troposphere. Nature 452:206–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakanishi M (2001) Improvement of the Mellor–Yamada turbulence closure model based on large-eddy simulation data. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 99:349–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakanishi M, Niino H (2004) An improved Mellor–Yamada level-3 model with condensation physics: its design and verification. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 112:1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakanishi M, Niino H (2006) An improved Mellor–Yamada level-3 model: Its numerical stability and application to a regional prediction of advection fog. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 119:397–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls S, Lemone MA, Sommeria G (1982) The simulation of a fair weather marine boundary layer in GATE using a three-dimensional model. Q J R Meteorol Soc 108:167–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishida T, Waseda T (2013) The impact of winter northwest monsoon on gust factor. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2013 32nd international conference on ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering

  • Nonaka M, Xie S-P (2003) Covariations of sea surface temperature and wind over the Kuroshio and its extension: evidence for ocean-to-atmospheric feedback. J Clim 16:1404–1413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito K, Fujita T, Yamada Y, Ishida J, Kumagai Y, Aranami K, Ohmori S, Nagasawa R, Kumagai S, Muroi C, Kato T, Eito H, Yamazaki Y (2006) The operational JMA nonhydrostatic mesoscale model. Mon Weather Rev 134:1266–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SD, Chandler PCP (1987) Spectra and gust factors for gale force marine winds. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 40:393–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SD, Anderson RJ, Oost WA, Kraan C, Maat N, DeCosmo J, Katsaros KB, Davidson KL, Bumke K, Hasse L, Chadwick HM (1992) Sea-surface wind stress and drag coefficients: the HEXOS results. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 60:109–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stull RB (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 666 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tokinaga H, Tanimoto Y, Nonaka M, Taguchi B, Fukamachi T, Xie S-P, Nakamura H, Watanabe T, Yasuda I (2006) Atmospheric sounding over the winter Kuroshio Extension: effect of surface stability on atmospheric boundary layer structure. Geophys Res Lett 33:L04703. doi:10.1029/2005GL025102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokinaga H, Tanimoto Y, Xie S-P, Sampe T, Tomita H, Ichikawa H (2009) Ocean frontal effects on the vertical development of clouds over the western North Pacific: in situ and satellite observations. J Clim 22:4241–4260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieringa J (1973) Gust factors over open water and built-up country. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 3:424–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The K-TRITON buoy data were provided by Y. Kawai and H. Tomita of the JAMSTEC. The NHM model was provided by the JMA Numerical Weather Prediction Platform. The JMA SST product used as the surface boundary condition in the NHM model was provided by way of “Meteorological Research Consortium,” a framework for research cooperation between the JMA and the Meteorological Society of Japan. NOWPHAS (Nationwide Ocean Wave information network for Ports and HArbourS) GPS wave buoy data were provided by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism. We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their critical and constructive comments. A. Webb contributed in finalizing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoya Nishida.

Appendix: Relationship Between Gust Factor and Turbulence Intensity

Appendix: Relationship Between Gust Factor and Turbulence Intensity

Assuming that the wind fluctuation is Gaussian, the gust factor is equivalent to the turbulence intensity as shown in Eq. 4. This relationship has two important implications: the first is that the turbulence intensity calculated in the atmospheric model can be treated in the same way as the gust factor. Secondly the gust factor can be used as an indicator of the intensity of turbulence when only mean and maximum wind speeds in an averaging period are measured. Here, we validate this relationship by available in-situ data.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Scatter diagram of turbulence intensity and gust factor at NOWPHAS Central Iwate. Blue dots observations, red dots and error bar the mean and standard deviation of the observations, and black line Eq. 9

Ports and Harbours Bureau, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism has deployed the NOWPHAS (Nationwide Ocean Wave information network for Ports and HArbourS) GPS wave buoy about 15 km off the Pacific coast of Japan island. The wave buoy at the NOWPHAS Central Iwate site \((39.627^{\circ }\hbox {N}, 142.187^{\circ }\hbox {E})\) is equipped with an anemometer that provides wind fluctuations continuously at a 1-Hz sampling rate. Therefore, the time series from the NOWPHAS Central Iwate site can be used to derive the correlation between the gust factor and turbulence intensity.

From the NOWPHAS observation in 2012, the gust factor and turbulence intensity were estimated for wind speeds \(>10 \hbox { m s}^{-1}\). The relationship of the observed gust factor with respect to observed turbulence intensity is compared against the Gaussian model (Fig. 12). Here, the Gaussian model (Eq. 4) was reduced to,

$$\begin{aligned} G=1+2.935 \, TI, \end{aligned}$$
(9)

for the gust duration time (t) of 1 s and averaging period (T) of 10 min. The Gaussian model (black line) shows quite good agreement with the NOWPHAS observation (red dots and error bar). An analysis conducted using ship-borne wind measurements (not shown here) showed a similar relationship as well. Therefore, the complementary relationship between gust factor and turbulence intensity (Eq. 4) is validated. Consequently, the analysis based on the in situ data (Fig. 9) and that based on atmospheric model (Fig. 10) are equivalent and indeed the results are consistent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nishida, T., Waseda, T. The Impact of the Winter Monsoon on Marine Surface-Layer Turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 157, 141–156 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-015-0053-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-015-0053-5

Keywords

Navigation