Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Methods in sustainable monitoring: plot sampling versus interviews

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biodiversity monitoring in developing countries has long been haunted by problems with sustaining monitoring programs, especially after funding stops. Current programs are developed to fulfill strict scientific demands, which often results in high priced programs, with little local participation and attention. Thus, to enhance sustainability of the biodiversity programs, there is a great need to reconcile scientific rigor with local involvement. In this paper, we analyze the cost-effectiveness and usefulness of a standard and a participatory monitoring method, in their ability to monitor biodiversity, while rising local participation. As a standard method we used a forest characteristic with tree basal area and Shannon index as proxy for biodiversity. Interviews were used as a participatory approach, with hunters’ catch-effort as proxy. The analysis showed that the interviews reached a better precision with fewer work hours spent and at the same time involved local populations and stake holders. As a tradeoff, the interviews lacked the scientific rigor from forest characteristic. In order to sustain monitoring programs, we conclude that conservation biologists needs to compromise between scientific rigor and public participation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrianandrasana HT, Randriamahefasoa J, Durbin J, Lewis RE, Ratsimbazafy JH (2005) Participatory ecological monitoring of the Alaotra wetlands in Madagascar. Biodivers Conserv 14(11):2757–2774. doi:10.1007/s10531-005-8413-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bormann FH (1953) The statistical efficiency of sample plot size and shape in forest ecology. Ecology 34(3):474–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandon A, Spyreas G, Molano-Flores B, Carroll C, Ellis J (2003) Can volunteers provide reliable data for forest vegetation surveys? Nat Areas J 23(3):254–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs-high diversity of trees and corals is maintained only in a non-equilibrium state. Science 199(4335):1302–1310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DANIDA (2000) Towards ‘best practice’ in biodiversity conservatino in Southern Africa. Royal Dan Ministry Foreign Aff, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen F, Balete DS, Poulsen MK, Enghoff M, Nozawa CM, Jensen AE (2000) A simple system for monitoring biodiversity in protected areas of a developing country. Biodivers Conserv 9(12):1671–1705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen F, Mendoza MM, Alviola P, Balete DS, Enghoff M, Poulsen MK, Jensen AE (2003) Biodiversity monitoring in developing countries: what are we trying to achieve? Oryx 37(4):407–409. doi:10.1017/s0030605303000735

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen F, Burgess ND, Balmford A (2005a) Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodivers Conserv 14(11):2507–2542. doi:10.1007/s10531-005-8375-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen F, Jensen AE, Alviola PA, Balete DS, Mendoza M, Tagtag A, Custodio C, Enghoff M (2005b) Does monitoring matter? A quantitative assessment of management decisions from locally-based monitoring of protected areas. Biodivers Conserv 14(11):2633–2652. doi:10.1007/s10531-005-8392-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen F, Burgess ND, Balmford A, Donald PF, Funder M, Jones JPG, Alviola P, Balete DS, Blomley T, Brashares J, Child B, Enghoff M, Fjeldsa J, Holt S, Hubertz H, Jensen AE, Jensen PM, Massao J, Mendoza MM, Ngaga Y, Poulsen MK, Rueda R, Sam M, Skielboe T, Stuart-Hill G, Topp-Jorgensen E, Yonten D (2009) Local participation in natural resource monitoring: a characterization of approaches. Conserv Biol 23(1):31–42. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01063.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen FD F, Skutsch M, Burgess ND, Jensen PM, Andrianandrasana H, Karky B, Lewis R, Lovett JC, Massao J, Ngaga Y, Phartiyal P, Poulsen MK, Singh SP, Solis S, Sorensen M, Tewari A, Young R, Zahabu E (2011) At the heart of REDD+: a role for local people in monitoring forests? Conserv Lett 4(2):158–167. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00159.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firehock K, West J (1995) A brief history of volunteer biological water monitoring using macroinvertebrates. J North Am Benthol Soc 14(1):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fragoso JMV (1997) Tapir-generated seed shadows: scale-dependent patchiness in the Amazon rain forest. J Ecol 85(4):519–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaidet N, Fritz H, Nyahuma C (2003) A participatory counting method to monitor populations of large mammals in non-protected areas: a case study of bicycle counts in the Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe. Biodivers Conserv 12(8):1571–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genet KS, Sargent LG (2003) Evaluation of methods and data quality from a volunteer-based amphibian call survey. Wildl Soc Bull 31(3):11

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz WM, Fortmann L, Cumming D, du Toit J, Hilty J, Martin R, Murphree M, Owen-Smith N, Starfield AM, Westphal MI (1999) Conservation-sustaining natural and human capital: villagers and scientists. Science 283(5409):1855–1856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimbacher PS, Catterall CP (2007) How much do site age, habitat structure and spatial isolation influence the restoration of rainforest beetle species assemblages? Biol Conserv 135(1):107–118. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez-Granados G, Dirzo R (2010) Indirect effects of timber extraction on plant recruitment and diversity via reductions in abundance of frugivorous spider monkeys. J Trop Ecol 26:45–52. doi:10.1017/s0266467409990307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley TA (1993) Balancing economic-development, biological conservatino, and human culture-the Sitka black-tailed deer (Odocoileus-hemionus sitkensis) as an ecological indicator. Biol Conserv 66(1):61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill K, McMillan G, Farina R (2003) Hunting-related changes in game encounter rates from 1994 to 2001 in the Mbaracayu Reserve, Paraguay. Conserv Biol 17(5):1312–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirata A, Kamijo T, Saito S (2009) Host trait preferences and distribution of vascular epiphytes in a warm-temperate forest. Plant Ecol 201(1):247–254. doi:10.1007/s11258-008-9519-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockley NJ, Jones JPG, Andriahajaina FB, Manica A, Ranambitsoa EH, Randriamboahary JA (2005) When should communities and conservationists monitor exploited resources? Biodivers Conserv 14(11):2795–2806. doi:10.1007/s10531-005-8416-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holck MH (2008) Participatory forest monitoring: an assessment of the accuracy of simple cost-effective methods. Biodivers Conserv 17(8):2023–2036. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9273-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe HF, Smallwood J (1982) Ecology of seed dispersal. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 13:201–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes R, Flintan F (2001) Integrating conservation and development experience: a review and bibliography of the ICDP Literature. Int Inst Environ Dev, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones JPG, Andriamarovololona MM, Hockley N, Gibbons JM, Milner-Gulland EJ (2008) Testing the use of interviews as a tool for monitoring trends in the harvesting of wild species. J Appl Ecol 45(4):1205–1212. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01487.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keuroghlian A, Eaton DP (2008) Importance of rare habitats and riparian zones in a tropical forest fragment: preferential use by Tayassu pecari, a wide-ranging frugivore. J Zool 275(3):283–293. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00440.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1999) Ecological methodology, 2nd edn. Addison-Welsey Publishers, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C, Merenlender AM, Murphy DD (1994) Ecological monitoring-a vital need for integrated conservation and development programs in the tropics. Conserv Biol 8(2):388–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert TD, Malcolm JR, Zimmerman BL (2006) Amazonian small mammal abundances in relation to habitat structure and resource abundance. J Mammal 87(4):766–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman M, Lieberman D, Hartshorn GS, Peralta R (1985) Small-scale altitudinal variation in lowland wet tropical forest vegetation. J Ecol 73(2):505–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra H, Ostrom E (2011) The Challenge of Forest Diagnostics. Ecol Soc 16(2)

  • Noss AJ, Cuellar E, Cuellar RL (2004) An evaluation of hunter self-monitoring in the Bolivian Chaco. Hum Ecol 32(6):685–702. doi:10.1007/s10745-004-6832-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novotny V, Basset Y, Miller SE, Drozd P, Cizek L (2002) Host specialization of leaf-chewing insects in a New Guinea rainforest. J Anim Ecol 71(3):400–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redford KH (1992) The empty forest. Bioscience 42(6):412–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rist J (2007) Bushmeat catch per unit effort in space and time: a monitoring tool for bushmeat hunting. University of London, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rist J, Milner-Gulland EJ, Cowlishaw G, Rowcliffe M (2010) Hunter reporting of catch per unit effort as a monitoring tool in a bushmeat-harvesting system. Conserv Biol 24(2):489–499. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01470.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez JP (2003) Challenges and opportunities for surveying and monitoring tropical biodiversity–a response to Danielsen et al. Oryx 37(4):411. doi:10.1017/s0030605303000759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper JM (2003) An assessment of Indigenous participation in commercial forestry markets: the case of Nicaragua’s Northern Atlantic Autonomous Region. Forest Trends, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (1998) Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single-species management passe in the landscape era? Biol Conserv 83(3):247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siren A, Hamback P, Machoa E (2004) Including spatial heterogeneity and animal dispersal when evaluating hunting: a model analysis and an empirical assessment in an Amazonian community. Conserv Biol 18(5):1315–1329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2007) The state of education in Latin America and the Caribbean: guaranteeing quality education for all. Regional Bureau of Education for Latin America and the Caribbean, Santiago

    Google Scholar 

  • Vierikko K, Pellikka J, Hanski IK, Myllyviita T, Niemela J, Vehkamaki S, Linden H (2010) Indicators of sustainable forestry: the association between wildlife species and forest structure in Finland. Ecol Indic 10(2):361–369. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.06.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells M, Guggenheim S, Khan A, Wardojo W, Jepson P (1999) Investing in biodiversity. A review of Indonesia’s integrated conservation and development projects. World Bank Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams SC, Ward JS (2006) Exotic seed dispersal by white-tailed deer in southern Connecticut. Nat Areas J 26(4):383–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoccoz NG, Nichols JD, Boulinier T (2001) Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time. Trends Ecol Evol 16(8):446–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Nepenthes, World Wildlife Foundation and Oticon for supporting the research. Additionally the authors thank Morten Foldager Pedersen and Peter Frederiksen for supervision of the research and Ove Faurby for insightful discussions. A big thanks to the entire IPADE office in Rosita and the communities for aiding in the fieldwork. Finally thanks to Jacob Nabe Nielsen, Mads C. Forchhammer and Leslie Walsh for comments and linguistic corrections on this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Environmental Research Institute, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark

    Lars O. Mortensen

  2. Holbæk Municipality, Kanalstræde 2, 4300, Holbaek, Denmark

    Maj Brit Jensen

Authors
  1. Lars O. Mortensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maj Brit Jensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars O. Mortensen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mortensen, L.O., Jensen, M.B. Methods in sustainable monitoring: plot sampling versus interviews. Biodivers Conserv 21, 145–153 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0171-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0171-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation