Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is vascular plant species diversity a predictor of bryophyte species diversity in Mediterranean forests?

  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to (i) investigate the congruence among the species composition and diversity of bryophytes and vascular plants in forests; (ii) test if site prioritization for conservation aims by the maximization of the pooled number of vascular plant species is effective to maximize the pooled number of bryophyte species. The study was performed in six forests in Tuscany, Italy. Four-hundred and twenty vascular plant species (61 of which were woody) and 128 bryophyte species were recorded in 109 plots. Despite the good predictive value of the compositional patterns of both woody plants and total vascular with respect to the compositional pattern of bryophytes, the species richness of the latter was only marginally related to the species richness of the former two. Bryophyte rare species were not spatially related to rare plant species and neither coincided with the sites of highest plant species richness. The species accumulation curves of bryophytes behaved differently with respect to those of woody plants or total vascular plants. Reserve selection analysis based on the maximization of the pooled species richness of either woody plants or total vascular plants were not effective in maximizing the pooled species richness of bryophytes. This study indicates that species diversity of vascular plants is not likely to be a good indicator of the bryophyte species diversity in Mediterranean forests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aleffi M. and Schumacker R. (1995). Check-list and red list of the liverworts (Marchantiophyta) and hornworts (Anthocerotophyta) of Italy. Flora Mediterranea 5: 73–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolozzi L., Bonini I., Boretti R., Bussotti F., Cenni E., Chiarucci A., Cozzi A., Ferretti M., Grassoni P., Landi G., Leonzio C., Vignozzi G. and Dominicis V. (2002). Forest ecosystem monitoring in Tuscany (Italy): past activities, present status and future perspectives. J. Limnol. 61: 129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernetti G. (1987). I boschi della Toscana. Giunta Regionale Toscana. Edagricole, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiarucci A., Wilson J.B. and Dominicis V. (2001). Structure and floristic diversity in permanent monitoring plots in forest ecosystems of Tuscany. For. Ecol. Manage. 141: 203–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiarucci A. and Bonini I. (2005). Quantitative floristics as a tool for the assessment of plant diversity in Tuscan forests. For. Ecol. Managem. 212: 160–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiarucci A., D’Auria F., Laganà A., Perini C., Salerni E. and Dominicis V. (2005). Using vascular plants as a surrogate taxon to maximize fungal species richness in reserve design. Conserv. Biol. 19: 1644–1652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church R.L., Stoms D.M. and Davis F.W. (1996). Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem. Biol. Conserv. 76: 105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell R.K. and Coddington J.A. (1994). Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 345: 101–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cortini Pedrotti C. (2001). New check-list of Mosses of Italy. Flora Mediterranea 11: 23–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Csuti B., Polasky S., Williams P.H., Pressey R.L., Camm J.D., Kershaw M., Kiester A.R., Downs B., Hamilton R., Huso M. and Sahr K. (1997). A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon. Biol. Conserv. 80: 83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garson J., Aggarwal A. and Sarkar S. (2002). Birds as surrogates for biodiversity: an analysis of a data set from southern Québec. J. Biosci. 27: 347–360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli N.J. and Colwell R.K. (2001). Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 4: 379–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray J.S., Ugland K.I. and Lambshead J. (2004). Species accumulation and species area curves – a comment on Scheiner (2003). Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 13: 473–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard P.C., Viskanic P., Davenport T.R.B., Kigenyi F.W., Baltzer M., Dickinson C.J., Lwanga J.S., Matthews R.A. and Balmford A. (1998). Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature 394: 472–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ILOG (1999). CPLEX 6.5. ILOG. Gentilly, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingerpuu N., Vellak K., Kukk T. and Pärtel M. (2001). Bryophyte and vascular plant species richness in boreo-nemoral moist forests and mires. Biodivers. Conserv. 10: 2153–2166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore J.L., Folkmann M., Balmford A., Brooks T., Burgess N., Rahbek C., Williams P.H. and Krarup J. (2003). Heuristic and optimal solutions for set-covering problems in conservation biology. Ecography 26: 595–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negi H.R. and Gadgil M. (2002). Cross-taxon surrogacy of biodiversity in the Indian Garhwal Himalaya. Biol. Conserv. 105: 143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nekola J.C. and White P.S. (1999). The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J. Biogeogr. 26: 867–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer M.W., Earls P.G., Hoagland B.W., White P.S. and Wohlgemuth T. (2002). Quantitative tools for perfecting species lists. Environmetrics 13: 121–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panzer R. and Schwartz M.W. (1998). Effectiveness of a vegetation based approach to invertebrate conservation. Conserv. Biol. 12: 693–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pharo E.J., Beattie A.J. and Binns D. (1999). Vascular plant diversity as a surrogate for bryophyte and lichen diversity. Conserv. Biol. 13: 282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pharo E.J., Beattie A.J. and Pressey R.L. (2000). Effectiveness of using vascular plants to select reserves for bryophytes and lichens. Biol. Conserv. 96: 371–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pignatti S. (1982). Flora d’Italia. Edagricole, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Polasky S., Csuti B., Vossler C.A. and Meyers S.M. (2001). A comparison of taxonomic distinctness versus richness as criteria for setting conservation priorities for North American birds. Biol. Conserv. 97: 99–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast J.R., Quinn R.M., Lawton J.H., Eversham B.C. and Gibbons D.W. (1993). Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365: 335–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressey R.L., Humphries C.J., Margules C.R., Vane-Wright R.I. and Williams P.H. (1993). Beyond opportunisms: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 124–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricotta C., Carranza M.L. and Avena G. (2002). Computing ß-diversity from species area curves. Basic Appl. Ecol. 3: 15–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues A.S., Cerdeira J.O. and Gaston K.J. (2000). Flexibility, efficiency, and accountability: adapting reserve selection algorithms to more complex conservation problems. Ecography 23: 565–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues A.S.L., Andelman S.J., Bakarr M.I., Boitani L., Brooks T.M., Cowling R.M., Fishpool L.D.C., Gaston K.J., Hoffmann M., Long J.S., Marquet P.A., Pilgrim J.D., Pressey R.L., Schipper J., Sechrest W., Stuart S.N., Underhill L.G., Waller R.W., Watts M.E.J., Yan X. and Fonseca G.A.B. (2004). Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428: 640–643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues A.S.L. and Gaston K.J. (2002). Optimisation in reserve selection procedures – why not?. Biol. Conserv. 107: 123–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryti R.T. (1992). Effect of the focal taxon on the selection of nature reserves. Ecol. Appl. 2: 404–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saetersdal M., Gjerde I., Blom H.H., Ihlen Per.G., Myrseth E.W., Pommeresche R., Skartveit J., Solhoy T. and Aas O. (2004). Vascular plants as a surrogate species group in complementary site selection for bryophytes, macrolichens, spiders, carabids, staphylinids, snails, and wood living polypore fungi in a northern forest. Biol. Conserv. 115: 21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders H.L. (1968). Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. Am. Nat. 102: 243–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner S.M. (2003). Six types of species-area curves. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 12: 441–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tardif B. and DesGranges J.-L. (1998). Correspondence between bird and plant hotspots of the St. Lawrence River and influence of scale on their location. Biol. Conserv. 84: 53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virolainen K.M., Ahlroth P., Hyvarinen E., Korkeamaki E., Mattila J., Paiivinen J., Rintala T., Suomi T. and Suhonen J. (2000). Hot spots, indicator taxa, complementarity and optimal networks of taiga. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 267: 1143–1147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H. (1999). Key sites for conservation: area selection methods for biodiversity. In: Mace, G.M., Balmford, A. and Ginsberg, J.R. (eds) Conservation in a Changing World: Integrating Processes into Priorities for Action, pp 211–249. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Chiarucci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chiarucci, A., D’auria, F. & Bonini, I. Is vascular plant species diversity a predictor of bryophyte species diversity in Mediterranean forests?. Biodivers Conserv 16, 525–545 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-6733-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-6733-1

Keywords

Navigation