Skip to main content
Log in

Regional ecological risk assessment for the introduction of Gambusia affinis (western mosquitofish) into Montana watersheds

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Qualitative risk assessment methodologies were used to assess the risk of establishment and consequent impacts on native minnows and species of concern (SOC) associated with the intentional or unintentional introduction of the mosquito biological control agent, Gambusia affinis, to various Montana watersheds. Gambusia affinis introductions for mosquito control have been made throughout the world; some introductions have resulted in deleterious effects on native species. We used average January water temperatures, the presence of dams, and the presence of native minnows and SOC to define endpoints for our assessment. Our results suggest that a section of the Missouri River running between Wolf Creek and Landusky had the highest overall risk score, which corresponds to the highest likelihood of establishment and effects on native minnows and SOC. We also demonstrate how rivers with the highest temperatures are not necessarily at the highest risk of having deleterious effects on minnows and SOC; conversely, these rivers were found to be at highest risk of a population of G. affinis establishing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EA:

Environmental assessment

G. affinis :

Gambusia affinis

GIS:

Geographical Information Systems

MFWP:

Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks

NRC:

National Research Council

ORS:

Overall risk score

SOC:

Species of concern

USGS:

United States Geological Survey

USOSTP:

United States Office of Science Technology and Policy

References

  • Al-Daham NK, Bhatti MN (1977) Salinity tolerance of Gambusia affinis (Baird and Girard) and Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch). J Fish Biol 11:309–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen MC, Adams H, Hope B et al (2004a) Risk analysis for invasive species: general framework and research needs. Risk Anal 24:893–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen MC, Adams H, Hope B et al (2004b) Risk assessment for invasive species. Risk Anal 24:787–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen MC, Thompson B, Boykin K (2004c) Spatial risk assessment across large landscapes with varied land use: lessons from a conservation assessment of military lands. Risk Anal 24:1231–1242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ayala J, Rader R, Belk M et al (2007) Ground-truthing the impact of invasive species: spatio-temporal overlap between native least chub and introduced western mosquitofish. Biol Invasions 9:857–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltz DM, Moyle PB (1993) Invasion resistance to introduced species by a native assemblage of California stream fishes. Ecol Appl 3:246–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bence JR (1988) Indirect effects and biological control of mosquitoes by mosquitofish. J Appl Ecol 25:505–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billman EJ, Wagner EJ, Arndt RE (2007) A comparison of mosquito consumption and prey selection between least chub (Lotichthys phlegethontis) and western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). West N Am Nat 67:71–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein L, Karban R (1990) Indirect effects of the mosquitofish Gambusia affinis on the mosquito Culex tarsalis. Limnol Oceanogr 35:767–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown CJD, Fox AC (1966) Mosquito fish (Gambusia affinis) in a Montana pond. Copeia 1966:614–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs MR (2006) Comparison of Gila topminnow and western mosquitofish as biological control agents of mosquitoes. West N Am Nat 66:181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chipps SR, Wahl DH (2004) Development and evaluation of a western mosquitofish bioenergetics model. Trans Am Fish Soc 133:1150–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colnar AM, Landis WG (2007) Conceptual model development for invasive species and a regional risk assessment case study: the European Green Crab, Carcinus maenas, at Cherry Point, Washington, USA. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 13:120–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtenay WR Jr, Meffe GK (1989) Small fishes in strange places: a review of introduced poeciliids. In: Meffe GK, Snelson FF Jr (eds) Ecology and evolution of livebearing fishes (Poeciliidae). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 319–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox AL Jr, Babayev D, Huber W (2005) Some limitations of qualitative risk rating systems. Risk Anal 25:651–662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crivelli AJ, Boy V (1987) The diet of the mosquitofish Gambusia affinis (Baird and Girard) (Poeciliidae) in Mediterranean France. Revue D Ecologie-La Terre Et La Vie 42:421–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne M (1985) Cannibalism, food availability, and reproduction in the mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis): a laboratory experiment. Am Nat 126:16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake JM, Lodge DM (2006) Allee effects, propagule pressure and the probability of establishment: risk analysis for biological invasions. Biol Invasions 8:365–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake JM, Drury KLS, Lodge DM et al (2006) Demographic stochasticity, environmental variability, and windows of invasion risk for Bythotrephes longimanus in North America. Biol Invasions 8:843–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duryea R, Donnelly J, Guthrie D et al (1996) Gambusia affinis effectiveness in New Jersey mosquito control. Proceedings of the eighty-third annual meeting of the New Jersey Mosquito Control Association, Inc, pp 95–102

  • Gamradt SC, Kats LB (1996) Effect of introduced crayfish and mosquitofish on California newts. Conserv Biol 10:1155–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Berthou E (1999) Food of introduced mosquitofish: ontogenetic diet shift and prey selection. J Fish Biol 55:135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentile JH, Harwell MA (2001) Strategies for assessing cumulative ecological risks. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 7:239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gido KB, Brown JH (1999) Invasion of North American drainages by alien fish species. Freshw Biol 42:387–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin BJ, McAllister AJ, Fahrig L (1999) Predicting invasiveness of plant species based on biological information. Conserv Biol 13:422–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes JL (1993) Annual reestablishment of mosquitofish populations in Nebraska. Copeia 1993:232–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy JB, Reed DE (1970) Biological control of Culex tarsalis in a California rice field. Mosq News 30:222–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy JB, Reed DE (1971) Efficacy of mosquitofish for control of Culex tarsalis in California rice fields. Mosq News 31:567–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy JB, O’berg AG, Kauffman EE (1971) Mosquitofish as a biological control agent against Culex tarsalis and Anopheles freeborni in Sacramento Valley rice fields. Mosq News 31:146–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy JB, Kauffman EE, Oberg A (1972) Large-scale field test of Gambusia affinis and chlorpyrifos for mosquito control. Mosq News 32:161–171

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes AL (1985) Seasonal changes in fecundity and size at first reproduction in an Indiana population of the mosquitofish Gambusia affinis. Am Midl Nat 114:30–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert SH, Mulla MS (1981) Impacts of mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) predation on plankton communities. Hydrobiologia 83:125–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert SH, Zedler J, Fairbank D (1972) Ecosystem alteration by mosquitofish (Gambusia Affinis) predation. Science 175:639–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16:199–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2002) Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298:1233–1236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Komak S, Crossland MR (2000) An assessment of the introduced mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis holbrooki) as a predator of eggs, hatchlings and tadpoles of native and non-native anurans. Wildlife Res 27:185–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer VL, Garcia R, Colwell AE (1988) An evaluation of Gambusia affinis and Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis as mosquito control agents in California wild rice fields. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 4:470–478

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krumholz LA (1944) Northward acclimatization of western mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis. Copeia 1944:82–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krumholz LA (1948) Reproduction in the western mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis (Baird & Girard), and its use in mosquito control. Ecol Monogr 18:1–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis WG, Wiegers JA (1997) Design considerations and a suggested approach for regional and comparative ecological risk assessment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 3:287–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd L (1984) Exotic fish—useful additions or “animals weeds”. Fishes Sahul 1:31–34, 39–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd LN, Arthington AH, Milton DA (1986) The mosquitofish—a valuable mosquito-control agent or a pest? In: Kitching RL (ed) The ecology of exotic animals and plants some Australian case histories. Wiley, Brisbane, pp 6–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Louda SM, Arnett AE, Rand TA et al (2003) Invasiveness of some biological control insects and adequacy of their ecological risk assessment and regulation. Conserv Biol 17:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch JD (1988) Introduction, establishment, and dispersal of western mosquitofish in Nebraska (Actinopterygii: Poeciliidae). Prairie Nat 20:203–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti MP, Moyle PB (2001) Effects of flow regime on fish assemblages in a regulated California stream. Ecol Appl 11:530–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti MP, Light T, Moyle PB et al (2004a) Fish invasions in California watersheds: testing hypotheses using landscape patterns. Ecol Appl 14:1507–1525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti MP, Moyle PB, Levine R (2004b) Alien fishes in California watersheds: characteristics of successful and failed invaders. Ecol Appl 14:587–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti MP, Moyle PB, Levine R (2004c) Invasive species profiling? Exploring the characteristics of non-native fishes across invasion stages in California. Freshw Biol 49:646–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meffe GK (1984) Effects of abiotic disturbance on coexistence of predator-prey fish species. Ecology 65:1525–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meffe GK (1985) Predation and species replacement in American southwestern fishes: a case study. Southwest Nat 30:173–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meffe GK, Snelson FF Jr (1989) An ecological overview of poeciliid fishes. In: Meffe GK, Snelson FF Jr (eds) Ecology and evolution of livebearing fishes (Poeciliidae). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 13–31

    Google Scholar 

  • MFWP (2004) Mosquitofish stocking in Montana. http://www.fwp.mt.gov/publicnotices/notice_567.aspx Cited 04 May 2007

  • MFWP (2006) GIS layers. http://www.fwp.mt.gov/insidefwp/GIS/download.aspx#Fis Cited 31 May 2007

  • Miura T, Takahashi RM, Wilder WH (1984) Impact of the mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) on a rice field ecosystem when used as a mosquito control agent. Mosq News 44:510–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle PB, Light T (1996) Biological invasions of fresh water: empirical rules and assembly theory. Biol Conserv 78:149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson SM, Keenan LC (1992) Use of an indigenous fish species, Fundulus zebrinus, in a mosquito abatement program: a field comparison with the mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 8:301–304

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niethammer KR, Kaiser MS (1983) Late summer food habits of three heron species in Northeastern Louisiana. Colonial Waterbirds 6:148–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (1983) Risk assessment in the Federal government: managing the process. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, pp 191

    Google Scholar 

  • Offill YA, Walton WE (1999) Comparative efficacy of the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) and the mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) for mosquito control. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 15:380–390

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Otto RG (1973) Temperature tolerance of mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis (Baird and Girard). J Fish Biol 5:575–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson RKD, Sing SE (2007) Releasing biocontrol agents: risk assessment and overdue reform. IOBC-NRS Newsletter 29:1, 3

  • Rees DM (1934) Notes on mosquito fish in Utah, Gambusia affinis (Baird and Girard). Copeia 1934:157–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehage JS, Sih A (2004) Dispersal behavior, boldness, and the link to invasiveness: a comparison of four gambusia species. Biol Invasions 6:379–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehage JS, Barnett BK, Sih A (2005) Foraging behavior and invasiveness: do invasive gambusia exhibit higher feeding rates and broader diets than their noninvasive relatives? Ecol Freshw Fish 14:352–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins LW, Hartman GD, Smith MH (1987) Dispersal, reproductive strategies, and the maintenance of genetic-variability in mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). Copeia 1987:156–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenherr AA (1981) The role of competition in the displacement of native fishes by introduced species. In: Naiman RJ, Soltz DL (eds) Fishes in North American deserts. Wiley Interscience, New York, pp 173–203

    Google Scholar 

  • SpatialSci (2007) Science goes spatial. http://www.spatialsci.com/index.php Cited 7 Jun 2007

  • Swingle HS (1949) Experiments with combinations of largemouth black bass, bluegills, and minnows in ponds. Trans Am Fish Soc 76:46–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner CL (1937) Reproductive cycle and superfoetation in poeciliid fishes. Bio Bull 72:145–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USGS (2007) USGS water-quality for Montana. http://www.waterdata.usgs.gov/mt/nwis/qw Cited 6 Jun 2007

  • USOSTP (1999) Ecological risk assessment in the federal government. CENR/5–99/001. Committee on Environment and Natural Resources of the National Science and Technology Council, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton WE, Mulla MS (1991) Integrated control of Culex tarsalis using Bacillus sphuericus and Gambusia affinis: effects on mosquitoes and nontarget organisms in field mesocosms. Bull Soc Vec Ecol 16:203–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton WE, Mulla MS, Wargo MJ et al (1991) Efficacy of a microbial insecticide and larvivorous fish against Culex tarsalis in duck club ponds in southern California. Proc Pap Ann Conf Calif Mosq Vec Contr Assoc 58:148–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegers JK, Feder HM, Mortensen LS et al (1998) A regional multiple-stressor rank-based ecological risk assessment for the fjord of Port Valdez, Alaska. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 4:1125–1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Staigmiller (Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks), M. Schat and F. Antwi (Montana State University), and R. Davis (ICM Ventures Inc.). This research was supported by a grant from the US Armed Forces Pest Management Board’s Deployed War Fighter Protection Program, Montana State University, and the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station, Bozeman, Montana, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerome J. Schleier III.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schleier, J.J., Sing, S.E. & Peterson, R.K.D. Regional ecological risk assessment for the introduction of Gambusia affinis (western mosquitofish) into Montana watersheds. Biol Invasions 10, 1277–1287 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9202-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9202-1

Keywords

Navigation