Abstract
As invasive species are key threats to ecosystem structure and function, it is essential to understand the factors underlying their success. Enigmatically, mutualistic organisms are often successful in colonizing novel environments even though they commonly persist only through intricate relationships with other species. Mutualistic ants, for example, protect aphids from natural enemies while collecting carbohydrate–rich honeydew. To facilitate this interaction, ants have evolved aggressive responses to aphid alarm pheromone emissions. As invasive and native mutualists have not evolved together, however, it is unclear if this form of cross-species communication exists between these two parties thereby facilitating these novel interactions. We address this hypothesis by assessing whether the invasive Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, responds to native poplar aphid, Chaitophorus populicola, alarm signals. Here, we show that interspecific signalling does exist in this newly established mutualistic interaction. Argentine ant workers exhibit increased aggression and double the number of visits to an aphid colony after an aphid alarm signal is emitted. We suggest that pre-adaptations may facilitate the emergence of mutualistic associations between many invasive and native species.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Addicott JF (1978) Competition for mutualists–aphids and ants. Can J Zool 56:2093–2096
Agrawal AA (1998) Leaf damage and associated cues induced aggressive ant recruitment in a neotropical ant-plant. Ecology 79:2100–2112
Agrawal AA, Rutter MT (1998) Dynamic anti-herbivore defense in ant-plants: the role of induced responses. Oikos 83:227–236
Axen AH, Leimar O, Hoffman V (1996) Signalling in a mutualistic interaction. Anim Behav 52:321–333
Bossert WH, Wilson EO (1963) The analysis of olfactory communication among animals. J Theor Biol 5:443–469
Boucher DH (1982) The ecology of mutualism. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 13:315–347
Bronstein JL (2001) The exploitation of mutualisms. Ecol Lett 4:277–287
Brouat C, McKey D, Bessiere J-M, Pascal L, Hossaert-McKey M (2000) Leaf volatile compounds and the distribution of ant patrolling in an ant-plant protection mutualism: Preliminary results on Leonardoxa (Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae) and Petalomyrmex (Formicidae: Formicinae). Acta Oecol 21:349–357
Clavero M, Garcia-Berthou E (2005) Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:110
Dahl ML (1971) Uber einen Schreckstoff bei Aphiden. Deutsche Entomol Zeit 18:121–128
Davidson DW (1998) Resource discovery vs resource domination in ants: a functional mechanism for breaking the trade-off. Ecol Entomol 23:484–490
Doebeli M, Knowlton N (1998) The evolution of interspecific mutualisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95:8676 –8680
Fiedler K, Hölldobler B, Seufert P (1996) Butterflies and ants: the communicative domain. Experientia 52:14–24
Gould SJ, Vrba ES (1982) Exaptation; a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8:4–15
Helms KR, Vinson SB (2002) Widespread association of the invasive ant Solenopsis invicta with an invasive mealybug. Ecology 83:2425–2438
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap press of Harvard University, Cambridge
Kaplan I, Eubanks MD (2005) Aphids alter the community-wide impact of fire ants. Ecology 86:1640–1649
Katayama N, Suzuki N (2002) Cost and benefit of ant attendance for Aphis craccivora (Hemiptera: Aphididae) with reference to aphid colony size. Can Entomol 134:241–249
Kislow CJ, Edwards LJ (1972) Repellent odour in aphids. Nature 235:108–109
Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16:199–204
Lach L (2003) Invasive ants: unwanted partners in ant-plant interactions?. Ann Missouri Bot Garden 90:91–108
Larsen KJ, Heady SE, Nault LR (1992) Influence of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on honeydew excretion and escape behaviours in a myrmecophile, Dalbulus quinquenotatus (Homoptera: Ciccadellidae) and its congeners. J Insect Behav 5:109–122
Lester PJ (2005) Determinants for the successful establishment of exotic ants in New Zealand. Diversity Distrib 11:279–288
Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710
Markin GP (1970) Foraging behavior of the Argentine ant in a California citrus grove. J Econ Entomol 63:740–744
Mondor EB, Roitberg BD, Stadler B (2002) Cornicle length in Macrosiphini aphids: a comparison of ecological traits. Ecol Entomol 27:758–762
Mondor EB, Tremblay MN, Messing RH (in press) Morphological and ecological traits promoting aphid colonization of the Hawaiian Islands. Biol Invasions. DOI 10.1007/s10530-006-9010-z
Mooney HA, Cleland EE (2001) The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:5446–5451
Moya-Raygoza G, Nault LR (2000) Obligatory mutualism between Dalbulus quinquenotatus (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) and attendant ants. Ann Entomol Soc Am 93:929–940
Nault LR, Montgomery ME, Bowers WS (1976) Ant-aphid association: role of aphid alarm pheromone. Science 192:1349–1351
Nault LR, Montgomery ME (1979) Aphid alarm pheromones. Misc Publ Entomol Soc Am 11:23–31
Ness JH, Bronstein JL (2004) The effects of invasive ants on prospective ant mutualists. Biol Invasions 6:445–461
Nixon GE (1951) The association of ants with aphids and coccids. Commonwealth institute of entomology, London
O’Dowd DJ, Green PT, Lake PS (2003) Invasional ‘meltdown’ on an oceanic island. Ecol Lett 6:812–817
Passera L (1994) Characteristics of tramp species. In: Williams DF (ed) Exotic ants: biology, impact, and control of introduced species. Westview press, Boulder, CO, pp 23–43
Pierce NE, Braby MF, Heath A, Lohman DJ, Mathew J, Rand DB, Travassos MA (2002) The ecology and evolution of ant association in the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera). Annu Rev Entomol 47:733–771
Reitz SR, Trumble JT (2002) Competitive displacement among insects and arachnids. Annu Rev Entomol 47:435–465
Richardson DM, Allsopp N, D’Antonio CM, Milton SJ, Rejmanek M (2000) Plant invasions – the role of mutualisms. Biol Rev 75:65–93
SAS Institute Inc (2001) JMP Start Statistics. Duxbury press, Pacific Grove, California
Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughman S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC, McCauley DE, O’Neil P, Parker IM, Thompson JN, Weller SG (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:305–332
Shingleton AW, Stern DL (2003) Molecular phylogenetic evidence for multiple gains or losses of ant mutualism within the aphid genus Chaitophorus. Mol Phylog Evol 26:26–35
Shingleton AW, Stern DL, Foster WA (2005) The origin of a mutualism: a morphological trait promoting the evolution of ant-aphid mutualisms. Evolution 59:921–926
Simberloff D, Von Holle B (1999) Positive interactions of nonidigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invasions 1:21–32
Stadler B, Dixon AFG (2005) Ecology and evolution of aphid-ant interactions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:345–372
Vitousek PM, D’Antonio CM, Loope LL, Westbrooks R (1996) Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am Scientist 84:468–478
Way MJ (1963) Mutualism between ants and honeydew-producing Homoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 8:307–344
Wimp GM, Whitham TG (2001) Biodiversity consequences of predation and host plant hybridization on an aphid-ant mutualism. Ecology 82:440–452
Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
Acknowledgements
We thank F. Messina, J. Rosenheim, and M. Tremblay for comments on this manuscript. Funding for this project was provided by the University of Calgary, a Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Postdoctoral Fellowship to EBM, and an NSERC operating grant to JFA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mondor, E.B., Addicott, J.F. Do exaptations facilitate mutualistic associations between invasive and native species?. Biol Invasions 9, 623–628 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-006-9062-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-006-9062-0