Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the Influence of the Rise and Fall Times of a Monophasic Trapezoidal Defibrillation Pulse on Its Energy Efficiency Using the ten Tusscher–Panfilov Cardiomyocyte Model

  • Published:
Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope

The ten Tusscher–Panfilov 2006 cardiomyocyte model was subjected to simulated fibrillation to determine the dependence of the threshold energy of guaranteed defibrillation on the duration of the trapezoidal defibrillation pulse with sloping rise and fall for different rise and fall times. According to the guaranteed defibrillation hypothesis, the duration of the current refractory period of all myocardial myocytes after exposure to a defibrillation pulse should be no less than the duration of the period of the fibrillation waves. This can lead to the cessation of the propagation of fibrillation waves through the myocardium. Computer simulation showed that the threshold energy of guaranteed defibrillation decreases only with an increase in the pulse rise time until the threshold energy of the energy-optimal half-sine pulse is reached. An increase in the pulse fall time reduces the threshold defibrillation energy spread in the range of energy-efficient pulse durations. In this case, the range of energy-efficient pulse durations shifts toward greater values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gorbunov, B. B., “Study of the impact of rectangular current pulses on the ten Tusscher-Panfilov model of human ventricular myocyte,” J. Biomed. Sci. Eng., 10, No. 7, 355-366 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gorbunov, B. B., Vostrikov, V. A., Nesterenko, I. V., and Telyshev, D. V., “Areas of effectiveness of defibrillating pulse in the energy/phase diagram for the fibrillation cycle on the cardiomyocyte model,” Int. J. Bioelectromagn., 20, No. 1, 1-4 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gorbunov, B. B., Vostrikov, V. A., Galyastov, A. A., and Telyshev, D. V., “The dependence of the fibrillation cycle fraction on which the defibrillation pulse is effective on the pulse energy,” in: 2020 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EIConRus), St. Petersburg and Moscow, Russia (2020), pp. 2486-2489.

  4. Gorbunov, B. B., Vostrikov, V. A., Galyastov, A. A., Nesterenko, I. V., Telyshev, D. V., and Denisov, M. V., “Guaranteed defibrillation on a cardiomyocyte model,” in: 2020 Ural Symposium on Biomedical Engineering, Radioelectronics and Information Technology (USBEREIT), Yekaterinburg, Russia (2020), pp. 0058-0061.

  5. Gasiunas, V., The Significance of the Type of Defibrillating Pulses in the Therapeutic and Damaging Effects of Current on the Heart: Candidate’s Dissertation [in Russian], Vilnius (1973).

  6. Ten Tusscher, K. H. and Panfilov, A. V., “Alternans and spiral breakup in a human ventricular tissue model,” Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol., 291, No. 3, H1088-H1100 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Antonioletti, M., Biktashev, V. N., Jackson, A., Kharche, S. R., Stary, T., and Biktasheva, I. V., “BeatBox – HPC Simulation Environment for Biophysically and Anatomically Realistic Cardiac Electrophysiology,” PLoS One, 12, No. 5, e0172292 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gorbunov, B. B., Vostrikov, V. A., Nesterenko, I. V., and Telyshev, D. V., “Comparative modeling of biphasic defibrillation pulses: Quasi-sinusoidal and trapezoidal pulses with sloping rise and fall,” Biomed. Eng., No. 1, 60-64 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vostrikov, V. A., Gorbunov, B. B., and Selishchev, S. V., “Construction of energy-optimal smooth monophasic defibrillation pulse waveforms using cardiomyocyte membrane model,” J. Biomed. Sci. Eng., 8, No. 9, 625-631 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gorbunov, B. B., Vostrikov, V. A., Nesterenko, I. V., Selishchev, S. V., and Telyshev, D. V., “Evaluation of the influence of the rise and fall duration of a defibrillation monophasic trapezoidal pulse on its energy efficiency on a ten Tusscher-Panfilov cardiomyocyte model: Supplementary resources,” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342392614 (accessed 2020).

  11. Kidwai, B. J., McIntyre, A., Anderson, J., and Adgey, A. A., “Optimization of transthoracic ventricular defibrillation-biphasic and triphasic shocks, waveform rounding, and synchronized shock delivery,” J. Electrocardiol., 35, No. 3, 235-244 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. B. Gorbunov.

Additional information

Translated from Meditsinskaya Tekhnika, Vol. 54, No. 4, Jul.-Aug., 2020, pp. 31-34.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gorbunov, B.B., Vostrikov, V.A., Nesterenko, I.V. et al. Evaluation of the Influence of the Rise and Fall Times of a Monophasic Trapezoidal Defibrillation Pulse on Its Energy Efficiency Using the ten Tusscher–Panfilov Cardiomyocyte Model. Biomed Eng 54, 270–274 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10527-020-10020-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10527-020-10020-8

Navigation