Abstract
Decades of research into the etiology of conduct disorder (CD) has yet to yield a consensus on the existence of sex differences in underlying genetic and environmental influences. This may be partly due to the failure of many previous studies to make a distinction between non-aggressive and aggressive CD symptoms or test for potential developmental changes in sex differences in the etiology of conduct problems. To address these gaps, we fit a series of univariate and bivariate biometric sex-difference models to self-reported non-aggressive and aggressive CD symptoms in a community-based sample of twins (N = 1548, ages 9–17 year), grouped into ages 9–13 and 14–17 years. Relative model fit was evaluated using the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), which favors parsimony, and by Chi square difference tests. The univariate sex-scalar model provided the best fit to the data for both non-aggressive and aggressive CD symptoms at ages 9–13 and 14–17 years. Thus, the same genetic and environmental factors influenced CD symptoms in both sexes, but the total variability was lower in females than males. At both ages, the heritability of non-aggressive CD symptoms was lower than heritability of aggressive CD symptoms, and shared environmental effects were only observed for non-aggressive CD symptoms. However, estimates for genetic and environmental factors could be not be constrained to be equal across age groups for either CD subtype, suggesting substantive developmental changes in the relative influence of genetic and environmental factors on individual differences in CD symptoms. For both subtypes, the heritability was larger, and shared environmental effect smaller, in the older age group than the younger age group. A bivariate quantitative sex differences model provided the best fit to the data at ages 9–13 years. Covariation between non-aggressive and aggressive CD symptoms was due to overlapping shared and non-shared environmental factors in males and females but the overall covariation was greater in males than females. In contrast, at ages 14–17 years, the sex-scalar bivariate model provided the best fit to the data, and covariation between non-aggressive and aggressive CD symptoms was due to overlapping genetic and non-shared environmental factors. Thus, the etiology of self-reported conduct disorder varied substantially by symptom type and age. However, quantitative sex differences were only apparent when the covariation between the two subtypes was considered.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Point estimates reported for average age 16.5 years.
For this age group, the qualitative model failed to converge under numerous start values. When constraints were added to ensure that the genetic correlations between opposite sex pairs were 0.5 or less the model estimated genetic correlation was at the boundary value. Therefore, we did not consider this model further.
References
Archer J (2004) Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: a meta-analytic review. Rev Gen Psychol 8(4):291–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.291
Bartels M, van de Aa N, van Beijsterveldt CEM, Middeldorp CM, Boomsma DI (2011) Adolescent self-report of emotional and behavioral problems: interactions of genetic factors with sex and age. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 20(1):35–52
Burt SA (2009) Are there meaningful etiological differences within antisocial behavior? Results of a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 29(2):163–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.12.004
Burt SA (2012) How do we optimally conceptualize the heterogeneity within antisocial behavior? An argument for aggressive versus non-aggressive behavioral dimensions. Clin Psychol Rev 32(4):263–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.02.006
Burt SA (2013) Do etiological influences on aggression overlap with those on rule breaking? A meta-analysis. Psychol Med 43(09):1801–1812. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291712001894
Burt SA, Klump KL (2009) The etiological moderation of aggressive and non-aggressive antisocial behavior by age. Twin Res Hum Genet 12(4):343–350
Burt SA, Neiderhiser JM (2009) Aggressive versus non-aggressive antisocial behavior: distinctive etiological moderation by age. Dev Psychol 45(4):1164–1176. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016130
Button TMM, Scourfield J, Martin N, McGuffin P (2004) Do aggressive and non-aggressive antisocial behaviors in adolescents result from the same genetic and environmental effects? Am J Med Genet 129B(1):59–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.30045
Crick NR, Grotpeter JK (1995) Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Dev 66(3):710–722. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131945
Crick NR, Ostrov JM, Werner NE (2006) A longitudinal study of relational aggression, physical aggression, and children’s social–psychological adjustment. J Abnorm Child Psychol 34(2):127–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-005-9009-4
Dahl RE (2004) Adolescent brain development: a period of vulnerabilities and opportunities. Keynote address. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1021(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1308.001
Ehrensaft MK (2005) Interpersonal relationships and sex differences in the development of conduct problems. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 8(1):39–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-005-2341-y
Eley TC, Lichtenstein P, Stevenson J (1999) Sex differences in the etiology of aggressive and non-aggressive antisocial behavior: results from two twin studies. Child Dev 70(1):155–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00012
Enders C (2010) Applied missing data analysis. The Guilford Press, New York
Frick PJ, Lahey BB, Loeber R, Tannenbaum L, Van Horn Y, Christ MAG et al (1993) Oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: A meta-analytic review of factor analyses and cross-validation in a clinic sample. Clin Psychol Rev 13(4):319–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(93)90016-F
Gelhorn H, Stallings M, Young S, Corley R, Rhee SH, Christian H, Hewitt J (2006) Common and specific genetic influences on aggressive and non-aggressive conduct disorder domains. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 45(5):570–577. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000198596.76443.b0
Harden KP, Patterson MW, Briley DA, Engelhardt LE, Kretsch N, Mann FD, Tackett JL, Tucker-Drob EM (2015) Developmental changes in genetic and environmental influences on rule-breaking and aggression: age and pubertal development. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 56(12):1370–1379. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12419
Hoeve M, Dubas JS, Eichelsheim VI, Van Der Laan PH, Smeenk W, Gerris JRM (2009) The relationship between parenting and delinquency: a meta-analysis. J Abnorm Child Psychol 37(6):749–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9310-8
Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6(1):1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Karriker-Jaffe KJ, Foshee VA, Ennett ST, Suchindran C (2008) The development of aggression during adolescence: sex differences in trajectories of physical and social aggression among youth in rural areas. J Abnorm Child Psychol 36(8):1227–1236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-008-9245-5
Lahey BB, Schwab-Stone M, Goodman SH, Waldman ID, Canino G, Rathouz PJ et al (2000) Age and gender differences in oppositional behavior and conduct problems: A cross-sectional household study of middle childhood and adolescence. J Abnorm Psychol 109(3):488–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.109.3.488
Lahey B, Applegate B, Waldman I, Loft J, Hankin B, Rick J (2004a) The structure of child and adolescent psychopathology: generating new hypotheses. J Abnorm Psychol 113:358–385
Lahey BB, Applegate B, Waldman ID, Loft JD, Hankin BL, Rick J (2004b) The structure of child and adolescent psychopathology: generating new hypotheses. J Abnorm Psychol 113(3):358–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.113.3.358
Lahey BB, Van Hulle CA, Waldman ID, Rodgers JL, D’Onofrio BM, Pedlow S, et al (2006) Testing descriptive hypotheses regarding sex differences in the development of conduct problems and delinquency. J Abnorm Child Psychol 34(5):730–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-006-9064-5
Mathias CW, Stanford MS, Marsh DM, Frick PJ, Moeller FG, Swann AC, Dougherty DM (2007) Characterizing aggressive behavior with the Impulsive/Premeditated Aggression Scale among adolescents with conduct disorder. Psychiatry Res 151(3):231–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2006.11.001
McGue M, Bouchard TJ (1984) Adjustment of twin data for the effects of age and sex. Behav Genet 14(4):325–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01080045
Peeters H, Van Gestel S, Vlietinck R, Derom C, Derom R (1998) Validation of a telephone zygosity questionniare in twins of known zygosity. Behav Genet 28(3):159–163. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021416112215
Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Rutter M, Silva PA (2001) Sex differences in antisocial behaviour: Conduct disorder, delinquency, and violence in the Dunedin Longitudinal Study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490057
Muthén L, Muthén B (1998) Mplus User’s Guide, 7th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA
Rathouz PJ, Van Hulle CA, Rodgers JL, Waldman ID, Lahey BB (2008) Specification, testing, and interpretation of gene-by-measured-environment interaction models in the presence of gene–environment correlation. Behav Genet 38(3):301–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-008-9193-4
Rigdon EE (1996) CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 3(4):369–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519609540052
Rosanoff AJ, Handy LM, Rosanoff IA (1934) Criminality and delinquency in twins. J Criminal Law Crim 24(5):923–934
Rutter M, Caspi A, Moffitt TE (2003) Using sex differences in psychopathology to study causal mechanisms: unifying issues and research strategies. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 44(8):1092–1115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00194
Satorra A, Bentler PM (2001) A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika 66(4):507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192
Tackett JL, Krueger RF, Iacono WG, McGue M (2005) Symptom-based subfactors of DSM-defined conduct disorder: evidence for etiologic distinctions. J Abnorm Psychol 114(3):483–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.114.3.483
Tiet QQ, Wasserman GA, Loeber R, McReynolds LS, Miller LS (2001) Developmental and sex differences in types of conduct problems. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 10(2):181–197. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016637702525
Tremblay RE, Masse B, Perron D, Leblanc M, Schwartzman AE, Ledingham JE (1992) Early disruptive behavior, poor school achievement, delinquent behavior, and delinquent personality: longitudinal analyses. J Consult Clin Psychol 60(1):64–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.60.1.64
van Beijsterveldt CEM, Bartels M, Hudziak JJ, Boomsma DI (2003) Causes of stability of aggression from early childhood to adolescence: a longitudinal genetic analysis in Dutch twins. Behav Genet 35(5):591–605
Van Hulle CA, Rodgers JL, D’Onofrio BM, Waldman ID, Lahey BB (2007) Sex differences in the causes of self-reported adolescent delinquency. J Abnorm Psychol 116(2):236–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.116.2.236
van den Oord EJCG., Boomsma DI, Verhulst FC (1994) A study of problem behaviors in 10- to 15- year old biologically related and unrelated international adoptees. Behav Genet 24(3):193–205
Wang P, Niv S, Tuvblad C, Raine A, Baker LA (2013) The genetic and environmental overlap between aggressive and non-aggressive antisocial behavior in children and adolescents using the self-report delinquency interview (SR-DI). J Crim Justice 41(5):277–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.06.011
Zheng H, Van Hulle CA, Rathouz PJ (2015) Comparing alternative biometric models with and without gene-by-measured environment interaction in behavior genetic designs: statistical operating characteristics. Behav Genet 45(4):480–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-015-9710-1
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health, R01-MH098098.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Carol A. Van Hulle, Irwin Waldman and Benjamin B. Lahey declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Statement of human and animal rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all adult participants in the study. Assent was obtained from all juvenile participants.
Additional information
Edited by Wendy Slutske.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Hulle, C.A., Waldman, I. & Lahey, B.B. Sex Differences in the Genetic and Environmental Influences on Self-Reported Non-aggressive and Aggressive Conduct Disorder Symptoms in Early and Middle Adolescence. Behav Genet 48, 271–282 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-018-9907-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-018-9907-1