Skip to main content
Log in

Shift Work has a Genetic Basis in Honeybee Pollen Foragers (Apis mellifera L.)

  • ORIGINAL RESEARCH
  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Division of labour is a fundamental property of any social system. The specialization of different individuals in different tasks increases the overall work performance and efficiency. Specialization is thought to be the very foundation of the success of human societies but also in complex colonies of social insects. In human societies an advanced form of division of labour, especially since the industrialisation, is shift work, where individuals perform the same task but in subsequent cohorts in time. Although social insects can measure and are aware of time, shift work has not been documented in colonies of social insects so far. We observed foragers of two honeybee (Apis mellifera) colonies (approximately 140 workers each) and genotyped them with microsatellite DNA markers. We determined paternity and assigned them to the various subfamilies in the colony to test whether there is genetic variance for shift work in foraging honeybees. We could show that the patriline identity of the foragers had a significant effect on foraging either in the morning or evening. Individual foragers differed in their preference for the “early” or “late” shift, and shift work indeed existed in the colony.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boomsma JJ, Ratnieks FLW (1996) Paternity in eusocial hymenoptera. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 351:947–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderone NW, Page RE (1988) Genotypic variability in age polyethism and task specialisation in the honey bee, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estoup A, Solignac M, Cornuet JM (1994) Precise assessment of the number of patrilines and of genetic relatedness in honeybee colonies. Proc R Soc Lond B 258:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frumhoff PC, Baker J (1988) A genetic component to division of labour within honey bee colonies. Nature 333:358–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1991) The ants. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes WOH, Sumner S, van Borm S, Boomsma JJ (2003) Worker caste polymorphism has a genetic basis in Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:9394–9397. doi:10.1073/pnas.1633701100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes WOH, Oldroyd BP, Beekman M, Ratnieks FLW (2008) Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Sci 320:1213–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hur YM, Bouchard TJ Jr, Lykken DT (1998) Genetic and environmental influence on morningness–eveningness. Personal Individ Diff 14:806–814. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00089-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe R, Kronauer DJC, Kraus FB, Boomsma JJ, Moritz RFA (2007) Worker caste determination in the army ant Eciton burchellii. Biol Lett 3:513–516. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones J, Myerscough M, Graham S, Oldroyd BP (2004) Honey bee nest thermoregulation: diversity promotes stability. Sci 305:402–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerkhof GA (1985) Inter-individual differences in the human circadian system: a review. Biol Psychol 20:83–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus FB, Neumann P, Moritz RFA (2005) Genetic variance of mating frequency in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Insect Soc 52:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronauer DJC, Johnson RA, Boomsma JJB (2007) The evolution of multiple mating in army ants. Evol 61:413–422. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00040.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lattorff HMG, Moritz RFA, Crewe RM, Solingnac M (2007) Control of reproductive dominance by the thelytoky gene in honeybees. Biol Lett 3:292–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattila HR, Seeley TD (2007) Genetic diversity in honey bee colonies enhances productivity and fitness. Sci 317:362–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrow M, Spoelstra K, Roenneberg T (2005) The circadian cycle: daily rhythms from behaviour to genes. EMBO Report 6:930–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffett MW (1987) Division of labour and diet in the extremely polymorphic ant Pheidologeton diversus. Nat Geograph Res 3:282–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore D (2001) Honey bee circadian clocks: behavioral control from individual workers to whole-colony rhythms. J Insect Physiol 47:843–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore D, Rankin MA (1983) Diurnal changes in the accuracy of the honeybee foraging rhythm. Biol Bull 164:472–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore D, Giray T, Robinson GE (1996) Genotypic differences in the ontogeny of circadian rhythmicity in honey bees. Soc for Neurosci Abstr 22:151

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore D, Angel JE, Cheeseman IM, Fahrbach SE, Robinson GE (1998) Timekeeping in the honey bee colony: intergration of circadian rhythms and division of labour. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz RFA, Sakofski F (1991) The role of the queen in circadian rhythms of honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:361–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz RFA, Lattorff HMG, Neumann P, Kraus FB, Radloff SE, Hepburn HR (2005) Rare royal families in honeybees, Apis mellifera. Naturwissenschaften 92:488–491. doi:10.1007/s00114-005-0025-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo P (1993) Polyandry and allele frequency differences between the sexes in the ant Formica aquilonia. Heredity 70:472–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pati AK, Chandrawanshi A, Reinberg A (2001) Shift work: consequences and management. Curr Sci 8:32–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley M (1996) The origins of virtue–human instincts and the evolution of cooperation. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson GE, Page RE (1988) Genetic determination of guarding and undertaking in honey-bee colonies. Nature 333:356–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson GE, Page RE (1989) Genetic determination of nectar foraging, pollen foraging, and nest-site scouting in honey bee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:317–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaibi T, Lattorff HMG, Moritz RFA (2008) A microsatellite DNA toolkit for studying population structure in Apis mellifera. Mol Ecol Res 8:1034–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma VK, Lone SR, Goel A, Chandrashekaran MK (2004a) Circadian consequences of social organization in the ant species Camponotus compressus. Naturwissenschaften 91:386–390

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma VK, Lone SR, Mathew D, Goel A, Chandrashekaran MK (2004b) Possible evidence for shift work schedules in the media workers of the ant Species Camponotus compressus. Chronobiol Internat 21:297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith CR, Toth AL, Suarez AV, Robinson GE (2008) Genetic and genomic analyses of the division of labour in insect societies. Nature Rev Genet 9:735–748. doi:10.1038/nrg2429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1994) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. WH Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangler HG (1972) Daily activity rhythms of individual worker and drone honey bees. An Entomol Soc Am 66:449–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Uribe-Rubio JL, Guzman-Novoa E, Vasquez-Pelaez CG, Hunt GJ (2008) Genotype, task specialisation, and nest environment influence the stinging response thresholds of individual Africanized and European honeybees to electrical stimulation. Behav Genet 38:93–100. doi:10.1007/s10519-007-9177-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vink JM, Groot AS, Kerkhof GA, Boomsma DI (2001) Genetic analysis of morningness and eveningness. Chronobiol Internat 18:809–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R (1991) Chelex100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques 10:506–513

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler DE (1991) The developmental basis of worker caste polymorphism in ants. Am Nat 138:1218–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann M, Dinich J, Merrow M, Roenneberg T (2006) Social jetlag: misalignment of biological and social time. Chronobiol Internat 23:497–509. doi:10.1080/07420520500545979

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Petra Leibe for assistance in the laboratory and Ray WK Moritz for helping with the collection of data and assistance in the field.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Bernhard Kraus.

Additional information

Edited by Yong-Kyu Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bernhard Kraus, F., Gerecke, E. & Moritz, R.F.A. Shift Work has a Genetic Basis in Honeybee Pollen Foragers (Apis mellifera L.). Behav Genet 41, 323–328 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-010-9382-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-010-9382-9

Keywords

Navigation