Skip to main content
Log in

Correction factors for GMMs considering site and topographic effects in South Korea

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the past five years, the local magnitude (ML) 5.8 Gyeongju and ML5.4 Pohang earthquakes have caused significant damage to the southeastern Korean Peninsula. To evaluate the ground motion recorded during these earthquakes, we compared them with the Korean ground motion models (GMMs), also known as the ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs), Next Generation Attenuation of Ground Motions (NGA) GMMs for Western U.S. and Central and Eastern North America. The ground motions exhibit amplification near a period of 0.1 s compared to the predicted spectral accelerations. These amplifications are likely to be attributed to site and topographic effects. The existing GMMs do not account for the topographic amplification which might be prevalent in the mountainous regions of Korea. Therefore, we propose correction factors for the predicted ground motions for various periods in terms of magnitude, source-to-site distance, VS30, and relative elevation. The standard deviation values of the residuals significantly decreased by applying these correction models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

We acquired the ground motion records from the Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) at https://necis.kma.go.kr/ (last accessed 28 July 2020). Some of the VS30 data used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  • Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ, Kamai R (2014) Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions. Earthq Spectra 30(3):1025–1055. https://doi.org/10.1193/070913EQS198M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn J-K, Kwak DY, Kim H-S (2021) Estimating VS30 at Korean Peninsular seismic observatory stations using HVSR of event records. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen TI, Wald DJ (2007) Topographic slope as a proxy for seismic site-conditions (VS30) and amplification around the globe, in Open-File Report

  • Ambraseys NN, Douglas J, Sarma SK, Smit PM (2005) Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration. Bull Earthq Eng 3(1):1–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-005-0183-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashford SA, Sitar N (1997) Analysis of topographic amplification of inclined shear waves in a steep coastal bluff. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87(3):692–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashford SA, Sitar N, Lysmer J, Deng N (1997) Topographic effects on the seismic response of steep slopes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87(3):701–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assimaki D, Kausel E, Gazetas G (2005) Soil-dependent topographic effects: a case study from the 1999 Athens earthquake. Earthq Spectra 21(4):929–966. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2068135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM (2010) Orientation-independent, nongeometric-mean measures of seismic intensity from two horizontal components of motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100(4):1830–1835. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Stewart JP, Seyhan E, Atkinson GM (2014) NGA-West2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthq Spectra 30(3):1057–1085. https://doi.org/10.1193/070113EQS184M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouckovalas GD, Papadimitriou AG (2005) Numerical evaluation of slope topography effects on seismic ground motion. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25(7):547–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozorgnia Y, Abrahamson NA, Atik LA, Ancheta TD, Atkinson GM, Baker JW, Baltay A, Boore DM, Campbell KW, Chiou BSJ, Darragh R, Day S, Donahue J, Graves RW, Gregor N, Hanks T, Idriss IM, Kamai R, Kishida T, Kottke A, Mahin SA, Rezaeian S, Rowshandel B, Seyhan E, Shahi S, Shantz T, Silva W, Spudich P, Stewart JP, Watson-Lamprey J, Wooddell K, Youngs R (2014) NGA-West2 research project. Earthq Spectra 30(3):973–987. https://doi.org/10.1193/072113EQS209M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KW (2016) Comprehensive comparison among the Campbell-Bozorgnia NGA-West2 GMPE and three GMPEs from Europe and the Middle East. Bull Seismol Soc Am 106(5):2081–2103. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120160024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2014) NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5% damped linear acceleration response spectra. Earthq Spectra 30(3):1087–1115. https://doi.org/10.1193/062913EQS175M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou BSJ, Youngs RR (2014) Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthq Spectra 30(3):1117–1153. https://doi.org/10.1193/072813EQS219M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emolo A, Sharma N, Festa G, Zollo A, Convertito V, Park JH, Chi HC, Lim IS (2015) Ground-motion prediction equations for South Korea Peninsula ground-motion prediction equations for South Korea Peninsula. Bull Seismol Soc Am 105(5):2625–2640. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farhadi A, Pezeshk S, Khoshnevis N (2018) Assessing the applicability of ground-motion models for induced seismicity application in central and Eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 108(4):2265–2277. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goda K, Atkinson GM (2014) Variation of source-to-site distance for Megathrust subduction earthquakes: effects on ground motion prediction equations. Earthq Spectra 30(2):845–866. https://doi.org/10.1193/080512EQS254M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulet C, Bozorgnia Y, Abrahamso N, Kuehn N, Atik L A, Youngs R, Graves R, and Atkinson G (2018) Central and eastern North America gound-motion chracterization - NGA-East final report, in PEER Report No. 2018/08, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center:817

  • Hashash YMA, Ilhan O, Harmon JA, Parker GA, Stewart JP, Rathje EM, Campbell KW, Silva WJ (2020) Nonlinear site amplification model for ergodic seismic hazard analysis in Central and Eastern North America. Earthq Spectra 36(1):69–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019878193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heisey JS, Stokoe KH, Meyer AH (1982) Moduli of pavement systems from spectral analysis of surface waves. Transp Res Rec 852(22–31):147

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Li G, Xiong M (2020) Stochastic assessment of slope failure run-out triggered by earthquake ground motion. Nat Hazards 101(1):87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03863-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM (2014) An NGA-West2 empirical model for estimating the horizontal spectral values generated by shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthq Spectra 30(3):1155–1177. https://doi.org/10.1193/070613EQS195M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jee HW, Han SW (2021) Regional ground motion prediction equation developed for the Korean Peninsula using recorded and simulated ground motions. J Earthq Eng: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2021.1871682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong KH, Lee HS (2018) Ground-motion prediction equation for South Korea based on recent earthquake records. Earthq Struct 15(1):29–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Jo N, Baag C (2003) Estimation of spectrum decay parameter k and stochastic prediction of strong ground motions in southeastern Korea. J Earthq Eng Soc Korea 7(6):59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junn J-G, Jo N-D, Baag C-E (2002) Stochastic prediction of ground motions in southern Korea. Geosci J 6(3):203–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang S, Kim B, Bae S, Lee H, Kim M (2019) Earthquake-induced ground deformations in the low-seismicity region: a case of the 2017 M5.4 Pohang, South Korea, Earthquake. Earthq Spectra 35(3):1235–1260. https://doi.org/10.1193/062318EQS160M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang S, Kim B, Cho H, Lee J, Kim K, Bae S, Sun CG (2019) Ground-motion amplifications in small-size hills: case study of Gokgang-ri, South Korea, during the 2017 ML 54 Pohang earthquake sequence. Bull Seismol Soc Am 109(6):2626–2643. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120190064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim B, Park K, Baek H (2018) Topographic amplification factors for Japan using 2D finite element analysis. Geotech Earthq Eng Soil Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481462.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim D-S, Manandhar S, Cho HI (2018) New site classification system and design response spectra in Korean seismic code. Earthq Struct 15:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim B, Ji Y, Kim M, Lee Y-J, Kang H, Yun N-R, Kim H, Lee J (2020) Building damage caused by the 2017 M5.4 Pohang, South Korea, earthquake, and effects of ground conditions. J Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1785585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiuchi R, Mooney WD, Zahran HM (2019) Ground-motion prediction equations for Western Saudi Arabia. Bull Seismol Soc Am 109(6):2722–2737. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120180302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) (2021) Available at: https://necis.kma.go.kr/

  • Lee S-J, Chan Y-C, Komatitsch D, Huang B-S, Tromp J (2009) Effects of realistic surface topography on seismic ground motion in the Yangminshan region of Taiwan based upon the spectral-element method and LiDAR DTM. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(2A):681–693. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J-M, Park D, Baag C (2000) Stochastic prediction of strong ground motions and attenuation equations in the southeastern Korean Peninsula. In: Proceedings of EESK Conference, Seoul, March:pp 70–77

  • Park HC, Kim DS (2001) Evaluation of the dispersive phase and group velocities using harmonic wavelet transform. NDT E Int 34(7):457–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8695(00)00076-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park CB, Miller RD, Xia J (1999) Multichannel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics 64(3):800–808. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park D, Lee J, Baag C, Kim J (2001) Stochastic prediction of strong ground motions and attenuation equations in the southeastern Korean peninsula. J Geol Soc Korea 37(1):21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai M, Rodriguez-Marek A, Yong A (2016) An empirical model to predict topographic effects in strong ground motion using California small- to medium-magnitude earthquake database. Earthq Spectra 32(2):1033–1054. https://doi.org/10.1193/113014eqs202m

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rai M, Rodriguez-Marek A, Chiou BS (2017) Empirical terrain-based topographic modification factors for use in ground motion prediction. Earthq Sepctra 33(1):157–177. https://doi.org/10.1193/071015eqs111m

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhie J (2015) A basic study on building ShakeMap database of scenario earthquakes in the Korean Peninsula, KMA, NDSL

  • Son M, Cho CS, Shin JS, Rhee HM, Sheen DH (2017) Spatiotemporal distribution of events during the first three months of the 2016 Gyeongju, Korea, Earthquake Sequence. Bull Seismol Soci Am 108(1):210–217. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart JP, Parker GA, Atkinson GM, Boore DM, Hashash YMA, Silva WJ (2020) Ergodic site amplification model for central and eastern North America. Earthq Spectra 36(1):42–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019878185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe KH, Wright SG, Bay JA, Roesset JM (1994) Characterization of geotechnical sites by SASW method:pp 15–25

  • Tafti MF, Hosseini KA, Firouzi E, Mansouri B, Ansari A (2018) Ranking of GMPEs for seismic hazard analysis in Iran using LH, LLH and EDR approaches, Journal of Seismology and Earthquake. Engineering 19(2):139–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavakoli B, Sedaghati F, Pezeshk S (2018) An analytical effective point-source-based distance-conversion approach to mimic the effects of extended faults on seismic hazard assessment. Bull Seismol Soc Am 108(2):742–760. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Geological Survey (2021) Available at: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/

  • Veeraraghavan S, Coleman JL, Bielak J (2019) Simulation of site and topographic effects on ground motion in Los Alamos, NM Mesas. Geophys J Int 220(3):1504–1520. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villani M, Polidoro B, McCully R, Ader T, Edwards B, Rietbrock A, Lubkowski Z, Courtney TJ, Walsh M (2019) A selection of GMPEs for the United Kingdom based on instrumental and macroseismic datasets. Bull Seismol Soc Am 109(4):1378–1400. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120180268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Du C, Huang D, Jin F, Koo RCH, Kwan JSH (2018) Parametric models for 3D topographic amplification of ground motions considering subsurface soils. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 115:41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Li D-Q, Liu Y, Du W (2021) Influence of ground motion duration on the seismic performance of earth slopes based on numerical analysis. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 143:106595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yun K, Park D, Choi W, Chang C, and Lee D (2005) Development of site-specific ground-motion attenuation relations for Nuclear Power Plant sites and study on their characteristics. In:EESK fall workshop: pp 23–24

  • Zhang Z, Fleurisson J-A, Pellet F (2018) The effects of slope topography on acceleration amplification and interaction between slope topography and seismic input motion. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 113:420–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.06.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank anonymous reviewers and Dr. Sean Ahdi for their constructive comments that have greatly helped us going over many details in the original submission.

Funding

This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (NRF-2020R1C1C1013317) and a grant (2020-MOIS31-013) of the Fundamental Technology Development Program for Extreme Disaster Response funded by Ministry of Interior and Safety (MOIS, Korea).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byungmin Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

There is no conflict of interest/competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 3919 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, HJ., Lee, H. & Kim, B. Correction factors for GMMs considering site and topographic effects in South Korea. Bull Earthquake Eng 20, 143–165 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01229-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01229-3

Keywords

Navigation