Skip to main content
Log in

Peak and integral seismic parameters of L’Aquila 2009 ground motions: observed versus code provision values

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The M w 6.3 L’Aquila earthquake of April 6, 2009 hit a wide area of the Abruzzo region (Central Italy). The epicentre of the main shock was very close to the urban centre of L’Aquila, the regional capital, with an epicentral distance less than 10 km. It was the strongest earthquake ever recorded in Italy which has provided ground motion recordings from accelerometric stations located in close proximity to the epicentre. Because of this, several remarkable results can be achieved by analysing the strong motion recorded signals in terms of peak (PGA, PGV and PGD) and integral (Housner Intensity, I H) seismic parameters. Additionally, an alternative time-domain representation of recorded signals has been used to furnish a rapid comparison of traces recorded at different stations and along different directions. Some comparisons between the response spectra derived from the recordings and the elastic demand spectra provided in the new seismic Italian code have also been performed. PGA recorded values are very high and generally higher than code values for seismic actions with return period T R = 475 years. In some cases, this also happens for seismic actions with T R up to 2,475 years. With regard to I H, recorded values are generally higher for T R = 475 years, whilst they are remarkably lower for T R = 2,475 years. Accurate analyses have been carried out in the article to better understand the above differences and their significance and implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albarello D, D’amico V (2008) Testing probabilistic seismic hazard estimates by comparison with observations: an example in Italy. Geophys J Int 175: 1088–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN, Simpson KA, Bommer JJ (1996) Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25: 371–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ameri G, Augliera P, Bindi D, D’Alema E, Ladina C, Lovati S, Luzi L, Marzorati S, Massa M, Pacor F, Puglia R (2009) Strong-motion parameters of the Mw = 6.3 Abruzzo (Central Italy) earthquake (ver.2 updated 21 May 2009). INGV Milano-Pavia, Italy. Web report available at http://www.mi.ingv.it.

  • CEN (2004) Eurocode 8—Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1998-1, Brussels

  • Chiauzzi L, Masi A, Mucciarelli M, Vona M, Pacor F, Cultrera G, Emolo A, Gallovich F (2010) Building damage scenarios based on exploitation of Housner Intensity derived from fault physically-based simulations. Natural Hazards (submitted)

  • Chioccarelli E, Iervolino I (2010) Near-source seismic demand and pulse-like records: a discussion for L’Aquila earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. doi:10.1002/eqe.987

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley H, Stucchi M, Meletti C, Calvi GM, Pacor F (2009) Revisiting Italian design code spectra following the L’Aquila earthquake. Progettazione Sismica, N. 3/2009 Special Issue, IUSS PRESS (ISSN 1973-7432)

  • Cultrera G, Luzi L, Ameri G, Augliera P, Azzara RM, Bergamaschi F, Bertrand E, Bordoni P, Cara F, Cogliano R, D’Alema E, Di Giacomo D, Di Giulio G, Duval A-M, Fodarella A, Franceschina G, Gallipoli MR, Harabaglia P, Ladina C, Lovati S, Marzorati S, Massa M, Milana G, Mucciarelli M, Pacor F, Parolai S, Picozzi M, Pilz M, Puglia R, Pucillo S, Régnier J, Riccio G, Salichon J, Sobiesiak M (2009) Evaluation of the local site effects in the upper and middle Aterno valley. Progettazione Sismica, N. 3/2009 Special Issue. IUSS PRESS (ISSN 1973-7432)

  • Decanini L, Liberatore L, Mollaioli F, Monti G, Al Shawa O (2009) Studio preliminare della domanda sismica elastica ed anelastica in termini di energia, spostamento e forze (Rel. 1.0) (in Italian). Web report available at http://www.reluis.it

  • Decanini L, Mollaioli F, Oliveto G (2002) Structural and seismological implications of the 1997 seismic sequence in Umbria and Marche, Italy. In: Oliveto G (ed) Innovative approaches to earthquake engineering. WIT Press, Southampton, pp 229–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Capua G, Kayen RE, Kieffer DS, Button E, Biscontin G, Scasserra G, Lanzo G, Tommasi P, Pagliaroli A, Silvestri F, d’Onofrio AL, Simonelli A, Puglia R, Mylonakis G, Athanasopoulos G, Vlahakis V, Stewart JP (2009) Preliminary report on the seismological and geotechnical aspects of the 6 April 2009 L’Aquila earthquake in central Italy. GEER Association Report, No. GEER–016. Web report available at http://www.geerassociation.org

  • Elenas A (2000) Correlation between seismic acceleration parameters and overall structural damage indices of buildings. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 20: 93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galli P, Camassi R (2009) Report on the effects of the Aquilano earthquake of 6 April 2009. QUick Earthquake Survey Team—Final Report (in Italian). Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia. Web report available at www.mi.ingv.it

  • GNDT Working Group (1999) Proposta di riclassificazione sismica del territorio nazionale (in Italian). Ingegneria Sismica. XVI N.1, gennaio—aprile 1999

  • Grünthal G (ed) (1998) European Macroseismic Scale 1998 (EMS-98). European Seismological Commission, sub commission on Engineering Seismology, working Group Macroseismic Scales. Conseil de l’Europe, Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, vol 15, Luxembourg

  • Gunay MS, Mosalam (2010) Structural engineering reconnaissance of the April 6, 2009, Abruzzo, Italy. Earthquake, and Lessons Learned. PEER Report 2010/105, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley

  • Housner GW (1952) Intensity of ground motion during strong earthquakes. Second technical report. August 1952, California Institute of Technology, Pasedena, California

  • Iervolino I, De Luca F, Chioccarelli E, Dolce M (2010) L’azione sismica registrata durante il mainshock del 6 aprile 2009 a L’Aquila e le prescrizioni del DM14/01/2008 V.1 (in Italian). Web report available at http://www.reluis.it

  • Joyner WB, Boore DM (1981) Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong-motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71: 2011–2038

    Google Scholar 

  • Magri L, Mucciarelli M, Albarello D (1994) Site hazard estimates using macroseismic data. PAGEOPH 143: 618–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masi A (2003) Seismic vulnerability assessment of gravity load designed R/C frames. Bull Earthq Eng 1(3): 371–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masi A, Chiauzzi L (2009) Preliminary analyses on the mainshock of the Aquilano earthquake occurred on April 06, 2009. Web report available at http://www.reluis.it

  • Masi A, Vona M, Mucciarelli M (2010) Selection of natural and synthetic accelerograms for seismic vulnerability studies on RC frames. J Struct Eng. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.209

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazza M, Pacor F, Luzi L, Bindi D, Milana G, Sabetta F, Gorini A, Marcocci C (2009) The Italian Accelerometric Archive (ITACA): processing of strong motion data. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-009-9152-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Montaldo V, Meletti C, Martinelli F, Stucchi M, Locati M (2007) On-line seismic hazard data for the New Italian building code. J Earthq Eng 11(1): 119–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucciarelli M, Albarello D, D’Amico V (2008) Comparison of probabilistic seismic hazard estimates in Italy. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98(6): 2652–2664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NTC08 (2008) D.M. 14 gennaio 2008—Norme tecniche per le costruzioni (in Italian). Ministero delle Infrastrutture. Available at http://www.cslp.it

  • OPCM 3274 (2003) Primi elementi in materia di criteri generali per la classificazione sismica del territorio nazionale e di normative tecniche per le costruzioni in zona sismica (in Italian). Ordinanza del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri n. 3274. GU n. 72 giugno 2003. Available at http://www.protezionecivile.it

  • OPCM 3519 (2006) Criteri generali per l’individuazione delle zone sismiche e per la formazione e l’aggiornamento delle medesime zone (in Italian). Ordinanza del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri n. 3519. GU 108 del 11 maggio 06. Available at http://zonesismiche.mi.ingv.it

  • Pace B, Peruzza L, La vecchia G, Boncio P (2006) Layered seismogenic source model and probabilistic seismic-hazard analyses in Central Italy. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(1): 107–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacor F, Mucciarelli M (2007) Scenari di Scuotimento in Aree di Interesse Prioritario e/o Strategico (in Italian). Progetto DPC-INGV S3. Available at web site http://esse3.mi.ingv.it/index.php

  • Palazzo, De Iuliis (2009) Inelastic seismic demand for non-linear SDOF systems subject to L’Aquila earthquake near-fault accelerometer registrations. Web report available at http://www.reluis.it

  • Pondrelli S, Salimbeni S, Morelli A, Ekström G, Olivieri M, Boschi E (2009) Seismic moment tensors of the April 2009, L’Aquila (Central Italy) earthquake sequence. Geophysical Journal International. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04418.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovida A, Castelli V, Camassi R, Stucchi M (2009) Historical earthquakes in the area affected by the April 2009 seismic sequence. Web report available at http://www.mi.ingv.it

  • Sabetta F, Pugliese A (1996) Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(2): 337–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Scasserra G, Stewart JP, Bazzurro P, Lanzo G, Mollaioli F (2009) A comparison of NGA ground-motion prediction equations to Italian data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(5): 2961–2978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stucchi M, Camassi R, Rovida A, Locati M, Ercolani E, Meletti C, Milgiavacca P, Bernardini F, Azzaro R (2007) DBMI04, il database delle osservazioni macrosismiche dei terremoti italiani utilizzate per la compilazione del catalogo parametrico CPTI04. Quaderni di Geofisica, 49, pp. 38. Available at http://emidius.mi.ingv.it/DBMI04/

  • Tertulliani A, Arcoraci L, Berardi M, Bernardini F, Camassi R, Castellano C, Del Mese S, Ercolani M, Graziani L, Leschiutta I, Rossi A, Vecchi M (2010) An application of EMS 98 in a medium size city: the case of L’Aquila (Italy) after the April 6, 2009 Mw 6.3 earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-010-9188-4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Chiauzzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Masi, A., Chiauzzi, L., Braga, F. et al. Peak and integral seismic parameters of L’Aquila 2009 ground motions: observed versus code provision values. Bull Earthquake Eng 9, 139–156 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9227-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9227-1

Keywords

Navigation